Featured Post

GUERRE MESSIANIQUE SIONISTE AVANT LA VENUE DE LEUR MACHIAH/ANTECHRIST/DAJJAL: EXTENSION DES FRONTIERES DE L'ENTITE SIONISTE, VOL ET PILLAGE DU GAZ ET DU PETROLE DES PAYS MUSULMANS DE NOUAKCHOTT A BAGHDAD

« Le comble du savoir-faire ne consiste pas à remporter toutes les batailles, mais à soumettre l’armée ennemie sans livrer bataille » (Sun...

Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Video: Islamic Resistance of Palestine kill two zionist terrorists in Gaza clashes


The military wing of Hamas publicized on Wednesday its documentation of the Gaza clashes last Friday, wherein two Israel Defense Soldiers were killed.

An article in the website of the Iz al-Din al-Qassam Brigade, Hamas’s military wing, describes the escalation of events in the Gaza incident and provides video documentation.

n the events on Friday, Maj. Eliraz Peretz and Staff Sgt. Ilan Sviatkovsky were killed in the Gaza Strip while pursuing a group of Palestinian militants trying to lay mines near the border fence. Two other soldiers were injured in the incident, and two militants were killed.

The Hamas website says that in the video, it is possible to see “the Special Forces (IDF soldiers) crossing outside the border area and then seen advancing westward. The forces get injured by Iz al-Din al-Qassam forces and then rescue forces come and evacuate the killed and injured soldiers.”

The military wing of Hamas, the Iz al-Din al-Qassam Brigade, announced on Friday that it was responsible for the killing of the two IDF soldiers and injuring two others.

In a Hamas news conference, the spokesperson for the military wing of Hamas, Abu Obeida, said that a Hamas sniper succeeded in striking two Israeli soldiers. Abu Obeida said that “the act is dedicated to the Palestinian nation, to the jailed prisoners and in honor of shahid Mahmoud al-Mabhouh.”


http://www.politicaltheatrics.net/2010/03/hamas-releases-footage-of-gaza-clashes/

A very convenient attack blamed on Muslims but has the stench of a False Flag

The news media says two 'Muslim' women were suicide bombers. Russian Zionist Jewish Mafia controlling FSB explained that these Chechnya Muslims were supplied by Iran.

This has the stench of the Mossad, very similar to their False Flag on the Madrid train, or the London bus bombing. Putin must support Israel and block the release of the S400 to Iran through the Caucasus or Netanyahu will bring terror over all the motherland ! That's the message !



Double Martyr operation killed or wounded at least 35 puppet policemen in Dagestan

Publication time: Today at 11:02 Emirate time

As reported by Russian terrorists media outlets, at least 12 puppet policemen, including their commander in the rank of a colonel and a police investigator, have been killed Kizlyar in two martyr bomb attacks in the Dagestani town of Kizlyar at 8:42 a.m. local time on Wednesday, March 31, 2010.

23 puppet policemen have been wounded in two blasts, the Russian terrorists report.

Other Russian sources say that there are scores of injured and that they are being delivered to hospitals.

One martyr bomber, a driver in a parked car, waited for a police car leaving the police headquarters and attacked it in the blast. The other martyr, a pedestrian in the uniform of a police senior lieutenant, blew himself up 20 minutes later when other policemen arrived to the site of the first blast. A crater of 6 meters wide and 2 meter deep formed at the site of the explosion.

It is to be mentioned that the Russians always reduce the real figures of fatalities and casualties of their puppets.

Kavkaz Center
http://www.kavkazcenter.com/eng/content/2010/03/31/11757.shtml

Israel bombarde Gaza vise deliberement des enfants


Dix Palestiniens blessés par les tirs de l'occupation à l'Est de Khan Younès

Gaza – CPI
www.palestine-info.info


Les forces de l'occupation ont ouvert le feu sur une marche palestinienne pacifique, au sud de la Bande de Gaza, durant la 34ème commémoration de la journée de la terre, le mardi 30 mars 2010.

Le directeur des urgences au ministère de la santé, Dr. Mouawia Hassanein, a affirmé que dix Palestiniens ont été blessés par les tirs des forces occupantes et que les ambulances se sont dirigées vers le lieu pour transporter les blessés.

Des civils palestiniens ont organisé une marche massive près des frontières entre la Bande de Gaza et les territoires palestiniens occupés en 1948 pour commémorer la journée de la terre.


L'occupation interdit la prière dans la mosquée d'el-Ibrahimi
[ 31/03/2010 - 13:09 ]
El Khalil – CPI

Les autorités de l'occupation ont décidé de fermer, aujourd'hui et demain, la mosquée d'el-Ibrahimi dans la ville d'el Khalil, sous prétexte de la fête de pâques juive.

Des sources palestiniennes ont déclaré que les autorités de l'occupation ont interdit aux croyants palestiniens, de faire la prière dans la mosquée sainte d'el-Ibrahimi, à partir de l'aube de mercredi 31/3 et jusqu'à l'aube de vendredi prochain, au moment où elles ouvrent toute la mosquée devant les colons sionistes pour célébrer la fête de pâque juive.

Des organisations sionistes ont appelé les colons sionistes à participer aux festivals organisés dans la mosquée d'el Ibrahimi, durant les deux jours prochains, pour exercer leurs rites.

On note que les forces occupantes vont empêcher également l'appel à la prière durant les deux jours prochains dans cette mosquée.

De grandes forces sionistes ainsi que les éléments des gardes-frontières se déploient dans la vieille ville d'el Khalil et aux entrées de la mosquée sainte d'el-Aqsa, ainsi que ses alentours et les routes reliant entre les colonies qui encadrent la ville d'el Qods.



Le Hamas n’a qu’une seule stratégie (1)

Dr. Azzam At-Tamimi

Les élections du Conseil Législatif Palestinien de 2006 sont différentes de celles de 1996. En particulier, en 2006, l’accord qui était la base de l’autorité et de ses institutions avait reçu un coup mortel de la part de l’ancien premier ministre israélien Ariel Sharon.

La direction du mouvement du Hamas n’a pu bien estimer que la participation du mouvement aux élections, les premières comme les dernières, donne une sorte de légitimité à cette autorité que les Israéliens ont vidée de tous sens. Ces derniers ont décidé d’encercler et ensuite de tuer leur partenaire dans les négociations de paix Yasser Arafat. Puis, ils ont décidé de se retirer, unilatéralement et sans aucun arrangement, de la bande de Gaza qui les avait épuisés. Sans une petite minorité, le mouvement du Hamas ne s’attendait à la position internationale face aux résultats des élections.

Probablement, les élections desquelles le mouvement du Hamas est sorti vainqueur représentaient une occasion en or et sans précédent pour réorganiser la maison intérieure palestinienne, croyaient quelques-uns dont moi-même. On croyait que cette maison serait en mesure de travailler avec la communauté internationale qui travaille toujours au profit de l’Entité sioniste. Mais dès que la victoire du Hamas avait été déclarée, on a commencé à imposer les conditions du Quartette, des conditions ficelées par l’ancien premier ministre israélien Ehud Olmert. Ainsi, un siège total a été imposé sur le Hamas et sur la société palestinienne qui lui avait donné sa confiance.

