La Franc-Maçonnerie est l'outil colonial sioniste qui est derriere chaque attentat, chaque coup d'etat dans les pays arabes

Islam Contre la Franc-Maçonnerie ou la fin de la colonisation

Les Rubriques thématiques du Grand Orient Arabe

Le Grand Orient Arabe publie sur son site d'Etude et de Recherche (www.grandorientarabe.org) des articles sur l'Islam et la Franc-Maçonnerie, sur l'Islam ésotérique et initiatique... Au sommaire de ses rubriques on pourra lire: HISTORIQUE: - La Franc-Maçonnerie au Moyen-Orient : Aperçu - Loges et Francs-Maçons Arabes ( avant 1950 ) : Liban, Syrie, Palestine, Egypte, Jordanie, Algérie, Maroc, Tunisie.. ETUDES ET RECHERCHES: - Déclaration de la Grande Loge Unie d'Angleterre sur la Franc-Maçonnerie et la Religion. - Islam et Franc-Maçonnerie: a) les "FATWAS" anti-maçonniques b) l'Opposition des intégristes musulmans. - La Franc-Maçonnerie au Proche et Moyen Orient et au Maghreb. - La Franc-Maçonnerie Algérienne: le tournant de 1899-1902. - La Franc-Maçonnerie en Egypte: " L'existence en 1818 de deux Loges travaillant au Rite Egyptien de CAGLIOSTRO" PLANCHES: JANVIER 2009 - L'enseignement du patrimoine culturel méditerranéen - DRUZES : La Symbolique des Couleurs ( Analogie avec la Franc-Maçonnerie ). FEVRIER 2009 - Salomon dans les traditions ésotériques. - Une lecture Soufie du Coran. - Zoroastre : L'Héritage Spirituel. - Swedenborg et Ismaéliens : Convergences MARS 2009 - Les structures ésotériques de l'Islam. AVRIL 2009 -Jamal-al-Din al- AFGHANI : Panislamiste et Franc-Maçon. - L'Islam Libéral. MAI 2009 - LA Tolérance selon les "Frères de la Pureté"(Ikhwan al Safa). - Chiisme : Le concept de "Wilayat al Faqih". BIBLIO: Introduction du livre "Secrets initiatiques en Islam et rituels maçonniques" Livres sur l'Islam Esotérique et initiatique. DIVERS et LIENS: Sites d' Obédiences et de Loges dans les Pays Arabes Liens: Wikipédia, Blog Maçonnique, Meubles et Objets Maçonniques... Lien de la Franc-Maçonnerie Universelle: Un article sur CAGLIOSTRO ( voir partie consacrée au Moyen-Orient). Conférences, Colloques, Symposium Memphis-Misraim, Hommage à Fabrice O'Driscoll Les Elections Législatives au LIBAN du 7 Juin 2009: La Position du Grand Orient Arabe... Catholiques et Francs-Maçons: L'Intervention de l'Abbé Eric de Beukelaer ( Belgique ). R.°.O.°.A.°.R.°. Rite Oriental Ancien Rectifié

Compte-rendu du procès de Baba Nadjar

Salah-Eddine Sidhoum, Médéa le 27 mai 2009

Aujourd’hui s’est déroulé le procès en appel de Mohamed Baba Nadjar, après deux reports successifs. Ce procès, comme nous l’avons annoncé la semaine dernière, a été délocalisé à Médéa, pour « des raisons de sécurité ».

Tôt le matin, à 7h 30 alors que nous étions sur la route pour rejoindre le tribunal, des citoyens venus de Ghardaïa m’ont appelé pour me signaler qu’ils avaient été arrêtés à l’entrée de Médéa. En effet, les véhicules immatriculées 47 (Ghardaïa) étaient arrêtés par les services de sécurité à un barrage situé à l’entrée de la ville et leurs occupants invités à remettre leurs pièces d’identité, sans aucune raison valable. Leurs papiers leurs furent restitués après avoir été enregistrés par ces mêmes services.

A l’arrivée, de nombreux véhicules de police étaient stationnés à la périphérie du tribunal. Ses rues d’accès étaient occupées par des policiers. Près de 200 citoyens venus d’Alger, de Ghardaïa, de Béjaïa et de Tizi-Ouzou attendaient l’ouverture du procès.

Ce dernier s’est ouvert vers 9h 30. Une cinquantaine de citoyens de Ghardaïa n’a pu accéder à la salle d’audience. Les malheureux attendront dehors, sous un soleil de plomb et ce, jusqu’à 17h 30. L’entrée à la salle d’audience de la victime de l’arbitraire, Mohamed Baba Nadjar fut accueillie par des applaudissements de l’assistance qui s’est levée à l’unisson. Douze avocats du collectif étaient présents. Sept autres s’étaient excusés la veille pour raison de programmation. Une avocate marocaine a tenu à être présente au procès en solidarité avec ses confrères algériens et avec la victime de l’arbitraire.

Le procès fut marqué par la citation de nombreux témoins à charge et à décharge. Aucun d’eux n’avait vu Baba Nadjar sur le lieu du crime ! Au fil des minutes, tout le monde, assistance et avocats, était persuadé de l’issue favorable du procès. Le procureur général réclamera, malgré tout, la peine de mort. La brillante plaidoirie de cinq avocats de la défense finira par détruire toutes les « preuves » de l’accusation.

La Cour se retirera en fin d’après-midi pour délibérer. Tout le monde était confiant. Aucune preuve tangible. Les jeunes de Ghardaïa rayonnaient d’espoir. Ils parlaient de retour triomphal à Ghardaïa, avec, dans leurs « bagages » Mohamed Baba Nadjar. L’espoir était vraiment permis, au vu du dossier vide démontré avec brio par la défense.

Un fait attirera cependant notre attention, lors de notre sortie dans la cour du tribunal, dans l’attente du verdict. Des renforts de gendarmes et de policiers étaient arrivés sur les lieux. La route du tribunal vers le haut était bouclée par un double cordon de policiers et de gendarmes. La salle d’audience fut envahie par de nombreux policiers en civil portant des gilets « police ». Pourquoi ce soudain déploiement des services de sécurité alors que le calme régnait tant à l’intérieur qu’à l’extérieur du tribunal ?

La délibération sera très courte. Elle ne durera pas plus de 30 mn. Stupeur dans la salle quand la condamnation à perpétuité sera prononcée. Baba Nadjar, blême, s’effondrera sur son siège. Son père et son oncle éclateront en sanglots. L’assistance, stupéfaite et scandalisée criera à l’injustice. De jeunes citoyens, révoltés par le verdict crieront leur rage en scandant : ‘Adalat Etilifoune » (justice du téléphone).

Les jeunes restés à l’extérieur, ayant appris la nouvelle, se mettront à scander « pouvoir assassin ». Les plus âgés lèveront leurs mains au ciel pour prier et maudire l’injustice et ses fonctionnaires aux ordres. C’était l’image d’un peuple mahgour qui criait sa rage, son désespoir et son impuissance devant cette situation de non-droit.

De nombreux sages de Ghardaïa, ont déployé tous leurs efforts pour calmer cette population révoltée à juste titre.

C’était une fin d’après-midi triste non seulement pour la population de Ghardaïa, mais pour toute l’Algérie. Un malheureux jeune citoyen condamné à perpétuité pour un crime qu’il nie de toutes ses forces. Un malheureux jeune innocent qui voit sa vie brisée par l’imposture au pouvoir.

Nous continuerons cependant le combat pour sauver Mohamed Baba Nadjar. Nous frapperons maintenant aux portes des instances judiciaires internationales pour que la vérité, toute la vérité éclate sur cette affaire plus que douteuse et pour que les véritables criminels soient démasqués.
Salah-Eddine Sidhoum.

Médéa le 27 mai 2009.

PS : Une analyse du procès sera réalisée par un ami juriste et professeur de droit qui a assisté à l’audience. Nous la publierons dès sa réception.

Gravité de la corruption en Grande-Bretagne

John Pilger, 28 mai 2009

Dans sa dernière rubrique pour New Statesman, John Pilger décrit comment le scandale actuel de l'évasion fiscale et des prêts hypothécaires fantômes des députés cache une corruption bien plus profonde, qui remonte à la culture politique homogène des États-Unis.

Des membres du Parlement, dont des ministres, chapardant l’argent public, ont donné aux Britanniques un coup d’œil rare sur l'intérieur de la tente du pouvoir et des privilèges. C’est inappréciable, car pas un seul journaliste ou commentateur politique, de ceux qui remplissent les colonnes de pierres tombales et dominent le journalisme, n’a révélé une once de ce scandale. La vente de la « fuite » a été laissée à un homme des relations publiques. Pourquoi ?

La réponse se trouve dans une corruption plus grande, effleurée mais aussi dissimulée par les histoires d'évasion fiscale et de prêts hypothécaires fantômes. Depuis Margaret Thatcher, la démocratie parlementaire britannique a été peu à peu détruite, la politique des deux principaux partis ayant convergé en une seule idéologie étatique, dotée chacune de mesures sociales, économiques et étrangères presque identiques. Ce « projet » a été achevé par Tony Blair et Gordon Brown, inspirés par la culture politique homogène des États-Unis. Que tant de politiciens travaillistes et conservateurs se révèlent désormais véreux en personne, n'est rien de plus qu'un symbole du système antidémocratique qu’ils ont forgé ensemble.

Leurs complices étaient ces journalistes du « lobby de la presse, » qui font des reportages sur le Parlement, et leurs éditeurs qui ont délibérément « joué le jeu, » induisant le public en erreur (et parfois eux-mêmes), sur l’existence de différences démocratiques capitales entre les partis. Conçus par les médias, des sondages d'opinion basés sur des échantillons ridiculement petits, avec un raz-de-marée de commentaires sur les personnalités et leurs problèmes spécieux, ont réduit le « dialogue national » à une suite de potins médiatiques, dans laquelle, comme le démontre le niveau des votants historiquement bas sous Blair, le décrochage de l’assentiment populaire a été roulé dans l’indifférence.

Ayant fixé les limites et les possibilités du débat politique, les paladins présomptueux, notamment les libéraux, ont promu l'empereur nu, Blair et les « valeurs » dont il se faisait le champion, qui permettraient à « l'esprit de se déployer à la recherche d'un mieux britannique. » Et quand les taches de sang sont apparues, ils ont couru à couvert. Comme le décrivait autrefois Larry David à un ancien copain, tout ça était « un ruisseau gazouillant des conneries. »

Comme semblent contrits à présent leurs anciens héros. Le 17 mai, Harriet Harman, le chef de la majorité à la Chambre des Communes, qui aurait dépensé 10.000 livres du contribuable en « formation des médias, » a demandé instamment aux députés de « reconstruire la confiance envers les partis. » L'ironie involontaire de ses paroles rappelle l'un de ses premiers actes en tant que secrétaire à la Sécurité sociale il y a plus de dix ans : la réduction des avantages des mères célibataires. Ce fut tourné et rapporté comme s'il y avait une « révolte » parmi les députés travaillistes de base, ce qui était faux. Pas une des nouvelles femmes parlementaires de Blair, qui ont été élues « pour mettre fin à la prédominance masculine, aux politiques conservatrices, » n’a osé dénoncer cette attaque contre les plus pauvres des pauvres femmes. Tous ont voté la réduction.

Il en va de même de l’attaque autoritaire contre l'Irak en 2003, derrière laquelle s’est rallié l'establishment bipartite et la politique médiatique. Assurant le remplacement à Downing Street, avec une impatience fébrile, Andrew Marr a déclaré aux téléspectateurs de la BBC que Blair avait « dit qu'ils seraient en mesure de prendre Bagdad sans bain de sang, et que, à la fin, les Irakiens pourraient faire la fête. Et sur ces deux points, il fut constaté de manière indubitable exacte que, « Quand Tony Blair retira enfin l'armée de Bassora en mai, elle laissa derrière elle, selon des estimations savantes, plus d'un million de morts, une majorité de sinistrés, des enfants malades, l'approvisionnement en eau contaminé, un réseau énergétique paralysé et quatre millions de réfugiés.

Quant à la « fête » des Irakiens, la grande majorité disent que les propres sondages de l’administration britannique voulaient sortir l'envahisseur. Et quand Blair a finalement quitté la Chambre des Communes, il a été ovationné debout par les députés, ceux qui ont refusé de tenir un vote sur son invasion criminelle ou même de monter une enquête sur ses mensonges, que demandaient près des trois-quarts de la population britannique.

Pareille bassesse va bien au-delà de la cupidité de l’arrogante Hazel Blears.

« La normalisation de l'impensable, » la phrase de Edward Herman dans son essai The Banality of Evil, sur le partage du travail dans l'État maffieux, est applicable ici. Le 18 mai 2009, le Guardian a consacré le début d'une page à un article intitulé, « Une récompense d’un million de dollars décernée à Blair pour son travail de relations internationales. » Ce prix, annoncé en Israël peu de temps après le massacre de Gaza, récompensait son « impact culturel et social dans le monde. » Vous avez cherché en vain des signes de parodie ou l’aveu de la vérité. Il y avait à la place son « optimisme sur les chances de ramener la paix » et sur son travail « visant à forger la paix. »

C’était le même Blair qui commettait le même crime, la planification délibérée de l'invasion d'un pays, « le crime international suprême, » pour lequel le ministre nazi des Affaires Étrangères, Joachim von Ribbentrop, fut pendu à Nuremberg après que la preuve de sa culpabilité ait été repérée dans des documents de son cabinet allemand. En février dernier, le secrétaire à la « Justice » de Grande-Bretagne, M. Jack Straw, a bloqué la publication des minutes du cabinet de mars 2003, cruciales sur la planification de l'invasion de l'Irak, bien que leur diffusion avait été ordonnée par le Commissaire à l'Information, Richard Thomas. Pour Blair, l'impensable est à la fois normalisé et célébré.

« Comment nos députés corrompus font le jeu des extrémistes, » disait la couverture de New Statesman la semaine dernière. Mais leur soutien à l'épopée criminelle en Irak n’était-ce pas déjà de l'extrémisme ? Et pour l'aventure impériale meurtrière en Afghanistan ? Et pour la collusion du gouvernement envers la torture ?

C'est comme si notre langage public était finalement devenu orwellien. Le recours à des lois totalitaires, approuvées par une majorité de députés, la police mettant en place des unités secrètes de lutte contre la dissidence démocratique qu'ils nomment « extrémisme. » Leurs partenaires sont de fait les journalistes qui les cautionnent, la nouvelle génération de propagandistes ou le « lobby » d’État. Le 9 avril, le programme Newsnight de la BBC montait en épingle la culpabilité de 12 « terroristes » arrêtés lors d’un spectacle médiatique factice, orchestré par le Premier ministre lui-même. Tous ont été relâchés sans chef d’accusation.

Quelque chose est en train de changer en Grande-Bretagne, qui donne à l'optimisme. Le peuple britannique n’a probablement jamais été plus conscient politiquement et préparé à débarrasser les mythes décrépits et les autres saletés tandis que, en colère, il enjambe le ruisseau gazouillant des conneries.

Original : www.johnpilger.com/page.asp?partid=534

Traduction libre de Pétrus Lombard pour Alter Info

Iraelis torture, rape applied by US military and agencies to every single detainee in US prisons or camps

CLICK O NTHE LINK BELOW TO SEE THE ZIONISTS MONSTERS TERRORISM:

http://www.presstv.com/detail.aspx?id=96365&sectionid=3510203

The Zionists and Torture in Iraq: Seymour Hersh and the Missing Zionist-Israeli Connection


OBAMA IS COMPLICE OF EVERY SINGLE DEATH, RAPE AND TORTURE... FORGET ABOUT 'USA IS NOT IN WAR AGAINST ISLAM', RAPE PICTURES WILL BE PUBLISHED ALL OVER THE WORLD AND WAR CRIMINAL SUCH AS HIM AND PENTAGONE MONSTERS WILL PAY FOR WHAT THEY'VE DONE AND WHAT THEY ARE TRYING TO COVER ! DO YOU THINK IT'S PLAYING THE GAME OF ZIONISTS IN LONDON , BARACK ?

An Exposé of an Exposé

As I read Hersh s highly publicized and influential reports in the New Yorker Magazine on torture in US occupied Iraq (1), it became increasingly apparent that this was not a thoroughly researched exposé of the higher ups responsible for the policy of torture. Hersh s reportage was a selective account guided by selected question about selected officials. As one reads through Hersh s version of events with increasing incredulity it is clear that Hersh hangs his whole argument and exposé of US officials involved in the use of torture on one person Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld - (important to be sure) and not on the other top Defense officials who were extremely influential and responsible for war policy, establishing intelligence agencies and co-coordinating strategy and tactics during the occupation. Rumsfeld was part of an elite, which sanctioned and promoted torture. Throughout his exposé Hersh deliberately omits the role of the Zionists (Wolfowitz, Feith numbers 2 and 3 in the Pentagon) who supported and promoted the war, torture-interrogation and particularly Israeli experts who led seminars teaching the US Military Intelligence their torture-interrogation techniques of Arab prisoners based on their half-century of practice.

In looking for documentary sources of torture interrogation Hersh relies on academic texts and 20 year old CIA manuals, not Israeli practice widely disseminated by the Mossad and Shin Bet advisers presently involved in torture in neighboring Palestine and Iraq today.

Hersh is presented in the mass media as an iconoclastic, investigative journalist, a role which gives his reportages and exposés a great deal of credibility. Yet it was Seymour Hersh who publicly defended torture of suspects and their family members as a method of interrogation, citing the Israeli examples in the wake of September 11, justifying torture in the same way as the Pentagon now justifies the torture of Iraqi suspects. Instead of citing an obscure professor at the University of Chicago, Hersh should have cited the influential tract defending torture by Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz (a fellow Zionist) widely read by the civilian militarists who run the Pentagon, and direct the chain of command leading to interrogation through torture.

Hersch's account fails to provide a political context in the Pentagon and in the Middle East for the systematic use of torture. To understand the issue of the US practice of torture and violent abuse of Iraqi prisoners and civilians requires an examination of the ideological demonization of the Iraqi population the Arabs and the US unconditional political and military support for the state of Israel, the principal long-term large-scale practitioner of torture against Arabs. The most vitriolic systematic denigration of Arabs and Muslims in the Middle East is found in the writings an speeches of influential US-based Zionist ideologues, like the Pipes (father and son), the Kristols (senior and junior), the Kagans, Cohens, Goldhagens and others. The first step toward justifying torture is to dehumanize the victim, to label them as untermensch (congenitally violent savages). The Zionists in the US were merely following the pronouncements of their ideological mentors in Israel who not infrequently proclaimed that the only thing the Arab understands is force (Sharon, Golda Meier, Dayan, Rabin etc&). The Zionist ideologues in the Pentagon were influential in arousing hatred of Arabs in several ways. First in their defense of Israel they deliberately distorted the nature of Israel s colonial war, blaming the Palestinian victims for the systematic violence which Israel inflicted on them. The ideologues defended every Israeli violent action: the massacre in Jenin, new Jewish settlements in the West Bank, the murderous assault on Rafah, the killing of UN aid workers and peace activists, the monstrous wall ghettoizing a whole people, the mass murder of hundreds of Palestinians and destructions of thousands of homes in Gaza. Israeli violence against Palestinians made a deep impression on US Zionists who generalized and deepened their animus to Arab Muslims throughout the Middle East, but particularly in Iraq where they were in a position to implement their policies.

The Zionists and Torture in Iraq

The Pentagon s main source of intelligence and propaganda for the invasion and occupation of Iraq was in part derived from the Office of Specials Plans (OSP) and Counter-terrorism Evaluation Group established by ultra-Zionist Douglas Feith, Undersecretary of Defense (third in the Pentagon hierarchy) with strong support from Wolfowitz, Abrams and Rumsfeld. Feith put fellow Zionist, Abram Shulsky in charge of OSP. The Special Group bypassed normal CIA and military intelligence agencies and secured its own intelligence prior to the war and was involved in securing intelligence during the first stages of the occupation (before it was dismantled). As the Iraqi resistance increased its effectiveness and the US justification for the war (weapons of mass destruction) was proven to be a total fabrication of the Special Group, the top echelon of the Pentagon, Rumsfeld and the Zionists grew desperate they collectively passed the orders to intensify and extend torture to all Iraqi suspects in all the prisons. It is a gross simplification to say that the line of command was limited to Rumsfeld, when Wolfowitz, Feith and Abrams were also intimately involved in everyday policies prosecuting the war, defending the occupation and controlling intelligence.

Even more than Rumsfeld, the Zionist zealots in the Pentagon were the most ardent promoters of introducing Israeli methods of torturing and humiliating Arab suspects, lauding Israeli successes in dealing with the Arabs . They, not military intelligence, promoted the use of Israeli experts in interrogation; they encouraged Israeli led seminars in urban warfare and interrogation techniques for the US military intelligence officers and private contractors.

Nothing about the responsibility of the Pentagon Zionists in the torture of Iraqis appears in Hersh s expose . The glaring omissions are deliberate as they are obvious form a systematic pattern and serve the purpose of exonerating the Pentagon Zionists and Israel and hanging the entire responsibility for war crimes on Rumsfeld.

A Close Look at Hersh s Method

A close reading of Hersh's series of articles in the New Yorker reveals his premises and political perspectives, none of which have anything to do with democratic values or concern with human rights.

Hersh s principal concern is that Rumsfeld's blanket order to use torture disrupted the operations of an elite group made up of professional commandos involved in a secret special access program designed to murder, kidnap, torture terror suspects throughout the world. In other words by involving thousands of everyday US soldiers (referred to by one of Hersh s sources as hillbillies ) as torturers in Iraq Rumsfeld was endangering the operation of professional killers throughout the world. Hersh s second major concern was that the discovery of the torture would hurt America s (sic) prospects in the war on terror in other words a tactic he attributed (solely and wrongfully) to Rumsfeld was endangering the US empire-building capacity. Hersh s empire-centric view refuses to recognize the elementary rights of self-determination and international law. Hersh s third apparent concern is with Rumsfeld s bypassing the CIA and other intelligence agencies and attempt to monopolize intelligence. This is a bit ingenuous. Wolfowitz and Feith set up the special intelluigence agency that fed Rumsfeld the fabricated intelligence, they promoted Chalabi (known throughout Washington intelligence circles as totally unreliable) as an impeccable source of inside information , in Saddams non-existent weapons of mass destruction knowing in advance that they were passing phony data . As Wolfowitz latter cynically admitted the decision to launch the US invasion over banned weapons was because it was the only issue they could agree upon.

Hersh is not stupid, he knows what everyone else in Washington and out of government knows: the Zionists in the Pentagon were pushing for war with Iraq before 9/11 (even before they took office in Washington and were working with the Israeli state) and were intent on having the US destroy Iraq, at any price including the loss of American lives, budget busting deficits, imperiling oil interests and jeopardizing US global imperial interests.

