Featured Post

GUERRE MESSIANIQUE SIONISTE AVANT LA VENUE DE LEUR MACHIAH/ANTECHRIST/DAJJAL: EXTENSION DES FRONTIERES DE L'ENTITE SIONISTE, VOL ET PILLAGE DU GAZ ET DU PETROLE DES PAYS MUSULMANS DE NOUAKCHOTT A BAGHDAD

« Le comble du savoir-faire ne consiste pas à remporter toutes les batailles, mais à soumettre l’armée ennemie sans livrer bataille » (Sun...

Sunday, February 28, 2010

Iran captures top CIA agents, and break up US terrorist networks in Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan


'Rigi planned to meet Holbrooke in Kyrgyzstan'
US special envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan Richard Holbrooke

The captured ringleader of the Jundallah terrorist group, Abdolmalek Rigi, was scheduled to meet US special envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan Richard Holbrooke at the Manas Air Base for talks on waging an insurgency against the Islamic Republic of Iran, a journalist says.

Rigi had planned to meet a high-profile US official at the Manas Air Base near Kyrgyzstan's capital Bishkek.

This senior US official must have been Holbrooke, who was in Kyrgyzstan to visit the only US air base in Central Asia, the IRNA news agency quoted journalist Wayne Madsen as saying on Saturday.

In a televised confession on Press TV on Thursday, Abdolmalek Rigi said that in a Dubai meeting with CIA agents, he was promised unlimited support that included a military base near the Iranian border equipped with weaponry and training facilities.

The Jundallah leader added that he was to meet a top US intelligence official at the US military base in Kyrgyzstan to work out the details of the support the US would provide for his group.

During their meetings with him, the US operatives insisted that Iran is their primary focus in the region, even more important than al-Qaeda and the Taliban, the terrorist leader stated.

Rigi added that the CIA agents also explained to him that since a US military attack on Iran would be very difficult, they planned to support all anti-Iran groups that have the capability of waging war inside Iran and destabilizing the country.


http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=119672§ionid=351020101

Liquidation de racaille harkie Ali Tounsi : Réaction du Sheykh Ali Belhadj


Dans la foulée du projet de loi du parlement algérien
qui tend à criminaliser le colonialisme français

Le cheikh Ali Benhadj appelle à la criminalisation
des actes des généraux janviéristes

Dans un communiqué daté du 13 février, le cheikh Ali Benhadj, vice-président du Front Islamique du Salut a exprimé son espoir de voir le parlement (la chambre d’enregistrement) adopter les 20 articles du projet de loi portant sur la criminalisation du colonialisme, malgré ses insuffisances. En faisant remarquer qu’il s’agit d’un devoir légitime, patriotique, humanitaire et historique qui incitera la France à reconnaître ses crimes et à dédommager ses victimes.

Le cheikh a saisi cette occasion pour appeler les parlementaires à faire preuve de courage en adoptant une loi similaire qui criminalisera les auteurs du coup d’Etat de janvier 1992 pour les traduire devant les tribunaux algériens pour répondre de leurs crimes et de ce qu’ils ont engendré comme drame pour le peuple algérien. Il a appelé les parlementaires algériens à prendre exemple sur leurs homologues chiliens, argentins, sud-africains et espagnols et à méditer sur l’initiative prise par le parlement du Nigeria qui a ouvert une enquête sur les exécutions sommaires:

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم


يوم السبت 28 صفر 1431

الموافق لـ 13 فيفري 2010

بيان: وقفة الأحرار في وجوب تجريم من سلك في إجرامه مسالك الإستعمار

* الحمد لله القائل في كتابه الكريم "إن الذين فتنوا المؤمنين والمؤمنات ثم لم يتوبوا فلهم عذاب جهنم ولهم عذاب الحريق"البروج10، والصلاة والسلام على أشرف المرسلين القائل في الحديث الصحيح "إن الله يعذّب يوم القيامة الذين يعذّبون الناس في الدنيا"وعلى آله وصحبه أجمعين.

* تقدم زهاء 125 نائبا في المجلس الوطني الشعبي بمشروع قانون تجريم الاستعمار وإقامة محاكم خاصة داخلية ودولية لمحاكمة المسؤولين الفرنسيين على مختلف جرائم الاستعمار وضرورة اعتراف فرنسا بجرائمها والاعتذار للشعب الجزائري، والتعويض المادي والمعنوي على أثار الاستعمار الوخيمة، والتي ما زالت تحصد الأرواح إلى يومنا هذا عن طريق الألغام التي زرعت بالمناطق المجاورة لخط موريس وشال، فضلا عن الآثار الناتجة عن التجارب النووية بالجنوب الجزائري، وجاء في المادة 18 من المشروع "سيظل مستقبل العلاقات بين البلدين مرهونا بمدى رضوخ فرنسا واستجابتها لمطالب الشعب الجزائري المتمثلة في الاعتراف والاعتذار والتعويض عن الأضرار المادية والمعنوية التي لحقت خلال مرحلة الاستعمار" واستند واضعو مشروع القانون على المواثيق الدولية والأممية التي تجرم الاستعمار والجرائم الإنسانية والإبادة الجماعية وجرائم الحرب وكل ذلك ينطبق على ما فعلته فرنسا منذ 1830 إلى 1962، لاسيما وأن تلك الجرائم لا تزول بالتقادم لأنها تدخل أيضا فيما يسمى بجرائم الدولة، ومما لا شك فيه أن هذا المشروع يفرح ويثلج قلب كل جزائري غيور على دينه ووطنه وأمجاد الشهداء والمجاهدين وذويهم مهما كان توجهه الفكري أو السياسي من حيث المبدأ بغض النظر عن الدوافع الحقيقية وراء صدور مثل هذا المشروع المقترح الذي لم تتم المصادقة عليه بعد، وهذا ما ستكشفه الأيام والشهور المقبلة، أهو مشروع يرمي إلى تحقيق أهداف وطنية حقيقية كبرى؟ أم هو مجرد متاجرة رخيصة بالذاكرة الجماعية؟ أو مناورة سياسية تافهة؟ تهدف إلى تبادل الابتزاز السياسي الظرفي من أجل تحقيق صفقات سياسية من أجل الوصول إلى تسوية ما في قضايا سياسية واقتصادية وثقافية وأمنية واستخباراتية، لاسيما وصداقة بعض قادة الأجهزة الإستخباراتية مع أجهزة الإستخبارات الفرنسية أشهر من أن تذكر، ثم بعدها يُقبر المشروع كما قُبر مشروع مماثل سنة 1963 لتجريم الاستعمار، ولقد تعودنا من النظام السياسي منذ 1962 أنه كلما كان هناك توتر في العلاقات بين الجزائر وفرنسا يلجأ النظام إلى فتح هذا الملف، ويوعز إلى وسائل الإعلام المختلفة بتحمية البندير، ثم سرعان ما تعود الأمور إلى نصابها وكأنّ شيئا لم يكن، والأمثلة على ذلك كثيرة سواء أثناء عهد الاشتراكية أو "الأحادية التعددية"، ورغم ذلك يأمل الشعب هذه المرة أن تكون الإرادة جادة وحقيقية لاسيما بعد تصريح وزير الخارجية كوشنير الذي قال أن الأمر للحكومة وليس للبرلمان وأنه مجرد مشروع، وكأنه متأكد من طبيعة النظام الجزائري الذي يناور ولا يعزم على اتخاذ قرار جاد !!!

* أما نحن الذين خبرنا هذا النظام الحرباوي نقول أن الأمر في رأينا، لا يعدو أن يكون زوبعة في فنجان كما يقال، ورغم ذلك نأمل أن تظهر الشهور القليلة القادمة خطأ ما نذهب إليه، أما الأسباب التي تدفعنا إلى مثل هذا القول، فيمكن إجمالها فيما يلي:

أولا: نظام فاقد الشرعية.