En attendant que le mouvement déclare sa soumission, le blocus a été mis en place. Le premier qui a béni cette position internationale était Mahmoud Abbas. Le mouvement du Fatah, l’OLP et l’autorité palestinienne ont pris la même position que celle du Quartette. Ainsi, le Hamas s’est retrouvé obligé de composer le premier cabinet d’après les élections tout seul, sans la participation d’autres factions. Les autres forces, autres que le Hamas, ont commencé à s’occuper à faire tomber ce cabinet, à provoquer des guerres civiles. Tout était bon pour convaincre le Hamas qu’il fallait qu’il se soumette aux leaders de la communauté internationale et aux dirigeants arabes.

Et lorsque tout cela n’a rien donné, le mouvement du Fatah a joué avec le dossier des captifs. Il a demandé au Hamas de signer un document les concernant. Par ce document, le Fatah a voulu convaincre la communauté internationale que le Hamas était rentré dans le rang et qu’il fallait lever, même partiellement, le blocus imposé sur les Palestiniens de manière collective. Mais en vain, on veut la tête du Hamas.

Accepter le document des captifs, transformé plus tard en document d’entente nationale, a modifié la ligne droite du Hamas. Désormais, il accepte un Etat palestinien dans les frontières de 1967. Cette position a été renforcée lors de l’accord signé entre le Fatah et le Hamas à la Mecque, sous une égide saoudienne. Ils se sont mis accord pour constituer un gouvernement d’unité nationale.

Mahmoud Abbas, en tant que président de l’autorité et de l’OLP, devait profiter du changement de discours du Hamas pour tenter, avec ses partenaires israéliens et américains, de donner jour à l’Etat palestinien.

Toutefois, les travaux du général Dayton n’ont fait que briser l’union nationale. Mais pas seulement. La rivalité entre les deux mouvements s’est transformée en une inimitié explicite. Les forces de sécurité préventive se sont mises à pratiquer des actes de provocation. Le Hamas n’a eu d’autre choix que de mettre un terme à cela, militairement. Et en Cisjordanie, le Hamas, ses membres, ses sympathisants et ses institutions sont l’objet d’un déracinement. Cependant, les négociations d’Abbas avec Olmert, jusqu’à l’arrivée de Netanyahu, n’ont rien donné, à part quelques embrassades et beaucoup de colonies.

Bien que le Hamas n’ait pas laissé tomber ses principes et son regard sur le conflit, le changement de son discours, à cause de la politique et de l’accord des captifs et celui de la Mecque, a un peu altéré sa réputation. En effet, beaucoup de Palestiniens et de sympathisants de la cause palestinienne partout dans le monde voyaient dans le Hamas une alternative au mouvement du Fatah qui a laissé tomber la lutte armée au profit des négociations, qui a laissé tomber le rêve palestinien pour lequel il est né au Koweït en 1957.

Article écrit par Dr. Azzam-Timimi, auteur du livre Le Hamas, chapitres non-achevés
Traduit et résumé par le CPI

Tuesday, March 30, 2010

Western Zionist Jewish Mafia with Russian Jewish Mafia still have enough power to block delivery of S400 through the Caucasus to Iran

The only responsible people of the genocide of Chechens are the Western Zionist Jewish Mafia and Russian Jewish Mafia, inside Russian government. Putin is a war criminal because he knows that Russian Jewish Mafia and her huge terror networks in old Khazaria are behind the war in the Caucasus since the beginning, and their desire to offer US-UK-Israel gaz, oil control of distribution and selling through Asia and Europe. If Russian jewish mafia is capable of blocking the delivery of weapons to Iran through Caucasus, then Putin is held by someone, somewhere !

Why war criminal Putin is supporting the israelis over the implementation of a new world currency ? More than 250 000 Chechens were slaughtered in the Caucasus, hundreds of thousands wounded, tortured, raped in a dirty war. Why Putin is not accusing the real brain masters and not cleaning his 'security services' and 'his government' from massive corruption, because claiming victory over innocents is much more easier than taking his responsibility. What is the difference between Berlusconi and Putin ? There is no difference, they are both owned by the zionist jewish mafia !


Russian society shocked. Russians accuse Putin

Publication time: 29 March 2010, 16:21

According to Russian media outlets, in Moscow radio programs devoted to subway bombings, ordinary citizens have expressed their view that this was the work of Russian secret services, whose purpose is to further "tighten the screws" of "ungirdled" society that dared to criticize and demand the resignation of Putin.

The reaction to the bombings is: that even, if the attacks have been really carried out by the Caucasian Mujahideen, the Russian society is now inclined to blame Putin and the FSB for the bombings.

A 10-year incessant talk about the "victory" in the Caucasus and the "pacification of Chechnya" is a de facto approval by Russia's public of a campaign of monstrous terror in Chechnya, which killed 250 thousand civilians, including 42 thousand Chechen children from 0 to 11 of age, led to an extension of the war far beyond Chechnya.

Today, it is more and more evident that a moment of truth has come to the Russian society.

It is obvious that the Russian society does not want itself to answer for their criminal acts - for the murder of a quarter million people. Therefore, according to the law of genre, a chief culprit should be named. And it would be likely Putin, even if the Martyrs' Brigade Riyad-us-Saliheen would later claim responsibility for the Moscow metro attacks.

Hence the explanation of Putin's hysteria, who after the bombings said he is immediately returning to Moscow and demanded, as he did 10 years ago, to "rub out terrorists in the outhouse".

However, a threatening movement of his pale eyebrows and lump horns on his forehead do not impress anybody anymore. It turns out that Putin is guilty in every case.

"If as a result, subsequent calls to the authorities to toughen and "tighten the screws", to increase the funding for law enforcement agencies, are heard, there will be no shadow of a doubt that these explosions are the handwork of special services, Russian citizens say.

A society's movement for a change of the inefficient, corrupt system of the Putin's "vertical of power" is growing. Demands "Putin must go" sound from all the sides, from all the groups of the society, even from his closest associates. In these circumstances, the current government could be capable for every provocations and atrocities, just in order to stay in power.

No trust of many citizens is left anymore in the current government", commentators and journalists write.

"In Putin's Russia the bombings are the most important part of politics. Putin's Russia started with the bombings. And after 10 years, the society has not seen any other explanation for these explosions, but as "the hand of the FSB".

For 10 years, no one took responsibility on them and said a word, like, we blew you up to achieve that and that. The amazing feature of Putin's Russia is: Terrorism in full anonymity.

Since then, terrorism in Putin's Russia, for the most part, is anonymous. Trains derailed, planes fell, subway cars exploded - and no one makes any demands. Guess yourselves, they say, what we wanted to achieve. And this Hollywood thriller has been continuing for 10 years already.

Now, even more interesting, would Putin's Russia end with the blasts, as it had begun?"- a former editor of the former Russian opposition paper Moskovsky Komsomolets Anatoly Baranov asks and concludes --

"Putin's Russia began with the explosions in Moscow, Volgodonsk and the "FSB exercises" in Ryazan. Putin's Russia has been bombing itself for 10 years with and without any reason.

So finally, take away a TNT charge from this fool!"

Department of Monitoring,

Kavkaz Center

http://www.kavkazcenter.com/eng/content/2010/03/29/11742.shtml


Monday, March 29, 2010

How can Israel impose his views on other countries, by bombing them like in Moscow !