They launched the invasion bypassing the military central command by deliberately falsifying the response of the conquered Iraqi people ( they will welcome us as liberators Wolfowitz and Perle) and intent on destroying civil and state structures (the so-called de-Baathification purges) in order to forever undermine Iraq s capacity to challenge Israel s domination of the Middle East.

None of Hersh s questions explore these well known facts about who is responsible for the atrocities against Iraqis. He didn t have to cite unnamed intelligence or Pentagon sources General Anthony Zinni and many non-Zionists insiders, as well as the CIA and Central Command knew about the Zionist promoters, plans and moreover knew the role Feith played in pushing for harsher interrogation techniques. But Hersh ignored these questions, those Zionists and their ideological supporters and advisers who did everything possible to undermine any Iraqi economic recovery and capacity to run their own education, health and electoral systems. De-Baathification was meant to turn Iraq into a backward tribal, divided desert country run by their protégé Chalabi, the only candidate who would recognize Israel, supply it with oil and support Mid-East integration under Israeli hegemony. The Zionist Pentagonistas succeeded in securing the war, they succeeded in destroying basic Iraqi social services, they destroyed the state (courts, military, civil services). However in their blind subservience to Israel they overlooked the fact that the disbanded professional soldiers and purged civil leaders and professionals would become part of an experienced armed resistance, that Iraq would become ungovernable, that US rule would crumble, that the US would become bogged down in a politically lost war, that its puppet regime would have neither legitimacy nor popular support. The Zionist did what they thought was best for Israel, even if it provoked greater opposition world-wide, including in the US, where a majority have turned against the occupation by May 2004. Only the Israeli transmission belt, AIPAC would cheer Bush and his continuation of the occupation and pledge allegiance to the Israeli war against Palestinians. When their self-serving prediction of an Iraqi welcoming committee turned into a valiant popular anti-colonial war, Feith and his underlings called for greater use of more forceful interrogation methods Rumsfeld and Feith encouraged Israeli type torture to humiliate the Arabs . Meanwhile Kagan s call to bomb the Arab street was tried and failed to intimidate the Iraqi resistance.

Hersh s exposé of Rumsfeld as the only top culprit turns up at a convenient moment: when US policy has failed and most knowledgeable officials are moving closer to identifying the role of the Pentagon Zionists. It was clever by half: Rumsfeld was universally despised in Congress, among the professional military and a host of others for his policies and arrogant public face. Even in exposing Rumsfeld however Hersh is careful to do so in a fashion that allows his Zionist colleagues to continue in office unscathed.

Hersh justifies some of Rumsfeld s acts of illegal terror by describing legalistic obstacles to eliminating terrorists. Hersh s support for Rumsfeld s resort to unaccountable commandos engaging in assassination, kidnapping and torture of suspects around the world is in effect a way to condone those tactics after Rumsfeld leaves office. If Rumsfeld resigns, torture will continue under colleagues Feith and Wolfowitz. Hersh drags in a fifth level functionary working under Feith, Stephan Cambone, who he tells us was deeply involved in the torture of prisoners more involved than his Zionist superiors? We might ask the peerless investigatory journalist: How is it that Hersh blames those above above (Rumsfeld) and those below (Cambone) but never focuses on Feith and Wolfowitz who designed and directed policy?

In setting up Cambone for the exposé, Hersh profiles Cambome in terms that fit with greater pertinence the Zionists: He advocated war with Iraq (following Wolfowitz, Feith, Perle and Abrams); he disdained the CIA who the Pentagon Zionists viewed as too cautious ; he attacked the CIA for not finding WMD. Since Cambone functioned under Wolfowitz and Feith he was simply repeating what his bosses wanted to hear and perhaps that s why they entrusted him with the relevant dirty tasks of extracting intelligence via torture.

Hersh tries to link Cambone with the extension of the torture practiced selectively by the Special Agency Program. SAP was already operative before Cambone took office and its operations were under the direction of Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Feith and Abrams. Hersh s dating of the torture in August 2003 with Cambone and Major General Miller (from Guantanamo) assignment is false. It started earlier under the SAP and with Israeli trained interrogators. Moreover the Pentagon headed by the same three (Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and Feith) ordered Miller s use of torture on suspects at Guantanamo who moved him to Iraq as a reward for exemplary work. Hersh does not explore Miller s links with Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and Feith before going to Iraq. He simply aborts the analysis looks at the middle and lower levels of power: Cambone, Miller, interrogators, and enlisted soldiers. Out of this framework Hersh comes up with a detailed piece of selective investigatory journalism. Hersh exposes some but covers up for those most actively involved in invoking the war and directing it in a way that served Israeli interests. The cost in US lives and the degradation of young US servicemen forced to assume the role of torturers is of little concern to the Pentagon Zionists. Even after all the exposés of torture, killings and rapes, major Zionist ideologues like Kristol, Krauthammer, Rubin, Perle, Kagan and Frum have launched attacks on Bush for backing off from the war.

The Pentagon s Zionists are under attack. In the face of the US debacle in Iraq, the anti-Zionist coalition found in the State Department, the Military, the CIA and elsewhere have launched a counter-offensive. Marine General Anthony Zinni, Senator Fritz Hollings and other prominent political, diplomatic and military leaders have openly identified the role of the Pentagon Zionists in launching and directing the war to favor Israel. The most recent and visible move was the marginalization of the pro-Israel Chalabi the protégé of Wolfowitz, Feith and Abrams. The raid on his house and the carting off of his records, ostensibly to investigate financial irregularities is a symbolic setback. So is the US abstention in the Security Council on Israel s rape of Rafah much to the chagrin of the Israel First crowd at the AIPAC convention. In response all the major Jewish organizations and publications from the Forward, Anti-Defamation League, AJC and others have denounced the critics of the Pentagon Zionists.

Hersh attempts to head off the anti-Zionist headhunting coalition by focusing on the two Goyim Rumsfeld and Cambone has been to no avail. The knives are drawn. Because of Zionist power in and out of the government, the anti-Zionist coalition and their supporters use code words, the most common of which is neo-conservative , which everyone now knows means Wolfowitz, Feith, Abrams and other Zionists in and out of the government. AIPAC, the Anti-Defamation League and other Israel Firsters sensing the danger to their co-thinkers have turned to labeling critics of the neo-conservative militarists anti-Semites and arousing Congress members, the media and their propaganda machine into silencing the coalition into submission..

But the Coalition is gaining influence Bush is insisting on handing over symbolic power to Iraqi Shias in a subtle game of cooption promoted by the State Department. Already the Zionists led by Kagan and Kristol have all but called Bush a traitor and coward for retreating.

The photos of torture, which have discredited the war policy, threaten to isolate the Zionist zealots. Faced with the indignation of the whole civilized world at the war crimes, the progressive Zionist apologists, like Hersh, take to isolating blame on Cambone and Rumsfeld and minimizing the responsibility to a few soldiers in a cell block , as did Senator Lieberman while the AIPAC elite cheer Bush on with the war ignoring the muck and blood of torture.

Rumsfeld has shrewdly tied his future to his Zionist partners in the Pentagon and outside, counting on riding on their coat tails and reaping the support of the powerful Jewish lobby and their leaders in the Israeli state, who stand behind them. He has few other influential allies.

Conclusion

In the final analysis even if Wolfowitz, Feith, Abrams, Rubin, Libby and the current crop of Zionist Pentagonistas are forced to resign it will only be a temporary setback. The Zionist political organizations remain intact, their influence over Congress remains overwhelming and they have pledges from both major presidential candidates that Israel s cause is America s cause (Bush and Kerry). The Zionist juggernaut grinds on, securing sanctions against Syria and calling for the bombing of Iran s supposed nuclear facilities. If you can t find a real threat to the US maybe the next crop of Zionists in power will cook up another consensual pretext . Holbrooke and Sandy Berger can tutor the US on multi-lateral wars of aggression.

Meantime among those who still deny Zionist power in US foreign policy, one only has to read the accounts of the AIPAC conference in Washington in May 2004. At a time when Israel was killing children in the streets of Rafah and destroying hundreds of homes under the horrified eyes of the entire civilized world, when an indignant UN Security Council finally rose to its feet and unanimously condemned Israel, US Congressional leaders and the two major Presidential candidates pledged unconditional support to Israel, evoking the bloodthirsty cheers of investment brokers, dentists, doctors, lawyers the cream of the cream of American Jewish society. The cause of Israel is the cause of America rings out from the mouth of every candidate as the Israelis bulldoze homes and snipers shoot small girls on their way to buy candy. Its almost as if Sharon wanted to demonstrate the power of the Zionists in the US, timing the vile destruction of Rafah to coincide with the AIPAC convention and the disgusting appearance of the spineless American politicians supporting ongoing crimes against humanity. Not one voice was raised in even meek protest. To those who claim that the Zionist are just one of a number of influential lobbies try explaining the unconditional support for Israel s genocide of the Palestinian people by the most powerful politicians in the US.

It is almost a perverse pleasure to watch Sharon smear the muck and gore of Rafah on the groveling faces of US politicians they deserve each other. But for those of us who support a democratic anti-imperialist foreign policy this is one of the most humiliating moments in US history. Something we won t read in the exposés of Hersh or the erudite Zionist treatises in defense of endless wars.

(1) Seymour Hersh, Torture at Abu Ghraib: American soldiers brutalized Iraqis. How far does responsibility go?, New Yorker, May 10, 2004; The Gray Zone: How a secret Pentagon program came to Abu Ghraib, New Yorker, May 25, 2004, and Mixed Messages: Why the government didn t know what it knew, New Yorker, June 3, 2004

Africa Genocides : Super-secret organization remains elusive as ever

By Wayne Madsen
Online Journal Contributing Writer
May 29, 2009,

(WMR) -- A super-secret entity, known as ISTO, or International Strategic and Tactical Organization, which this editor previously reported was involved in coups and assassinations primarily in Africa, including the April 6, 1994, double assassinations of the presidents of Rwanda and Burundi, remains as secretive and elusive as ever. However, WMR has been informed by a well-placed source that ISTO has been active as late as 2006.

After French Judge Jean-Louis Bruguiere named a number of Rwandan government officials as behind the 1994 missile attack on the Rwandan presidential aircraft that resulted in the deaths of Rwandan President Juvenal Habyarimana and Burundian President Cyprien Ntaryamira, ISTO, which reportedly consists of U.S. defense contractors, oil company executives, and wealthy Republicans, began a campaign via the Belgian media to spread the disinformation that it was France that brought down the aircraft of its ally, Habyarimana, and three French military officers said to have shot down the plane -- Cyrille Lafortune, Michel Billet and Raymond Meghuira -- were supplied to the Rwandan embassy in Canada. French investigators originally tracked down an ISTO operation in Canada. There is also a strong indication that ISTO elements were represented in Rosslyn, Virginia, the home to a number of defense and intelligence contractors.

The three French officers identified by ISTO’s interlocutors in Belgium turned out to be bogus. Neither the French St. Cyr military academy nor INTERPOL and the French Judicial Police had any record of the individuals identified.

There are strong indications that ISTO operates as a front for the CIA.

The CIA’s use of Canadian front operations to carry out some of its “wet affairs” is not new. The CIA’s use of a Canadian firm that interacted with then-Zimbabwean opposition leader Morgan Tsvangirai is well documented. After Tsvangirai became prime minister, following a lengthy political stalemate with President Robert Mugabe, Tsvangirai’s vehicle was struck on March 6 by a truck bearing U.S. embassy license plates. Tsvangirai’s wife, Susan, was killed and Tsvangirai was injured. The truck that killed Susan Tsvangirai and almost killed Zimbabwe’s new prime minister was owned by John Snow Inc., and contracted to the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), a long-time cipher for CIA clandestine activities in Africa and elsewhere. However, three days after the crash, John Snow International sent out a confidential memo that stated that on the day of the crash with Tsvangirai’s car, the driver was not a JSI [John Snow Inc.] driver on that particular day.

John Snow Inc., named after a 19th century physician who worked on cleaning up drinking water supplies to prevent epidemic outbreaks, manages public health projects in over 38 countries
The JSI memo stated: “‘As you may have heard, there was a tragic car accident on Friday [March 6] in Zimbabwe in which the Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai was injured and his wife was killed. The vehicle involved in this accident was registered to USAID/Deliver (a JSI Project) although not driven by a JSI driver, as far as we know. At this point, further details about the accident are unknown. Understandably, this tragedy has generated a lot of media interest. If you receive any inquiries from the media, we ask that you please direct them to Penelope Riseborough, WEI/JSI Director of Communication in Boston.”

After the crash, newspaper articles began to appear suggesting that Mugabe’s loyalists had something to do with the crash. It was the same modus operandi used by ISTO in the case of the aerial assassination of the Rwandan and Burundian presidents. Independent Member of Parliament Jonathan Moyo demanded a full inquiry into USAID’s activities in Zimbabwe. WMR has recently learned of a strong link between a top former USAID official and ISTO’s highly covert operations.
In October 2004, Tsvangirai was accused by Mugabe’s government of involvement in a plot to assassinate Mugabe. Tsvangirai’s comments, allegedly implicating him in the plot, were secretly tape recorded at a meeting in Canada between Tsvangirai and officials of the political lobbying firm Dickens & Madsen, which was representing Tsvangirai’s political party, Movement for Democratic Change (MDC), in North America. The firm also had a long standing link to the Mugabe regime.

The alleged tape recording had been made by Israeli expatriate author and Dickens & Madsen employee Ari Ben-Mensahe, who claims to have once worked for Mossad and who was born in Tehran before emigrating to Israel. A dubiously edited copy of the tape was later aired on the Australian SBS television network and resulted in Tsvangirai’s trial in Zimbabwe on treason charges. Newsweek magazine and reporter Seymour Hersh, who previously used Ben-Menashe as a source, have called him a fabricator.

Whatever Tsvangirai knew about covert Western intelligence support for his party and presidential candidacy may have later earned him a death sentence by parties associated with ISTO.

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_4746.shtml

Was Rape an Enhanced Interrogation Technique?

There are those who argue that U.S. officials who authorized waterboarding and who performed waterboarding should not be held criminally accountable, notwithstanding the fact that the U.S. government prosecuted Japanese military personnel who waterboarded U.S. POWs during World War II. Their reasoning goes as follows: Since the president’s attorneys redefined torture to mean only those actions that threaten death or serious injury to bodily organs, waterboarding did not meet that redefinition.

What about rape? It would seem that rape, like waterboarding, would not meet the Bush administration’s redefinition of torture. Rape doesn’t threaten death or serious injury to bodily organs. Should U.S. officials who authorized enhanced interrogation techniques be let off the hook for rapes committed by U.S. officials as part of enhanced interrogations of detainees?

That of course begs the question: Were people raped as part of the U.S. government’s enhanced interrogation techniques?

Well, think back to the Abu Ghrab photos and videos, which depicted sordid sexual acts being committed by U.S. personnel on Iraqi prisoners. You may have forgotten that there was a particular set of photos and videos that were never released to the public because they depicted acts that were apparently much worse than anything that was shown in the photos that were released. Therefore, U.S. officials decided to keep those particular photos and videos under lock and key.

What do those photos and videos reflect? We don’t really know, but according to an article dated July 15, 2004, on Salon.com, Seymour Hersh is quoted as saying in a speech to the ACLU:


Debating about it, ummm ... Some of the worst things that happened you don't know about, okay? Videos, um, there are women there. Some of you may have read that they were passing letters out, communications out to their men. This is at Abu Ghraib ... The women were passing messages out saying “Please come and kill me, because of what's happened” and basically what happened is that those women who were arrested with young boys, children in cases that have been recorded. The boys were sodomized with the cameras rolling. And the worst above all of that is the soundtrack of the boys shrieking that your government has. They are in total terror. It's going to come out.

The Salon article concludes with the following paragraph:

(Update: A reader brought to our attention that the rape of boys at Abu Ghraib has been mentioned in some news accounts of the prisoner abuse evidence. The Telegraph and other news organizations described “a videotape, apparently made by US personnel, is said to show Iraqi guards raping young boys.” The Guardian reported “formal statements by inmates published yesterday describe horrific treatment at the hands of guards, including the rape of a teenage Iraqi boy by an army translator.”)
It should be noted that that batch of photos and videos is a different batch from the ones that the Obama administration is now doing its best to keep secret. The rationale for keeping both batches secret is that the photos and videos will inflame anger and hatred among foreigners against the United States. It’s difficult to imagine how the photos and videos that are being kept secret could be much worse than the Abu Ghraib photos and videos that were released, but one distinct possibility is that they show people being raped.

Is it inconceivable that rape was employed as an enhanced interrogation technique? Well, it certainly wouldn’t be the first time that a regime used rape as an enhanced interrogation technique. Think back to the Pinochet coup in Chile, a coup in which the CIA played a role — as yet undefined — in the murder of a young American journalist, Charles Horman, at the hands of Pinochet’s forces. According to an article in The Independent, “Prisoners at both centres were subjected to electric shocks, severe beatings, suspensions from ceilings until their wrists tore, and rapes.”

If U.S. officials are going to continue keeping both batches of photos and videos secret, isn’t it incumbent on them to put all questions to rest respecting the issue of rape? How about a sworn affidavit signed by three members of Congress who have viewed the evidence stating unequivocally that the photos and videos do not depict rape in any form or fashion?

If it turns out that the secret photos and videos do show that people were being raped pursuant to the Bush administration’s enhanced interrogation techniques, I’d like to see defenders of waterboarding explain why those who authorized, ordered, condoned, and performed such rapes should be let off the hook too.


Hornberger’s Blog Archives



Jacob Hornberger is founder and president of The Future of Freedom Foundation, publisher of Your Money or Your Life: Why We Must Abolish the Income Tax by Sheldon Richman. Send him email.

http://www.fff.org/blog/jghblog2009-05-26.asp

Haniyeh : le dialogue inter-Palestinien est accablé d'interventions étrangères

Gaza - CPI

http://www.palestine-info.info/

Le premier ministre du gouvernement d'entente, Ismaïl Haniyeh a affirmé que les palestiniens ont réalisé des pas très avantageux durant leurs dialogues au Caire, tout en espérant d'arriver au consensus national, et en soulignant que les défis extérieurs devant le peuple palestinien et sa question légitime sont certainement plus grands que tout désaccord interne.

"Les interventions des pays étrangers et les trahisons sont les grands obstacles devant le succès du dialogue inter-Palestinien", a souligné Haniyeh en marge de la conférence d'accueil après l'arrivée de la caravane d'espoir à Gaza, le mardi 26/5.

En confirmant que le Hamas est totalement prêt pour une accalmie générale, bilatérale et simultanée, sous la garde égyptienne, Haniyeh a souligné que les efforts égyptiens sont continuels à ce propos, notamment en ce qui concerne le dialogue inter-Palestinien et l'opération d'échange des captifs, tout en insistant sur les principes, intérêts suprêmes et droits légaux du peuple palestinien face aux agendas criminels du gouvernement terroriste sioniste présidé par Benjamin Netanyahu qui tente d'arracher la légitimité d'un état juif au dépend des droits palestiniens.

Shimon Péres ambassadeur des pays arabes à Washington

Erdogan et le criminel de guerre Peres a Davos

Les déclarations du président israélien Shimon Peres devant le gratin de l’ « American Israel Public Affairs Committee » [AIPAC] en présence de 6000 personnes, avec parmi elles des membres influents du Congrès, ne nous ont pas étonnés. Il a déclaré qu’ « Israël ne cédera pas à la menace nucléaire iranienne » et a martelé que « le Moyen-Orient vit actuellement sous cette menace. »

Abdel Bari Atwan - Al Qods al Arabi Jeudi 28 Mai 2009

Les officiels israéliens ont commencé à battre les tambours de guerre contre l’Iran de la même manière qu’ils avaient battu les tambours de guerre contre l’Irak, en exagérant ses ambitions nucléaires et le danger qu’elles présenteraient, non seulement pour leur Etat mais également pour les voisins arabes et le monde entier.




La stratégie israélienne est basée sur plusieurs piliers qui déterminent les actions politiques et militaires :




le premier est d’empêcher l’apparition de n’importe quelle force régionale arabe ou musulmane qui pourrait imposer un rééquilibrage stratégique et éliminer ou compenser la supériorité militaire israélienne




le second est d’empêcher toute connexion militaire, financière ou politique entre n’importe quel mouvement de résistance palestinien ou arabe contre le projet israélien et n’importe quelle puissance régionale émergente, qu’elle soit arabe (l’Egypte, la Syrie, l’Irak) ou musulmane (l’Iran).




le troisième est de couper la culture de la résistance de ses racines en la bloquant, en la torpillant sous l’accusation de terrorisme, en dressant le monde contre elle et en essayant enfin de l’écraser.




Le problème de l’Iran n’a jamais été ses ambitions nucléaires mais son rôle régional croissant et son soutien à la résistance palestinienne et libanaise et à quelques organisations qui lui sont proches en Irak. Nous n’aurions pas entendu tout ce tumulte venant des Israéliens si c’était l’Iran du Shah qui pratiquait l’enrichissement d’uranium et projetait de produire des armes nucléaires ; nous entendrions au lieu de cela des bénédictions et des encouragement sans retenue sous le prétexte qu’un Iran nucléarisé serait un soutien pour un Israël nucléarisé.




Israël n’a jamais protesté contre le programme nucléaire pakistanais ou indien avant celui-ci, bien que le premier soit un pays musulman avec une majorité sunnite, parce que tous les gouvernements pakistanais ont été soucieux de se soumettre totalement aux injonctions des Américains, employant leurs capacités militaires à les servir, et n’ont jamais établi de relations directes ou indirectes avec les mouvements arabes de résistance contre le projet israélien.




Péres est allé à Washington afin de mobiliser contre une menace nucléaire iranienne qui ne s’est pas encore matérialisée, s’appuyant sur le lobby juif pour qu’il agisse en ce sens, avant de rencontrer le nouveau président Barack Obama. L’objectif est clair et il est de détourner l’attention du nouveau gouvernement des États-Unis du processus de paix et de contrecarrer ses préparatifs pour formuler une politique qui rétablirait ce processus sur de nouvelles bases, dont l’initiative arabe de paix.




Les officiels israéliens mènent d’intensives campagnes diplomatiques ces jours-ci pour persuader le monde occidental que l’action prioritaire est de se concentrer sur les ambitions nucléaires iraniennes, lesquelles représenteraient le plus grand danger, et non pas sur le processus de paix. C’est pourquoi le ministre israélien des affaires étrangères Avigdor Lieberman réalise actuellement une tournée en Europe, dans le même but et parallèlement à la visite de Péres à la Maison Blanche, et pour préparer une autre visite de Binyamin Netanyahu à l’invitation du nouveau président des USA d’ici deux semaines.




L’arsenal nucléaire israélien aurait cessé de représenter une menace pour la région parce que, selon l’opinion occidentale et celle du monde arabe (ou de certains de ses régimes) il serait d’une réelle nécessité pour protéger les régimes arabes contre le danger iranien. Nous ne serions pas étonnés que Péres parle de ce danger en se posant comme représentant de ces régimes puisque « l’alliance de la peur » inclue les Arabes et les Israéliens.