*إن النظام الجزائري فاقد للشرعية والمشروعية لأن السلطة الفعلية ما زالت بيد بعض جنرالات المؤسسة العسكرية ممّن انقلبوا على الإرادة الشعبية 1992 فكل الرؤساء الذين حكموا البلاد منذ الانقلاب على الإرادة الشعبية إنما جاء بهم إلى سدة الحكم بعض جنرالات المؤسسة العسكرية من أصحاب النفوذ والسطوة وهم الذين نظموا لهم الانتخابات المزورة والأدلّة على أن بعض الجنرالات هم صناع الرؤساء ورؤساء الحكومة أكثر من أن تحصر وأشهر من أن تذكر، ومن اطلع على مذكّرات نزّار وبلعيد عبد السلام يجد فيها خير دليل موثّق أن الجنرالات هم الذين أقالوا الشاذلي بن جديد ولذلك نقول، إن النظام منذ 1992 إلى يومنا هذا لا شرعية له لأن سائر المواعيد الانتخابية أشرف عليها الإنقلابيون أنفسهم، وها هو رئيس الحكومة بن بيتور يصرح مؤخرا أن الجزائر ليس فيها أي مؤسسة حكومية قوية سوى المخابرات ومعنى هذا أن المخابرات هي الحاكم الحقيقي والفعلي للجزائر والبقية عبارة عن "خضرة فوق عشاء" كما قال بلعيد عبد السلام في أوت 2007، وقال نزار "أنا صاحب فكرة تنحية عبد السلام" وقال سعيداني رئيس البرلمان السابق في 06 جوان 2006 أنه يأمل في تعديل الدستور لوضع حد للسلطة الخفية، فوضعوا له حدا ونظام فاقد للشرعية لا يقوى على سن قانون تجريم الاستعمار كما هو منصوص في مشروع القانون وخاصة في المادة 18 منه.

ثانيا: برلمان يمثل السلطة ولا يمثل الشعب.

* إن المجلس الوطني الشعبي هو الآخر فاقد للشرعية التمثيلية والسياسية وأغلب نوابه يمثلون السلطة التي أوصلتهم إلى كراسي البرلمان ولا يمثلون الشعب بل رضوا لأنفسهم أن يجلسوا على كراسي إخوانهم النواب الذين اختارهم الشعب في 1992، والذين تعرضوا بعد الانقلاب المشؤوم للسجن والنفي والإغتيال والإختطاف والتعذيب الرهيب والإقصاء من الحياة السياسية والمدنية والإجتماعية، فنواب المجلس الوطني الشعبي جالسون على كراسي الخزي والعار والدماء والأشلاء، ونتائج 17 ماي 2007 تظهر بكل جلاء أنه برلمان غير تمثيلي فقد حصل الائتلاف الثلاثي المساند للسلطة والذي لا مشروع له إلا برنامج رئيس الجمهورية حصل على 2459100 ناخيا من أصل 18760400، وتعتبر هذه النتيجة أدنى النتائج منذ الاستقلال 1962، فهو أضعف برلمان في تاريخ البلاد لأن السيادة الشعبية لا تمارس بالتزوير والشعب الجزائري يعرف جيدا أن البرلمان لا يقدم ولا يؤخر وكما يقول المثال العامي "لا يحك ولا يصك" وهو لا يتبنى القضايا المصيرية للأمة، لأن القضايا المصيرية تطبخ في مكاتب وفيلات بعض الجنرالات أصحاب النفوذ أو تصدر بأوامر رئاسية بين الدورتين، فهو غرفة تسجيل لا أكثر ولا أقل، ولا يتحرك إلا بمهماز خارجي.

ثالثا: لابد من مشروع لتجريم الانقلابيين.

* نحن مع مواد مشروع قانون تجريم الاستعمار ولدينا مزيد لو كنا تحت قبة البرلمان، ولكن السؤال المطروح لماذا لا يتقدم المجلس الشعبي بمشروع قانون آخر لتجريم من قام بالانقلاب على الإرادة الشعبية 1992 من أجل محاكمة الانقلابين في محاكم داخلية والاعتراف بالجرائم التي ارتكبها الإنقلابيون بحق شرائح واسعة من أبناء الجزائر وعلى رأسهم مجاهدين وأبناء شهداء يوم كان هؤلاء الإنقلابيون في صفوف جيش الإستعمار رافعين السلاح في وجه جيش التحرير الوطني، وتعويض سائر ضحايا المأساة تعويضا عادلا وشاملا دون انتقاء أو إقصاء أو محاباة، ولئن كانت فرنسا فعلت ما فعلت عبر تاريخها الإستعماري الإجرامي المقيت، فقد مارست كل ذلك وهي دولة مستعمرة ظالمة وقد أخرجها رجال الجزائر الأبطال مهزومة مدحورة ونالوا فضل الشهادة في سبيل الله وتحرير دار الإسلام من الكفار، فعوّضهم الله تعالى أفضل العوض في الدنيا بالذكر الحسن وفي الآخرة بالمنازل الرفيعة حيث قال عليه الصلاة والسلام "إن للشهيد عند الله تعالى سبع خصال أن يغفر له في أول دفعة من دمه ويرى مقعده من الجنة ويحلى حلّة الإيمان ويجار من عذاب القبر ويأمن من الفزع الأكبر ويوضع على رأسه تاج الوقار، الياقوتة منه خير من الدنيا وما فيها ويزوج من اثنين وسبعين زوجة من الحور العين، ويشفع في سبعين إنسانا من أقاربه" ولسنا الآن بصدد ذكر فضل المُرابط في سبيل الله وفضل المشاركة في الثورة بالمال والنفس والدعم، وفضل من جُرح أو فقد عضوا من أعضائه في سبيل الله تعالى، فهذا مبحث يطول، فالشهداء والمجاهدون فضلهم عند الله تعالى عظيم وذكرهم عند الناس جميل لمن أخلص النية وكان جهاده في سبيل الله تعالى لقوله عليه الصلاة والسلام "إن الله لا يقبل من العمل إلاّ ما كان خالصا وابتغي به وجهه" ورغم أن الله تعالى عوضهم في الدنيا بمحبة الشعب لهم وتمجيدهم وتخليد ذكرهم فإن الشعب الجزائري ما زال مصرّا على تجريم فرنسا الإستعمارية منذ 1962 ولكن لم يجدوا نظاما سياسيا يمثلهم حق التمثيل يجعل هذه الأمنية الغالية واقعا ملموسا، ولا شك لأنه سوف يأتي ذلك اليوم الذي تعتذر فيه فرنسا عن جرائمها وتعوض للشعب الجزائري وتعتذر له، كما فعلت إيطاليا مع الشعب الليبي، والحاصل أن المطالبة بتجريم الإستعمار لن يثنينا عن المطالبة بتجريم دفعة جنرالات لاكوست الذين اغتصبوا بقوة الحديد والنار اختيار الشعب 1992 لأن ظلم ذوي القربى أنكر وأفظع كما قال الشاعر:

وظلم ذوي القربى أشد مضاضة * على المرء من وقع الحسام المهند

* بعض أبناء الشعب الجزائري ممّن عايشوا وذاقوا أهوال جرائم فرنسا أثناء الثورة وفي شهرها الأول يقولون، إن ما فعلته الأجهزة الأمنية الجزائرية المختلفة من تعذيب وقهر وإذلال وقتل خارج إطار القانون، فاق ما فعلته فرنسا المستعمرة، بل إن بعضهم يقول بكل مرارة إن جرائم جنرالات الإنقلاب فاق ما فعله لاكوست وبيجار وسوستال، إن الذين انقلبوا على الإرادة الشعبية لا يقلّون جرما عن جنرالات الاستعمار، بل سلكوا مسالك الاستعمار، ويمكن الإشارة إلى بعض جرائمهم التي لا تزول بالتقادم على عجل:

1- ألغوا الانتخابات كما ألغت فرنسا الاستعمارية انتخابات 1919 و1937 و1938 و 1939 و 1948.