HOW CAN NETANYAHU AFFORD TO DEFY THE U.S.A.?


By Christopher Bollyn,

www.bollyn.com


SOME DAY AMERICANS WILL AWAKEN to the heavy strategic price their own nation pays for indulging Israeli excesses. Israel may be successful in securing all of Jerusalem within its own borders. But it runs the historic risk of making itself, by a ghastly irony, a pariah state.

Max Hastings in "A deaf and defiant Israel is gambling with its future", Financial Times (U.K.) March 26, 2010


"Bibi" Netanyahu, Israel's prime minister, is a disciple of Ze'ev Jabotinsky, the founder of the most radical, racist, and militant form of Zionism. Jabotinsky was the Zionist who called for an "Iron Wall" to be built in Palestine. The West should know that there can be no appeasement with such fanatics who are devoted to an ideology of Jewish supremacism and Greater Israel. The fact that the U.S. and the international community have now clearly condemned illegal Israeli settlements is piling pressure on Netanyahu and his government of extremists. The crucial question now is how will Netanyahu respond to this pressure? This is a dangerous situation because Zionist zealots, when pressed to make compromises for peace, usually react with violence and terrorism.

HOW CAN NETANYAHU AFFORD TO DEFY OBAMA AND INTERNATIONAL LAW?

(CLUE - Remember Madoff's Missing Billions?)

It is said that one can judge a man by the company he keeps. This is sage advice. It is true that one can judge the nature a person by the kind of people he associates with. This is how one can understand the connections between the Zionist network behind the terrorism of 9-11 and the massive financial scams of the past few years. As I pointed out when the Bernard Madoff scam surfaced, the very same small circle of people are involved in 9-11 and the theft of some $50 billion by Madoff and company.

One might wonder how Benjamin Netanyahu can afford to offend and insult the Obama administration so openly? The hubris of Netanyahu comes from his conceit - and the fact that he and his cronies have tucked away billions of stolen dollars, the missing billions from the Madoff scam, for example.

THE SILVERSTEIN CONNECTION

Benjamin Netanyahu and his former commander, Ehud Barak, are both very close friends and business associates with Larry Silverstein. Silverstein was a business partner on his Israeli tax-free zone project with Larry Tisch of CBS and the late Sy Syms Merns (the former Seymour Merinsky), who passed away in November 2009. Sy Syms, a member of the board of the Israeli Discount Bank of New York, was a close business partner of Bernard Madoff. This is the small circle of Zionist masterminds behind 9-11 and the Madoff rip-off.


Bernard Madoff (left) treasurer and chairman of the board of Sy Syms School of Business at Yeshiva University with his vice chairman Sy Syms (center) and Josh S. Weston.

As I wrote about the toothless prosecution of Madoff in May 2009:

[Lev] Dassin, the scion of a family of Russian Zionists, is also handling the Madoff and Art Nadel cases. In the Madoff case, Dassin did not file the most obvious charge of conspiracy. He obviously accepted Madoff's statement that he had stolen the $50 billion all by himself and had no accomplices. According to Dassin's complaint against Madoff, his closest business partners, Sy Syms and Jacob Ezra Merkin, who funneled billions of dollars to his investment fund, were completely clueless and out of the loop. They just invested billions of dollars into a black hole. Is that believable? The conspicuous fact that Madoff's partners are the directors and owners of "private" Israeli banks (privatized under then finance minister Bibi Netanyahu) and have branches in Switzerland that are allowed to make use of Swiss secrecy laws is of no interest to Lev Dassin. Golly Lev, so where did the $50 billion go?

See: The Bronx Temple Bomb Set-Up, May 22, 2009
http://www.bollyn.com/the-bronx-temple

When the massive Madoff rip-off emerged, I pointed out Madoff's close business connections to Ezra Merkin and Sy Syms Merns [born Seymour Merinsky in Brooklyn, 1926], who was a director of the Israel Discount Bank, an institution well-known for money laundering:

The latest massive financial scandal is the giant $50 billion pyramid or ‘Ponzi’ scheme run by a New York Zionist Jew, Bernard Lawrence Madoff. Madoff was chairman of the Syms business school at Yeshiva University with his partner, Sy Merns, a.k.a. Sy Syms, who has been a director at Israel Discount Bank (IDB) since 1991. The IDB bank is well known for its money laundering business.

Syms and the Israel discount bank

The IDB is the Israeli bank at the center of the 9-11 funding matrix connected to the Bronfman family and Israeli military intelligence. IDB is the Israeli financial institution at the center of the Zionist crimocracy. (See: The Architecture of Terror: Mapping the Israeli Network Behind 9-11, especially the section on Joseph Ciechanover, the former chairman of IDB's New York branch.)

On January 31, 2006, a controlling interest in the Bank was acquired by an investor group led by Matthew Bronfman and Rubin Schron. The deal gave Bronfman ownership of IDB's wholly owned subsidiary, the Israel Discount Bank of New York. Bronfman is a younger brother of Edgar Bronfman Jr., chairman and CEO of Warner Music Group Corp.


A director of Israel Discount Bank (NY), Sy Syms (center) is the man in the middle of the Madoff scam and Larry Silverstein's free-trade zone in the Negev, a project that involved Ehud Barak and Bibi Netanyahu.

See: "Who is Bernie Madoff, the man behind the $50 billion fraud?" by Christopher Bollyn, December 12, 2008
http://www.ety.com/HRP/jewishstudies/madoff.htm

To understand the long-standing relationship between Commander Barak, Bibi Netanyahu, Larry Silverstein, and Seymour Syms [Merinsky], I recommend reading the 2001 Haaretz article entitled "Up in Smoke", by Sara Leibovich-Dar. It reveals that Netanyahu and Silverstein were very close and spoke every Sunday. Why would Benjamin Netanyahu need to speak with Larry Silverstein on a weekly basis - for years?

Here a few key extracts from "Up in Smoke":

Shortly after the events of September 11, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon called Larry Silverstein, a Jewish real estate magnate in New York, the owner of the World Trade Center's 110-story Twin Towers and a close friend, to ask how he was. Since then they have spoken a few more times. Two former prime ministers - Benjamin Netanyahu, who this week called Silverstein a "friend," and Ehud Barak, whom Silverstein in the past offered a job as his representative in Israel - also called soon after the disaster...

Silverstein is also a member of the joint American-Israeli commission for housing and community development, which was established by former president Bill Clinton. In the early 1990s, he was involved in projects to build housing for new immigrants. The Israeli political world got to know Silverstein when he tried to create a free-trade zone in the country. He became friendly with Yitzhak Rabin, Benjamin Netanyahu, Ehud Barak and Ariel Sharon...

Silverstein conceived the idea of creating the free-trade zone in 1989. He met with Shimon Peres, who was then the finance minister, and with his deputy, Yossi Beilin, and tried to convince them that the project was an urgent necessity. The idea was that he would be given land in the Negev and would establish tax-free industries there. The Negev would benefit by getting new jobs, and Silverstein would benefit by raking in plenty of money. Peres and Beilin objected: Free-trade zones of the kind envisaged were usually created in the Third World and had the reputation of being slave markets. The local workers earn starvation wages, while the entrepreneurs enjoy full tax exemption and make high profits.