Les Arabes sont dans une crainte terrible. Ils sont dans la crainte de voir se développer le programme nucléaire iranien et de voir les Etats-Unis conclure un accord avec l’Iran qui placerait ce dernier en position de leader régional.




Robert Gates, le secrétaire américain de la défense, visite actuellement la région pour rassurer ces Arabes effrayés. Il a déclaré aux journalistes à bord de l’avion qui l’emmenait hier au Caire qu’ « il cherchera à assurer les dirigeants de l’Egypte et de l’Arabie Saoudite que la diplomatie des Etats-Unis envers l’Iran n’affectera pas les relations de longue date de Washington avec les pays arabes dans la région. » Il a ajouté que « un message important sera adressé à l’Arabie Saoudite en particulier confirmant qu’aucun accord avec l’Iran ne se fera aux dépens des relations de longue date avec elle et avec les pays de Golfe avec lesquels nous sommes liés par des associations et des amitiés depuis des décennies ».




De façon très regrettable, Gates se comporte avec ses alliés arabes comme s’ils étaient un groupe de gamins. Sinon il n’oserait pas leur donner d’aussi naïves assurances. Si se confirment les fuites en provenance des Etats-Unis selon lesquelles ces derniers proposeraient à l’Iran un accord stratégique qui en ferait son principal allié dans la région s’il se pliait aux injonctions de ralentir son enrichissement d’uranium et de confiner ses opérations à une utilisation à des fins pacifiques sous surveillance internationale, en échange de l’établissement d’un état palestinien indépendant, alors ceci signifie que les pays arabes deviendraient les laquais de l’Iran, lui verseraient des subsides et suivraient ses directives.




Si nous reprenons l’hypothèse selon laquelle l’Iran accepterait réellement cette proposition américaine et réviserait à la baisse son programme nucléaire en échange de l’état palestinien indépendant que les initiatives et les appels arabes pour la paix n’ont pas réussi à imposer, l’Iran remettra-t-il cet Etat à l’autorité de Ramallah et à Mahmud Abbas ou à ses alliés dans les mouvements de résistance et en particulier au Hamas ? D’ailleurs, quel sera le statut de Hezbollah au Liban et celui de la Syrie dans le cadre de cet accord Etats-Unis-Iran sur lequel il y a beaucoup de débats ?




Les Arabes « effrayés » devraient admettre que leurs politiques depuis ces 20 dernières années, consistant à reprendre les projets des USA et à se comporter comme des soldats désireux de les mettre en application sans rien obtenir en échange, sont celles qui les ont placés dans cette humiliante situation où le secrétaire de défense des Etats-Unis vient pour les rassurer, et où Ahmad Abu-al-Ghayt, ministre égyptien des affaires étrangères et célèbre pour ses propos sur « briser les os (*) », se plaint au délégué américain Dennis Ross, disant que la politique iranienne ne contribue pas à la stabilité dans la région et gêne le processus de paix, comme l’a cité Husam Zaki, porte-parole du ministère égyptien des affaires étrangères.




Le gouvernement des États-Unis n’est pas une fondation charitable dont la tâche est d’aider et rassurer le faible, mais une superpuissance qui définit sa politique afin de servir ses intérêts stratégiques. Il ne respecte que le fort qui peut agir sur ces intérêts de façon positive ou négative. Et les Arabes n’en font pas partie car ils n’ont aujourd’hui aucune place dans les équations internationales.




(*) Paraphrasant Rabin qui ordonnait "de briser les os" des Palestiniens lors de la première Intifada, le ministre égyptien des affaires étrangères avait repris la même formule pour menacer les Palestiniens qui forceraient du côté égyptien le blocus international appliqué contre la population de la bande de Gaza.









Du même auteur :




Ahmadinejhad n’a fait que dire la vérité - 22 avril 2009
Si seulement Hillary Clinton se taisait ! - 27 février 2009
La République Palestinienne de Dayton - 11 février 2009
L’enthousiasme israélien pour l’initiative saoudienne - 26 octobre 2008
Procès de Tarek Aziz : il est noble, tandis qu’ils sont ignobles... - 11 mai 2008
ligne-mediane



ligne-notes
5 mai 2009 - Vous pouvez consulter cet article à :
- http://www.bariatwan.com/index.as...
Traduction de l’anglais : Claude Zurbach



http://www.info-palestine.net/article.php3?id_article=6676

Breaking News: Algerian daily confirms Mossad training camps for 'Al Qaeda'

Mossadnik Sarkosy with war criminal Netanyahu

Note for the readers: We warned on the 02nd November 2008 that zionist jews in Great Britain. France, Germany and clandestine NATO networks are preparing 'dirty bomb' plots in Europe to expand wars in the Middle East and Africa.

The daily newspaper in Algeria is directly linked to algerian military intelligence, which is directly owned by French gouvernment, as his head general Mohamed Mediene known as Tewfik was put in power by algerian jew general Larbi Belkheir, former french military intelligence operative and creator of the fake 'islamic groups' known as GIA, Group Islamic Armed.

Goal for France was to keep control of oil and gas in Algeria. Sarkosy government is prosecuted for war crimes and genocide in Algeria, this is probably the main reason of this article, but still, this is the first country who acknowledge openly and blatantly that Israel is 'al qaeda' who stroke in NY, London, Madrid, Istambul, Beyrouth, Bali, Casablanca, Algiers.

Sarkosy's zionist services stroke Algiers twice in 2007 on the 11th April/December 2007 to force the Algerian and North African to accept Israel through the 'Union for the Mediterranea', as Israel is totaly bankrupted and need to be integrated to the EU to survive.

Abu Suleyman

My RSS reader delivers an average of 600 headlines daily from a select number of news sources, some in languages other than English. This evening, one particular headline caught my attention, as it came from mediarabe.info, a website that translates articles written from the arabic into French and focuses on the Arab world. At first, I thought I had misread the headline which I quote below verbatim:'Selon un quotidien algérien, le Mossad recrute des Maghrébins et les entraîne en Israël' - which translates into:'According to an Algerian daily, the Mossad is recruiting people from the Maghreb and training them in Israel'.And then in red print it has a caveat: 'The Algerian Press, which is usually anti-Israeli, steers between informing and flaming.'I immediately googled the key words of the article in English and found an article by Ennaharonline, the newspaper in question, that had translated its own article into English. The date of the release was today's date, April 16, 2009.

No other newspaper carried the story, though they were plenty of previous 'conspiracy' theories and stories tying Mossad and al-Qaida in other scenarios.Randa Al-Fayçal translated and analyzed the original Arabic article, thus, it might be beneficial to study the analysis, since the article itself is self-explanatory.Al-Fayçal summed up the report in a very short and succinct manner: 'Ennahar, the Algerian daily, asserted that the Jewish State is recruiting al-Qaeda Islamists in Europe who originated in the Maghreb (the Maghreb, or the Western part of Africa, is considered to encompass the countries of Morocco, Tunisia, Lybia and Algeria) and providing them with training in Israeli camps, in order to use them in terrorist attacks next summer.'continued>>

http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/21328

Algerians and Moroccans in El Qaida training camps in Israel

According to sources well informed on the case and the activities of El Qaeda, Israel would have created about a year, training camps on its territory for elements from Arab countries.

The military training and intelligence are provided in preparation for possible terrorist operations against the interests of foreign countries in the Arab countries who are regarded by Israel as a threat to its security and its strategic interests, including the Maghreb Arab. According to our sources, the camps include Arabs from Algeria, Morocco and Yemen who came in, with false passports, from Europe and carrying Jewish names. These were recruited by the Mossad in the European capitals to activate within the ‘El Qaeda’ organization after being selected by the intelligence services in Europe.

These people are generally wanted for belonging to terrorist groups. The secret training camps have relations with the sleeping cells of El Qaida in Europe, where their elements are recruited for possible terrorist operations in Arab countries in coordination with the branches of the organization including the armed terrorist groups of the Sahara. This proves what Ennahar had previously published on the military attaché at the Israeli embassy in Mauritania, who had prepared a secret report on security activities of armed men in the Sahara regions. The latter maintained secret relations with the rebel movements in Mali and Niger.

The Mossad had relations with the branches of El Qaeda and the operations committed against foreign interests, mainly American, and in connection with the events in Iraq and the Middle East. According to these sources, the Mossad might even try to use Algerian Harraga in Italy and recruit them in these training camps across the logistics network of seafarers on the axis Sardinia Naples in search of elements to send secretly in Israel, for the purpose of committing operations against foreign interests during the summer; operations to be awarded to El Qaeda. This new stage in the activities of the El Qaeda organization is the subject of the discourse of El Dhawahiri in an attempt to revive the various branches after the stranglehold exercised on the organization by the European intelligence and painful strikes made by the security services and the army in particular in the Arab Maghreb and in Algeria.

Ennahar / Mohamed Ben Kemoukh

http://www.ennaharonline.com/en/news/943.html

Attaques contre l’illustre Sheikh Ahmed Deedat (RA)

L’illustre et très regretté Sheikh Ahmed Hussein Deedat, Rahmatullah alaih (RA), de l’Afrique du Sud (1 Juillet 1918 – 8 Août 2005) se voit accuser de toutes sortes de vilainies, après sa mort, par son propre « frère » cadet, Abdoollah Hoosen, alors qu’il aurait dû montrer plus de respect à l’égard de son aîné et le laisser reposer en paix. Dire du mal d’un mort sur des mensonges fabriqués est contraire à l’enseignement islamique. On se demande quelles furent les prises de position de ce « frère » du vivant du Sheikh Deedat. Dans un reportage publié dans Impact News du 22 mai 2009, « Deedat :“Islam n’est pas une religion de critique ou de débat” », Abdoollah Hoosen, un homme totalement inconnu du grand public, a donné l’impression qu’il veut ternir la réputation d’un aussi charmant personnage que fut le Sheikh Deedat et contrer son œuvre incomparable dans l’histoire récente des Musulmans et de l’Islam en matière de religions comparatives. Qui se cachent derrière ces attaques qui d’habitude ne sont l’œuvre que des ennemis des Musulmans et de l’Islam?

La sortie de Abdoollah Hoosen contre un Musulman tant aimé et chéri par des centaines de millions de personnes de par le monde tout en propageant la fausse notion que l’ « Islam n’est pas une religion de critique ou de débat » ne peuvent être ignorées sans une réplique appropriée. Six millions de Français lui doivent beaucoup, et le monde anglophone ne cesse d’écouter les causeries et les débats du Sheikh Deedat. La chaîne de télévision « Islam Channel » diffuse ses débats et causeries régulièrement. Les librairies islamiques diffusent ses œuvres en forme de pamphlets, de cassettes audio et vidéo, et toute sa collection est actuellement sur DVD. Des dizaines de milliers de personnes sont revenues à l’Islam grâce à lui. Sa contribution dans le domaine comparatif des religions est immense à tel point que d’autres personnages aussi éminents suivent sa voie et son combat, notamment le Dr Zakir Naik (qualifié par le Sheikh Deedat lui-même de « Deedat Plus »), le Dr Jamal Badawi, le Dr Khalid Al-Mansour, le Sheikh Khalid Yassine, etc. Il est du devoir de tout Musulman de faire cesser les calomnies proférées par Abdoollah Hoosen, selon ce reportage, et qui cachent sûrement un dessein satanique !

Quoiqu’il en soit, Sheikh Ahmed Deedat est reconnu comme un « Muslim scholar ». Il fut un grand orateur et un spécialiste dans le domaine interreligieux. Il a reçu le prestigieux King Faisal Award en 1986 pour ses 50 ans de travail assidu dans le domaine islamique. En ce qui concerne les études comparatives des religions du Sheikh Deedat, sur les aspects contentieux, ses analyses et commentaires sont normalement en faveur de l'Islam où se trouvent les réponses aux nombreuses questions posées par les chercheurs, et ne sont d’aucune manière des « violentes sorties contre les autres religions » tel que le mentionne l’article en question. Par contre, le Sheikh Deedat a toujours dénoncé la violence du sionisme contre l’Islam et les Musulmans. Seul, il a pu faire interdire le livre obscène, blasphématoire, anti-islamique et anti-Musulman « Les versets sataniques » de Salman Rushdie en Afrique du Sud en 1992, quand le pays était encore sous le régime de l’Apartheid.

Ceux qui veulent interdire toute liberté d’esprit, tout débat saint et constructif en Islam et avec d’autres religions, et toute critique, ne conaissent pas l’Islam ou sont carrément ses ennemis. Abdoollah Hoosen a tort de se vanter d’être « plus qualifié » (en quoi ?) que son frère aîné, le Sheikh Deedat, et sûrement, selon lui, « plus qualifié » même que le Saint Prophète lui-même, paix et bénédiction sur lui, car le Prophète Muhammad était An-Nabi Ul-Ummi : The Unlettered Prophet. Néanmoins, cela n’empêche que le Sheikh Deedat soit d’une intelligence remarquable avec une prodigieuse mémoire et grande expérience. Les diplômes n’ont jamais empêché certains d’être corrompus, de raconter et d’écrire des faussetés durant toute leur vie.

Abdoollah Hoosen fait honte en s’attaquant aussi diaboliquement à « la personnalité du musulman », qu’il veut sans doute voir réformer à l’occidental ainsi que l’Islam, lui aussi, comme certains académiciens et intellectuels ‘éclairés’ et pseudo-réformateurs, tels les européanistes Tariq Ramadan, Malek Chebel, Foaud Lahouri, Abdelwahab Meddeb, Rashid Benzine, les soit disant ‘nouveaux penseurs’ de l’Islam. Tout comme Tariq Ramadan, Abdoollah Hoosen essaie-t-il de se servir de l’île Maurice comme « laboratoire » à travers la propagande médiatique comme ce fut le cas pour la laïcité ? Il doit sûrement se réjouir du fait qu’il soit bienvenu en France alors que son défunt frère, tout comme Malcom X, ne l’était pas. Mais, avant de parler du respect des autres religions, il devrait plutôt commencer par respecter la mémoire de son frère même si (maintenant ?) il ne partage pas son combat ou ses méthodes. Alors que les forces anti-islamiques n’ont pas réussi à corrompre notre illustre Sheikh Ahmed Deedat, dont la grandeur d’âme et les compétences sont reconnues mondialement, ces mêmes forces, ont-elles pu corrompre son frère cadet Abdoollah Hoosen ?

L’essence du combat du Sheikh Ahmed Deedat (RA) est la défense de l’Islam et des Musulmans contre toute attaque, de l’intérieur comme de l’extérieur, d’éduquer et de renseigner les gens de toutes les religions, et surtout l’invitation à l’Islam : « DA’WAH ». Le Sheikh Ahmed Deedat n’a jamais manqué de respect aux religions d’autrui. La sourate de l’Araignée (Al-'Ankabût) 29:46, appelle les croyants à n’argumenter face aux gens du Livre que de la manière la meilleure et la plus respectueuse, à l’exception de ceux qui ont fait violence et injustice (al dhalimun) - voir les Sionistes et les impérialistes. C’est un péché grave que de s’attaquer à la mémoire et à l’honneur du Sheikh Ahmed Deedat et lui attribuer des faussetés, surtout venant de son propre frère. La médisance est un péché en Islam. Il est à souhaiter que ces attaques ne soulèvent aucune passion de la part de ceux qui pourraient se sentir blessés

M Rafic Soormally
Londres
25 mai 2009

Craignant des poursuites pour enlevement, sequestration et torture, Sarkosy fait 'rapatrier' Lakhdar Boumediene depuis Guantanamo pour sauver la face

Lakhdar Boumediene, otage de l'axe americano-sioniste pendant plus de 7 ans

Nous possedons plusieurs documents officiels prouvant que ce sont bien les services francais (policiers et militaires) qui ont monté un dossier bidon sur Lakhdar Boumediene, et les autres maghrebins de Bosnie. Le MI6, la CIA, le BND ainsi que la DST cherchent a effacer toute trace de leur presence dans des camps d'entrainement bosniaque dans le milieu des annees 1990. Ces camps etant sous la coupe des plusieurs services occidentaux et des reseaux clandestins de l'OTAN.

Certaines des 'unites' creees en Ex-Yougoslavie et sous la coupe des services francais sont entrees au Maroc, apres leur sejour dans les Balkans, ils y ont pris le nom de GIAs, puis en Algerie, se sont rendus coupables de massacres, crimes de guerre entre 1996 et 1999.

Ce sont bien les autorites francaises qui sont allées a Guantanamo pour interroger la quasi totalite des detenus maghrebins entre 2002 et 2007 alors qu'ils ne possedaient meme pas la nationalité francaise. Ce 'geste' de la France, tout comme celui du Portugal ou de la Belgique n'est pas anodin, il est destiné a empecher toute poursuite contre ces gouvernements qui ont directement participé aux enlevements, aux sequestrations et a la torture systematique de detenus maghrebins pour la plupart a Guantanamo.

Dans le meme registre, le gouvernement Sarkosy fait face a plusieurs dizaines de plaintes pour enlevements, sequestrations et tortures de ressortissants algeriens et francais durant la guerre civile en Algerie qui continue jusqu'a aujourd'hui.

La multiplication des plaintes a permis de poursuivre le gouvernement francais pour complicite de crimes de guerre et genocide lorsque ce n'est pas pour terrorisme. Sont directement vises par ces plaintes, Fillon, Alliot Marie, Squarcini, Morin, Kouchner, mais egalement leurs homonymes depuis 1993 (gouvernments Balladur, Juppe et Jospin). Sarkosy est poursuivi depuis 2004 lorsqu'il etait encore a l'interieur. Les poursuites a l'international contre le gouvernement Sarkosy provoquent d'intenses pressions, notament avec la junte harki en Algerie, car Sarkosy ferait mine de croire que ce sont les 'algeriens' qui sont derriere les plaintes or il n'en est rien et toutes les ONG le savent tres bien.

Aujourd'hui, alors que tous les liens entre les faux groupes 'islamiques' avec la France sont prouves au plus haut niveau de l'etat francais, Fillon et Alliot Marie refusent de se rendre d'eux memes aux autorites internationales, ce qui pourrait conduire la France vers une guerre civile, faisant ainsi le jeu du lobby israelien a Paris et son pantin Sarkosy.

Abu Suleyman

La bonne nouvelle d'abord.Lakhdar Boumediene, 42 ans, Mustafa Aït Idir, 38 ans, Mohamed Nechla, 40 ans, Hadji Boudella, 43 ans, Saber Lahmar, 39 ans, et Belkacem Bensayah, 46 ans : ils étaient six Algériens, naturalisés bosniaques, pour services rendus à la cause bosniaque pendant la guerre d'indépendance de cette ancienne république yougoslave. Ils avaient été remis par traîtrise par le gouvernement de Sarajevo à la CIA en 2001. En novembre 2008, un juge fédéral US avait ordonné la libération de cinq d'entre eux. L'un d'eux, Lakhdar Boumediene, vient d'être libéré et d'arriver en France vendredi soir 15 mai, où il est accueilli, ansi que sa femme et ses deux enfants, venus d'Algérie. La nouvelle avait été annoncée par Sarkozy lors du sommet de l'OTAN à Strasbourg, en avril dernier. Lakhdar a mené une grève de la faim depuis décembre 2006 et avait été nourri de force depuis. Il a perdu 20 kg.

Les mauvaises nouvelles ensuite.Barack Obama a pris deux décisions :

1 - Il vient de demander à son administration de s'opposer à la décision de justice de faire publier 44 photos détenues par le Pentagone sur des sévices exercés sur des détenus en Irak et en Afghanistan. Cette décision faisait suite à une plainte déposée en 2004 par l'ACLU (l'Union des libertés civiles américaine). Le boss du Pentagone et ses généraux avaient dit leur opposition à cette décision. Obama s'est donc exécuté.2 - Il vient d'annoncer que les tribunaux militaires d'exception (d'une légalité plus que douteuse) mis en place à guantánamo sous Bush II seraient maintenus, ajoutant que les "droits de la défense" seraient améliorés.

C'est ce qu'on appelle "le changement dans la continuité"...

http://chroniquedeguantanamo.blogspot.com/

Une récompense pour l’entité sioniste

Le 11 mai, le roi Abdullah II de Jordanie, interviewé par le quotidien britannique Times, déclarait que les Arabes n’offraient pas à l’entité sioniste une solution à deux Etats, mais à 57 Etats. Il a ajouté que « le prix pour l’entité sioniste n’est pas le Jourdain, les Hauts du Golan ou le Sinaï, » mais « le Maroc, sur l’Atlantique, jusqu’à l’Indonésie, sur le Pacifique. »

Par Ezzedeen AlQassam Brigades

Le Roi de Jordanie a fait ces commentaires après sa rencontre avec le président US Barak Obama le 21 avril 2009. On croit également que les remarques du roi ont été coordonnées avec l’Egypte, l’Arabie Saoudite et l’Autorité Palestinienne de Ramallah, et qu’elles reflétaient un effort commun arabo-américain pour modifier l’Initiative de Paix Arabe de mars 2002 pour la rendre acceptable pour l’entité sioniste.

Ses commentaires, en particulier sur Al-Quds (Jérusalem), renforcent cette conviction. Interrogé sur l’avenir, le Roi a répondu : « Je sens beaucoup plus de maturité et de compréhension en ces temps troublés de soupçons culturels et religieux et que Jérusalem pourrait être le liant dont nous avons besoin. »

De nouveaux articles déclarent aussi que le Président Obama présentera un plan de paix à l’intérieur des grandes lignes des commentaires du Roi Abdullah lorsqu’il s’adressera au monde musulman depuis le Caire début juin. Arabes modérés : l’entité sioniste est une amie, l’Iran l’ennemi De plus, lors de sa rencontre avec le Président égyptien, Hosni Mubarak, le 11 mai, Netanyahu a déclaré que les modérés arabes et l’entité sioniste n’avaient jamais été plus proches d’une compréhension de la menace mutuelle à laquelle ils sont confrontés. Les articles confirment que la réunion « s'est centrée sur l’urgence d’une stratégie commune sioniste-arabe pour traiter de l’Iran et de ses alliés. »

En bref, le soi-disant camp arabe modéré propose au gouvernement sioniste de droite une normalisation totale avec tous les Etats musulmans, un compromis sur Al-Quds et un alignement déclaré contre l’Iran, en échange de l’accord sioniste de négocier un compromis sur les colonies avec l’Autorité Palestinienne de Ramallah, la Syrie et le Liban. D’un côté, c’est un retrait total de l’Initiative arabe de paix initiale ; de l’autre, le camp arabe modéré donne la priorité à la sécurité nationale de l’entité sioniste au dépens de la sécurité des Etats arabes. L’Initiative de Paix arabe soulignait que la normalisation avec l’entité sioniste n’aurait lieu qu’après qu’elle se soit complètement retirée de toutes les terres arabes occupées pendant la guerre de juin 1967, Al-Quds comprise.