2- إن النظام السياسي المتعفن منذ سنوات قليلة يركز على جريمة التجارب النووية الفرنسية التي أجريت في الصحراء قبل الإستقلال وبعد الإستقلال ويصرح هنا وهناك أن ما فعلته فرنسا جريمة ضد الإنسانية يجب أن تُعاقب عليها، ولكنه يتجاهل أنه قد ساق إلى نفس هذه الأماكن ذات الإشعاع النووي الخطير على صحة الإنسان خيرة شباب الجزائر ممّن انتخبهم الشعب بالصندوق الشفاف ومن مختلف الشرائح ووضعهم في قلب الإشعاع النووي، عن ترصد وسبق إصرار، بحكم أنه يعرف خطورة تلك المنطقة، وبلغ عدد الذين سيقوا إلى الصحراء من 17 إلى 24 ألف ضمن 07 مراكز اعتقال وتوفي منهم حوالي 43 جزائري متأثرا بالإشعاعات النووية وهناك حوالي 200 منهم يعاني من الأمراض والأعراض وهذه جريمة كبرى، فهل يعقل محاسبة فرنسا على تجارب الصحراء وغض الطرف عن من وضع شباب الجزائر في نفس الأماكن وهو يعرف خطورتها.

3- اختطاف وقتل حوالي 20 ألف قضوا تحت التعذيب الوحشي في مراكز الدرك والشرطة وخاصة مراكز المخابرات العسكرية هنا وهناك خاصة العاصمة، حيث تتواجد أمهات مراكز الظلم المخابراتي الرهيب، ووصل عدد القتلى 200 ألف وزهاء مليون سجين والقائمة طويلة وهذا مجرد إشارة وما زالت آثار الانقلاب ماثلة إلى اليوم على أكثر من صعيد.

* لقد ارتكب الإنقلابيون جرائم عظيمة تندرج تحت جرائم حرب وجرائم ضد الإنسانية والانقلاب في حد ذاته جريمة تطالها المواد 112، 113 و 114 من قانون العقوبات ورغم تلك الجرائم الفظيعة وتخريب البلاد يصرح رئيس الجمهورية في 21 أوت 2005 قائلا "سأمنح الحصانة للجيش والأمن" وهذا يدل على أنهم ارتكبوا جرائم لأن الحصانة تدل دلالة قاطعة على أنهم ارتكبوا جرائم ولو كانوا أبرياء لما منحهم الحصانة، والأدهى من ذلك أن ميثاق السلم والمصالحة الوطنية نص على معاقبة كل من يصرح أو يكتب بشأن جذور المأساة الوطنية والمتسببين فيها كما تنص المادة 46 منه ومعناه هلكوست جزائري، حتى لا يعرف الشعب الحقيقة من جميع الأطراف، أما المادة 45 منه فتمنع الأفراد من متابعة المجرمين وعدم قبول أي إبلاغ أو شكوى، أي منع المواطنين من حق التظلم والتقاضي، فهل يعقل أن نطالب الاستعمار بالاعتذار والتعويض ونصب المحاكم الداخلية والدولية للمجرمين من عُتاة رؤوس الإستعمار ونعطي الحصانة للمجرمين الطغاة في الداخل ونقوم بترقيتهم ورفع مراتبهم وتزكية أعمالهم "مالكم كيف تحكمون؟!!!"

* وأخيرا، نأمل أن يصادق المجلس الوطني الشعبي (غرفة التسجيل) على مشروع قانون تجريم الإستعمار بمواده العشرين رغم ما فيه من نقائص، لأن تجريم الاستعمار ودفع فرنسا إلى الاعتراف بجرائمها وتقديم الإعتذار للشعب الجزائري ومنح التعويضات لمن يستحقها إنما هو واجب شرعي ووطني وسياسي وتاريخي وإنساني، مع تأييدنا لمشروع تجريم الإستعمار نصرّ وبنفس الإلحاح على مطالبة نواب المجلس الوطني الشعبي على علاّتهم، أن يسارعوا إلى إعداد مشروع آخر مماثل يجرم قادة الإنقلاب المشؤوم لسنة 1992 وتقديمهم إلى محاكم وطنية وإجبارهم على الاعتراف بجرائهم والاعتذار للشعب وتعويض كل من مسّته المأساة الوطنية التي تسببوا في إشعال فتيلها، وللنواب أسوة بما أقدمت عليه برلمانات تمثيلية جادة في العالم كبرلمان جنوب إفريقيا والشيلي والأرجنتين واسبانيا عقب انتهاء الحرب الأهلية، وما أقدم عليه مؤخرا برلمان نيجيريا من فتح تحقيق بشأن القتل خارج القانون وفي الساحات العامة لجماعة ما يسمى بوكو حرام، والحاصل أنه يجب وضع حد للظلم بجميع أشكاله بين أبناء الوطن الواحد، وفي الحديث القدسي يقول الله تعالى "يا عبادي إني حرمت الظلم على نفسي وجعلته بينكم محرما فلا تظالموا..." والله من وراء القصد وهو يهدي السبيل.

نائب رئيس الجبهة الإسلامية للإنقاذ

بن حاج علي



http://www.assawt-alhor.com/


L'occupation envahit les esplanades d'al-Aqsa et encercle les croyants


Al-Qods occupée – CPI www.palestine-info.info

Les forces de l'occupation ont envahi les esplanades de la mosquée sainte d'al-Aqsa et ont encerclé des dizaines de fidèles palestiniens qui se trouvaient à l'intérieur, depuis hier soir, en refusant de la quitter de crainte d'une nouvelle attaque des groupes de colons extrémistes sionistes.

Des témoins oculaires ont dit que plus de 200 policiers sionistes ont encerclé la mosquée d'al-Aqsa depuis les premières heures de l'aube de vendredi 28/2, en demandant aux croyants palestiniens de la quitter.

Les témoins ont ajouté que 12 citoyens palestiniens ont été asphyxiés par les bombes de gaz lacrymogène lancées par les forces occupantes sur les citoyens qui tentaient d'arriver à la mosquée sainte, à travers la porte d'al Majlis, l'une des portes principales de la mosquée.

Plusieurs quartiers dans la vieille ville d'al-Qods ont témoigné des affrontements des jeunes palestiniens avec les soldats sionistes, alors que les forces sionistes ont annoncé la détention d'un manifestant qui a lancé des pierres sur les colons sionistes qui se regroupaient devant la porte des Maghrébins pour envahir les esplanades d'al-Aqsa.

La police sioniste a permis à 4 extrémistes sionistes d'entrer dans les esplanades d'al-Aqsa.

Mujahideen of Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan military operations, update Sat 27 Fe b 2010

This page is updated throughout the day as new operations are reported.

Rabi' al-awwal 13, 1431 A.H, Saturday February 27, 2010

Mujahideen operations against the enemies of Islam terrorists in Afghanistan are reported to Theunjustmedia.com by the official Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan spokesmen Qari Muhammad Yousuf and Zabihullah Mujahid by e-mails.

In the Name of Allah, the Most Beneficent, the Most Merciful

All Praise and thanks are due to Allah, the Lord of all that exists and may peace and prayers be upon the Messenger of Allah, his family, companions in entirety


More than 50 foreign and local puppet officials and soldiers killed in Kabul attack There are reports from Kabul city that at least 50 foreign diplomats and puppet Afghan terrorists were killed in Friday's attack in Safi Landmark hotel located in Shahri Now in the heart of Kabul city. As per details, a Mujahid reached by the telephone, said that five martyr-seeking Mujahideen of the Islamic Emirate, penetrating into all security checks and barriers had entered heavily-secured Kabul city in the early morning hours of Friday who had conducted a series of attacks and gunbattles using martyr and heavy and small arms attacks.

The Mujahid in his telephonic conversation said the first martyr attacker, Naseer Ahmad, had slammed his explosive-filled vehicle into a part of the hotel where at least 24 had been killed and a number wounded out of 50 foreign and domestic officials who were staying there, which was moments later followed by a second martyr bomb attack by another Mujahid, killing the rest of the wounded from the first bomb attack.

Meantime, the other three Mujahideen of a group of five have penetrated another guesthouse and immediately opened firing at the security guards and foreign guests, killing about 30 foreign officials and puppet Afghan terrorists. After positioning themselves in the guesthouse, started targeting other government buildings from there, who besides damaging the buildings inflicted casualties and losses on the officials based in the certain buildings.