Silverstein did not give up. The economic difficulties he encountered in New York forced him to look for an additional source of revenues. In September 1992, he met in New York with the new finance minister in the Rabin government, Avraham Shochat, and again raised the idea of the free-trade zone, claiming it would create 20,000 new jobs and make the Negev flourish. With Silverstein were his partners in the investment group, Larry Tisch, the owner of CBS, and Sy Sims, a major New York discount retailer...

Close ties with Netanyahu

The ascension to power of Benjamin Netanyahu opened a new chapter in the saga. Silverstein is left-leaning in his political views - he supports the Democratic Party - but after despairing of Rabin and Peres, he believed that Netanyahu, whom he called a hero of the free market, would push the project forward.

The two have been on friendly terms since Netanyahu's stint as Israel's ambassador to the United Nations. For years they kept in close touch. Every Sunday afternoon, New York time, Netanyahu would call Silverstein. It made no difference what the subject was or where Netanyahu was, he would always call, Silverstein told an Israeli acquaintance. Their ties continued after Netanyahu became prime minister. They met several times and Netanyahu promised to give the project his support...

However, Sharon's initiative was stopped dead in its tracks by the elections of May 1999. Still, the change of government did not look ominous to Silverstein - on the contrary. He was friends with the new prime minister, Ehud Barak, too. In 1995, when Barak left the army, Silverstein offered him the job of acting as his representative in Israel, hoping that the former chief of staff, with his ramified connections, would be able to push the project through. Barak turned down the offer, but continued to stay in touch with Silverstein. They met at various social events and Barak introduced him to some of the members of his family.

Silverstein had another close contact in Barak's bureau in the person of Isaac Herzog, who handled Silverstein's legal affairs along with Yaakov Ne'eman. "I didn't touch the subject during my period as cabinet secretary," Herzog says. None of this stopped Barak, after his election as prime minister, from trying to help Silverstein advance the project.

"They came to Barak," says Shochat, who was then the finance minister again. "Barak examined the subject with all kinds of confidants and also talked to me about it. I told him that I was vehemently against it." Barak drew on the help of Yaakov Terner, the mayor of Be'er Sheva, the "capital of the Negev," who was an ardent supporter of the free-trade zone.

WHO IS BIBI NETANYAHU?

Joe Lockhart, spokesman for President Bill Clinton, described Benjamin Netanyahu as "one of the most obnoxious individuals you're going to come into - just a liar and a cheat. He could open his mouth and you could have no confidence that anything that came out of it was the truth." When Netanyahu addressed the AIPAC conference in Washington, D.C. on March 22, besides the usual Zionist lies about Jerusalem and Iran, he told a lie that exposes the fundamental deception of his worldview:

We should be judged by one standard and allegations made against the State of Israel must be grounded in facts. One allegation that is not grounded in fact is the attempt to describe the Jews as foreign colonialists in their own homeland. This is one of the great lies of modern times. In my office, I have a signet ring that was loaned to me by Israel’s Department of Antiquities This ring was found next to the Western wall, but it dates back 2,800 years ago, two hundred years after King David declared Jerusalem as our people’s capital. This ring is a seal of a Jewish official, and his name is inscribed on it in Hebrew. The name is: Netanyahu. Netanyahu Ben-Yoash. That’s my last name. My first name, Benjamin, dates back 1,000 years earlier to Benjamin, the son of Jacob. One of Benjamin’s brothers was named Shimon, which also happens to be the first name of my good friend, Shimon Peres, the President of Israel. Nearly 4,000 years ago, Benjamin, Shimon and their ten brothers roamed the hills of Judea.

Benjamin Netanyahu's name, however, is not really Netanyahu and never was. There is, in fact, no real connection between the Jew who owned the ring and the obnoxious Israeli prime minister, and he knows it very well but that doesn't stop him from lying to the AIPAC crowd. His father was born in 1910 in Warsaw, Poland, with the name Benzion Mileikowsky. Like many Zionist immigrants from Poland and Russia, the Mileikowsky family changed the name when they came to Palestine in the 1920s. Shimon Peres is the same. Peres was born Szymon Perski in Wiszniewo, Poland, on August 2, 1923. The Mileikowskys and Perskis of Poland are, indeed, "foreign colonialists" and have no historical or religious right to the land of Palestine.

The Ashkenazi Jews of Poland are neither Semitic nor related to the Jews of ancient Palestine. Ashkenaz (see Chapter 10 of the Book of Genesis) was the son of Gomer and is not descended from Shem - and neither are the Ashkenazi Jews. The Ashkenazi Jews are descendants of the Asiatic Khazars, who lived around the Caspian Sea (in what is today Khazakstan) and who converted to Judaisim in the 8th Century A.D. The extremely fraudulent claim by Polish and Russian Zionists that they are descendants of Abraham and have a right to Palestine is truly "one of the great lies of modern times."


The Ashkenazi Jews are descended from the Sons of Japhet (pink areas), the people who lived around the Caspian and Black Seas. As they are not descendants of Shem or Abraham, they cannot be called Semitic.

NETANYAHU - "A LIAR AND A CHEAT"


Netanyahu and George Mitchell, U.S. Special Envoy in the Middle East

As the Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported in 2009, the Obama administration knows very well that Netanyahu is "a liar and a cheat":

Presumably, former president Bill Clinton did not conceal his opinion of Bibi from his wife. If Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has forgotten Bibi's tricks then Dennis Ross, who was the coordinator of the peace process in the Clinton administration and is an advisor to Obama, can refer her to his book "The Missing Peace."

There he quotes president Clinton's reaction to Bibi's retreat from a commitment.

"At times he was tough," writes Ross, "yelling at Bibi when he retracted an earlier pledge on Palestinian prisoners. 'This is just chicken shit. I'm not going to put up with this kind of bullshit.'"

Aaron David Miller, who was Ross' deputy, also documented the days of Bibi and Bill. In his book "The Much Too Promised Land," Miller relates that during their first meeting in the summer of 1996, Bibi lectured the president about the Arab-Israeli issue, prompting Clinton to expostulate when it was over, "Who the fuck does he think he is? Who's the fucking superpower here?"

Most definite of all is Joe Lockhart, who was the White House spokesman at the time. In a recorded interview to Clayton Swisher, author of the book "The Truth About Camp David," he described Netanyahu as "one of the most obnoxious individuals you're going to come into - just a liar and a cheat. He could open his mouth and you could have no confidence that anything that came out of it was the truth."

Source: "Perfect English or not, Netanyahu shares no common language with Obama" by Akiva Eldar, Haaretz, February 11, 2009
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1063057.html



Ehud Barak (left) and Benjamin Netanyahu were at the White House on March 23 for two secret meetings with President Barack Obama and his senior staff. These men are the two highest-level suspects of the false-flag terrorism of 9-11. They should both be arrested for war crimes and crimes of terrorism. Why is Obama meeting with the Israeli terrorists who carried out 9-11? This is clearly a difficult issue where the people have to lead their governments. Public protests should meet the arrival of these terrorists in every nation they visit and shame them as the real culprits of 9-11. This is what our democratic rights allow and what truth and justice demand of us.