L’Initiative de Paix arabe n’est pas à négocier mais à appliquer et l’entité sioniste doit résoudre le droit au retour des réfugiés palestiniens selon la Résolution 194 des Nations Unies. C’est aussi l’entité sioniste qui occupe les terres arabes, jouit de la suprématie nucléaire, menace et lance des guerres contre ses voisins, par l’Iran. C’est pourquoi, contrairement à la sagesse conventionnelle « du camp modéré arabe », selon lequel le plus possible d’initiatives de paix et de concessions doivent être faites à l’entité sioniste pour qu’elle se retire des terres qu’elle occupe, l’entité sioniste comprend que ces initiatives sont des signes de faiblesse qu’elle doit utiliser pour maximiser ses gains et créer des réalités irréversibles sur le terrain. Par exemple, l’entité sioniste n’aurait pas été en mesure de vendre « le mensonge de la paix » avec les Palestiniens à la communauté internationale sans les Accords d’Oslo qu’elle a signé avec l’Organisation de Libération de la Palestine (OLP).

Il est évident que davantage de concessions à l’entité sioniste au nom de la paix ne fait qu’augmenter son désir d’en obtenir d’autres ; c’est pourquoi l’entité sioniste insiste aujourd’hui pour être d’abord reconnue comme Etat juif avant d’accepter de négocier le principe de la solution à deux Etats. Plus de paix, plus de colonies La paix avec l’entité sioniste ne peut pas survenir en offrant simplement sa reconnaissance de la part du tiers restant du monde. Et c’est pourquoi l’extrémiste Avigdor Lieberman voit une opportunité de se débarrasser des Palestiniens arabes dans les territoires de 1967 au moyen d’idées comme un échange de territoire.

Mais les questions d’histoire et de légitimité comptent davantage. Armé d’un mandat de sa population, la légitimité des dirigeants sionistes lui donne un atout dans les négociations avec les leaders arabes ; ils peuvent accepter ou refuser des propositions de paix au nom de leur peuple. Du côté arabe, quelle sorte de mandat ont les dirigeants arabes pour signer des accords avec l’entité sioniste ? La population égyptienne, par exemple, n’a pas élu Anwar al-Sadate pour signer un traité de paix en son nom, ce qui explique pourquoi la paix entre l’Egypte et l’entité sioniste reste, 30 ans après, « glaciale ». Selon le magazine Vanity Fair, lorsque le Hamas a remporté les élections au Conseil Législatif Palestinien en 2006, Abbas, le président de l’Autorité Palestinienne, a participé à un complot pour renverser le gouvernement Hamas par la force militaire au lieu de profiter de son succès pour renforcer sa position de négociation avec l’entité sioniste.

La paix avec l’entité sioniste ne peut pas arriver en offrant simplement sa reconnaissance de la part du tiers du monde (les Etats musulmans) qui, jusqu’à maintenant, ont refusé de la reconnaître. La reconnaissance de l’entité sioniste ne peut se produire que lorsqu’elle se conformera aux résolutions de l’ONU, et agira comme un Etat qui respecte le droit international. De plus, tout accord avec l’entité sioniste doit être signé par des leaders arabes démocratiquement élus ; si non, ces accords ne lieront pas le peuple arabe.

Source : Ezzedeen AlQassam Brigades

Traduction : MR pour ISM

Obama, Netanyahu and the FBI plot against a synagogue in New York

War criminal Netanyahu, brainmaster of 9/11, London and Madrid bombings and the new puppet of the White House, even Bush was better lying to his fellows

Be Careful With Whom You Associate – Your Friend Could Be an F.B.I. Informant

By Christopher Bollyn,

http://www.bollyn.com/

May 22, 2009

We are living in very strange times in the United States. The U.S. has become a bizarre police state in which all the dirty tricks and tactics developed in the Soviet Union, East Germany, and Israel are now used on the unwitting American population. As we discovered in suburban Hoffman Estates (N.W. Chicago) before I was assaulted by undercover police, several of the people who tried to be our friends were actually F.B.I. informants. I know of at least three. These F.B.I. informants would come to my house and try to engage me although there was never any real reason why I would want to be involved with them in the first place. In the summer of 2005, we discovered the first two F.B.I. informants. They were a male-female team that swarmed around us like flies. One was a handicapped American male; the other a woman from the Philippines.

The first (who had met my wife at the library) had introduced us to the latter, which is typical of such operations. Later, a Lebanese friend I had known for years, a U.S. postal worker, told me he had "started" working for the F.B.I. This swarming of F.B.I. informers around our house was the main reason we left our home in the fall of 2005 and went to Europe. This is also why I have learned to be very careful about the people I associate with. I don't abide F.B.I.

informants.Amazingly, only a few days after President Obama met terror-specialist Benjamin Netanyahu, now prime minister of Israel, four American black men have been arrested in what certainly appears to be a very shady "terror" bomb plot against Jewish buildings in the Bronx and a plane at the privately-owned airport/military base at Stewart Airport in Newburgh, N.Y. Bibi Netanyahu was the Israeli foreign minister who told the New York Times on 9-11 that the terror attacks that killed thousands of Americans were "very good" for U.S.-Israeli relations. Amazingly, he was also on the scene of the bombings in London in July 2005, and reportedly escaped danger after being warned by Israeli intelligence of the imminent bombings.

Netanyahu, a violent Jewish racist of the most extreme sort, meeting with America's first "black" president. Truly amazing! What will come next? The bombing of Iran? All indications point to a continuation of the radical Zionist agenda. There is no organized resistance to this agenda, which has complete control of the mass media.Judith Miller, the disgraced and convicted Zionist propagandist from the New York Times, wrote about the terror plot on FOX Forum (Rupert Murdoch's FOX News) where she is now employed. Still a devoted Zionist propagandist, Miller's article was meant to underline the main point that the Zionists want to drill into the minds of Americans: "Watch Out, America, Our Biggest Terror Threats Are Increasingly Homegrown.""The foiled plot in New York demonstrates that the terrorist threat to America, and to New York in particular, did not end with Obama’s election as president," Miller wrote. On this, I agree. The United States is still in the hands of terrorists. Obama's chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel from my hometown of Chicago, is named after a Jewish terrorist and comes from a family of dedicated Zionist terrorists.

The Zionist Irgun, Haganah, LEHI, and Stern Gang of Palestine invented the use of terrorism as a political tool. Sherman Skolnik, the late Chicago muck-raking journalist of the Jewish faith, wrote that Rahm Emanuel's father, Dr. Ben Emanuel (formerly Auerbach) was actually involved in the Irgun murder of the U.N. Special Envoy to Palestine in 1948, the Swedish Count Folke Bernadotte. How interesting.What is very clear from this latest "terror" plot in New York is that this was another false-flag conspiracy in which the U.S. government, specifically the F.B.I., played a very active, if not the leading, role. From reading the statement and complaint from the office of the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York it is very clear that the F.B.I. was directing and guiding the terror plot from the beginning. How typical. One of the four defendants, a Haitian, can not even read or write English. The bombs and Stinger missile that are described in the complaint were fakes produced by the F.B.I. That is to say that if the F.B.I. had not been involved in this plot there would not have been any plot, nor bombs, nor Stinger missile. This was clearly more of a terror plot "with the U.S." rather than "within the U.S." The U.S. government was involved in every aspect of this planned crime.

So, why aren't the government agents involved in plotting terrorist crimes exposed? Who was leading whom? Do we actually pay for this kind of government service?This is a case that is strikingly similar to the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center. Like the 1993 false flag attack, this case is also being prosecuted by the Zionist prosecutor Lev Louis Dassin, acting U.S. Attorney in New York. "Acting" means, in this case , that U.S. Attorney Lev Dassin holds his position without being appointed by the President or approved by Congress. Somebody retired and, BINGO, Dassin is put into the crucial position. I have written more extensively about Lev Dassin's Zionist background in relation to the Madoff and Nadel cases. He is clearly part of the terror problem - not the solution.

Dassin, the scion of a family of Russian Zionists, is also handling the Madoff and Art Nadel cases. In the Madoff case, Dassin did not file the most obvious charge of conspiracy. He obviously accepted Madoff's statement that he had stolen the $50 billion all by himself and had no accomplices. According to Dassin's complaint against Madoff, his closest business partners, Sy Syms and Jacob Ezra Merkin, who funneled billions of dollars to his investment fund, were completely clueless and out of the loop. They just invested billions of dollars into a black hole. Is that believable?

The conspicuous fact that Madoff's partners are the directors and owners of "private" Israeli banks (privatized under then finance minister Bibi Netanyahu) and have branches in Switzerland that are allowed to make use of Swiss secrecy laws is of no interest to Lev Dassin. Golly Lev, so where did the $50 billion go?Lev Dassin, who comes from a very Zionist Jewish family, worked closely with Michael Chertoff on the prosecution of the 1993 "false flag" bombing of the World Trade Center. Do we see a pattern here?I find it outrageous that the U.S. Dept. of Justice is involved in plotting and setting up such crimes while it hides the real evidence of what really happened on 9-11. This is, however, the Zionist-controlled terror state we are faced with. As Joe Biden clearly revealed in Los Angeles, the U.S. government refuses to address the evidence of super-thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center as it conspires to frame American Muslims for crimes that it designs. What is most disturbing for patriotic Americans is that we have met the enemy and it is -- U.S.

Sources:

Bollyn, Christopher, "Is the Prosecutor Protecting Madoff's Fellow Conspirators?" March 17, 2009

Bollyn, Christopher, "Who is Bernard Madoff, the man behind the $50 billion fraud?" March 18, 2009
Dassin, Lev Louis, Bronx Temple Statement by U.S. Attorney Lev Dassin, May 20, 2009

Dassin, Lev Louis, Bronx Temple Complaint by U.S. Attorney Lev Dassin, May 19, 2009

Miller, Judith, "Watch Out, America, Our Biggest Terror Threats Are Increasingly Homegrown," May 21, 2009, Contributing Editor, The Manhattan Institute/FOX News Contributor

"Synagogue Bomb Plot" - Latest Zionist Publicity Coup

The round-up of patsies in the FBI/police-provoked "synagogue bomb plot" (the ersatz weapons and explosives were, as per usual, furnished by the cops themselves), is only the latest Zionist publicity coup, timed to coincide with the hyping of the Iranian missile launch, the visit of assassin-master Binyamin "Bibi" Netanyahu to the White House, and Jeffrey Goldberg's Holocaustomania-drenched apologia for Netanyahu's murderous racism, in the pages of the oh-so hip-and-humane New York Times.

Dim-witted news anchors across the television and radio air waves and satellite rays have confidently repeated the account of the NY synagogue bomb plot exactly as told to them by "the police and the FBI." Nary a dollop of skepticism do the media offer to salt this goose, in spite of the fact that it is has been conclusively documented that the Federal government from Bush and Cheney to Condi and Colin lied to us big time concerning Saddam Hussein's supposed weapons of mass distraction.

Loud mouth Cheney, who has taken a cue from the rabbis and decided that the best policy is the chutzpagh tactic -- of lying outrageously with a straight face about "enhanced interrogation" and the "threat of terror" -- lied most outrageously during his time in office, by claiming Saddam was mixed up with with Al Qaeda in the 9/11 attacks. In reporting Cheney's recent speeches defending torture, nowhere have the major media reminded the people of Cheney's most easily documented big lie -- about Saddam/Al Qaeda.

The little shadow play in Mayor Bloomberg's New York, with the-suckers-who-would-be synagogue bombers (James Cromitie, Laguerre Payen, David Williams and Onta Williams), is a harbinger of our through-a-glass-darkly future, wherein any sustained rejection by the American people of the Israeli sodomy of Uncle Sam, will be met by a backpack-detonated nuke in downtown (pick your radioactive poison): Seattle, Chicago or Houston; said backpack to be detonated by an A-rab suicide bomber whose passport will miraculously drift down from the mushroom cloud, and land intact at the feet of Sean Hannity. The media will report this mother of all terror acts exactly as the covert terrorists --which is to say U.S. and Israeli intelligence --will want it reported, and that will end the peace and populism movements, as well as the Bill of Rights as we know it.

The Cryptocracy permits us the safety-valve, playpen simulacra of what we imagine to be petition, exposé, voting, organizing and protesting, but since It owns the major broadcast and print media, and commands the loyalty of the time-serving, mercenary bureaucrats in law enforcement and intelligence, anytime it begins to look as though We the People will actually revolt and seriously alter U.S. policy toward the Israeli war machine, or the Carlyle Group's military-industrial profit-complex, or the bankster's speculative ability to raise oil prices in a time of falling demand for oil, then the whole Yankee Doodle Spirit of '76 townhall populist pitchfork rebellion will be locked down and locked up in a two-pronged motion made possible by one big repeat of 9/11.

This can happen mainly because the scum of the earth, i.e. "news" executives at the six main TV networks (CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, FOX and PBS), and at National Public Radio and the newspaper chains, are all disproportionately staffed by agents and mouthpieces of the police and security apparatus of the Zionist Occupation Government (ZOG) itself.

As the curtain rises on today's comically contrived, off-Broadway synagogue bombshow, confirmed and repeated with a sober and straight face by a turkey flock of reporters and news execs, we are seeing our future in microcosm - captive to the secret agents of the state who fuel, feed, arm and direct the "antisemitic terrorists" and "jihadists" who will bomb us to smithereens if we don't loyally submit to the Dick Cheney apocalypse-now paradigm of Zionist-goodness vs. Third World-wickedness -- the perpetual war for perpetual peace dystopia.

Top Priority: The loudest alarm we should be sounding every day of our lives, in every imaginable forum and street corner, if we would have any hope of halting this black op, false flag, Arlington Road process, is the clarion alert to all Americans that every domestic "terror" plot or actual attack should always first be assumed to be a U.S. government covert action, until proved otherwise.

The sad little rehearsal with the four patsies today in New York, preceded by the Air Force One flyover Manhattan stagecraft, are intimations of a government-orchestrated terrorist spectacular in our future that will end the Bill of Rights as we know it, if we fail to boldly call the media on its mouthpiece status as a servile publicity arm of American "security forces."
We must reinstate the sleuthing reporter's vocation of uncovering hidden works of darkness by bigshots in high places, not the Cryptocracy's "right" to lock us down --and up-- due to a depraved "news" media that's part of the play.

YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.

Hoffman is the author of Judaism Discovered, the only book about Judaism ever banned by Amazon.com

http://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2009/05/synagogue-bomb-plot-latest-zionist.html

How MI5 blackmails Muslims

British-israeli Jonathan Evans, head of MI5

I publish this article because zionist jews inside MI5 tried exactly the same thing with me, when they discover that I was the one who made public that Israel was going to strike London 48 hours before, on the 05th July 2005, with evidence coming from two military intelligence services one European one Arabic, they put me on the top list of national security threat in the UK. MI5 is 100 % an israeli terrorism tool in the UK.

Abu Suleyman

Robert Verkaik The Independent

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/home-secretary-was-warned-of-mi5s-blackmailing-of-muslims-1689212.html

LONDON: Five Muslim community workers have accused MI5 of waging a campaign of blackmail and harassment in an attempt to recruit them as informants.

The men claim they were given a choice of working for the Security Service or face detention and harassment in the UK and overseas.

They have made official complaints to the police, to the body that oversees the work of the Security Service and to their local MP Frank Dobson. Now they have decided to speak publicly about their experiences in the hope that publicity will stop similar tactics being used in the future.

Intelligence gathered by informers is crucial to stopping further terror outrages, but the men’s allegations raise concerns about the coercion of young Muslim men by the Security Service and the damage this does to the gathering of information in the future.

Three of the men say they were detained at foreign airports on the orders of MI5 after leaving Britain on family holidays last year.

After they were sent back to the UK, they were interviewed by MI5 officers who, they say, falsely accused them of links to extremism. On each occasion the agents said they would lift the travel restrictions and threat of detention in return for their cooperation. When the men refused some of them received what they say were intimidating phone calls and threats.

Two other Muslim men say they were approached by MI5 at their homes after police officers posed as postmen. Each of the five men, aged between 19 and 25, was warned that if he did not help the security services he would be considered a terror suspect. A sixth man was held by MI5 for three hours after returning from his honeymoon in Saudi Arabia. He too claims he was threatened with travel restrictions if he tried to leave the UK.

An agent who gave her name as Katherine is alleged to have made direct threats to Adydarus Elmi, a 25-year-old cinema worker from north London. In one telephone call she rang him at 7 a.m. to congratulate him on the birth of his baby girl. His wife was still seven months’ pregnant and the couple had expressly told the hospital that they did not want to know the sex of their child.

Elmi further alleges: “Katherine tried to threaten me by saying, and it still runs through my mind now: ‘Remember, this won’t be the last time we ever meet.’ And then during our last conversation she explained: ‘If you do not want anything to happen to your family you will cooperate.’”

Madhi Hashi, a 19-year-old care worker from Camden, claims he was held for 16 hours in a cell in the Djibouti airport on the orders of MI5. He alleges that when he was returned to the UK on April 9 this year he was met by an MI5 agent who told him his terror suspect status would remain until he agreed to work for the Security Service. He alleges that he was to be given the job of informing on his friends by encouraging them to talk about jihad.

Mohamed Nur, 25, a community youth worker from north London, claims he was threatened by the Security Service after an agent gained access to his home accompanied by a police officer posing as a postman.

“The MI5 agent said, ‘Mohamed if you do not work for us we will tell any foreign country you try to travel to that you are a suspected terrorist.’”
Mohamed Aden, 25, a community youth worker from Camden, was also approached by someone disguised as a postman in August last year. He alleges an agent told him: “We’re going to make your traveling harder for you if you don’t cooperate.”

None of the six men, who work with disadvantaged youths at the Kentish Town Community Organization (KTCO), has ever been arrested for terrorism or a terrorism-related offense.
They have repeatedly complained about their treatment to the police and to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal, which oversees the work of the Security Services.

In a letter to Lord Justice Mummery, who heads the tribunal, Sharhabeel Lone, the chairman of the KTCO, said: “The only thing these young people have in common is that they studied Arabic abroad and are of Somali origin. They are not involved in any terrorist activity whatsoever, nor have they ever been, and the security services are well aware of this.”

Sharhabeel added: “These incidents smack of racism, Islamophobia and all that undermines social cohesion. Threatening British citizens, harassing them in their own country, alienating young people who have committed no crime other than practicing a particular faith and being a different color is a recipe for disaster.
“These disgraceful incidents have undermined 10 years of hard work and severely impacted social cohesion in Camden. Targeting young people who are role models for all young people in our country in such a disparaging way demonstrates a total lack of understanding of on-the-ground reality and can only be counterproductive.

“When people are terrorized by the very same body that is meant to protect them, sowing fear, suspicion and division, we are on a slippery slope to an Orwellian society.”
Frank Dobson said: “To identify real suspects from the Muslim communities MI5 must use informers. But it seems that from what I have seen some of their methods may be counterproductive.”

MI5 and the police refused to discuss the men’s complaints with The Independent. But on its website, MI5 says it is untrue that the Security Service harasses Muslims.
The organization says: “We do not investigate any individuals on the grounds of ethnicity or religious beliefs. Countering the threat from international terrorists, including those who claim to be acting for Islam, is the Security Service’s highest priority.

“We know that attacks are being considered and planned for the UK by Al-Qaeda and associated networks. International terrorists in this country threaten us directly through violence and indirectly through supporting violence overseas.”

It adds: “Muslims are often themselves the victims of this violence — the series of terrorist attacks in Casablanca in May 2003 and Riyadh in May and November 2003 illustrate this.
“The service also employs staff of all religions, including Muslims. We are committed to recruiting a diverse range of staff from all backgrounds so that we can benefit from their different perspectives and experience.”

Al-Aqsa face à un danger « réel, immédiat »

Par Khaled Amayreh

Les Palestiniens sonnent l’alarme sur les fouilles ininterrompues d’Israël sous Haram al-Sharif (le Sanctuaire Noble) à Al-Quds (Jérusalem Est occupée), qui posent un danger « réel et immédiat » à sa Mosquée Aqsa, le troisième lieu saint de l’Islam.

Les Palestiniens sonnent l’alarme sur les fouilles ininterrompues d’Israël sous Haram al-Sharif (le Sanctuaire Noble) à Al-Quds (Jérusalem Est occupée), qui posent un danger « réel et immédiat » à sa Mosquée Aqsa, le troisième lieu saint de l’Islam.


« Les fouilles israéliennes et les creusements continus juste en dessous de l’esplanade d’Haram al Sharif ont d’ores et déjà causé des dommages irréparables à la stabilité des fondations de la Mosquée Al-Aqsa, » dit Sheikh Raed Salah (photo ci-contre), chef du Mouvement Islamique, à IslamOnline.net.

Salah, qui surveille de près les fouilles israéliennes dans la Vieille Ville d’Al-Quds depuis plus de 25 ans, dit qu’Israël ne prête aucune attention aux protestations des pays arabes et musulmans sur les périls que ses fouilles posent aux lieux saints islamiques.

Ces dernières années, le gouvernement israélien, en coordination avec un puissant groupe de colons, a commencé à creuser un énorme réseau de tunnels sous la Vieille Ville.

Israël décrit les tunnels comme « des projets touristiques » qui ne constituent aucune menace aux lieux saints islamiques.

Cependant, les organisations palestiniennes et quelques israéliennes, dont le Comité israélien contre la démolition de maisons (ICAHD), pensent que le but ultime est de créer un itinéraire d’accès souterrain pour attaquer Al-Aqsa et d’autres lieux du secteur.

L'année dernière, un avocat israélien représentant le groupe anti-colonies, Ir Amin, a révélé que des colons financés par le gouvernement essayaient d'établir "des faits irréversibles" comme partie d'un projet de prise de contrôle.

« Il ne fait aucun doute que les fondations d’Aqsa sont minées par ces tunnels et autres fouilles, » maintient Sheikh Salah.

« Il n’est pas nécessaire d’être un grand architecte pour s’en rendre compte. Nous avons déjà découvert des trous et des fissures sur tout le site. »

Une section de la cour de la Mosquée Aqsa a cédé l'année dernière suite aux fouilles israéliennes.

L’effondrement s’est produit près de la fontaine Qaitbay, dans la section occidentale de la mosquée.

Le trou, profond d'un mètre, est considéré comme un signe avant-coureur alarmant de ce qui va se passer dans l’avenir.

Une école dans le quartier Silwan s'est aussi partiellement écroulée en raison des fouilles israéliennes dans le secteur.

Démolir Al-Aqsa

Sheikh Salah dit qu’il est absolument certain qu’Israël veut détruire la Mosquée.

« Ils veulent le faire de manière à ce que ça apparaisse comme le résultat de causes naturelles, comme un tremblement de terre. »

Salah dit qu’Israël a un « projet diabolique » et le met en œuvre pendant que les Musulmans continuent d’observer et se contentent de protestations verbales.