Two hours after the incident, the soldiers of Afghan minion army reached the site where they met with the strong residences from the three Mujahideen for about five hours. The three heroic Mujahideen have fought the local soldiers till the last moment of their life and finally one of those, Ajmal, conducted a martyr bomb attack, damaging a part of the hotel followed by two straight martyr bomb attacks carried out by the rest of two Mujahideen, Muhammadulllah and Zafar, damaging some part of the hotel and killing dozens. Reported by Zabihullah Mujahid

12 French invading terrorists sustained loss of life and injuries in Mujahideen's missiles in Kapisa A French invaders base came under missile strikes from Mujahideen in the province's Tagab district on earlier Saturday. According to the report from the province, two missiles landed in the base killing and wounding about twelve French invading terrorists in the facility. Saturday's attack besides damaging the facility damaged some vehicles inside the facility. Minutes after the attack, the enemy helicopters reached the area to move out the dead and wounded from the site, according to the witnesses. Reported by Zabihullah Mujahid

Marjah bombings destroy two American invaders tanks Two of the U.S. invaders tanks were separately targeted by bombings and in Marjah town of Nad Ali district in Helmand province, on Friday. According to the report from the province, the first tank was hit by a planted mine in the evening hours of Friday in Mataki area of Marjah, while the latter tank was exploded by another mine explosion in Abdullah Qulf area of Marjah resulting in killing the U.S. invading terrorists in both tanks, added the report. The struck tanks were left burning at the site but the dead were carried by the helicopter from the area, according to the residents. The British invaders military, however, said Friday that a British tank had been exploded in the bombing in Nad Ali district but gave no further details of the dead of injured in the incident. Meantime, the U.S and the Nato invaders forces announced the death of fifty-five foreign soldiers thirty-one which were U.S invading terrorists in the Marjah town, Helmand province during the month of February. Reported by Qari Muhammad Yousuf

Blast kills 4, injures 3 American terrorists and wounded 7 British terrorists in Helmand A blast on Friday killed four U.S terrorists and wounded three while walking on foot in Shawl area of Nad Ali district in Helmand. The report states shortly after the incident the area was cordoned off and the helicopter reached the site to airlift the dead and the wounded from the area. Also on Friday, seven British terrorists were killed and injured in Gruop-e-Shash area of Nad Ali district, Helmand province.
Reported by Qari Muhammad Yousuf

4 American invader, 3 puppet army terrorists killed in Wardak A planted IED blew up killing four U.S invading and three puppet army terrorists on Friday while they were trying to neutralize the mine in Wardak's Sayedabad district. The incident took place in Khwaj Ahmad area of this district on Kabul-Kandahar highway which was closed soon after the blast and all the traffic movement was halted on the highway where the helicopter was called in to evacuate the dead and the wounded.
Reported by Zabihullah Mujahid

American invaders tank torn apart in Marjah A U.S. invaders armored tank got blown off by IED blast in Marjah town of Helmand's Nad Ali district in the late morning hours of Saturday, according to a recent report from Marjah. The report adds a roadside bomb ripped into the armored tank in Abdulah Qulf area of Marjah where another tank of the U.S terrorists had been destroyed on Friday. At least two dozens of the U.S terrorists were killed and both blasts.
Reported by Qari Muhammad Yousuf

Nato invaders tank was eliminated in roadside bombing in Logar On early Saturday, a military convoy of the Nato invading terrorists was traveling on Kabul-Gardiz road when a roadside bomb tore apart the lead tank of the convoy in Pol Alam, capital of Logar province, destroying the tank and killing the Nato invading terrorists who were traveling in the tank.The incident occurred in Badkwan Shah area of this city which was cordoned of by the enemy closing the road to the traffic so as to evacuate the dead and the wounded from the site.
Reported by Zabihullah Mujahid

These operations were part of new Nasrat (Victory) operations plan, which was declared by Amir-ul-Momineen (Leader of the Believers) Mullah Mohammad Omar Mujahid (May Allah preserve him), leader of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan.

O Allah, make them and their weaponry a booty for the Mujahideen

O Allah, you are our support and you are our only Victor; by your order we attack; by your order we retreat and by your order we fight

O Allah, the sky is yours; the earth is yours; the sea is yours, so whatever forces they have in the sky, drop them. Destroy all their forces in earth and sink all their forces in sea

O Allah, deal with them for verily they can never disable you

O Allah, retaliate upon them, afflict them like you did to Pharaoh and his nation

O Allah afflict their country with floods, make them in need of money and food and persons

O Allah defeat them, destroy them O the All-Strong, the All-Mighty

Allahu Akbar

"Honor, Power and Glory belong to Allah, His Messenger and the believers, but the hypocrites know not"

Friday, February 26, 2010

Un pilier du terrorisme de la France-Israel en Algerie abattu dans son bureau

Le harki de la France-Israel Ali Tounsi

La mort (du Harki) Ali Tounsi

Ali Tounsi, le chef de la DGSN (Sûreté nationale) vient d'être assassiné alors qu'il était en réunion avec ses proches collaborateurs. C'est précisément un de ces derniers qui aurait tiré sur M. Tounsi car il était révolté à l'idée d'être limogé pour corruption.

En soi, un limogeage pour cause de corruption n'a rien de scandaleux. Sauf quand celui qui s'apprête à prendre une décision de ce genre est tout sauf un modèle de vertu. Car M. Tounsi n'est pas spécialement exemplaire en matière de probité, c'est le moins que l'on puisse dire.

Pas plus que le corps de la Sûreté nationale dont il était le chef et qui, paradoxalement, est un important pourvoyeur de cadres dans les représentations consulaires de l'Etat algérien à l'étranger. Cherchez l'erreur.

Alors, si on peut toujours déplorer la mort violente d'un homme, est-il pour autant imaginable d'évoquer, comme le fait M. Zerhouni, ministre Algérien de l'Intérieur, "le patriotisme de feu Colonel Ali Tounsi, compagnon d'armes et cadre valeureux".?
Compagnon d'armes peut-être, mais avec qui et quand?

Quoi qu'il en soit, le dénouement de cette réunion en dit long sur l'état de décomposition de l'institution policière. S'il se confirmait que l'auteur du meurtre pourrait être le propre gendre du chef de la DGSN, ce ne serait qu'une illustration supplémentaire de cette déliquescence d'un instrument essentiel de l'Etat. Si les autres institutions fonctionnent de la même manière, les dirigeants n'ont plus qu'à espérer que les prix du pétrole restent à un niveau suffisamment élevé, faute de quoi l'Algérie explosera encore.

http://mounadil.blogspot.com/

Thursday, February 25, 2010

Sous pression Sarkosy, Squarcini et leur pantin Tewfik decident de liberer Pierre Carmatte sans atteindre leurs objectifs

Sarkosy manipule le Mali avec l'aide de Tewfik pour mieux le re-occuper militairement, tout comme le Niger, la Mauritanie, l'Algerie, elle, est occupée par l'agent de la DST Tewfik pour le compte de la France. En perte de vitesse au maghreb, ou la France-Israel a perdu toute influence, Sarkosy essait de maintenir coute que coute le controle de la Sonatrach sous sa coupe, malheureusement celle-ci, tout comme le DRS a deja implosé et il s'agit maintenant de sauver les meubles ou d'envoyer l'OTAN occuper le Maghreb et le Sahel... Pendant que les sionistes s'affairent sur l'Iran, ils perdent le controle de plusieurs regions strategiques, certains 'algeriens' ont tres bien compris la manoeuvre... Une revolution a Alger, ces jours-ci, ne verra pas l'intervention de la France car Sarkosy se verrait immediatement foulé aux pieds par les 'reseaux algeriens' , tres organisés en France et en Europe, si ce n'etait pas le cas, Pierre Carmatte serait encore prisonnier et l'excuse des regionales et tes sondages de popularité ne tiennent pas la route, Sarkosy est grillé totalement en France et ailleurs, son agenda de guerre civile est maintenant clairement visible de tous...