Ethnic cleansing : A Very Dangerous Racial Israeli Publication in Jerusalem! بالعربية , English and French


These are translated copies (English and French) of the publication which was published by the Israelis in Arabic to people of Jerusalem within their savage campaign to judaize Jerusalem and the historical holy land of Palestine:

النص الأصلي باللغة العربية بالاسفل

Call for all Muslims living in "Israel "

In this message, we would like to explain the view of Torah regarding non- Jewish inhabitants in Israel. Firstly, we say that all human beings were created by one God and every faithful man must be treated respectfully. Therefore, the view of Judaism is not racial nor inhumane! It is all about religion!

The gist of our religions both is the belief in God, the creator. As we both believe, God gave us Torah which contains the duties and messages that we must achieve.

As what Holy Qur'an says, there is no contrast between what Torah says and what Qur'an says. As faithful Jews, we must achieve our duties. In many parts of Torah, it is written that the land of "Israel" was promised to Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and their grandsons ONLY! All the people agree that we are the grandsons of the ancient people of Israel, grandsons of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob!!

Moreover, it is written in Torah that this small land is a property of the Jewish people ONLY! And it is forbidden to let others live here permanently. It is also written in Books of Nevi'im (Books of the Prophets) that we were dismissed because we did not achieve this divine order! The Jewish people were dismissed and stayed outside their homeland for 2000 years. Now and after we have returned back to the land of Israel, as we were promised by Prophets; it is time for the Israeli people to achieve this divine order. So, we ask you to leave the land of Israel!!!

We say that in the point view of religion and to guarantee peace in Israel! We explain to you all the holy speech in both Qura'an and Torah. We think that when you understand that we do not hate you nor do we want to fight you because of your belief in Islam, you will come to understand the reason behind our determine to achieve the divine order! As Islam says, " There is no god but Allah. "

Here is the divine order. God told Moses:

Torah, 33 . 56-50

God talked to Moses on Moab regarding Jordan and Jericho saying:
Tell people of Israel that you will pass Jordan to the land of Canaanites.
So, you will dismiss all the inhabitants from there, will vanish all their statues and you will control all their heights.
You will own the land and live there because I gave you the land to possess and to divide it by lot regarding your tribes.
You should give more for the big tribes than the small tribes.
And if you did not dismiss the inhabitants, they would be thorns in your eyes and bodies and they would annoy you in the land you live on
And I will punish you the same way I wanted to punish them.

After you see the divine speech and because Islam is a religion of morals, and to avoid the Jews to possess another land, you must have no objection!! You have wide countries to live in!!! You must understand that we achieve the order written in Torah. Because it is not easy to leave millions of people without financial support, we suggest you to negotiate with "State of Israel" (which embodies the promise of prophets) to get economic aids to live wherever else!!!!

When we and you obey God, then we can live peacefully. We, you, our grandsons and your grandsons for a long time!!

As prophet Ichaaih said, " No nation holds the sword on the face of another nation and they no longer learn about war."

Regard the holiness of these pages. (End of the publication!)

*****

Translated into English
By: Shadi Y. Nassar

Please, suggest a better translation by contacting me on:

shadinassar@hotmail.com

Note: all the holy verses of Qur'an were omitted.

****************

I have made a French translation of your document: (By: Gwénaëlle Taffin)

Une copie de la traduction publiée par les habitants Israëliens de Jerusalem dans le cadre de leur sauvage campagne de " judaisation" de Jerusalem et la partie historique de la Palestine:
النص الأصلي باللغة العربية بالاسفل

Appel aux musulmans qui vivent en "Israël"

Dans ce message, nous aimerions vous expliquer la position du Torah concernant les habitants non-juifs d´Israël.
Dans un premier temps, nous déclarons que tous les êtres humains furent crées par un seul Dieu et tout fidèle sera traité avec respect. en conséquence, le point de vue "judaique" n´est ni racial ni ihumain!!!! Il n´est question que de religion!!

L´idée essentielle de nos deux religions est la croyance en Dieu, le createur. Comme nous le savons tous deux, Dieu nous donna le Torah qui contient les tâches et messages que nous nous devons de réaliser.

Selon ce que dit le Coran, il n´y a pas de contraste entre ce que dit le Torah et ce que dit le Coran. Comme juifs croyants, nous devons réaliser nos tâches. Dans beaucoup de passages du Torah, il est écrit que la région d´Israël a été promise SEULEMENT à Abraham, Isaac, Jacob et à leurs petits enfants.

De plus, il est écrit dans le Torah que ce petit pays est la propriété UNIQUE des juifs!!!! Et il interdit de laisser d´autres (gens) y vivre en permanence. Il est également écrit dans les Livres de Neviim (Livres des Prophètes) que nous avions été reniés pour ne pas obéir cette ordre divin!!!! Les juifs ont été renvoyés et sont restés en dehors de leur patrie pendant 2000 ans. Maintenant et après être de retour sur le sol d´Israël, comme les prophètes nous avaient promis, il est temps que les Israëliens réalise cet ordre divin. Nous vous demandons donc d´abandonner le pays d´Israël!!!

Nous le disons du point de vue religieux et pour garantir la paix en Israël!!! Nous vous expliquons le discours du Coran et Torah ensembles. Nous pensons que lorsque vous comprendrez que nous ne vous haissons pas ni ne vous combattons pas pour votre croyance en l´Islam , vous arriverez à comprendre la raison à notre détermination pour réaliser cet ordre divin!!! Comme dit l´Islam , " Il ´n´y a de Dieu qu´Allah!
Voici l´ordre divin: Dieu dit à Moses

Torah, 33 . 56-50

Dieu expliqua à Moises et à Moab, en contemplant le Jordan et Jericho:
Dites aux gens d´Israël que vous allez dépasser le Jordan vers le pays de Canaanites.
Donc, vous allez renvoyer tous les habitants d´ici, vous détruirez toutes leurs statuts et contrôlerez tous leurs " évolutions" .
Vous posséderez le pays et y vivrez car je vous ai donné le pays pour le posséder et le diviser en lots selon vos tribus.
Vous devrrez donner plus aux grandes tribus qu´aux petites.
Et si vous n´aviez pas abandonné les habitants, ils auraient été des épines dans vos yeux et corps et ils auraient dérangé dans le pays dans lequel vous vivez.
Et je vous punirais de la même manière que j´ai voulu les punir.
Après avoir vue le discour divin et parce que l´Islam est une religion de morale, et afin d´éviter que les Juifs possèdent un autre pays, vous ne devez avoir aucune objection!!!! Vous avez de larges pays pour y vivre!!!

Vous devez comprendre que nous obéissons l´ordre écrit dans le Torah. Comme il n´est pas facile pour des millions de personnes de partir sans appui financier, vous vous suggérons de négocier avec "L´Etat d´Israël" (qui incarne la promesse des prophètes) afin d´obtenir des aides économiques pour vivre ailleurs!!!!

Lorsque vous comme nous ayons obéi à Dieu, nous pourrons alors vivre en paix. Nous, vous , vos petits enfants et leurs petits enfants pour longtemps.