« Ce ne sont pas des réactions verbales qui arrêteront les desseins israéliens contre les lieux saints islamiques, en particulier la Mosquée Aqsa, » souligne-t-il.

« Il faut que les peuples et les gouvernements musulmans prennent des initiatives. Les Musulmans doivent dire avec force à Israël et à ses partisans que les lieux saints islamiques à Al-Quds sont une ligne rouge. »

Al-Aqsa est le premier Qiblah des Musulmans [la direction vers laquelle se tournent les Musulmans pour les prières] et c'est le troisième lieu saint après Al Ka’bah, à La Mecque, et la Mosquée du Prophète Muhammad à Médine, en Arabie Saoudite.

Sa signification a été renforcée par l'incident d'Al Isra’a et Al Mi'raj - le voyage nocturne de La Mecque à Al-Quds et l’ascension aux cieux du Prophète Muhammad (Paix et Bénédictions Sur Lui).

Des leaders religieux israéliens, y compris des membres de la Knesset, ne font aucun secret de leurs plans quant à Al-Aqsa.

Les Fidèles du Mont du Temple, un groupe fanatique extrémiste, s’est consacré à la démolition de la Mosquée Aqsa et du Dôme du Rocher.

L’Institut du Mont du Temple, autre société juive extrémiste, a préparé des plans détaillés pour la reconstruction du présumé Temple de Salomon sur les décombres d’Al-Aqsa.

Il a une grande maquette du temple, des vêtements spéciaux pour ses rabbins, des lieux spéciaux pour des offrandes sacrificielles, un calice d'encens, des navires de cuivre pour des offrandes de repas, un navire d'argent pour la libation de vin et d'autres ustensiles d’offrande.

Sans exagération

Ces dernières années, les autorités d'occupation israéliennes ont permis aux extrémistes juifs de prier à l'intérieur de l'esplanade Sharif Al-Haram.

Les fonctionnaires des Dotations Religieuses Musulmanes ont averti que permettre aux Juifs de prier à Haram n’est qu’une partie d’un plan plus large visant à usurper les lieux saints islamiques.

« Je pense qu'ils veulent s’assurer de prendre pied, pour plus tard consolider et étendre la présence juive, » maintient Sheikh Muhammed Hussein, Chef du Conseil Suprême Musulman qui supervise le Haram al-Sharif.

« C’est la raison pour laquelle les Musulmans du monde entier, les peuples et les gouvernements, doivent protester à voix haute contre cette agression flagrante et provocante du caractère sacré des sanctuaires islamiques. »

Sheik Raed Salah, qui se consacre à dénoncer les plans israéliens à Al-Quds, dit que les Musulmans du monde entier devraient se rendre compte que ses avertissements répétés ne sont pas du tout exagérés.

« Quand les Musulmans se rendront-ils compte que les dangers sont réels ? Quand la Mosquée sera détruite et que la nouvelle de sa destruction paraîtra sur Al-Jazeera ? »

Il a un message clair aux Musulmans et à tous ceux pour qui al-Quds et Al-Aqsa comptent.

« Seul un réveil véritable et rapide des Arabes et des Musulmans peut aider et c'est exactement ce que nous essayons d'effectuer. »


Source : Islam On Line
Traduction : MR pour ISM

Official Reports Confirm That Israelis Are Behind The Release Of The Swine Flu Virus in Mexico : Was Obama the target ?

The Voice of the White House

Washington, D.C., May 10, 2009: “As much as I dislike coping with the incredible glut of conspiracy theories I have to review on a daily basis, I saw a report early this morning that I felt I had to pass on to the public, such as it is. I cannot just scan it in because it is classified with a very limited COSMIC readership but I can, and have, copied out salient parts of it and, after suitable rewriting, I am sending it out.

There is now an on-going mini-epidemic of a form of swine flu sweeping the world but I can see almost nothing about how, or where, it really started.

Of course, it started in Mexico, probably Mexico City, and was deliberately sat on by the Mexican government because it coincided with the American spring break and the Mexicans did not want to warn off the enormous army of American teenagers who pour into that benighted country every year, flush with nice money.

By delaying official notice of the disease, they allowed it to spread all over the world but that is not the issue. After all, what can you expect from a country whose national bird is the fly?

It seems that an Israeli pharmaceutical company, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, one of the world’s largest with 28,000 employees located in 50 countries, bought out one Ivax Corporation that had labs in Mexico City. Teva has been working on finding vaccines and medicines for a host of different human ailments and took over the work of Ivax which also produced medicines and vaccines for human consumption but also did extensive experimental work in the veterinarian field.

It seems that sometime in late March of this year, one of the human test subjects for Teva developed a form of swine/bird flu that was not responsive to medical treatment but company officials in charge of the program (the development of a vaccine for several different forms of swine/bird flu) were unaware of this and allowed the test subject to leave their facilities and go into the public. When the test subject died, it took two weeks for the company to find out about this and as the infection was now spreading, instead of speaking out, they quickly burn reams of test documents and destroyed the records of their test subject.

The CDC has learned that the type of swine/bird flu involved here “has the potential of causing a pandemic” that could “easily have the same global effect as the 1918 influenza” epidemic that killed 30-50 millions of people world wide and did terrible damage to the global economy.

It is obvious that this was a deplorable accident but by trying to cover it up, the potential damage could be beyond our belief. Neither the Mexican authorities or the pharmaceutical company will admit to any of this and, like the missing billions of Bernie Madoff, no one in authority in the United States, Mexico or Israel will address it, hoping that the flu now creeping across the planet will not prove to be pandemic or deadly.

What can be done about this tragedy of errors? Nothing at all. However, unlike a major earthquake, this is not an act of God but an act of man.”

Teva Mexico
Pharmaceutical, Biogeneric and API

development manufacture and marketing

Pasaje Interlomas No. 16 - 5to. piso

Col. San Fernando La Herradura

CP 52784 HuixquilucanEdo. de Mexico
Phone: +(52)-55-5950-0200
Fax: +(52)-55-5950-0201

http://www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a2942.htm

Al Tamimi avertit des projets secrets sionistes pour transférer la judaïsation à Al Khalil

Al Qods occupée - CPI
www.palestine-info.info


Le Haut expert juriste Palestinien, Cheikh Tayssir Al Tamimi a révélé des projets sionistes secrets dont l'occupation tient à élaborer pour judaïser la ville d'Al Khalil, et surtout la vieille ville.

"La décision du ministre sioniste de la guerre, Ehud Barak, d'autoriser, aujourd'hui lundi 18/5, au soi-disant parti d'union nationale sioniste d'organiser une tournée dans la ville d'Al Khalil, ne vient que pour violer la dignité des palestiniens de cette ville et presser sur eux afin de les expulser et accomplir leur projet de judaïsation", a protesté l'expert juriste palestinien contre la politique raciste de l'occupation sioniste.

Le haut juriste palestinien a révélé que des membres dans le cabinet extrémiste sioniste coopèrent avec plusieurs associations et organisations coloniales, pour planifier des projets secrets qui vont proposer au premier ministre sioniste terroriste, Benjamin Netanyahu, d'instaurer plus de 20 nouvelles unités coloniales dans la vieille ville d'Al Khalil.

Al Tamimi a appelé l'ONU, la communauté internationale, la Ligue arabe, l'Organisation de la Conférence Islamique, ainsi que les hommes libres au monde entier à intervenir immédiatement pour sauver le peuple palestinien dominé illégalement et d'une manière très sauvage par l'occupation israélienne.

Bringing the threat of war to Russia’s borders is having wide-ranging repercussions

By Eric Walberg
Online Journal Contributing Writer


May 18, 2009, 00:19



As Russian troops marched to celebrate the victory over Nazi Germany 8 May, NATO troops -- 1,300 of them from 10 member countries and six “partners” -- were beginning their month-long Cooperative Longbow/Lancer war “games” on Russia’s southern border.

In deference to Moscow, Armenia, Kazakhstan, Moldova and Serbia decided not to participate in the NATO exercises, preferring to send their diplomats to Red Square in homage to the untold Russian sacrifice in pursuit of world peace.

According to Russian MP Sergei Abeltsev, the NATO decision to hold the drills in Georgia during the WWII Victory Day celebrations was a “total revision of the history of the Great Patriotic War.”

The games were greeted by Georgian troops with a coup attempt against their beleaguered president, Mikheil Saakashvili, though there is speculation that this was something dreamed up by the Georgian president himself (he has done stranger things, like declaring war on Russia). This latest bizarre twist, the argument goes, gives him ammunition in his battle with protesters -- they have been demanding his resignation for over a month and vow to keep protesting unyil he’s gone. Lucky for Saak, riot police are still loyal to him and broke up an anti-NATO rally by thousands converging on parliament on the eve of the games.

According to Russian Ambassador to NATO Dmitri Rogozin, Saakashvili “has long been aiming to bring Georgia’s domestic conflict to the international level. It’s for this reason that he shot down our military -- to draw us into the August war. It’s for this reason that he wanted American marines to come to Georgia, to draw Americans into that war. This man is dangerous for the world.”

In support of Saakashvili, the US darling, Democratic Senator John Kerry and Republican Congressman David Dreier (note the bipartisan unity) are calling for a free trade agreement with Georgia.

NATO is busy as a bee these days. Apart from its centrepiece, Afghanistan, where deaths of both Afghans and occupiers are increasing daily, and practising for God-knows-what in Georgia, it was recently flexing its naval muscle in neighbouring Turkey, where delegates from 27 countries just wrapped up NATO’s annual Maritime Commanders Meeting (MARCOMET 2009). Its theme this year was “The Future Security Environment -- Implications for Navies” and was focused on terrorism, piracy and conflicts deriving from energy and resources issues. No doubt it will be deploying forces on the Horn of Africa soon, pursuing those pesky pirates.

Prague is also a hive of activity these days. It hosted a meeting of the Eastern Partnership (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Ukraine and Moldova ) 7 May, followed by a summit dubbed “Southern Corridor -- New Silk Road of European and Central Asian countries,” seeking a non-Russian route for gas imports from Central Asia. The summit participants included Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Egypt, Iraq and Turkey. The Czech EU official said that after years of wavering, Europe had no time to lose in securing alternatives to Russian gas.

If the intent in all this is to make Russia angry, it is working. On the first day of the Georgian military exercise, Russia expelled two NATO envoys. Rogozin stated that his country would not attend a NATO military meeting planned for this week. Russian lawmaker Sergei Abeltsev has floated the idea of a response to the NATO move that would entail Cuba and Venezuela taking part in “large-scale drills” in the Caribbean Sea on 2 July. Nicaragua intends to buy Russian aircraft and helicopters for its armed forces, and will be sure to join in.

The battleground between East and West these days thus includes not only Georgia, but the Czech Republic, Poland and the Baltics. Not only is US President Barack Obama continuing Bush’s policy of provoking Russia in Georgia, but he made no indication in his first 100 days that he would reverse the planned Star Wars radar installation in the Czech Republic and Poland. Fortunately, grassroots Czech opposition to the proposed base resulted in the defeat of the conservative government and it looks like the Czech base will not go ahead. Strong opposition in Poland has so far not managed to make a similar political inroad.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov accused the US of using the Iran issue as a pretext to set up its missile shield in Russia’s backyard. “The way it is designed has nothing to do with Iran’s nuclear programme. It is aimed at Russian strategic forces, deployed in the European part of the Russian Federation,” Lavrov told Euronews. “We are being very frank about this with our American colleagues and hope that our arguments are heard. Iran’s nuclear programme is a separate issue. We approach it according to a key principal -- preventing the spread of weapons of mass destruction.”

As if the Czech government’s anti-Russian conferences and the war games aren’t enough, the Czech air force is now “protecting” the airspace of the three Baltic NATO members, the first time that the Czech military’s tactical air force has been deployed in a foreign operation since the end of WWII. The Czech aircraft will be ready to take action in case of a military threat to the Baltic countries and to provide them with help.

But what “threat” is there in the Baltics, other than one invented by trigger-happy NATO planners playing yet more war “games” with Russia ?

This scheming has not gone unnoticed by Moscow. “We are not afraid of anything, including the prospect of a new Cold War, but we don’t want one,” Russian President Dmitri Medvedev said recently. In The Grand Chessboard (1997) Zbigniew Brzezinski predicted that the only countries Russia could convince to join a defence pact might be Belarus and Tajikistan. But the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) founded in 2002 in reaction to NATO expansion eastward now includes not only Belarus and Tajikistan, but Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Armenia.

It, along with the Eurasian Economic Community (EurAsEC), the Russia-Belarus Union State and the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) are natural developments by countries concerned about what the US and NATO are really up to. Russian General Leonid Ivashov, vice president of the Academy of Geopolitical Science, says there is a need “to neutralise the spread of NATO’s influence not only to Central Asia but also to East and Southeast Asia,” adding that this “won’t be of an aggressive or offensive nature; it will be a deterrent.”

Relations with the SCO are developing, and just a few months ago, it was reported that the CSTO will have its own Joint Rapid Reaction Force which could be used to protect its members from military aggression, defend critical infrastructure and fight terrorism and organised crime. Russia and Kazakhstan are the key movers in the CSTO and managed to obtain a 25 percent growth in this year’s budget.

There are problems. First, the standoff between Armenia and Azerbaijan, with the latter inching towards NATO membership in reaction to Russian support for the former. And then there’s Uzbekistan. President Islam Karimov was initially very pro-US and anti-Russian, but after being spurned by the West over the brutal suppression of demonstrations in 2005, he quickly made up with Russia and even joined the CSTO in 2006. However, human rights have never interfered with US strategic thinking in the past, and there are signs that Karimov is flirting with the West once again. He has also signed a military cooperation agreement with Azerbaijan, and is withdrawing from EurAsEC, adding to the confusion.

What Moscow would really like is for Ukraine to join the CSTO. And why not? If such pacts are truly defensive, then this makes perfect sense. What conceivable role does NATO play so far from the Atlantic, except as a forward base for the US? Ukraine in the CSTO would give it clout where it counts -- with its big and vital neighbour. Ukraine in NATO can only be a serious cause of tension with Russia. As Egyptians say, “Your neighbour is closer than your mother.”

While things look grim these days from Moscow, the EU/NATO machinations are far from yielding results. Euro “partners” Armenia and Azerbaijan are in a state of war; Belarus and Moldova leaders have no illusions about Euro intentions and did not attend the EP fest in Prague, despite the 600 million euros being thrown around. And signs of reaction to NATO’s nosiness are setting in. In a poll by the US government-funded International Republican Institute (IRI) only 63 percent of Georgian respondents back NATO accession, down from the 87 percent the IRI recorded last September. Keep in mind the bias of an organisation like the IRI and imagine likely statistics if such a poll were carried out by a real NGO like, say, the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament or StopNATO. What is telling in the IRI poll is the massive shift away from NATO membership in the past six months.

And then there’s Ukraine. The district council of its second largest city, Kharkov, has just called for a ban on all NATO-related organisations and activities pending a nationwide referendum on Kiev’s membership in the alliance. A statement circulated by the council last week denounced any violations of Ukraine’s bloc-free status. The protest by the deputies followed the opening in April this year of a Euro-Atlantic cooperation (read: NATO) centre at Economics and Law University in Kharkov .

Obama has yet to make any of the hard choices he faces. He caved in to the bankers, and his health plan is being vetted by the health insurance industry to prevent the single-payer system, by far the cheapest and most comprehensive. He appears to be letting the Bush torturers off the hook and continuing their wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. But he can’t finesse Russia so easily. Russia will not cooperate on Afghanistan or arms treaties if he continues the foolish and dangerous meddling in Eastern Europe under the pretense of supporting “democracy and freedom.” The current games can only be interpreted by Moscow as a replay -- hopefully farcical -- of the Nazis in Georgia in WWII, which will strengthen their resolve to keep the enemy at bay.

Eric Walberg writes for Al-Ahram Weekly. You can reach him at geocities.com/walberg2002

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_4709.shtml

The US and Pakistan’s aerial bombing is killing civilians and will make more 'terrorists'

By Abdul Malik Mujahid
Online Journal Guest Writer


May 18, 2009, 00:13


During the last 30 years of wars in Afghanistan, Afghan civilians have had one safe place to escape to: Pakistan.

They fled the Soviet invasion. They fled civil wars. They fled US bombing. Pakistan took care of millions of these Afghan refugees.

Now that safe haven with its lush green valleys is burning with bombs. And the hosts, the people who themselves welcomed Afghan refugees, at times literally into their homes or into campsites on their farms, are on the run. They are streaming out of Swat, Dir, and Buner, and registering as refugees in Mardan and the fertile valleys of Pakistan. The UN says about 2 million Pakistanis have been displaced during the last year of drone attacks, bombing and fighting.

Pakistan is bombing its own land and its own people who are caught between the Taliban and the Americans.

Whomever I talk to among Pakistanis, it seems, there is an emerging consensus. They hate both the Taliban who blast schools and the Americans who bomb madrasahs. Both kill civilians.

The Soviets could not win by bombing Afghanistan, although even today bomblets and mines left over by the Soviets kill and injure 60 Afghans a month.

And American bombings in Afghanistan are so ineffective and counterproductive that even the puppet president Karzai is consistently and publicly campaigning against the air strikes. He told CNN recently that “We believe strongly that air strikes are not an effective way of fighting terrorism,” adding that “air strikes rather cause civilian casualties and do not do good for the U.S., do not do good for Afghanistan.”

On Sunday, May 10, hundreds of students in Kabul held protests over US air strikes in the Farah province that killed nearly150 Afghan civilians.

Students held up banners, including one describing America as “the biggest terrorist in the world,” according to the BBC.

It is unfortunate that while the US has refused to listen to President Karzai, it has now successfully persuaded President Zardari of Pakistan to do the same. The Pakistani air force is using bombers and helicopters to bomb the “Taliban positions” and declare that they have already killed 200 of them, while Zardari is asking for drones so they can do exactly what the US is doing. Yet, even the U.S. air strikes have failed to accomplish their stated goals. There have been 65 to 85 US drone attacks on Pakistan, killing about 780 civilians and about 50 alleged terrorists.

I wonder which technology allows soldiers flying tens of thousands of feet high in the air to distinguish between one guy dressed in Salwar Kameez and another guy also dressed in Salwar Kameez? This is the dress all Taliban and all civilians use in that area. It is next to impossible to distinguish between them unless you are on the ground, know the language and the culture. The result is that wherever there is a crowd, people are at risk of being killed, be it a wedding party or any other gathering. It is so difficult to understand, from the air, what lies below that the US planes have ended up dropping a few bombs on the Pakistani Frontier Corps outposts, killing 11 Pakistani border guards who all dress in the same Salwar Kameez as others. To confuse things further, for American air force pilots and video shooters handling war drones from sites as remote as Nevada, Taliban, civilians, and Frontier Corps, all sport beards. And, culturally, most men in these mountainous areas will carry a gun, even if they are not fighting.

Pakistan cannot solve its problems by bombing its people.

The culprits are in the midst of people. The population is by and large with them since they are sick and tired of foreign intervention, the corrupt governments and the absence of justice.

Just imagine that despite a seven-year long massive air and ground hunt for Osama bin Laden and despite the U.S. having placed on him the highest bounty in the history of humanity, which has been doubled to $50 million, all trails have gone cold to find Osama bin Laden.

Even when the US cornered Osama bin Laden in the Tora Bora complex (which was built with CIA help during the “good Jihad” against the Soviets) he managed to escape; this despite the use of “Daisy Cutter bombs” which Rear Admiral John Stufflebeem of the Joint Chiefs of Staff described as “the most powerful in the US arsenal.”

Unless the US does a massive ethnic cleansing, the Afghans/Pathans will win in their lands no matter how many drones and air strikes take place. Afghans don’t like foreign occupations. This is the reason the British failed in the 19th century. This is the reason the Soviets failed in the 20th century. This is the reason the US is going nowhere in that region in the 21st century.

No wonder, Lord Curzon, the former British viceroy of India (1899–1905) who achieved peace with the Afghans and created the current Pakistani province of NWFP, said, “No patchwork scheme -- and all our present recent schemes, blockade, allowances, etc., are mere patchwork -- will settle the Waziristan problem. Not until the military steamroller has passed over the country from end to end, will there be peace. But I do not want to be the person to start that machine.”

The British were wise enough to stop invading Afghanistan after 100 years of wars. The date on the Afghan flag signifies that victory. In an apparently unrelated event, the wise Lord Curzon was appointed the Foreign Secretary of the British Empire in the same year.

Abdul Malik Mujahid is a Pak-American Imam in Chicago who serves as the vice chair for the Council for a Parliament of World Religions.

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_4707.shtml

War in Pakistan : China is putting final nail in the US-Israel's coffin in South East Asia

US -Israelis Zionist plan to redraw Middle East

Pakistan war fuels international tensions

by Peter Symonds
Global Research

Comments by China’s ambassador in Islamabad last Thursday highlight the reckless character of the Obama administration’s escalating intervention in Pakistan. By pressuring Islamabad to wage an all-out military offensive against Islamic insurgents in the Swat Valley and neighbouring districts, Washington is not only destabilising Pakistan but raising tensions in a highly volatile area.

Speaking to Pakistani business leaders, Chinese ambassador Luo Zhaohui pointedly voiced concern about the growth of “outside influence” in the region. He singled out the US in particular, saying that China was worried about US policies and the presence of a large number of foreign troops in neighbouring Afghanistan. While reiterating China’s support for “the fight against terror,” Luo declared that US strategies needed some “corrective measures”. He added, “These are issues of serious concern for China.”

Luo’s unusually blunt remarks came just one day after US President Obama spoke to his Chinese counterpart, President Hu Jintao. While a number of issues were discussed, the escalating war in Pakistan was clearly high on the agenda. This first publicised phone call between the two men came as Obama met with the Afghan and Pakistani presidents over US strategy in the two countries. While Hu reportedly offered his cooperation, Luo’s comments express China’s underlying fears over growing US influence in South Asia.

Last week’s tripartite summit in Washington signalled a major upsurge in military violence in both Afghanistan and Pakistan. Under intense pressure from the US, the Pakistani army has launched a large-scale offensive against militants in the Swat Valley in which hundreds have already died and hundreds of thousands of civilians have been forced to flee. The summit, however, involved more than discussions on military cooperation, outlining comprehensive plans for the closer economic and strategic integration of the two countries into an American sphere of influence.

China, which has longstanding ties with Pakistan, is obviously disturbed by these developments. As Ambassador Luo told his business audience, more than 60 Chinese companies are involved in 122 projects in Pakistan. He noted the “close liaison” with Pakistan over the security of over 10,000 Chinese engineers and technical experts in the country. In fact, Beijing has previously insisted on reprisals over the abduction and killing of Chinese citizens by Pakistani militants as well as military action against Islamic Uighur separatists from western China taking refuge in Pakistan.