En clair, tu fais dans ton froc l'israelien, on te tient bien par la ou il faut... Nous esperons une revolution en Algerie pour 2010... et peut etre ta destitution, qui sait ce qui peut arriver et qui peut mesurer les consequences de la totale desintegration du DRS, et la perte de controle de la sonatrach par la France-Israel. Sarkosy, nous parions sur ta chute en 2010, tu prends les paris ? Comme toi Squarcini et ton mentor de Tel Aviv etes des breles, nous sommes plutot confiants, a moins que la Gabon t'offre la cles de sa tresorerie, et encore !


Wa Allah swt 'alam

Abu Suleyman

INTERFERENCES

par M. Saadoune, Le Quotidien d'Oran, 24 février 2010

Sur le Sahel, il existe déjà toute une littérature qui le dessine comme un nouvel Afghanistan ou une Somalie anarchique qui menacerait le monde. Cette «zone grise» de trois millions de kilomètres carrés, où des rebellions locales et des trafics en tout genre ont existé de tout temps, est devenue très «intéressante» pour des raisons économiques et géopolitiques.

Al-Qaïda, ici comme ailleurs, est une réalité relative grossie pour servir de prétexte ou de justification aux Occidentaux pour exiger une présence militaire directe. Les Américains ont des «initiatives» pour la région. Ils ont caressé l'idée l'ont-ils définitivement oubliée ? - d'y installer le QG de l'Africom. Il faudrait être naïf pour ne pas lier ces pressantes sollicitudes aux réserves, encore inexploitées, de matières premières stratégiques dans cette vaste zone. Et de l'entrée en scène du concurrent chinois qui, à force d'être entreprenant, est parvenu à battre en brèche le monopole occidental.

Les Etats de la région, tout en collaborant, ont, à des degrés divers, refusé d'être embarqués à l'aveuglette dans la «global war» américaine. Ce refus ne les laissait pas moins comptables d'une situation où leurs propres faiblesses et leur incapacité à intégrer leurs populations ont fait le lit de trafics en tous genres. Et aussi de rebellions endémiques.

Face à l'intrusion, à partir des années 90, d'un activisme djihadiste surdimensionné par le discours sécuritaire occidental, les Etats de la région se devaient d'adapter leurs réponses. Ils avaient une «offre» américaine de supervision de l'action militaire dans la région sahélienne assortie d'une présence physique. Certains Etats étaient tentés d'accepter, d'autres l'ont rejetée résolument en essayant d'initier une réponse régionalisée pour résister à une pression globalisante à la finalité douteuse. Cette démarche s'est pendant longtemps heurtée au choix du Mali de ne pas trop s'attaquer à la présence des djihadistes sur son territoire pour se focaliser sur la rébellion targuie. Cela a constitué un motif de discorde silencieux entre Alger et Bamako.

En réussissant à nouveau à résorber la rébellion targuie, Alger ne laissait plus de prétexte au Mali. L'armée malienne a même semblé se faire plus entreprenante face aux membres de l'AQMI. Cette tendance nouvelle a permis la tenue d'une réunion des chefs des armées des pays de la région (Algérie, Mauritanie, Mali et Niger) à Tamanrasset en août dernier. C'était une première. Elle indiquait qu'une riposte régionale au défi sécuritaire au Sahel était en marche. Et qu'elle était le fait des seuls pays de la région.

L'affaire de la libération «judiciaire» de quatre activistes de l'AQMI par le Mali porte indéniablement un coup dur à cette amorce de riposte régionale. Il n'est pas besoin de discuter de l'attitude de la France. Les Etats occidentaux ont déjà montré par le passé qu'ils sont de manière générale pour la fermeté contre le terrorisme, mais qu'ils font exception quand la vie de leurs citoyens est en jeu. Une fois les otages occidentaux libérés contre des élargissements de prisonniers ou contre des rançons, il restera aux Etats de la région à faire le bilan. Et incontestablement, ils ne pourront que noter qu'ils auront à payer la facture de la gestion «humanitaire» occidentale tout aussi respectable qu'elle puisse être des otages. La crise entre le Mali et ses voisins algériens et mauritaniens en est un indice. Ces Etats sont condamnés à reprendre, tôt au tard, le chemin de la coopération. Il leur reste à tirer la leçon de cette affaire et de ses lourdes interférences.


Wednesday, February 24, 2010

La Première Intifada, 22 ans plus tard : confirmation de l’unité de la terre de la Palestine


Gaza – CPI
www.palestine-info.info


L’Intifada n’était pas une affaire anodine. Les Palestiniens vécurent cette première Intifada comme une révolution populaire. Avec leur simple pierre, ils purent perturber les autorités de l’occupation israélienne.

Vingt-deux années se sont écoulées, et les Palestiniens restent attachés à leurs principes. Ils confirment, jour après jour, que l’Occident et les occupants israéliens ne peuvent en aucun cas réduire la terre de la Palestine. Cette terre, allant du fleuve à la mer, de Naqoura à Om Ar-Rachach, restera une unité indivisible.

L’Intifada, le début

La Première Intifada, l’Intifada des mosquées, l’Intifada de la pierre, débuta le 9 décembre 1987. En 1993, elle commença à se calmer, pour s’arrêter complètement en 1993, suite à l’accord d’Oslo, signé par les autorités de l’occupation israélienne et l’Organisation de la Libération de la Palestine (OLP).

Le terme Intifada fut utilisé pour la première fois pour qualifier la révolution populaire palestinienne par le mouvement de la résistance islamique Hamas. Le mouvement l’utilisa dans son communiqué publié le 11 décembre 1987. L’Intifada qualifiait ces immenses manifestations éclatées pour protester contre les occupants israéliens et leurs pressions pratiquées sur ces quelques Palestiniens qui croyaient aux semblants efforts de paix. Et c’était à cette époque que le terme « Intifada » entra dans les médias arabes et internationaux.

Pourquoi l’Intifada ?

Le 8 décembre 1987, un camion conduit par un Israélien de la colonie d’Achdoud heurta volontairement une voiture stationnée dans une station service. Quatre de ses passagers palestiniens trouvèrent la mort, les autres furent blessés.

La radio israélienne mentionna le crime comme un accident de route ordinaire, parmi ceux qui arrivent tous les jours, à tout moment.

Mais le lendemain, le cortège funèbre de quatre martyrs se transforma en manifestations de protestation. Les manifestants commencèrent à jeter des pierres sur un site de l’armée israélienne, dans le village de Jabalia.

Tout de suite, les soldats de l’occupation israélienne ouvrirent le feu sur les civils qui ne désarmaient pas. Les soldats demandèrent des renforts. Les renforts arrivèrent, pour ne rien faire ; ce fut la goutte d’eau qui fit déborder le vase.

En effet, cet incident ne fit que lever le voile sur une frustration profonde chez les Palestiniens sous occupation. Le peuple palestinien n’acceptait pas ce qui lui était arrivé après la guerre de 1948 : déportation et déplacement forcé, agressions, humiliations, pressions…

Effervescence populaire

La Première Intifada représentait un échec total pour la direction sioniste. Cette dernière ne s’était pas rendue compte de l’effervescence de la société palestinienne. Les chefs militaires israéliens furent attaqués, signe d’une grande frustration. La direction militaire refusa cependant d’envoyer de renfort. Elle croyait que la vie reprendrait son cours normal tranquillement le lendemain. Mais le lendemain, la population refusa de regagner son lieu de travail. Les étudiants de l’Université Islamique de Gaza se mirent à parcourir les rues en appelant à la révolution.

Le troisième jour, Isaac Rabin, premier ministre israélien de l’époque, partit vers Etats-Unis sans prendre de mesures faisant face à l’Intifada. Dès son retour, il déclara, à la Knesset, qu’ils iraient imposer la loi dans les territoires occupés, qu’ils iraient « casser leurs mains et leurs pieds, s’il le faut ».

Dans le mois de février, l’Intifada arriva à son summum. Des photos montrant des soldats israéliens frappant des civils palestiniens furent montrées dans les télévisions du monde entier. Le monde commença à avoir un grand sentiment de solidarité avec les Palestiniens. L’armée de l’occupation israélienne ne pouvant faire face à l’Intifada, elle demanda l’aide aux gardes-frontières et commença à semer la zizanie parmi les factions palestiniennes, sans succès.