Comme dit le prophete Ichaaih : "Aucune nation ne porte l´épée à une autre nation et ils n´apprendront pas plus sur la guerre " .
Etudiez la sainteté de ces pages (Fin de la publication)

**********

المنشور الذي وزعه الكيان الصهيوني على أبناء مدينة القدس ضمن الحملة المستمرة لتهجيرهم و تهويد القدس ومقدساتها وتفريغها من أهلها
ويبدأ البيان بآية من القرآن الكريم :

" ( ولا تجادلوا هل الكتاب إلا بالتي هي أحسن إلا الذين ظلموا منهم وقولوا أمنا بالذي انزل إلينا وانزل إليكم وإلهنا وإلهكم واحد ونحن له مسلمون).

نداء إلى جميع المسلمين الساكنين في ارض إسرائيل

نريد أن نشرح لكم هذه الرسالة رأي التوراة بالنسبة لسكن غير اليهود في ارض اسرائيل , نقول أولا انه حسب التوراة كل إنسان خلق من نفس الله , ويجب التعامل مع كل إنسان مؤمن باحترام , ولذلك نظرة الدين اليهودي ليست عنصرية أو غير إنسانية , فهو ديني فحسب.

الأصل في ديننا ودينكم هو الإيمان بالله , ملك العالم , وحسب إيماننا وإيمانكم أعطانا الله التوراة وفيها الواجبات والرسالات ويجب علينا القيام بها.
حسب مقولات القرآن الكريم لا يوجد أي تناقض بين ما أمرتنا التوراة القيام به وبين ما أمركم القرآن به , كيهود مؤمنون يجب علينا القيام بواجبات التوراة , وفي التوراة مكتوب في عدة أماكن أن ارض إسرائيل وعدت لإبراهيم واسحق ويعقوب و أحفادهم ولا غيرهم , الكل يجمعون بأننا أحفاد شعب اسرايل القديم , أحفاد إبراهيم واسحق ويعقوب.

ومكتوب في التوراة أيضا بان ارض إسرائيل , هذه الأرض الصغيرة , هي ملك الشعب اليهودي فقط , ومن الممنوع سكن غيرهم فيها بصورة دائمة.
مكتوب أيضا في أسفار الأنبياء انه بسبب عدم قيامنا بهذا الأمر الالهي , الشعب اليهودي طرد وبقي خارج بلاده 2000 سنة , ألان وبعد عودة شعب إسرائيل إلى ارض إسرائيل ,كما وعدونا الأنبياء , حان الوقت ليقوم الشعب الإسرائيلي بتنفيذ هذا الأمر الالهى , ولذلك نطلب منكم مغادرة ارض إسرائيل.

نحن نقول ذلك من وجهة النظر الدينية , لنضمن السلام في ارض إسرائيل , نحن نشرح لكم المقولات التوراتية والقرآنية , ونحن نعتقد انه حين تفهمون أننا لا نكرهكم ولا نريد محاربتكم بسبب إيمانكم بالإسلام , ستفهمون سبب إرادتنا القيام بأمر الله , كما قال الإسلام لا اله إلا الله.

هذا الأمر الرباني قاله الله لموسى :

التوراة , سفر العدد 33 . 56-50 :

كلم الرب موسى في عربات مواب على أردن أريحا قائلا
كلم بني إسرائيل وقل لهم أنكم عابرون الأردن إلى ارض كنعان
فتطردون كل سكان الأرض من أمامكم وتمحون جميع تصاويرهم وتبيدون كل أصنامهم المسبوكة وتخبربون جميع مرتفعاتهم
تملكون الأرض وتسكنون فيها لاني قد أعطيتكم الأرض لكي تملكوها
وتقتسمون الأرض بالقرعة حسب عشائركم الكثير تكثرون له نصيبه والقليل تقللون له نصيبه حيث خرجت له القرعة فهناك يكون له حسب أسباط آبائكم تقتسمون
وان لم تطردوا سكان الأرض من أمامكم يكون الذين تستبقون منهم أشواكا في أعينكم ومناخس في جوانبكم ويضايقونكم على الأرض التي انتم ساكنون فيها
فيكون أني افعل بكم كما هممت أن افعل بهم

وفي القرآن الكريم :
سورة الإسراء : ( وقلنا من بعده لبني إسرائيل اسكنوا الأرض فإذا جاء وعد الآخرة جئنا بكم لفيفا)

سورة الاحقاف : ( ومن قبله كتاب موسى إماما ورحمة وهذا كتاب مصدق لسانا عربيا لينذر الذين ظلموا وبشرى للمحسنين)

سورة المائدة : ( إنا أنزلنا التوراة فيها هدىً ونور يحكم بها النبيّون الذين اسلموا للذين هادوا والربّانيون والأحبار بما استحفظوا من كتاب الله وكانوا عليه شهداء فلا تخشوا الناس واخشون ولا تشتروا بآياتي ثمنا قليلا ومن لم يحكم بما انزل الله فاؤلئك هم الكافرون)

بعدما رايتهم الأقوال السماوية ولان الدين الإسلامي هو دين أخلاقي , ولان لا تكون بيد الشعب اليهودي أي ارض أخرى , لذلك يجب أن لا تكون لكم معارضة لهذا – ولديكم بلدان واسعة يمكنكم السكن فيها- وتفهمون بان علينا القيام بالأمر المكتوب في التوراة . ولأنه من غير السهل مغادرة ملايين الناس بدون مساعدات مالية , فإننا نقترح عليكم أن تفاوضوا دولة إسرائيل ( التي تجسد وعود الأنبياء) , على أن تحصلوا على مساعدات اقتصادية للسكن في مكان آخر.

ولما نطيع الله نحن وانتم , يمكننا العيش بسلام , نحن وانتم وأولادنا وأولادكم لسنوات طويلة , كما قال النبي يشاعيه : ( لا ترفع امة على امة سيفا ولا يتعلمون الحرب في ما بعد)

يطلب الحفظ على قدسية هذه الصفحات. (نهاية المنشور)!! "

http://www.shorouknews.com/ContentData.aspx?id=194150

Here are scanned copies of the original publication in Arabic :

http://www.qudsmedia.net/uploads/1062009-035507PM.jpg

http://www.qudsmedia.net/uploads/1062009-035555PM.jpg

http://www.qudsmedia.net/?articles=topic&topic=4371



http://palestinethinktank.com/2010/03/18/shadi-nassar-a-very-dangerous-racial-israeli-publication-in-jerusalem-%D8%A8%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D8%B1%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%A9-english-and-french/

Russia must support Israel and don't deliver S400 to Iran or face consequences : Netanyahu suspected in Moscow terror operations


Russian Jewish Mafia inside FSB suspected and Caucasus Muslims blamed for something they never done. A kind of deja vu ! In February 2004, zionist jews clans stroke Moscow, one year later, London underground was bombed, by israelis... helped by Tony Blair government. Russia is invited to pull off Iran or face consequences like Lukoil last week, said war criminal and 911 brain master Netanyahu.





Moscow metro blasts kill dozens



At least 62 people have been reported killed and 73 have been wounded in twin explosions at stations on Moscow's metro rail network.



The first blast took place at the Lubyanka metro station in the centre of the city, followed by a second explosion at Park Kultury in the southwest of the city.



Moscow's chief prosecutor said the explosions were carried out by "suicide bombers" wearing explosive belts.



"We can assume that belts with explosive devices were attached to their bodies," Yuri Syomin told reporters at Lubyanka square.



"The scenario was similar at Park Kultury metro station."