More fundamentally, Beijing regards Islamabad as a crucial partner in its own regional strategy. China devoted considerable resources to building up Pakistan as a counterweight to India after the 1962 Sino-Indian border war. Pakistan is the largest purchaser of Chinese arms and, according to the Pentagon, accounted for 36 percent of China’s military exports between 2003 and 2007. Chinese technical assistance was critical to Pakistan’s nuclear weapon and ballistic missile programs.

In return, China received the green light to build a major naval/commercial port facility at Gwadar, a coastal town in Baluchistan. The port is the linchpin of Beijing’s “string of pearls” strategy to establish access for its expanding navy to a series of ports along key sea routes across the Indian Ocean—above all, to protect oil and gas supplies from the Middle East and Africa. For its part, the US, which regards China as a rising economic and strategic rival, is determined to maintain its military, including naval, predominance.

US-China tensions over Pakistan only highlight the deeply destabilising role of Washington’s aggressive intervention, firstly in subjugating Afghanistan, and now in seeking to bring Pakistan more directly under its sway. The escalating conflict in Pakistan is a direct product of the US-led invasion of Afghanistan, which the Bush administration forced Pakistan to support under the threat of becoming a military target itself. Widespread opposition inside Pakistan and Afghanistan to US actions has fuelled a growing insurgency that threatens not only the US occupation of Afghanistan, but a full-scale civil war in Pakistan.

US imperialism, under the Obama administration, is determined to exploit the very disasters it has created in order to advance its strategic interests throughout the broader region, especially in energy-rich Central Asia. By doing so, Washington is fundamentally altering the precarious strategic balance and threatening to draw the other major powers into the vortex.

China is not alone in its fear of US designs in Central Asia and the presence of large numbers of foreign troops in Afghanistan. Ever since the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, the US has been seeking to establish military alliances and economic ties with the newly established Central Asian Republics. Washington exploited its invasion of Afghanistan to establish military bases in Central Asia for the first time. Afghanistan and Pakistan also provided a potential alternate pipeline route to extract energy riches from the region. In response, China and Russia, which both regard the region as their backyard, came together in the Shanghai Cooperation Group to counter expanding American influence.

Neighbouring India is also watching events in Pakistan with trepidation. While quietly applauding Washington’s pressure on Islamabad to wage war against “terrorism”, New Delhi is concerned that Pakistan’s closer incorporation under the American umbrella may lead to the downgrading of the US-Indian strategic partnership, which only developed in the late 1990s. The weakening of rival Pakistan, against which India has fought three wars, is no doubt welcomed in New Delhi. But its replacement by a US client state, or worse its collapse into chaos, would only confront the Indian establishment with new uncertainties.

The entire region remains a potential powder keg. The Cold War certainties that divided the world between the Soviet and Western blocs have been replaced by new tensions and rivalries. Tentative steps by India and Pakistan to resolve their longstanding disputes, especially over Kashmir, have all but stalled. Efforts by China and India to improve relations have moved slowly. Each continues to eye the other with suspicion and to intrigue at each other’s expense in Nepal, Sri Lanka and Burma.

The most explosive ingredient in this volatile mixture is the attempt by US imperialism to use its military superiority to offset its long-term economic decline. Far from easing tensions, the installation of the Obama administration marked an aggressive new turn in the war in Afghanistan and Pakistan aimed at advancing US ambitions. Last week’s comments by China’s ambassador are another sign that Washington’s moves will not go unopposed.

http://pakalert.wordpress.com/2009/05/14/pakistan-war-fuels-international-tensions/





Also See:



Pakistan and China versus Mossad, CIA, RAW and MI6



China breaks its silence on Afghanistan



Zionist Agenda From Kabul to Islamabad



Quietus in Pakistan



American Wolf, Pakistani Lamb

US/Israel Want Genocide in Sri Lanka

Mossad has caused Sri Lanka’s fighting to become some of the bloodiest in human history. Entire villages are routinely wiped out. Massacres happen almost daily. Over 70,000 people have been killed.

http://www.nowpublic.com/world/world-s-most-dangerous-collaborationThe World’s Most Dangerous CollaborationBy Zaheerul HassanDecember 24, 2008...8:21 pm

http://pakalert.wordpress.com/2008/12/24/the-world-most-dangerous-coll...
http://www.wordofmouthexperiment.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=993&view=pr...SRI LANKA, MOSSAD and the CIA, DRUGS AND ARMS DEALERSSunday, August 14, 2005

http://whatreallyhappened.com/

Les pirates somaliens seraient guidés par une équipe secrète depuis Londres

War criminal Barak and israeli mouthpiece inside british government Miliband, foreign office

The Guardian, Giles Tremlett, 11 mai 2009

Selon un document du renseignement militaire européen, obtenu par une station de radio espagnole, les pirates somaliens qui attaquent les navires dans le Golfe d'Aden et l'Océan Indien sont dirigés vers leurs cibles par une équipe de « consultants » à Londres.

Selon le document, obtenu par la radio Cadena SER, l'équipe et les pirates restent en contact par téléphone satellite.

Il dit que les groupes de pirates ont des « informateurs bien placés » à Londres, qui sont en contact permanent avec les centres de contrôle en Somalie, où sont prises les décisions sur quels navires attaquer. Ces « consultants » de Londres aident les pirates à choisir les cibles, en fournissant des informations sur la cargaisons et la route des navires.

Selon une compagnie de navigation ciblée, dans un cas au moins, les pirates sont restés en contact avec leurs informateurs de Londres depuis le navire détourné. Le réseau d'information des pirates s'étend au Yémen, à Dubaï et au Canal de Suez.

Ce document du renseignement est considéré avoir été émis pour les marines européennes.
Selon Cadena SER, ce document dit que, « Des informations selon lesquelles des navires marchands naviguent volontairement dans la zone pour diverses organisations internationales, se retrouvent entre les mains pirates ».

Cela permet aux groupes de pirate de mieux s’organiser en étudiant leurs objectifs à l'avance, voire même à passer plusieurs jours à entraîner des équipes à des détournements particuliers. Les pirates chevronnés rejoignent ensuite le navire dès qu'il navigue à proximité de la Somalie.
Les capitaines des navires attaqués ont constaté que les pirates connaissent tout, depuis la structure du navire jusqu’à ses ports d'escale. Les navires visés à la suite de ce type de renseignement incluaient le cargo grec Titan, le navire marchand turc Karagöl et le chalutier espagnol Felipe Ruano.

Dans chaque cas, selon le document, les pirates connaissaient parfaitement la cargaison, la nationalité et la route du navire.

Selon le rapport, le pavillon national des navires est aussi pris en compte lors du choix d'une cible, avec les navires britanniques de plus en plus évités. On ignore si c'est parce que les pirates veulent éviter d’attirer l'attention de la police britannique sur leur source d'information à Londres.

Les pays européens ont mis en place l'Opération Atalanta pour coordonner leurs efforts militaires dans la région.

Original : www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/may/11/somali-pirates-london-intelligence



Traduction libre de Pétrus Lombard pour Alter Info

Israeli Tactics to Seize Al-Quds Properties

By Khalid Amayreh,

IOL Correspondent


Bahr, an Al-Quds lawyer, says Israel is using fictitious real-estate front-firms based in Arab countries to buy Palestinian property in the city.

AL-QUDS -- Mohammed al-Tamimi’s family has been living in the Old City of Al-Quds (occupied East Jerusalem) since time immemorial.

He says that his lineage goes back to Tamim al-Dari, a companion of Prophet Mohammed (peace and blessings be upon him), who arrived from the Arabian Peninsula and settled in the Al-Khalil region around 650 A.D.

"Without the slightest exaggeration, I can solemnly testify that my roots in this land are deeper than the roots of 99.99% of Israeli Jews, the very people who are now claiming we don’t belong here and who are trying to expel us from this land, our land," he told IslamOnline.net.

Pointing to his home, Mohammed said agents of the Israeli government have been trying desperately to convince him to sell it to Jewish settlement interests for a hefty amount of money.

"A nice-looking man, dressed in an elegant business suit, knocked on the door, saying he wanted to drink a cup of coffee with me," he recalls.


Al-Quds Ailing City (Special Page)

IslamOnline.net's Al-Quds Awareness Campaign

"He said he would pay a million dollars if I agreed to sell him my home. He said we didn’t have to leave the home now and that we could stay ten more years," added Mohammed.
"He also stressed that he would swear by God to keep the matter secret until after I die."

Mohammed was deeply infuriated by the man’s audacity.

"I really would have beaten him had it not been for the Arab customs of showing respect and courtesy to guests. He was in our home after all," said the Palestinian man.

"But I told him that our religion and honor and dignity were not for sale."

Mohammed says Arabs had settled in Al-Quds and Palestine hundreds of years before the Khazar tribes converted to Judaism in around the 8th century.

"These people claim to be connected to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. They have no connections with these prophets, neither biologically, nor even religiously," he contended.

"These settlers are White Europeans, just look at their faces, the color of their skin. Does Ariel Sharon or Ehud Olmert look like a Semite, or even Middle Eastern?"

Seizure Tactics

Palestinian families divided by the separation wall also lose their Al-Quds residency rights. (IOL photo).

Tamimi is one of thousand of Palestinians who have been struggling to keep their property in the face of a vicious Israeli campaign to take over Arab property and land in and around Al-Quds.
The campaign is fueled by hundreds of millions of dollars donated by wealthy Jews around the world and also by the Israeli government which has been trying to Judaize the holy city and obliterate its Arab-Muslim identity.

Bassam Bahr, an Al-Quds lawyer, has been monitoring Israel’s illicit tactics of seizing Arab real estate in the city and surrounding localities for many years.

He says Israel is now heavily using fictitious real-estate front-firms to purchase Palestinian homes and property.

"Some of these firms would even bear auspicious Islamic titles to ensnare potential sellers. And they would offer to pay attractive sums of money exceeding real market price."

In recent years, Israelis have been using front real estate firms based in some Arabic countries.

"Some gullible and unsuspecting people would think that the last thing a Jordan-based real estate firm would do is to serve as cover for Israeli settlement interests," said Bahr.

"Eventually, the truth is exposed but after the ownership of the home or plot of land in question is transferred to an Israeli. Then the front-company is liquidated and those involved disappear or immigrate."

Present/Absent

Israel has also been seizing the property of "absentees" on the ground that the state is the proprietor of property that has no proprietor.

But in many cases, notes Bahr, the absentee is not really absent but lives a few hundred meters from his property and all that separates him from it is the gigantic separation wall Israel has erected around Al-Quds.

"They would tell the rightful owner that since your property is located inside the city and your place of residence is outside it, it means that yours is an absentee property. And when the case reaches the court, the judge normally rules in favor of the state," says Bahr, the Al-Quds lawyer.

"The judge, who often happens to be a Jewish settler, is actually an enemy. So, how can one possibly hope to obtain justice from a judge who is actually an enemy?"

In some cases, Israeli agents would convince, by way of blackmail or financial seduction, a member of a certain Arab family to sell his/her part of the family property.

"In any country, a family member who only has a small share of a given real estate has no right to sell the entire property without the consent of the rest of the family," notes Bahr.

"However, in Israel, the signature of only one family member, even if he/she happens to be mentally unstable, is sufficient for the seizure of the family's property even though the other family members have no foreknowledge of the secret deal."

Revoked residency

When all pretexts and excuses are exhausted, and all conceivable legal tricks and loopholes prove insufficient to defraud an Arab family of its property, Israel resorts to long-term plans.

This is exactly what happened with Mohammed a few years ago when he wanted to build another floor to his home to accommodate his newly-wed son.

"I applied for a license and waited more than three years for a reply from the Israeli authorities. And eventually, they told me that I couldn’t do it."

Mohammed says his son was forced to relocate to the nearby Abu-Dis neighborhood, an Al-Quds neighborhood not yet annexed by Israel.

But the story doesn’t end here.

Every few weeks agents of the Israeli Interior Ministry would stealthily come to inspect Mohammed's home to see if his son and his wife were still living there.

And when they eventually found out that he had moved to Abu Dis, they decided to recommend that his Al-Quds residency right be revoked.

"You see they are telling us that either we suffer silently or lose residency rights. This is the behavior of the state that claims to be the only democracy in the Middle East."

http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?c=Article_C&cid=1239888837000&pagename=Zone-English-News/NWELayout

Tel Aviv Ordered Sarkosy To Ban Anti-Zionist party in France

Parti Anti-Sioniste

Anti-Zionist Party

http://www.partiantisioniste.com/

Anti-Zionist Party Running in France





By Christopher Bollyn,


http://www.bollyn.com/


http://www.bollyn.info/

May 11, 2009

When the United States of America was a much younger and more politically active nation, Americans actually had a political party that stood up against the powerful secret society of the Freemasons. There was an Anti-Masonic Party running candidates for election in the United States in the 1820s and 30s and again in the 1870s and 80s. These parties were formed from a "popular movement based on public indignation at and suspicion of the secret fraternal order known as the Masons, or Freemasons," according to the Encyclopedia Britannica. The Anti-Masonic party, which was the first American third party, was a single-issue party. You can imagine how strongly Americans must have felt about Freemasons running the government in the 1800s; today nobody knows enough to even care. American society is infested with Freemasons.

In France, there were anti-Semitic parties that fielded candidates during the late 1800s. Other nations in the past have also had anti-Semitic political parties and movements that were organizations that were primarily engaged in resisting the political influence of organized Jewry in their nations. Today, there are very few.

In the United States we have neither anti-Masonic nor anti-Semitic political parties or organizations. Rather, we are ruled by a secret society of Jewish Freemasons known as the International Order of B'nai B'rith. This is not meant to be a provocative statement. I am just stating a rather well-recognized matter of fact. Our political parties, our media, our schools and universities, even our churches, are all heavily influenced or directly controlled by organized Jewry and have been for decades; the key word being "organized." The B'nai B'rith are powerful, secretive, and organized. This is how they control our nation.

Now, in France, it appears that there will be lists of anti-Zionist candidates (http://www.partiantisioniste.com/) for the European Union elections in June. This is a major development. It seems very likely that -- if the plug is not pulled on this anti-Zionist party -- that there will be several anti-Zionist candidates elected to positions in the EU machine, while in the USA it is currently impossible for a political candidate to stand up against the Zionist crimocracy running the United States. The media, much of which is Zionist controlled, protects the crimocracy. The media silence about the discovery of super-thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center is a good example of how the media supports the crimocracy. That is why the Citizen Action Plan is so important. We need to see which media outlets are truly interested in informing the public and which are simply controlled. It's a matter of separating the wheat from the chaff.

The anti-Zionist party in France is providing the French voters with a real choice, but it is still not out of the woods. The EU Observer reports that France is still looking for ways to ban the anti-Zionist party from running in the election:

France is examining the possibility of banning the "anti-Zionist" voting lists French comedian Dieudonne wants to present for the European Parliament elections in June, a senior advisor of President Nicolas Sarkozy has said.

"The public authorities are currently looking into whether [Dieudonne's] initiatives are within the reach of the law," Claude Gueant, the secretary-general of the Elysee Palace, said on Sunday (3 May) on France's Radio J.

Mr Diedonne has been given fines on several occasions for making anti-Jewish comments, notably during his shows.

"I am not sure that we will manage to prohibit them. We can only prohibit what the law allows to prohibit."


One of the candidates is Yahia Gouasmi, president of the Anti-Zionist Party - a French nationalist movement.

During the press conference launching the campaign, Mr Gouasmi said: "Behind every divorce, there is a Zionist, I am telling you. Behind everything that divides human nature, there is a Zionist. This is what we believe and this is what we are going to prove."

It looks like it may be a very interesting election in France in June.

Source: "France considers ban on 'anti-Zionist' voting lists," Elitsa Vucheva, EUobserver.com
http://euobserver.com/883/28055
http://www.bollyn.com/index.php#article_11127

9/11: IT WASN'T MUSLIMS

With a peer-reviewed scientific journal having published "loaded gun" (i.e. unreacted nano-thermite) evidence finally proving beyond doubt that World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2 and 7 were brought down in a series of controlled demolitions, here are a few more facts to consider.
It wasn't Muslims in an Afghan cave who had access to highly energetic nano-thermites; it was the US military and government scientists such as those connected with NIST.

It wasn't Muslims who ran a construction company that was awarded a $124 million contract for construction of the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) headquarters in Washington, DC, which oversees the Indian Head Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC-IH), which was described during the 1990s as the "National Center for Energetics", the military's term for "explosives work", and as of 1999-2000 the "only reliable source of aluminum nanopowders in the United States"; it was Tom Leppert who was CEO of Turner Construction as of 9/11/01, and who even writes parts of Presidential speeches.

It wasn't Muslims who ran a construction company that had supervised the 2000 demolition of the Seattle Kingdome, participated in the post 9/11 collection and disposal of the steel wreckage of the WTC towers, and carried out extensive renovations throughout the World Trade Center complex right up to the morning of 9/11 including fireproofing upgrades on the floors that were struck by planes and subsequently "failed", when the steel had already been certified to ASTM E119 by Universal Laboratories, and, in tests sponsored by NIST on corresponding floor assemblies subjected to greater heat exposure and protected with less fireproofing than was the case at the WTC, the test specimens "were able to sustain the maximum design load" without collapsing for as long as the tests were run (2 to 3 1/2 hours); it was Tom Leppert who was CEO of Turner Construction as of 9/11/01 and received a Torch of Conscience award from the American Jewish Congress.

It wasn't Muslims who trained their cameras on the World Trade Center Towers prior to the first aircraft impact, who danced and celebrated with high fives prior to the second impact as most onlookers still believed it had been a terrible accident rather than terrorism, and who were caught with foreign passports, $4,700 in cash hidden in a sock, maps highlighting certain places in the city, and a van that tested positive for traces of explosives; it was Israelis Sivan Kurzberg, Paul Kurzberg, Yaron Shmuel, Oded Ellner, and Omer Marmari, several of whom have been confirmed as Mossad agents, as part of their job in "documenting the event".

It wasn't Muslims who were caught on 9/11/01 operating in teams with vans full of explosives, including one team who attempted to blow up the George Washington Bridge with a truck packed with tons of explosives, and another who blew up a van between 6th and 7th on King Street with a mural painted of a remote controlled airplane diving into New York and blowing up; it was Israelis, which is why the authorities did their best to ignore and bury these reports which included a suspected van bomb driven into the WTC basement and exploded to weaken the structure.

It wasn't Muslims who were caught shortly after midnight on May 7, 2002 very close to the Whidbey Island Naval Air Station, Oak Harbor, Wash., (where the Navy conducts explosive ordnance training for bomb disposal mobile units to the consternation of local marine life) with a rental truck that tested positive for TNT and RDX plastic explosives; it was Israelis whose cover story was of "delivering furniture" but regarded by authorities as dubious because of the early morning hour, and the authorities' subsequent claim that the dog's reaction and initial tests for explosives were wrong is so full of holes that it merely demonstrates the power of the Israeli lobby.

It wasn't Muslims who were in New York on 9/11 and in London on the morning of the 7/7 attacks; it was Benjamin Netanyahu and Rudy Giuliani.

It wasn't Muslims who received advance warning of the London 7/7 attacks; it was Benjamin Netanyahu and the Mossad.

It wasn't Muslims who provided two hours' advance warning of an attack on the World Trade Center via an instant messaging company based in Herzliya; it was Israelis.

It wasn't a Muslim who fled the US on September 14, 2001; it was Dominick Suter of "Urban Moving Systems" who fled to Israel.

It wasn't over a hundred Muslims who, from around January 2000 to September 2001, posed as "art students" and attempted to penetrate US Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) offices and other federal buildings including 36 sensitive Department of Defense (DoD) sites, were caught with diagrams of the interior of federal buildings and photographs of federal agents and often evaded security by entering through back doors or parking garages, and even visited the homes of senior federal officials but not those of their neighbors; it was Israelis, none of whom were "art students" but many of whom had backgrounds in Israeli military intelligence. Not surprisingly, the Press went for a limited hangout by trying to pretend the Israelis were merely shadowing "Arab hijackers" and either failed to pass on information, or "it was not treated seriously", the old canard about "intelligence failure". The operations of the Israeli fake "art students" is well documented, including plenty of names and even descriptions. An unusually large number of these Israelis were located in Irving, Dallas, TX (p.23, previous link), which is about ten miles west of Tom Leppert's Alva Court home, which is barely more than a mile north of the Dallas home that George W. Bush moved into after leaving office.

It isn't Muslim countries that have a massive spy ring in the USA capable of tapping into much of the telecoms network and using information obtained to blackmail Americans; it is Israel.

It wasn't Muslims who received advance warning on Monday September 10, 2001, against flying the next day; it was San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown, and a group of top Pentagon officials.

It wasn't Muslims who acquired a 99-year lease on the World Trade Center's Twin Towers, Buildings Four and Five and approximately 400,000 square feet of retail space, and insured for billions of dollars against terror attacks a mere six weeks before terror attacks did in fact occur, and then employed (to press for the insurance claim) a 'structural engineer' who misleadingly asserts that steel loses half its strength at "400 degrees"; it was - in a deal negotiated by Lewis Eisenberg of the Port Authority - Benjamin Netanyahu's (and Ariel Sharon's and Ehud Barak's) friend Larry Silverstein and his partner Australian billionaire and "Holocaust survivor" Frank Lowy who fought "in the Jewish underground", was embroiled in a high-level bank corruption scandal with Israeli Premier Ehud Olmert and found to be making payments to Lord (Michael Abraham) Levy who was arrested several times in relation to a "cash for honors" scandal, Levy being a "tennis partner" and advisor of Tony Blair.

It isn't Muslims who have a reputation for perpetrating arson scams in order to claim off insurance companies as evidenced by any colloquial use of the term "Muslim lightning"; it is Jews as evidenced by the recognized term "Jewish lightning".

It wasn't Muslims who normally breakfasted at the Windows on the World restaurant on the 106th and 107th floors of the North Tower, but by some bizarre coincidence did not happen to be there on 9/11 and were thus spared the fate of occupants on that tragic day (none of whom escaped from the floors above the aircraft impact at 8:46 AM); it was Larry Silverstein who was spared due to having a "dermatologist's appointment", an event which also spared his two children who worked at Silverstein Properties.

It wasn't a Muslim who went on TV within hours of the attacks to tell everyone that "It... certainly has the fingerprints of somebody like bin Laden" and the World Trade Center had collapsed because of "the velocity of the plane" and "intense heat probably weakened the structure as well", and who reportedly on that very day advised the White House to take Cipro, an effective antibiotic against anthrax, seven days before the commencement of an anthrax letters terror campaign targeted at Democratic U.S. Senators and news media offices, who on 9/11/01 was a managing director of the crisis and consequence management group at Kroll Associates, who was an advisor to the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR) regarding "epidemiological surveillance" and national security advisor at the National Institute of Health (NIH), and who gave his 'friend' John O'Neill a job as Head Of Security at the World Trade Center; it was Jerome Hauer.