Les médias

Les gens, les hommes de le Première Intifada et les résistants palestiniens se contactaient par les moyens du bord. Ils s’échangeaient des tracts. Des enfants dont l’âge ne dépassait les sept ans les distribuaient à la sortie des mosquées. Parfois, ils les mettaient sur des voitures. Des slogans étaient écrits sur les murs, un autre moyen pour communiquer. Des moyens, il n’y en avait pas beaucoup. Les journalistes étaient muselés. Les occupants israéliens agressaient, frappaient, interpellaient, emprisonnaient sans jugement pour un oui ou pour un non. Les universités étaient fermées. Des sanctions économiques collectives étaient imposées. Les colonies poussaient comme des champignons.

Des principes palestiniens

A travers l’Intifada, la guerre des pierres, les Palestiniens voulaient exprimer leur colère et leur attachement à leurs principes dont le droit d’un Etat palestinien indépendant, avec la ville occupée d’Al-Quds (Jérusalem) comme capitale. Les peuples ont le droit à disposer d'eux-mêmes. Le peuple palestinien en fait partie. Les Palestiniens veulent que les colonies sionistes soient démantelées, que leur économie soit libérée de celle de l’occupation israélienne, que les réfugiés palestiniens retournent à leur patrie…

La naissance du Hamas

Le projet sioniste abusait trop du peuple palestinien et de ses droits. Un mouvement honnête qui pourrait y faire face devait voir le jour. C’est ainsi qu’à la fin de l’an 1987, le mouvement de la résistance islamique Hamas vit le jour.

Tout de suite, les Sionistes exprimèrent leur inquiétude vis-à-vis de la naissance de ce mouvement. Ils voyaient leurs rêves menacés. Tous leurs services d’espionnage se mirent à travailler à plein régime.

Et petit à petit, les autorités de l’occupation israélienne remarquèrent que les Palestiniens répondaient présents et en masses aux activités du mouvement du Hamas, et elles commencèrent à viser ses cadres. Elles ne s’arrêtèrent pas là ; elles allèrent même jusqu'à assassiner plusieurs grands chef dont le cheikh Yassine, Al-Rantissi, entre autres.

Mais plus les occupants israéliens tuent et sèment la désolation, plus les Palestiniens restent attachés à leur terre, à leur amour, à leur Palestine.

Afghanistan :Marjah Operations Are an Exemplary Lesson for the Invaders

For the last two weeks, a 15,000-strong army of NATO, British and American forces has been carrying out military operations in a small are i.e. Marjah which is located in Nad Ali district. A number of jet bombers of the enemy including unmanned drones and 60 gunship helicopters are taking part in the operations.

In addition to this, the enemy have brought to the battle field their huge and most advanced tanks by the name of Abraham and Shifton, which approximately weigh 65 tons. But despite the preparations, boasts and propaganda stunts, the enemy have not been able to make any headway against a small group of Mujahideen who are not more than 1000 armed men and their weapons are no match with those of the enemy. But still the sacrificing and committed Mujahideen have bravely blocked the invaders’ way successfully.

Skilled snipers have put shock and awe into the ranks of the enemy. The Mujahideen have blown up 53 tanks; shot down two unmanned drones and one helicopter besides killing tens of soldiers. An Afghan honor-loving woman made history by shooting soldiers pointblank in the bazaar. She revived the memory of Malalai of the past and proved by her heroic act, that still there are many sisters-in-arms of Malalai in this land. If we count the crews in the tanks which have been destroyed, we can easily conclude that the enemy losses are more than one hundred soldiers.


Approximate, just two weeks ago, Mc Crystal, top commanders of American forces in Afghanistan, was boasting and claimed that he would soon take Marja from Mujahideen. But today he admits that they are facing stiff resistance, which he did not imagine before. He said we thought if we make announcement about Marjah before the inception of the operations, Taliban would either fled or lay down their arms but now we are facing tough resistance contrary to our expectations. Similarly, the enemy twice tried to airdrop soldiers behind the line of the fighting but soon Mujahideen besieged them and after Mujahideen’s inflicting on them losses, the enemy hastily left the area.

Major General Nick Carter, NATO commander of forces in Helmand says we will be able in three months to say whether the operations were success or not.

These are the words uttered by the enemy and they are the ground realities, which are a good lesson for the moribund generals of Pentagon and the new rulers of the White House Administrations. There are thousands of towns in Afghanistan like Marja in addition to about 385 districts in the country.


Seeing that they were not able to take a small area like Marja in two weeks, so ironically, how much decades and how massive force they would need to take the whole Afghanistan. Still it is a matter of pondering that the Mujahideen learn new tactics with the passage of time and their knowledge in the field of politics, culture and military experience increase with every passing day.


It will be better for the rulers of the White House to put an end to the current unsuccessful adventure in Afghanistan. All invaders, beginning with Alexander, the Great up to the time of the former Soviet Union have tried this adventure in this Mujahid-bearing land but they all failed. By traversing the same path of failure and fiasco, Obama only prolongs days and nights of his failure and disgrace. Similarly, Obama should stop resorting to other stratagems and ploys because the resistance of Mujahideen has now evolved into a mature phase. This candle could not be extinguished by just blowing it away. The caravan of the holy martyrs and fighters will surely reach its destination soon or later. Allah willing.

http://www.alemarah.info/english/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1184:marjah-operations-are-an-exemplary-lesson-for-the-invaders&catid=3:comments&Itemid=4

UK politics and the Israel lobby: has anything changed?

Press TV | February 17, 2010


Amina Taylor asks if Channel 4 TV’s “Dispatches” programme of November 2009 on the power of the Israel lobby has encouraged other broadcasters and public figures to question whether it is right that the interests of a foreign state – Israel – should be so predominant in Britain’s main political parties, especially the Conservative Party.



http://alethonews.wordpress.com/


Tuesday, February 23, 2010

D. Duweïk : la violation sioniste contre la mosquée d'al-Ibrahimi exige une révolte internationale

Netanyahu cherche a declencher la guerre pour le pourim, le 28 Fevrier 2010. Apres Dubai, Israel se permet de prendre le controle des lieux saint musulmans, Netanyahu cherchant deliberement a provoquer les Musulmans.


Al-Khalil - CPI
www.palestine-info.info


"La mosquée d'al-Ibrahimi dans la ville d'al-Khalil et celle de Bilal Ibn Rabah à Bethléem, sont des lieux saints islamiques sacrés, et leur célèbre histoire est profondément engendrée dans le cadre du patrimoine de l'histoire musulmane", a déclaré le chef du conseil législatif palestinien, Dr. Aziz Duweïk, en contestant contre la décision sioniste pour annexer ces mosquées aux prétendus patrimoines juifs.

Les affirmations du leader palestinien sont venues, le lundi 22/2, lors d'une conférence de presse, en présence de plusieurs députés palestiniens dans le siège de "Bal Médias", dans la ville d'al-Khalil.

Duweïk a souligné dans un communiqué prononcé devant les médias que la mosquée sacrée d'al-Ibrahimi était un objectif stratégique sioniste depuis son occupation, et que ce but est devenu réel après le massacre sioniste perpétré par le criminel sioniste, "Baruch Goldstein", en 1994.

En mettant en garde contre les violations et crimes sauvages des autorités occupantes israéliennes, le chef du conseil législatif palestinien a appelé l'assemblée générale de l'ONU à se réunir immédiatement pour débattre la situation très critique dans les territoires palestiniens occupés, après l'annonce du gouvernement de l'entité sioniste d'annexer illégitimement les lieux saints palestiniens et islamiques à ses prétendus patrimoines juifs.

Duweïk a appelé les dirigeants arabes qui vont se réunir, bientôt, dans la capitale Libyenne, Tripoli, à mettre les violations sionistes en tête des priorités dans leurs agendas pour sauver les lieux saints, tout en demandant la communauté internationale d'assumer ses responsabilités envers les droits légaux et lieux saints palestiniens face aux crimes sauvages de l'occupation israélienne qui viole solennellement les lois internationales.