Yuri Luzhkov, the mayor of Moscow, said that both attacks were carried out by "female bombers".

Speaking about the Lubyanka attack, Irina Andrianova, a spokeswoman for Russia's emergencies ministry, told the Itar-Tass news agency: "The blast hit the second carriage of a metro train that stopped at Lubyanka, at 0756 (0356 GMT)."



The headquarters of Russia's Federal Security Service (FSB), successor to the Soviet-era KGB, is located just above Lubyanka station.



At least 12 people were reported to have been killed and 23 wounded in the later blast at Park Kultury.



"Both attacks took place on what is known as the Red Line, or line number one," Al Jazeera's Neave Barker, reporting from Moscow, said.



"This has to be seen as a politically motivated attack targeting what is perhaps one of the most symbolic signs of Russian authority in the capital when thousands of people are using one of the most heavily used metros in the world."



The Moscow metro system is one of the world's busiest, carrying around seven million passengers on an average workday.



Witnesses spoke of panic at the stations, with people falling over each other in dense smoke and dust as they tried to escape.



"I was moving up on the escalator when I heard a loud bang, a blast. A door near the passage way arched, was ripped out and a cloud of dust came down on the escalator," a witness called Alexei told the state-run Rossiya 24 news television channel.

"People started running, panicking, falling on each other."



Another witness at the Park Kultury station told RIA news agency: "People were yelling like hell.

"There was a lot of smoke and in about two minutes everything was covered in smoke," he said.



Russian civil aviation authorities ordered increased security at airports after the explosions.


Source: Agencies

Kavkaz Center

http://www.kavkazcenter.com/eng/content/2010/03/29/11737.shtml

Sunday, March 28, 2010

أبو عبيدة: المقاومة جاهزة للردِّ على أي عدوان


غزة - المركز الفلسطيني للإعلام
www.palestine-info.info

أكد "أبو عبيدة" الناطق الإعلامي باسم "كتائب الشهيد عز الدين القسام" الجناح العسكري لحركة المقاومة الإسلامية "حماس" أن تهديدات وزير المالية الصهيوني "يوفال شتاينيتس" بإعادة احتلال قطاع غزة هي محاولةٌ للهروب من الصدمة التي مُنِيَ بها الاحتلال بعد مقتل 3 من جنوده على حدود قطاع غزة الجمعة الماضي، ومن أجل رفع معنويات الجنود الصهاينة، مشددةً على جاهزية "الكتائب" التامَّة؛ للتصدِّي لأي عدوان أو حماقة صهيونية.

وأوضح أبو عبيدة -في تصريحات صحفية اليوم الأحد (27-3)-: "هذه التصريحات والتهديدات المتتالية من الاحتلال الصهيوني -عبر وزرائه وقادة جيشه وغيرهم- تأتي من منطق العنجهية والاستكبار الذي يتميز به العدو الصهيوني منذ أن احتلَّ هذه الأرض، لكنْ في المقابل هذا المنطق لن يربكنا ولن يقلقنا ولن يدفعنا إلى التراجع".

وتساءل أبو عبيدة: "إذا كانت هذه قوات النخبة تتعرَّض بواسطة سلاح بسيط موجود لدينا؛ لهذه الخسائر، وهي لا تستطيع التقدم عشرات الأمتار في قطاع غزة، فكيف هو الحال في القوات العادية؟ وكيف يمكنهم التقدم لإعادة احتلال كامل القطاع؟!".

وحول حديث الوزير الصهيوني عن أنهم لن يقبلوا بمواصلة حركة "حماس" التسلُّح بصواريخ بعيدة المدى، قال أبو عبيدة: إن "هذه أسطوانة مكررة، وأصبحت معتادةً، وسمعها الجميع.. نحن من حقنا أن نتسلَّح بكل ما نستطيع؛ لأن الاحتلال يمارس الإرهاب والعنصرية والإجرام بحق شعبنا الفلسطيني، بالإضافة إلى كونه يحتل أرضنا، وبالتالي نحن إن لم نتسلَّح فهذا يعدُّ جريمةً بحق شعبنا وبحق مقدساتنا وبحق تاريخنا، وتسلُّحُنا يعدُّ واجبًا دينيًّا ووطنيًّا وأخلاقيًّا حتى ندافع عن أرضنا وعن شعبنا".

وأضاف: "إن قلب الحقائق التي يمارسها الاحتلال، الذي يتسلَّح بأقوى قوة عسكرية في هذه المنطقة، ويحاول الآن يروِّج بأننا نحن من يتسلَّح من أجل مهاجمته.. هذا المنطق المقلوب لن يضلِّل شعبنا ولا شعوبنا العربية والإسلامية، وإنما يستطيعون أن يضلِّلوا حلفاءهم المضللين في العالم الغربي.. نحن سنتسمر في امتلاكنا سلاحًا، مهما كان الظرف؛ لأن هذا واجبنا للدفاع عن شعبنا".

وكان وزير المالية الصهيوني "يوفال شتاينيتس" قال في حديث إذاعي صباح اليوم الأحد (28-3): "إن "إسرائيل "قد تضطر إلى إعادة الاستيلاء على قطاع غزة، والقضاء على سلطة "حماس" الحاكمة فيه، إذا لم يكن أمامها أيُّ خيار آخر"، وأضاف: "إنه لا يمكن لـ"إسرائيل" أن تسلِّم بتسليح حركة "حماس" بصواريخ بعيدة المدى".

La ‘Séparation de l’Église/Synagogue de l’État’ n’est qu’un mythe !



L’État est comme une Église qui ne peut se séparer de ses adeptes. L’État ne peut séparer le religieux comme le non-religieux de l’État vivant. Les humains font de l’État un organisme vivant qui respire alors que sans eux, l’État ne fonctionne pas; il existe toujours, mais il est mort.


Alors qu’un peuple peut facilement identifier une Église, un Temple, une Mosquée (des bâtisses ou institutions) et leurs adeptes dans toutes leurs diversités, le même exercice n’est pas tout à fait évident dans l’identification de l’État. Qu’est-ce un État? Est-il un être humain, une structure (physique ou abstraite), ou tous en même temps ? Pourquoi séparer l’Église de l’État ? Dans le contexte de la dite séparation de l’Église obscurantiste de l’État éclairé, concept qui émane de la laïcité française, on procèdera à apporter une définition du terme tout en analysant si l’Église peut être réellement séparée de l’État ou si elle forme toujours parti intégrante de cet État.

« L’État c’est moi », Louis XIV

État est dérivé du latin, status, qui veut dire « être debout ». En nom propre, « l'Etat désigne la personne morale de droit public qui, sur le plan juridique, représente une collectivité, un peuple ou une nation, à l'intérieur ou à l'extérieur d'un territoire déterminé sur lequel elle exerce le pouvoir suprême, la souveraineté. » Par extension « l'État désigne l'ensemble des institutions et des services qui permettent de gouverner et d'administrer un pays : ministères, directions, préfectures, délégations, administrations déconcentrées ou décentralisées ». État est aussi synonyme de « pays ». [Source : Dictionnaire politique].