It wasn't Muslims who carried out a terror campaign mailing letters containing anthrax spores that had their electrostatic charge altered so that they would disperse more readily, anthrax that was traced to the weapons grade Ames strain originating at the US Army Medical Research Institute for Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) at Fort Detrick, neither was it the FBI's final "suspect" Roman Catholic Bruce Ivins, who, unlike the true perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks, had no motive to target news media and Opposition Senators and thereby scare them into uncritical acceptance of the "Arab hijackers" conspiracy theory. Ivins died of an overdose and alleged "suicide" in July 2008 after the FBI gave up attempting to pin the blame on Steven Hatfill because there was not a scintilla of evidence against him; a logical suspect is Philip M. Zack who left Fort Detrick under a cloud in December 1991 after having headed a clique calling itself the "Camel Club" that was racially harassing Egyptian-born Dr. Ayaad Assaad. Zack was found by a 1992 inquiry to have been caught on surveillance camera being let into a Fort Detrick lab building at 8:40 p.m. on Jan. 23, 1992 apparently by Dr. Marian Rippy, a lab pathologist and close friend of Zack. The inquiry also found someone had been in a lab late at night secretly conducting unauthorised research, evidently on anthrax believed to include the Ames strain. Nearly ten years on, during the week between 9/11 and the commencement of the anthrax campaign, the FBI received an anonymous letter attempting to frame Dr. Assaad as a "bioterrorist". The anthrax letters seemed contrived so as to appear to have been written by a Muslim, and a New York Times writer told of a "Mr. Z." who failed some FBI polygraph tests and was once caught with a girlfriend at Fort Detrick "surrounded only by blushing germs".
It wasn't a Muslim who was claimed to have been killed on the alleged American Airlines "Flight 77", to have lived at Silver Spring, Maryland (as did a certain Rabbi Dr. Dov Zakheim), and to have worked on top-secret "deep-black" projects at the Indian Head Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC-IH), a "renowned leader in energetics" which operates an "Energetics Manufacturing Technology Center", carries out "advanced research in energetic systems" and "absorbed the function of the closed Naval Ordnance Laboratory, formerly in White Oak, MD" which is a couple miles from Silver Spring; it was William E. Caswell.

It wasn't Muslims who were claimed to have been killed on the alleged "Flight 77" and who worked for government or defense, particularly the Navy; it was John Yamnicky who, strangely, for the first time did not tell his daughter that he was going on travel, and who, like William Caswell, had worked for the Navy on top-secret "black" projects. Others included Charles Burlingame, a former Navy fighter pilot who used to work in the section of the Pentagon that was hit and who had formulated a response for the eventuality of an airliner being flown into the Pentagon and whose daughter Wendy subsequently died in a "suspicious fire" at a 50-story high-rise in New Jersey in December 2006, Wilson "Bud" Flagg, a retired American Airlines pilot and Navy Admiral, Stanley Hall, an expert in anti-radar technology and a director of program management at Raytheon, Bryan Jack, a senior executive and top budget analyst who worked at the Pentagon, Chandler Keller, a Boeing propulsion engineer, Dong Lee, a Boeing engineer who worked for their Integrated Defense Systems and who had worked for the National Security Agency (NSA) for 14 years, Barbara Olson, CNN commentator and wife of the US Solicitor General who claimed to have received cell phone calls from "Flight 77", Ruben Ornedo, a Boeing propulsion / satellite communications engineer, Robert Penniger, an electrical engineer with BAE Systems, and another dozen alleged "Flight 77 passengers" who were linked to defense and government who, we are told, all just happened to be on this unusually low occupancy flight. These people, well loved and respected as honest, decent heroes, are the very sort of characters whose work could have been horrifically exploited without their knowledge, and whom the 9/11 perpetrators would need to eliminate to prevent them speaking out after the attacks.

It wasn't Muslims who profited by speculating on airline and insurance stocks in advance of 9/11; it was Israelis.

It wasn't Muslims who concocted a hoax about pork-swilling, money-eschewing, celibate, truthful, courageous, pro-animal rights, "devout Jews" who were "suicide hijackers / pilots", almost half of whom later turned up alive and well; it was Jews who concocted a hoax about drinking, gambling, strip joint-frequenting, womanizing, "devout Muslims" who were "suicide hijackers / pilots", almost half of whom later turned up alive and well.

It wasn't a Muslim who was a former unit team leader in an elite special forces unit and whose father was a senior aide, secretary and pallbearer to a man who in 1937 was commander of the Irgun Tzvai Leumi, a Jewish terrorist organization responsible for atrocities such as the King David Hotel bombing; it was Benjamin Netanyahu.

It wasn't a Muslim who was the mentor of Benjamin Netanyahu's father Benzion and who wrote a column in the Revisionist Zionist magazine Doar Hayom under the title "From the Notebook of a Fascist", praising Mussolini and referring to one-time commander of the Irgun Ze'ev (Vladimir) Jabotinsky as "our Duce"; it was Abba Ahimeir the founder of Revisionist Maximalism, a Jewish fascist ideology.

It wasn't Muslim terrorists who plotted to assassinate British foreign secretary Ernest Bevin; it was Jewish terrorists.

It wasn't Muslims who orchestrated, and whose operatives were caught red-handed in, a failed false-flag terrorist campaign in Egypt; it was Israel.

It wasn't Muslims who attacked the USS Liberty killing 34 Americans, and had the US President saying "I don't give a damn if every man drowns and the ship sinks. I don't want to embarrass our allies"; it was Israel.

It wasn't Muslims who were evacuated "apparently due to a specific security threat" in advance of the Amman, Jordan terror attacks on November 9, 2005 (9/11 by Israeli and European calendars), which included a blast at the Radisson hotel that was known to have emanated from a bomb hidden in a false ceiling, even though the official story held that it was really the work of "suicide bombers" and therefore by some bizarre coincidence the ceiling bomb must have been placed there previously by someone else; it was Israelis who were evacuated in advance of these attacks in which there were no Jewish casualties, most of the dead were Jordanian Sunni Muslims, two Israeli casualties were both Arabs, and five Palestinians died including Major-General Bashir Nafeh, the head of military intelligence in the West Bank.

It wasn't Muslims who were caught and arrested inside the Mexican Congress chamber on October 10, 2001 in possession of guns, grenades, dynamite, detonators and wiring while posing as "press photographers"; it was Mossad agent Salvador Guersson Smecke and Israeli illegal immigrant Saur Ben Zvi at the very time that Zionists would obtain maximum benefit from a false-flag terror attack that would mobilize support for the war on "Muslim terrorists" in Afghanistan that had been launched only three days previously.

It wasn't Muslims who were convicted and jailed for six months in 2004 for fraudulently attempting to obtain a New Zealand passport in the name of a tetraplegic man; it was Mossad agents Uriel Kelman and Eli Cara who were seeking to create a false identity for Zev Barkan.

It wasn't Muslims who claimed to know the identity of "suicide hijackers" Abdulaziz al-Omari and Saeed al-Ghamdi when, since individuals with the exact same names and other personal details such as birth date, place and occupation subsequently turned up alive and well, the population of Saudi Arabia in 1975 was 7,180,000 and even given a high annual birth rate of 30 per 1,000 and ignoring infant mortality the daily birth rate was only 590 and so it is highly improbable that individuals would share the exact same name, birth date, place and occupation, al-Omari's passport had been stolen in 1995 when his apartment was burgled in Denver, Colorado (a state where Mossad agents have been active), and only utter cretins would steal the identities of people with a different appearance but having their exact same name, place, date of birth and occupation, ergo those hypothetical "suicide hijackers" would have had entirely different names; it was the FBI who published a list claiming that the 9/11 perpetrators included Abdulaziz al-Omari and Saeed al-Ghamdi in addition to several others who had turned up alive and well, and even though the FBI admitted that some hijackers may have used stolen identities and that there is "no legal proof to prove the identities of the suicidal hijackers," they denied having misidentified the alleged "suicide hijackers" and refused to change the names, photographs or backgrounds on their list - albeit obfuscating and trying to cover themselves by including multiple spellings and aliases.

It wasn't Muslims who were behind a failed coup in Turkey; it was crypto-Jew and Mossad agent pseudo-Rabbi Tuncay Guney, who fled to Canada in 2004, and who in 2001 lived in New Jersey towns that were centers of activity for Mossad Urban Moving Systems operatives.

It wasn't Muslims who set up an "al Qaeda cell" in Palestine; it was the Israeli Mossad.

It wasn't Muslims who had established a reputation for having the capability to stage false-flag terror attacks, i.e., to target U.S. forces and make it look like the act of a third party, prior to 9/11; it was the Mossad.

It wasn't a Muslim who infiltrated the Pentagon and betrayed his country of birth by selling classified documents to another country that were then traded to the USSR; it was convicted spy Jonathan Pollard whose treachery resulted in stolen nuclear secrets being passed on to the USSR with Israel as the paying intermediary.

It wasn't Muslims who were running an exercise commencing at 9:00 a.m. on the morning of 9/11 involving a plane crashing into a tower; it was officials at the National Reconnaissance Office, Chantilly, VA.

It wasn't a Muslim who, in response to the question "Do the orders still stand?" regarding the response - or more precisely, the lack of response - to an aircraft that was rapidly homing in on the Pentagon and ten miles out after both of the Twin Towers had already been hit by planes more than half an hour previously, whipped his neck around and replied "Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?"; it was Dick Cheney.

It wasn't a Muslim who was CEO of a company that made remote control "Flight Termination Systems" that could electronically hijack in-flight aircraft and steer them into targets by means of a "Command Transmitter System"; it was Rabbi Dov Zakheim.

It wasn't a Muslim who, well aware that a percentage of trillions of dollars is still hundreds of billions of dollars, took a position as Comptroller of the Pentagon in May 2001 when it was already public knowledge that the Pentagon's accounting systems were in complete disarray with $6.9 trillion of "adjustments" having been required in an attempt to make the figures add up, and with no receipts for $2.3 trillion of these hard to track changes on non-integrated computer systems and antiquated paperwork that could be readily taken out by a missile or plane strike on the relevant auditing section at the Pentagon, and who subsequently delivered a commemorative sermon on the Pentagon lawn to hundreds of co-religionists from 40 countries six months after such a terror strike did in fact occur killing at least 34 budget analysts / accountants / financial experts; it was Rabbi Dov Zakheim.

It wasn't a Muslim who was at a breakfast meeting with Donald Rumsfeld when the first plane hit the WTC, and was at the Army Navy Country Club "when the plane that hit the Pentagon came right over the top of the Army Navy Club and bounced down the hill and hit the side of the Pentagon"; it was Thomas E. White, who is linked to the Enron fraud, who participated in JINSA trips to Israel, e.g. with his wife Susan in 1997, and who was sworn in as Secretary of the Army on May 31, 2001 which is 27 days after George W Bush appointed Rabbi Dov Zakheim as Undersecretary of Defense and Comptroller of the Pentagon, both White and Zakheim having been placed by Bush at the Pentagon where more than $2 trillion of transactions had no receipts and Pentagon finances were vulnerable to a "terror attack" that would target the appropriate auditing section.

It wasn't Muslims who in 2000 co-authored a document which called for a "new Pearl Harbor"; it was Roger Barnett, Alvin Bernstein, Stephen Cambone, Eliot Cohen, Devon Gaffney Cross, Thomas Donnelly, David Epstein, David Fautua, Dan Goure, Donald Kagan, Fred Kagan, Robert Kagan, Robert Killebrew, William Kristol, Mark Lagon, James Lasswell, I. Lewis Libby, Robert Martinage, Phil Meilinger, Mackubin Owens, Steve Rosen, Gary Schmitt, Abram Shulsky, Michael Vickers, Barry Watts, Paul Wolfowitz, and Rabbi Dov Zakheim.

It wasn't Muslims who had a motive for employing a "Flight Termination System" to take control of EgyptAir Flight 990 - a Boeing 767 - on October 31, 1999 (after a bizarre coincidence in which "air crash victims grief counselor" Ed McLaughlin of the Family Enterprise Institute was the only person to board the ill-fated plane in Los Angeles and get off at New York), send it plunging into the Atlantic 60 miles south of Nantucket killing all 217 on board, none of whom were Israelis but 33 of the casualties were Egyptian army officers including two Air Force brigadier generals and two army major generals, and promote the concept of "Muslim suicide pilots" to a gullible public; it was Jews who would have needed to conduct a trial run of electronically hijacking in-flight Boeing aircraft for their imminent false-flag terror operation that was to be blamed on "Muslim suicide pilots / hijackers", with the EgyptAir Flight 990 "inquiry" being overseen by Zionist Jew Bernard Loeb who had Jewish translators transcribe the cockpit recordings, and the FBI conducting a character assassination to smear the alleged "suicidal" co-pilot.

It wasn't Muslims who wrote in 1998 of a "transforming event" rather like "Pearl Harbor"; it was John Deutsch, Ashton Carter and Philip Zelikow.

It wasn't a Muslim who served as Executive Director of the 9/11 Commission, whose expertise and job entailed the creation and maintenance of public myths or "presumptions", and who confirmed that the Iraq war had been for Israel's benefit; it was Philip Zelikow.

It wasn't Muslims who published a paper in 1996 entitled A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm, which mentioned "removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq" and introduced the concept of pre-emptive strikes for which some phony pretext such as halting drug money or striking counterfeiting infrastructure or "weapons of mass destruction" could be devised that Americans would sympathise with; it was The Institute for Advanced Strategic & Political Studies (IASPS) of Jerusalem and Washington which, for new Israeli Premier Benjamin Netanyahu, discussed how such a policy would benefit Israel.

It wasn't a Muslim who, in a 1995 book, predicted that "if the West doesn’t wake up to the suicidal nature of militant Islam, the next thing you will see is militant Islam is bringing down the World Trade Center"; it was Benjamin Netanyahu.

It wasn't Muslim security officials who, in 1991, inspected the garage of a Muslim shipping company in the World Trade Center and concluded that the WTC garage was vulnerable to a car bomb, two years before the WTC garage was in fact hit by a car bomb and the FBI were aware of the plot yet let it go ahead killing six people and injuring more than a thousand, and ten years before the WTC was demolished one week after the very same shipping company had moved out of the WTC; it was Israeli security officials and an Israeli shipping company.

It wasn't Muslims who paid Ali al-Jarrah more than $300,000 for services rendered, i.e., posing as a "supporter" of the Palestinian cause while betraying his country to an enemy state, and who was a cousin of Ziad al-Jarrah who was alleged to be one of nineteen 9/11 "suicide hijackers"; it was Israel that paid this Mossad asset.

It wasn't Muslims who 1) broadcast the pilot episode on March 4, 2001 of The Lone Gunmen TV series, an episode about a plot by a secret cabal within the US government to electronically hijack by remote control a Boeing heading for Boston and divert it to crash into the World Trade Center 2) said in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks that no one had ever conceived of aircraft being used by terrorists as missiles to target buildings; it was 1) Fox TV, owned by Rupert Murdoch, a long-time friend of Benjamin Netanyahu 2) National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice / acting Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Richard Myers / President George W. Bush / Vice President Dick Cheney / White House spokesman Ari Fleischer.

It wasn't a Muslim who said he'd seen the (first) plane hit the (North) Tower and reckoned it must have been "one terrible pilot" and "a horrible accident" before going into a classroom and subsequently being informed of the second impact when the first impact was not broadcast live on TV; it was George W. Bush.

It wasn't Muslims who, on Tuesday, October 2 through Friday, October 5, 2001: 1) met with, and 2) received $3 million in gifts for "funds for victims" from Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifah Al-Thani, the Emir of Qatar who started the Al Jazeera channel in 1996 with a $150 million grant, the channel which broadcasts audios and videos purporting to be of "Osama bin Laden" aka Emmanuel Goldstein; it was: 1) George W. Bush, Dick Cheney (an "old friend") - Cheney also met the Emir on October 20, 2001 to discuss the "Osama" interviews, Rudy Giuliani, Colin Powell, Paul Wolfowitz, and Richard Myers 2) Rudy Giuliani, Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Myers.

It wasn't Muslims who fabricated a fairy story about Pfc. Jessica Lynch being ambushed, stabbed, shot, bravely continuing to shoot Iraqis, being abused, raped, and held captive in a hospital by Iraqi guards, and later rescued by elite US forces; it was "unnamed US officials" who lied, since in fact there was no "rescue", Lynch's gun had jammed with sand, she was being cared for by the Iraqis after being injured in a car crash, she had no "bullet holes" or "knife wounds", the hospital was not "under guard", and doctors had even tried to return Lynch to US forces themselves.

It wasn't Muslims who conspired to invade a defenseless nation by lying about "weapons of mass destruction" ("WMDs") when they had already made up their minds to invade for "regime change", resulting in excess Iraqi deaths estimated at 655,000 to one million, the displacement of more than four million, the sacrifice of thousands of troops and throwing away of $3 trillion to no avail save for enriching a few war criminals and profiteers to the tune of billions of dollars in this proxy war for Israel; it was George W. Bush and Tony Blair.

It wasn't a Muslim who ordered aides to plan for striking Iraq barely five hours after the Pentagon was attacked on 9/11; it was Donald Rumsfeld.

It wasn't Muslims who ordered 250 police to smash their way into a house in Forest Gate, London, in the middle of the night and arrest two brothers after shooting one of them in the shoulder, on the basis of intelligence said to be from a "reliable", single source regarding a conspiracy involving a "cyanide bomb", with the brothers being released without charge several days later before it was subsequently revealed that the source was a man with an IQ of 69 who was already in jail on a terror conviction; it was Jewish supremacist lackeys MI5, Tony Blair and John Reid.

It isn't Muslim countries that have hundreds of nuclear warheads and submarines equipped with cruise missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads with a 900-mile range; it is Israel.

It isn't Muslims that have a powerful political lobby capable of extorting vast sums; it is Israel.
It wasn't a Muslim who boasted "We Muslims control America, and the Americans know it"; it was Ariel Sharon who boasted "We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it".

It isn't Muslims who fake phony "hate crimes" against themselves, such as vandalising their own cars or graves, or poisoning their dogs and defacing their houses with swastikas, or cutting their clothes and drawing swastikas on their stomachs; it is Jews.

It wasn't Muslims who took control of The New York Times in 1896, or who indeed own and control much of the mainstream media today; it was and is Jews.

It isn't a Muslim country that crushes peace protesters to death with bulldozers or shoots them, or shells a picnicking family on a beach (and then refuses to own up) when it wants to launch a war within the next three weeks, or warns civilians to flee after blowing up bridges so it can target them like sitting ducks, or shoots at Red Cross ambulances or UN observers after promising they would be safe, or bombs a power station so that more than ten thousand tonnes of crude oil leaks into the Mediterranean as a "collective punishment"; it is Israel.

It isn't Muslims who routinely employ weapons such as phosphorus shells to inflict grave and horrific injuries on civilians, and who deliberately fire more than a million cluster bomblets of which 40% fail to detonate on impact and 90% are employed in the final three days before a ceasefire so they can "get them all in while the going is good"; it is Israel.

It isn't a Muslim nation that holds the world record for defying UN resolutions; it is Israel.

It wasn't Muslims who ganged up on a handicapped Jew for hiking on his own land, beat him with clubs, dragged him along the ground, tied him to a power pole and continued to beat and kick him as Muslim soldiers did nothing to stop it and police merely advised the thugs to pour water on the victim's head to wash away the blood before journalists and photographers arrived; it was a gang of four cowardly, bigoted Jewish settlers who beat up a handicapped Palestinian with impunity, basking in the knowledge that Jewish soldiers and police would not act impartially, and even returning a week later to torment the neighbors, ransacking their home and destroying their few possessions.

It wasn't Muslim soldiers who beat up and killed a Jew with clubs and rifle butts and kicks to the head and then, after an 'investigation', concluded that the soldiers had "acted properly"; it was the Israeli "Defense" Forces who smashed three holes in a Palestinian teenager's skull killing him as he merely waited at a bus stop, continuing to beat him as he lay unconscious, then made up a story about him "pulling a knife" and suggested that he was "mentally unstable" in a case that is sadly all too typical of violence perpetrated by racist, bigoted right-wing extremist Jewish supremacists upon those whom they perceive as "animals in human form".

It wasn't Muslims who created a global organization named the "Anti Defamation League" in order to defend Muslim criminals by playing the race card and accusing their pursuers of being "racists" and "anti-Semites" who were guilty of "hate crimes"; it was Jews who set up the Anti Defamation League of B'nai B'rith in response to the lynching of Leo Frank, president of the Atlanta chapter of the B'nai B'rith Jewish secret society who had been convicted of murdering 13-year-old Mary Phagan who worked at Frank's pencil factory, with the lynching of Frank being in response to the commuting of his death sentence to life imprisonment after organized Jewry had tried to cast doubt on Frank's conviction by shifting the blame to a black man even though ritual murder is a known Jewish tradition, the ADL being used thereafter to denounce anti-criminals as "anti-Semites" whenever the criminals happened to be Jews.

It isn't Muslims who, for political and financial gain, demolished the World Trade Center with nano-thermite and crashed remote-controlled planes into it in order to set up a hoax about "Jewish kamikaze pilots" and then attempt to throw researchers off the scent by pretending to "investigate" the demolitions whilst 'accidentally' plumping for the wrong hypothesis (e.g. H-bombs rather than thermite), and then stubbornly refuse to change to a hypothesis that is in accordance with the evidence; it is Jews who set up a hoax about "Muslim kamikaze pilots" and have their deliberately misleading 'work' about the demolitions hosted at sites that are owned and edited by Jews.

It wasn't Muslims who practised pseudo-science by refusing to look for Iron Blue at Auschwitz or explosives at the World Trade Center, in order that their 'investigation' would come up with the required financially and politically motivated result; it was Jan Markiewicz, Wojciech Gubala, and Jerzy Labedz of the Jan Sehn Institute at Krakow (Auschwitz fraud), and "scientists" and "engineers" at NIST (WTC fraud).

It wasn't Muslims who took over the "investigation" of the World Trade Center collapses when FEMA were making a hash of the cover up, mixed up Figures 11-51 and 11-52 in NCSTAR1-9Vol2 on their WTC7 report which was published two days after the mysterious death of eyewitness Barry Jennings whose testimony of explosions in WTC7 before either Tower had collapsed - note he specifically says (4:43) "I was trapped in there when both buildings came down" - blew their politically motivated assumptions and conclusions apart, failed to spot their mistake in their accompanying description, assumed unrealistically high gas temperatures in order to derive their required unrealistically high steel temperatures, published a preposterous hypothesis of a "thermal-expansion"-based collapse with the logical conclusion that the 180 kip shear capacity of four bolts in a seated connection would be exceeded if the steel heated up from 20 C to 32 C making the force to completely resist the thermal expansion 191 kip, irrespective of the fact that no steel-framed high-rises had ever collapsed due to "fires" or "impacts" apart from the three that allegedly did so on 9/11, claimed inward bowing of the WTC1 perimeter columns between floors 94 to 100 peaking at 55 inches at column 316 on the 96th floor which could not be reconciled with the fact that the columns' moment of inertia or second moment of area was at least 342 ins^4 along the minor axis and a maximum deflection of 55 inches given fixed - fixed boundary conditions and a distributed load would have required the failure within 102 minutes of at least ten consecutive floors, many of which did not have any fireproofing 'dislodged' by a plane and did not even experience substantial fires; it was NIST, whose top scientists and engineers have extensive knowledge of nano-thermites, but said they had found "no evidence" of explosives at the WTC and later admitted that they had not bothered to look for any. The 9/11 perpetrators had to ensure those in charge of the "investigation" were aware of that which they must not find.