NIGER : The Uranium Coup



By Michael Carmichael - Feb 22, 10
http://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/the-uranium-coup-1
February 22, 2010


Summary

U.S. House of Representative Alan Grayson led a Congressional delegation that just happened to be in Niger at the time of the recent military coup last Thursday that deposed the legitimate elected government of the Uranium-rich nation.

Analysis

The official story is that the members of Congress were focused on science, technology and humanitarian relief - at the very same time that the military coup was unfolding on the streets of the capital, Niamey.

This intriguing "coincidence" raises the question: Was this Congressional presence during a military coup another instance of a massive intelligence failure or something entirely different?

Niger is a landlocked African country with a population of 15 million mostly Islamic citizens. Niger has a relatively small military that consumes a mere 1.6% of its annual budget.

When the Grayson delegation reached Niamey, the military staged a coup d'etat to displace the elected government of President Tandja Mamadou who had raised some concerns by moves to introduce reforms and revise the constitution as well as to extend his term in office.

Niger is rich in Uranium holding at least 6% of global reserves - a figure that is twice as large as US Uranium deposits. The radioactive mineral constitutes 72% of national exports. In recent years, foreign corporations have invested billions into the Uranium-driven economy of Niger.

The military coup was allegedly led by a relatively low-level Platoon Commander Salou Djibo who held an official briefing during which he maintained silence about any future return to Niger's constitutional democracy.

Djibo is the now the leader of a 'Supreme Council' of army officials that currently constitutes the military junta governing the Uranium-rich nation.

Following Djibo's coup, the UN promptly condemned the military takeover, and the African Union immediately expelled Niger. France, Niger's former colonial overlord, condemned the coup, but the official American reaction struck a distinctly different chord when US State Department Spokesman, P. J. Crowley, briefed reporters that President Tandja may have triggered the coup himself by, "trying to extend his mandate."

The simultaneous presence of a US Congressional delegation in a uranium-rich Muslim nation at the time of a right-wing military coup is bound to arouse international scrutiny — especially when official spokesmen in Washington are the sole sources to rationalize — if not defend — the military action against the elected government of Niger.

Grayson is a member of the Science and Technology Committee that has jurisdiction over non-defense (ie. non-military) federal scientific research and development including NASA, FEMA and the Department of Energy. Grayson is a progressive on domestic issues, but, as Max Blumenthal has pointed out, he follows the AIPAC line on Israel and the Middle East - because he supported Israel's Operation Cast Lead and a pro-Israel position vis a vis Iran, an Islamic nation currently developing nuclear energy.

At this point in time, no other names of the members of the "Congressional delegation" led by Alan Grayson have been released raising deeper questions about the Uranium Coup.

http://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/the-uranium-coup-1/

Destabilizing Pakistan – Operation Breakfast Redux

Operation enduring turmoil

Click on image to see larger version


By Tom Engelhardt and Pratap Chatterje

Almost every day, reports come back from the CIA’s “secret” battlefield in the Pakistani tribal borderlands. Unmanned aerial vehicles – that is, pilotless drones – shoot missiles (18 of them in a single attack on a tiny village last week) or drop bombs and then the news comes in: a certain number of al-Qaeda or Taliban leaders or suspected Arab or Uzbek or Afghan “militants” have died. The numbers are often remarkably precise. Sometimes they are attributed to U.S. sources, sometimes to the Pakistanis; sometimes, it’s hard to tell where the information comes from. In the Pakistani press, on the other hand, the numbers that come back are usually of civilian dead. They, too, tend to be precise.

Don’t let that precision fool you. Here’s the reality: There are no reporters on the ground and none of these figures can be taken as accurate. Let’s just consider the CIA side of things. Any information that comes from American sources (i.e., the CIA) has to be looked at with great wariness. As a start, the CIA’s history is one of deception. There’s no reason to take anything its sources say at face value. They will report just what they think it’s in their interest to report – and the ongoing “success” of their drone strikes is distinctly in their interest.

Then, there’s history. In the present drone wars, as in the CIA’s bloody Phoenix Program in the Vietnam era, the Agency’s operatives, working in distinctly alien terrain, must rely on local sources (or possibly official Pakistani ones) for targeting intelligence. In Vietnam in the 1960s, the Agency’s Phoenix Program – reportedly responsible for the assassination of 20,000 Vietnamese – became, according to historian Marilyn Young, “an extortionist’s paradise, with payoffs as available for denunciation as for protection.” Once again, the CIA is reportedly passing out bags of money and anyone on the ground with a grudge, or the desire to eliminate an enemy, or simply the desire to make some of that money can undoubtedly feed information into the system, watch the drones do their damnedest, and then report back that more “terrorists” are dead. Just assume that at least some of those “militants” dying in Pakistan, and possibly many of them, aren’t who the CIA hopes they are.

Think of it as a foolproof situation, with an emphasis on the “fool.” And then keep in mind that, in December, the CIA’s local brain trust, undoubtedly the same people who were leaking precise news of “successes” in Pakistan, mistook a jihadist double agent from Jordan for an agent of theirs, gathered at an Agency base in Khost, Afghanistan, and let him wipe them out with a suicide bomb. Seven CIA operatives died, including the base chief. This should give us a grim clue as to the accuracy of the CIA’s insights into what’s happening on the ground in Pakistan, or into the real effects of their 24/7 robotic assassination program.

But there’s a deeper, more dangerous level of deception in Washington’s widening war in the region: self-deception. The CIA drone program, which the Agency’s Director Leon Panetta has called “the only game in town” when it comes to dismantling al-Qaeda, is just symptomatic of such self-deception. While the CIA and the U.S. military have been expending enormous effort studying the Afghan and Pakistani situations and consulting experts, and while the White House has conducted an extensive series of seminars-cum-policy-debates on both countries, you can count on one thing: none of them have spent significant time studying or thinking about us.

As a result, the seeming cleanliness and effectiveness of the drone-war solution undoubtedly only reinforces a sense in Washington that the world’s last great military power can still control this war – that it can organize, order, prod, wheedle, and bribe both the Afghans and Pakistanis into doing what’s best, and if that doesn’t work, simply continue raining down the missiles and bombs. Beware Washington’s deep-seated belief that it controls events; that it is, however precariously, in the saddle; that, as Afghan War commander Gen. Stanley McChrystal recently put it, there is a “corner” to “turn” out there, even if we haven’t quite turned it yet.

In fact, Washington is not in the saddle and that corner, if there, if turned, will have its own unpleasant surprises. Washington is, in this sense, as oblivious as those CIA operatives were as they waited for “their” Jordanian agent to give them supposedly vital information on the al-Qaeda leadership in the Pakistani tribal areas. Like their drones, the Americans in charge of this war are desperately far from the ground, and they don’t even seem to know it. It’s this that makes the analogy drawn by TomDispatch regular and author of Halliburton’s Army Pratap Chatterjee so unnerving. It’s time for Washington to examine not what we know about them, but what we don’t know about ourselves. Tom

http://pakalert.wordpress.com/

Monday, February 22, 2010

Mossad's Murderous Reach: The Larger Political Issues

By James Petra

On January 19 Israel's international secret police, the Mossad, sent an eighteen member death squad to Dubai using European passports, supposedly 'stolen' from Israeli dual citizens and altered with fake photos and signatures, in order to assassinate the Palestinian leader, Mahmoud al Mabhouh.

The evidence is overwhelming: The Dubai police presentation of detailed security videos of the assassins was corroborated by the testimony of Israeli security experts and applauded by Israel's leading newspapers and columnists. The Mossad openly stated that Mabhouh was a high priority target who had survived three previous assassination attempts. Israel did not even bother to deny the murder. Furthermore, the sophisticated communication system used by the killers, the logistics and planning surrounding their entry and exit from Dubai and the scope and scale of the operation have all the characteristics of a high-level state operation. Furthermore, only Mossad would have access to the European passports of its dual citizens! Only Mossad would have the capacity, motivation, stated intent and willingness to provoke a diplomatic row with its European allies, knowing full well that Western European governments' anger would blow over because of their deep links to Israel. After meticulous investigation and the interrogation of 2 captured Palestinian Mossad collaborators, the Dubai police chief has stated he is sure the Mossad was behind the killing.

The Larger Political Issues

Israel's policy of overseas assassination raises profound issues that threaten the basis of the modern state: sovereignty, rule of law and national and personal security.

Israel has a publicly-stated policy of violating the sovereignty of any and all countries in order to kill or abduct its opponents. In both proclamation and actual practice, Israeli law, decrees and actions abroad supersede the laws and law enforcement agencies of any other nation. If Israel's policy becomes the common practice world-wide, we would enter a savage Hobbesian jungle in which individuals would be subject to the murderous intent of foreign assassination squads unrestrained by any law or accountable national authority. Each and every state could impose its own laws and cross national borders in order to murder other nation's citizens or residents with impunity. Israel's extra-territorial assassinations make a mockery of the very notion of national sovereignty. Extra-territorial secret police elimination of opponents was a common practice of the Nazi Gestapo, Stalin's GPU and Pinochet's DINA and has now become the sanctioned practice of the US "Special Forces" and the CIA clandestine division. Such policies are the hallmark of totalitarian, dictatorial and imperialist states, which systematically trample on the sovereign rights of peoples.

Israel's practice of extra-judicial, extra-territorial assassinations, exemplified by the recent murder of Mahmoud al Mabhouh in a Dubai hotel room, violates all the fundamental precepts of the rule of law. Extra-judicial killings ordered by a state, mean its own secret police are judge, jury, prosecutor and executioner, unrestrained by sovereignty, law and the duty of nations to protect their citizens and visitors. Evidence, legal procedures, defense and cross examinations are obliterated in the process. State-sponsored, extra-judicial murder completely undermines due process. Liquidation of opponents abroad is the logical next step after Israel's domestic show trials, based on the application of its racial laws and administrative detention decrees, which have dispossessed the Palestinian people and violated international laws.

Mossad death squads operate directly under the Israeli Prime Minister (who personally approved the recent murder).The vast majority of Israelis proudly support these assassinations, especially

when the killers escape detection and capture. The unfettered operation of foreign state-sponsored death squads, carrying out extra-judicial assassinations with impunity, is a serious threat to every critic, writer, political leader and civic activist who dares to criticize Israel.

Mossad Murders - Zionist Fire

The precedent of Israel killing its adversaries abroad, establishes the outer boundaries of repression by its overseas supporters in the leading Zionist organizations, most of whom have now and in the past supported Israel's violation of national sovereignty via extra-judicial killings. If Israel physically eliminates its opponents and critics, the 51 major American Jewish organizations economically repress Israel's critics in the US. They actively pressure employers, university presidents and public officials to fire employees, academics and professionals who dare to speak or write against Israeli torture, killing and systematic dispossession of Palestinians.

So far, most critical comments, in Israel and elsewhere, of Mossad's recent murder in Dubai focus on the agents' "incompetence", including allowing their faces to be captured on numerous security videos as they clumsily changed their wigs and costumes under the camera gaze . Other critics complain that the bungling Mossad is "tarnishing Israel's image" as a democratic state and providing ammunition for the anti-Semites. None of these superficial criticisms have been repeated by the US Congress, White House or the Presidents of the Major Jewish American organizations, where the mafia rule of Omerga, or silence, reigns supreme and criminal complicity is the rule

Conclusion

While the critics bemoan the clumsy Mossad job, making it harder for Western powers to provide Israel with diplomatic cover for its operations abroad, the fundamental issue is never addressed: The Mossad's acquisition and alteration of official British, French, German and Irish passports of dual Israeli citizen's underscores the cynical and sinister nature of Israel's exploitation of its dual citizens in the pursuit of its own bloody foreign policy goals. Mossad's use of genuine passports issued by four sovereign European nations to its citizens in order to murder a Palestinian in a Dubai hotel room raises the question of to whom 'dual' Israeli citizens really owe their allegiance and just how far they are willing to go in defending or promoting Israel's overseas assassinations.

Thanks to Israel's use of British passports to enter Dubai and murder an adversary, every British businessperson or tourist traveling in the Middle East will be suspected of links to Israeli death squads. With elections this year and the Labor and Conservative parties counting heavenly on Zionist millionaires for campaign funding, it remains to be seen whether Prime Minister Gordon Brown will do more than whimper and cringe!


http://www.rebelnews.org/opinion/middle-east/188936-mossads-murderous-reach-the-larger-political-issues

Cut the "ambiguity", ambassador, or pack your bags

Challenging UK support for Israeli criminals

22 February 2010

By Stuart Littlewood

Stuart Littlewood challenges UK Foreign Secretary David Miliband – and the rest of the British Establishment – to explain to the British public his government's support for Israeli crimes and criminals.

Hey, Mr Foreign Secretary Miliband,

Let me tell you something. If I were the British foreign secretary there would be no more "friendly chats". The Israeli ambassador would have 24 hours to find a cure for his "ambiguity" or pack his bags. How dare that lawless, racist regime smugly sit in its London offices and keep us guessing whether or not they have abused our sovereignty and hijacked our passport system?

Britain is far too cosy with the Israelis. Given their thieving, power-crazed ambitions in the Middle East (and beyond), how reliable is the intelligence they are said to share with us anyway?

Our government is riddled with Zionist sympathizers right up to the top. Our most important security bodies – the Intelligence and Security Committee, the Foreign Affairs Committee and the Defence Committee – are all chaired by Israel flag-wavers. Whose bright idea was that?
"Your enthusiasm for changing the law of universal jurisdiction and turning the UK into a safe house for Israeli psychopaths to freely walk the streets of London, makes our country and particularly yourself a laughing stock in the civilized world."

Blair and Brown are patrons of the Jewish National Fund, an organization that acquires stolen Palestinian lands and helps fund illegal settlements in the occupied territories. Are they mad?

When Labour bites the dust in the elections in May, we can expect no better from the Conservatives who are waiting in the wings, if the findings of Peter Oborne's recent Channel 4 Dispatches programme are anything to go by. Cameron has declared himself a Zionist and is also a patron of the JNF, as are the Israeli ambassador and the Chief Rabbi. So there'll be a seamless transfer of Zionist influence to our new government and business as usual with that pseudo-democracy (yes, you can drop the pretense; everyone knows Israel is an ethnocracy with apartheid knobs on).

The Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission reports that your "true friend" Israel has a nuclear arsenal numbering in the hundreds, possibly larger than our own. It has a plutonium production reactor and reprocessing facility, and possibly a uranium enrichment capability.

You'll also know that Israel is the only state in the region not to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, nor has it signed the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention. It has signed but not ratified the Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban Treaty, similarly the Chemical Weapons Convention.

Nevertheless, the rogue regime and its stooges screech their eagerness to obliterate Iran and involve us in their dirty work, even though the Islamic state as yet has no nuclear capability – unless Tehran managed to get its hands on one of the warheads rumoured to have been mislaid by the US. Is that why everyone is wetting their pants?

Back to the extra-judicial assassination in Dubai. Given all the amazing intelligence we’re supposed to receive from our "trusted allies", any foreign secretary worth his salt would at least know if and how Britain was implicated in the crime, which, according to Sunday Times, was OK'd by your good buddy the Israeli prime minister.

Or are you seriously telling us you haven't a clue?

Talking of atrocities, you know perfectly well that we are solemnly obligated – and rightly so – to seek and prosecute all who have allegedly committed war crimes. Your enthusiasm for changing the law of universal jurisdiction and turning the UK into a safe house for Israeli psychopaths to freely walk the streets of London, makes our country and particularly yourself a laughing stock in the civilized world.

Yes, we've been well and truly stitched up at government level. But here at street level we're not so stupid.


Stuart Littlewood is author of the book Radio Free Palestine, which tells the plight of the Palestinians under occupation. For further information please visit www.radiofreepalestine.co.uk.

http://www.redress.cc/global/slittlewood20100222