It wasn't a Muslim who announced on Sunday September 16, 2001 that a "hijacker's passport" (allegedly that of Satam al Suqami) had been found "several blocks from the ruins of the World Trade Center", with other reports asserting that the passport was found "in the vicinity of Vesey Street"; it was former Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik who was indicted November 2007 on multiple counts including lying, fraud and conspiracy, which is consistent with the fact that the laws of aerodynamics dictate that the passport should have been found in the vicinity of Liberty Street, the scriptwriter forgot that Suqami was supposed to be on Flight AA11 approaching from the north, and, of several attempts made by the authorities to guess where the passport should have been found, not one of them was correct!

It wasn't Muslims who had JFK killed; it was Jews.

It wasn't Muslims who stole elections by exploiting electronic voting machines that biased the results such that the odds for several swing states to swing as much as they did from the exit polls was 250 million to one against; it was George W. Bush.

It isn't Muslims who exhibit traits of supremacist megalomaniacs by referring to their enemies as "grasshoppers", "beasts", "crocodiles" and "cockroaches"; it is Jews.

It wasn't a Muslim who set up a Ponzi scheme that netted $50 billion; it was a Jew.

It wasn't Muslims who made a record about doing "The Wall Street Shuffle" and whose other songs included scatological references; it was Jews.

It isn't Muslims who rule the world by proxy and get others to fight and die for them in wars; it is Jews, whose modus operandi is to select rich host populations that will let them in, pose as their "ally" whilst draining them of hard-earned wealth, employ deception to trick the hosts into fighting poorer nations, and reap the spoils of war such as Afghan opium trafficking, missing Pentagon funds, looting of oil-for-food funds, etc, along with other opportunistic scams such as the $550 billion electronic run on the banks. Note: some reports incorrectly state Thursday September "15", 2008 for the latter; it should of course be September 11, the Thursday prior to September 15.

It isn't Muslims who have been expelled from countries on numerous occasions, it is Jews who keep getting kicked out as soon as the host gets wise to the fact that Jews' only loyalty is to their own tribe, rather than the host nation to whom Jews pose as an "ally".

It wasn't Muslims who started a World War in 1914 in the hope that they could successfully launch a hoax about "six million" of their number being killed in order to obtain their own country and net a substantial fraction of global wealth in "reparations", failed, but also exploited the opportunity to annex and loot Russia and indulge in horrific blood-letting and oppression as a means of settling old scores with the Rus who had chased them westwards from former Khazaria; it was Khazar (fake) 'Jews'.

It wasn't Muslims who blew up Francois Duprat's car killing him and maiming his wife, beat up Dr. Robert Faurisson at least ten times in which his jaw was broken / teeth knocked out / nearly killed several times / hospitalized for weeks and was persecuted in legal battles and had his home raided by police, tried to kill Ernst Zundel on at least three occasions in arson and pipe bomb attacks and had him and Germar Rudolf deported to Germany and jailed for years, beat Jurgen Rieger unconscious and blew up his car, beat up David Cole and threatened to kill him and his family, persecuted and beat Joseph Burg, attacked Frank Walus seven times and nearly killed him in an acid attack, forced Ivan Lagace to resign from his job as a crematory expert after endless threats from thugs claiming to be from the Jewish Defense League, perpetrated numerous terrorist attacks in France including sulfuric acid sprayed into faces / attacks with iron bars / baseball bats / gas sprayed / excrement strewn around, had historian David Irving spend 400 days in jail before being released on Appeal from a three year sentence which was for two speeches and a newspaper interview he gave 16 years earlier, had Dr. Frederick Toben jailed in Germany for ten months for using his Australian website to express his views, and who had dozens more jailed, fined, and financially ruined by character assassination and legal battles; it was Jews attempting to prop up their idiosyncratic brand of "truth" which profited them handsomely for decades.

It wasn't Muslims who fabricated a hoax about "six million" of their people being "murdered" involving an evidence-free conspiracy theory about a plot to exterminate them in "gas chambers" which netted them - by way of a huge, illegitimate land grab - their own sovereign state, colossal profits in "reparations", hundreds of billions of dollars in foreign "aid" and "loan guarantees" and waiving / subsidizing of interest payments, etc, and now serves as their "sword and shield" to practice apartheid and kill and oppress their enemies with impunity; it was Jews.

It wasn't Muslims who were caught red-handed forging fake "smoke" onto wartime photographs of Auschwitz; it was the Simon Wiesenthal Center, whose suitability as guardians of truth is comparable to a choice of Count Dracula as a maintainer of blood banks.

It isn't Muslim mathematics that holds that the sum of a set of variables a + b + c + d + e... remains constant, e.g. at "six million", when several variables fluctuate downwards by, say, nearly three million and about half of that, in the absence of any corresponding upwards revision; it is financially and politically motivated Jewish "mathematics".

It isn't Muslim physics and chemistry that holds that corpses may be rapidly and economically cremated with between a pound and a kilogram of coke per body when the firebricks of the cremation ovens are not even replaced after some 20,000 cremations (which is rather like expecting a Trabant to be capable of doing 100,000 miles non-stop at 100 mph on 100 gallons of gasoline and a couple of cans of motor oil); it is politically and financially motivated Jewish "physics" and Jewish "chemistry".

It wasn't Muslims - or even the "Russian police" - who behave as if they authored The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion; it is International Jewry, and if it hisses like a snake and rattles like a rattlesnake, it isn't exactly benign.

It is not the "international Muslim" who has much to answer for; it is the international Jew.

The mainstream media’s conspicuous silence over the collapse of the official 9/11 conspiracy theory has clearly exposed them as "the dogs that didn’t bark".

This was inspired by an excellent piece from back in November 2003: It Wasn't Arabs by Edgar J. Steele
http://www.conspiracypenpal.com/columns/arabs.htm

http://www.takeourworldback.com/itwasntmuslims.htm

Le parti anti-sioniste lance ses listes anti-sionistes : Sarkosy et son mulet Guéant n'ont pas encore fait leur aliyah ? !

1/ Liste antisioniste, présentation: conférence de press
Uploaded by centre-zahra-france - Up-to-the minute news videos.

2/ Liste antisioniste: conférence de press
Uploaded by centre-zahra-france - News videos hot off the press.

3/ Liste antisioniste: conférence de press
Uploaded by centre-zahra-france - News videos from around the world.

4/ Liste antisioniste: conférence de press
Uploaded by centre-zahra-france - News videos from around the world.

Programme du parti :

Faire disparaître l’ingérence sioniste dans les affaires publiques de la Nation.

Dénoncer tous les hommes politiques qui font l’apologie du Sionisme.

Eradiquer toutes les formes de Sionisme dans la Nation.

Empêcher les entreprises et les institutions de contribuer aux efforts de guerre d’une nation étrangère qui ne respecte pas le Droit International.

Libérer notre état, notre gouvernement et nos institutions de la main mise et de la pression des organisations sionistes.

Libérer les médias pour une pluralité de l’information afin de promouvoir la liberté d’expression.

Promouvoir l’expression libre de la politique, de la culture, de la philosophie et de la religion et les libérer du Sionisme.

Redonner le pouvoir à la France et aux Français selon les nouvelles règles géopolitiques et économiques sur les grandes questions qui engagent la responsabilité de la Nation.

Ne plus engager la France dans des guerres de colonisation et rapatrier nos armées postées en Afrique, en Afghanistan et partout dans le monde.

Exiger un référendum populaire pour tout nouvel engagement de la France à l’étranger.

Etablir un projet de loi pour interdire aux binationaux de participer aux guerres sans mandant explicite de la Nation.

Interdire toute milice quelle que soit sa confession religieuse.

Instaurer un dialogue national de sensibilisation pour un projet de société qui exclut toute apologie du Sionisme.

Etablir le mode de scrutin à la proportionnelle afin que toute les composantes de la société soient représentées.

Militer pour l’instauration d’une société de justice, de progrès et de tolérance.

http://www.partiantisioniste.com/elections/programme

La France-Israel et ses reseaux de generaux criminels corrompus en Algerie

Selon plusieurs sources, le prochain remaniement gouvernemental de l'agent israelien Sarkosy a Paris verra la levée de l'immunité pour Fillon, Alliot Marie entre autres et l'officialisation de poursuites internationales contre plusieurs responsables politiques francais pour complicité de génocide et crimes de guerre en Algérie. Sarkosy et ses pantins parlent de 'l'eradication du terrorisme' mais ce sont ceux la meme qui sont derrieres ces reseaux terroristes. En France on a pas de petrole mais on a le GIA, dont Claude Guéant, porte parole du Netanyahu en France, est un membre éminent, le GICM et depuis 1996, le GSPC/AQMI. Claude Guéant et son 'excellent ami' Meziane Cherif, ambassadeur d'Algerie a Paris, est aussi un membre du GIA (Maison Pasqua), qui lors de la prise d'otage bidonnée d'un avion d'Air France en 1994 a Alger n'a pas su se couvrir et s'est rendu complice d'actes terroristes et de crimes. Ceci a déjá été demontré mais de nouvelles révélations seraient tres embarassantes pour Sarkosy-Gueant-Pasqua, ils devraient se garder d'ouvrir leurs grandes gueules sur l'opportunité de la présence de 'listes anti-sionistes' aux européenes et se chercher de tres bons avocats, dans le genre de ceux de Karadzic !

Abu Suleyman

Témoignage sur Hizb frança en Algérie

Je vous invite à télecharger ce livre de Abdelhamid Brahimi, ex 1 ér ministre du juif sioniste Khemeyes, plus connu sous le nom de Chadli Bendjedid, ancien président algérien, lui-meme sous le controle total d'un autre juif sioniste terroriste, le général Larbi Belkheir, expulsé de France et d'Espagne apres avoir tenté de s'y faire soigner, car recherché pour assassinat, crimes de guerre et genocide, sur ce lien ci-dessous :

HizbFransa-fr.pdf

Le général-major Bousteïla : “Jusqu’à l’éradication totale du terrorisme”

Par :Farid Belgacem, Liberté, 5 mai 2009

Les multiples corrélations avérées entre les réseaux de trafic d’armes et d’explosifs et les cartels internationaux de drogue, notamment après le recours des narcotrafiquants à l’usage des armes de guerre pour défier toute résistance sur nos frontières, ont poussé le patron de la Gendarmerie nationale à adopter une stratégie offensive.

“Une de nos préoccupations majeures est l’éradication totale du terrorisme pour que le pays puisse connaître un essor économique appréciable et que l’Algérie devienne une destination privilégiée des investisseurs étrangers. Il est vrai que nous assistons à l’effondrement et à l’effritement des groupes terroristes et à la déstabilisation de la tête du Gspc. Mais une bête blessée peut être à l’origine de beaucoup de nuisance. La vigilance doit être de tous les instants et la mobilisation dans la lutte antiterroriste doit revêtir un cachet particulier. C’est ce qu’a déclaré, hier, le patron de la Gendarmerie nationale, le général-major Ahmed Bousteïla, lors de l’installation du nouveau commandant régional de la Gendarmerie nationale de Constantine, le colonel Ali Toureche, relevant de la 5e Région militaire, et qui a succédé au colonel Amar Tounsi, récemment désigné en qualité de commandant du corps des gardes-frontières.
Entre-temps, l’intérim a été assuré par le colonel Abdelkader Kharroubi à qui Bousteïla a rendu un vibrant hommage. Mettant l’accent sur l’optimisation des moyens opérationnels de renseignements, d’investigations et d’intervention que le Commandement de la Gendarmerie nationale (CGN) a mis à la disposition de ses hommes, Ahmed Bousteïla a insisté sur “le renforcement du dispositif sécuritaire aux frontières pour mieux lutter contre le trafic des stupéfiants, la contrebande, l’immigration clandestine et le trafic d’armes et d’explosifs”. C’est dire que l’approche sécuritaire contre la menace qui pèse sur nos frontières, tant au niveau de la bande frontalière ouest qu’au niveau de celle est, ou encore du Grand Sud algérien, a changé.

La criminalité transfrontalière prend de l’ampleur
D’ailleurs, au lendemain de l’installation du commandant régional de Constantine, le patron de la Gendarmerie nationale s’est déplacé dans les régions d’Aïn M’lila, d’Oum El-Bouaghi, de Guelma et d’Annaba pour prendre la température au niveau des groupements et des unités, d’une part, et instruire les troupes sur la nécessité de passer à un autre cap de lutte contre la criminalité transfrontalière qui prend une ampleur d’année en année, d’autre part. L’objectif étant de prémunir la sécurité nationale, notamment contre les groupes armés – y compris contre les narcotrafiquants qui recourent à l’usage des armes de guerre pour acheminer les stupéfiants vers l’Europe et le Moyen-Orient. Bousteïla s’est montré, par ailleurs, intransigeant sur la rentabilité des moyens déployés. En ce sens et à l’issue de son long périple dans les wilayas de l’Est, Bousteïla a consacré une importante réunion à Annaba avec les cadres de la gendarmerie afin de peaufiner une stratégie plus opérationnelle, avec en appoint un seul mot d’ordre : l’obligation de résultats. Il l’a souligné plus loin dans son intervention : “Il s’agit aujourd’hui de maîtriser ces moyens modernes et surtout de les rentabiliser dans la lutte contre la criminalité sous toutes ses formes, et ce, grâce à une formation de qualité et la spécialisation de la ressource humaine.” Décidé plus que jamais à juguler les phénomènes de trafic de véhicules (22 personnes récemment arrêtées à Constantine), de pillage du patrimoine (près de 300 pièces et objets de valeur récupérés et 6 trafiquants appréhendés la semaine écoulée à Guelma), de trafic de drogue (plus de 35 tonnes de kif traité saisies en quatre mois, dont 80% à Béchar, Tindouf et Aïn Témouchent, en plus des 5 tonnes saisies à Alger), des explosifs et des armes, Bousteïla a donné des instructions fermes à ses cadres et à ses troupes. Il a dit à ce propos que “le renseignement, son recoupement et l’échange d’informations avec toutes les forces de l’ordre ainsi que la mise en œuvre des sections de sécurité et d’intervention (SSI) qui ont reçu une formation appropriée doivent prévaloir et constituer un objectif incontournable”. Cela va sans dire que ce corps de sécurité devra “dès à présent, a-t-il indiqué, se préparer à l’après-terrorisme en valorisant la police judiciaire”. Il a précisé qu’en matière de soutien aux investigations, le CGN a réalisé un Institut national de criminalistique et de criminologie chargé de la formation de spécialistes en scène de crime, en collaboration avec l’École de police judiciaire et l’examen et analyse des indices prélevés pour l’établissement de la preuve matérielle irréfutable. Bousteila a cité les deux systèmes d’identification opérationnels depuis 2006, à savoir le système d’identification biométrique (AFIS) permettant d’identifier des individus à partir de l’empreinte digitale et du visage et le système d’identification balistique (IBIS) permettant l’identification de l’arme à partir de douilles ou de projectiles. Il a rappelé plus tard que tous ces moyens, notamment ceux mis à la disposition de la police judiciaire, devront porter leurs fruits et contribuer efficacement “à la lutte antiterroriste aussi bien dans l’orientation des enquêtes que dans l’identification des personnes mises hors d’état de nuire”.
Rendant un hommage particulier aux Groupements des gardes-frontières (GGF) que dirige avec une main de fer le colonel Amar Tounsi, “qui a su redynamiser l’activité de la Gendarmerie nationale, mettre à niveau les unités et densifier le maillage territorial”, dit-il, Bousteila a exhorté ses hommes “à prendre acte en faisant montre de disponibilité et d’enthousiasme dans le travail en alliant la compétence au sacrifice” pour faire barrage à la criminalité transfrontalière et prémunir le pays contre toute menace extérieure. “Évidemment, l’image de la Gendarmerie nationale est la résultante du comportement de tous ses hommes. Le gendarme doit être l’exemple dans sa probité, sa tenue et ses relations avec la couche saine de la population. Il se doit également d’être à l’écoute des citoyens, prendre en charge avec célérité leurs plaintes et aviser sans délai les autorités judiciaires”, a conclu Bousteila d’un ton intransigeant.

F. B.

Israel behind Red Sea piracy, WHY 911 WTC PLANES WERE NOT SHOT DOWN?

“Israel sees Islam as the greatest danger to its dominance over the Middle East, itself built on cruelty, violation and oppression,” - Professor Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi (Haifa University) in his book ‘The Israeli Connection: Who Arms Israel and Why?’

Under direct orders from Barack Hussein Obama, American snipers on Navy Seal killed three “Somali pirates” and rescued Captain Richard Phillips a few days ago.

When US Marines invaded Somali on December 12, 1992 - Gen. Colin Powell, Chairman of US Joint Chiefs of Staff - called the invasion “a paid political advertisement for the Pentagon”. However, during the next ten months, this ‘political advertisement’ cost 10,000 Somalian lives and a humiliating defeat for the world’s top nuclear power - as captured in the movie “Black Hawk Down”.

So what interests the US and other foreign countries have in this God forsaken country since 1991 overthrow of its western-puppet dictator. Mohammad Said Barre? Well - there are several of them - off-shore oil and gas reserves; tens of million dollars worth of fishery; an open dumping ground for West’s nuclear waste (it costs US$2.5 to dump it in the Red Sea as compared to US$250 in some western country); the strategic importance of Horn of Africa for US imperialism, and of course Zionists’ fear of an additional anti-Israel Islamic state in that part of the world on top of Sudan.

Israeli agenda for the control of Red Sea was laid out by the first prime minister of the Zionist entity, David Ben Gurion, who said in 1949: “We are beseiged from land frontiers while Sea is the only passage to the outside world and the only mean for establishing communications with other continents.”

Governments of both Yemen and Saudi Arabia have pointed their fingers toward Israel being involved in the piracy in the Red Sea. Beside the Zionist entity - eight Muslim states - Egypt, Jordan, Sudan, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Yemen, Eritrea, and DJibouti border the Red Sea.

Even Nyna Karpachyova, the Ukrainian parliament’s human rights ombudsman, said that “the real owner of the weapon-ship, MV Faina, is an Israeli citizen with the name Vadim Alperin (alias Vadim Oltrena). It is extremely rare for ships to be registered to individual investors such as Mr Alperin. Vadim Alperin was further investigated to have acquired this ship from a Russian state auction during the era of Boris Yeltsin. The ship was refurbished and later conveniently registered to fly the Belize flag. Other ships by the same owner where found to be operating as casinos including one based in the Gulf to entertain rich Arab clients.” Vadim Alperin was once quoted to be a “Mossad brother” running a number of clandestine front companies including one Kenyan Meat export company enjoying “good trade” with Middle Eastern countries, but covertly used for gathering intelligence from countries such as Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia.

Somalia perches on the most important maritime channels in the world. Through this passageway passes Arab oil on its way to European and American markets. It is also a relatively inexpensive route for the shipment of Western industrial products to Asia and Africa. Approximately 10 per cent of the world’s maritime cargo passes through these waters, according to recent statistics. The maritime channel has special strategic significance for Washington and Israel. For the former, it serves as the vital link between the US’s Sixth Fleet in the Mediterranean and its Fifth Fleet stationed off the coast of Bahrain and its Seventh Fleet in the Indian Ocean. Tel Aviv, meanwhile, has not forgotten that Egypt together with Yemen closed the Bab Al-Mandeb upon the outbreak of the 1973 October War, which came as an additional blow to Israeli and international shipping with the closure of the Suez Canal following the Israeli occupation of Sinai in 1967. Israel has been pressing for the internationalization of the Red Sea. With its ships no longer confined to a narrow lane as they pass to and from the port of Eilat, it would have much greater manoeuvrability in those waters as well as the opportunity to secure supply lines for its naval units. There is no overstating what a military advantage this would bring to the Zionist state and what a threat this would pose to Israel’s neighboring countries, especially to Somalia, Lebanon, Syria and Islamic Iran.

A commander of Israel Navy is quoted as saying: “Control over the Suez Canal only gives Egypt one key to the Red Sea. The second and more important key from the strategic point of view is the Bab Al-Mandeb. This could fall into Israeli hands if it could develop its naval force in the Red Sea zone.”

And finally, here is someting to ponder upon. How come the Pentagon, which is known for using F16s on even Muslim marriage parties in both Iraq and Afghanistan - never used them against the pirates or the hijacked planes smashing into WTC? Maybe, the answers lies with Rabbi Dov Zakheim, a signee of PNAC, a rabbit Zionist whose loyalties rest with Israel and was Pentagon Comptroller when trillions of dollars went unacounted. Zakheim was forced to resign in 2004 - but he left many of his pro-Israel Zionists in high positions in the Pentagon.

http://www.daily.pk/world/middle-east/9915-israel-behind-red-sea-piracy-why-911-wtc-planes-were-not-shot-down.html

Israel and 9/11 : The Definitive Truth About 9/11

THE *FINAL VERSION* OF MISSING LINKS IS NOW RELEASED!

Now you will discover the definitive truth about 9/11 and learn why even the most popular movies on the subject have failed to address the evidence exhaustively presented in this video. The facts will make it abundantly clear that the so-called 9/11 “Truth” movement has been infiltrated and is ultimately controlled by the same criminal group who masterminded the attacks. As they say, 'if you want to control the dissent you lead the dissent.' Utilizing evidence from the FBI, CIA, NSA, US Armed Forces Intelligence sectors, Foreign Intelligence organizations, local law enforcement agencies and independent investigators, Missing Links goes where no other 9/11 video has dared to.

Contact Exec Producer:

Mike Delaney

Email: prothink@yahoo.com

http://www.911missinglinks.com/

Les forces de l'occupation poursuivent leurs attaques contre les habitants de la Bande de Gaza

Khan Younès – CPI

http://www.palestine-info.info/

Les brigades de Nasser Salah Eddine, la branche militaire des comités de la résistance populaire, ont annoncé leur responsabilité dans le bombardement d'une force spéciale sioniste qui a envahi la région située à l'est d'Al Qarara, au nord-est de la ville de Khan Younès, dans la bande de Gaza.

Dans un communiqué militaire dont le centre palestinien d'information a reçu une copie, les brigades ont dit, le dimanche 3/5, que leurs résistants ont pu cibler une force spéciale sioniste avec un obus de mortier.

Elles ont ajouté que leurs résistants ont obligé la force occupante de se retirer de cette région.