Quand Louis XIV exaltait « l’État c’est moi », il voulait dire qu’un tel pouvoir suprême aussi bien que les structures pour appliquer ce pouvoir étaient investis en sa personne. L’État, tel qu’on le connaît, est incarné par le gouvernement qui est mis en place par les humains et fonctionne également par les humains pour les humains, les animaux, l’environnement, etc. Les personnes qui font fonctionner l’État incluent les représentants du peuple, les leaders, les fonctionnaires, les juges, les soldats, ainsi de suite. Et ces personnes peuvent être des athées ou des adeptes de diverses religions. Ils sont tous les employés de l’État. Mais qui emploie l’État ? C’est le peuple, y compris les employés de l’État eux-mêmes. Les gouvernants ne sont pas réellement séparés des gouvernés (non-gouvernants), mais ces derniers doivent se plier aux dictats des gouvernants.

« L’État, c’est nous »

Mais la philosophie de l’État est une abstraction qui peut bien exister sans un peuple pour gouverner. Robinson Crusoé peut bien concevoir un tel État. Si on comprend l’État uniquement comme un concept structuré, on peut dire que l’État n’a pas de religion. Il n’a pas de cœur, pas de cervelle; il ne pense pas; il est un imbécile; il est muet ; il est sourd ; il ne mange pas et ne boit pas.

Mais les humains font de l’État un organisme vivant qui respire alors que sans eux, l’État ne fonctionne pas; il existe toujours, mais il est mort. Pour abriter les êtres humains qui font fonctionner l’État, il nous faut des structures physiques qui ne sont que des symboles de l’État et non l’État en lui-même. L’État est alors infesté par des êtres humains qui gouvernent. Mais le peuple non-gouvernant n’est pas la propriété de l’État. Le peuple est représenté par et forme parti de l’État. « L’État, c’est nous ».

‘Séparation de l’Église de l’État’

Il va de soi que l’État reconnaisse, représente et adopte les diversités légitimes du peuple. En dépit de la propagande, l’État ne peut jamais être laïque, car il ne peut séparer le religieux comme le non-religieux et leurs institutions respectives de l’État vivant. La séparation de l’Église de l’État n’existe pas, même dans les pays européens qui revendiquent cette philosophie, par exemple, la France qui inventa la politique de la laïcité, terme emprunté à l’Église catholique [v. la philosophie des années lumières européennes]. Malgré qu’elle se professe laïque, la France est dirigée et contrôlée par les synagogues et les églises, et elle a non seulement aidé à créer avec force l’État juif en Palestine, mais elle soutient, finance et s’identifie même avec cet État religieux et d’apartheid.

« La séparation de l’Église de l’État » est une doctrine qui s’applique à l’Église catholique dans la France post-révolutionnaire en raison des circonstances propres à cette dernière. Cependant, on ne dira pas la séparation de la Mosquée ou du Temple hindouiste de l’État. Mais, la doctrine a été élargie pour inclure toutes les institutions religieuses, et imposées même au-delà de la France à travers le colonialisme (ou le néo-colonialisme).

Un religieux qui veut le bien-être de ses semblables a parfaitement le droit de revendiquer leurs droits politiques et économiques. Il a tout le droit d’audience avec le Chef d’État, et vice versa. Dans un sens, l’État est comme une Église qui ne peut se séparer de ses adeptes.

L’État n’est pas une invention grecque

Le principe de l’État prédate la civilisation grecque. C’est fort connu que l’Europe n’aime toujours s’identifier qu’avec la civilisation grecque parce que les Grecs sont considérés ‘blancs’ et chrétiens. En réalité l’État grec n’était que très rudimentaire. Ce n’est que subséquemment que les Européens ont incorporé et adopté bien des éléments non grecs dans ce concept tout en les faisant passer pour des concepts purement occidentaux, par exemple, les droits humains, l’émancipation de la femme, l’État de Droit, l’équité en justice, le système égalitaire, la sécurité sociale, le respect d’autres religions et cultures, et davantage.

Le Khilâfah (Califate) est un example de l’État basé sur les principes islamiques [VIIeme s.]. L’Islam n’est pas uniquement une religion, mais un État, et un mode de vie (diin) complet. Selon Bertrand Russel, l’Islam fut une religion politique dès son origine. [Ref. Dictionary of Mind, Matter & Morals]. Cependant, l’État islamique est un État civil et non un état religieux comme le Vatican parce qu’il doit obligatoirement reconnaître et respecter toutes les religions. Genghis Khan [1162–1227], né Témujin, qui originalement combattait les Musulmans avant de se convertir à l’Islam, gouvernait par les codes civils et militaires, appelés Yassa. Il incorpora bien de principes islamiques dans son État. Il ne s’attachait pas à l’appartenance ethnique et à la race mais à la méritocratie. L’Islam ne reconnaît qu’une race, seule la race humaine. L’Empire mongol était ethniquement et culturellement l’un des plus divers de l’histoire. Il pratiquait la tolérance religieuse parce que la tradition mongole a toujours soutenu que la religion est un concept personnel qui ne devrait pas être sujet à la loi ou à l’ingérence. Précédant sa mort, Genghis Khan voulait créer un État civil sous le Grand Yassa en faveur de l’égalité pour tous, y compris les femmes. L’État grec, par contre, n’avait pas ces qualités. À rappeler que la civilisation grecque est redevable à la civilisation égyptienne et aryenne, et non vice versa, et que la Civilisation de la Vallée de l’Indus, n’ont pas non plus appris les principes de l’État chez les Grecs. [Réf. « Stolen Legacy: Greek Philosophy is Stolen Egyptian Philosophy » de George G.M. James.]

Conclusion

Grâce à une férocité inégalable dans l’histoire, le colonialisme et l’impérialisme occidentaux ne reculèrent devant aucun génocide et culturocide, et démantelèrent tous les autres systèmes étatiques bien supérieurs aux leurs. Des centaines de pays subirent le sort de l’Hindoustan, réputé pour ses richesses, et son État moderne et pluriculturel, en voyant leurs richesses spoliées, leurs cultures détruites, et leurs systèmes de gouvernance imposés aux vaincus, sans oublier l’institutionnalisation du racisme à l’occidental, et en glorifiant tout ce qui était (ou qu’ils disaient être) de Grèce. C’est à travers des guerres d’agression d’une violence extrême et une politique très britannique de « diviser pour régner » qu’ils réussirent à démolir les empires mongol et ottoman qui ont civilisé plus de la moitié du monde. Par exemple, l’empereur Jalaluddin Muhammad Akbar est mentionné dans l’Encyclopédie britannique comme le plus grand empereur de l’histoire, et l’Hindoustan unifié par les Mongols comme un État moderne.

Les Européens sont militairement supérieurs. Ils ont inventé les bombes nucléaires, hydrogène et à neutron qu’ils ne veulent pas que les autres possèdent. Ils ont inventé le capitalisme sauvage à travers lequel ils asservissent et exploitent les peuples du monde entier. Ils manipulent les principes de l’État à leurs bénéfices. Ils passent de lois fascistes et oppressives et créent des camps de concentration et de torture. Alors qu’ils sont toujours dirigés par leurs Églises, Synagogues et Loges franc-maçonniques, ils nous aveuglent en imposant le mythe de la Séparation de l’Église de l’État chez eux comme dans les pays qu’ils exploitent par un capitalisme sauvage d’État ou qu’ils occupent militairement, et contrôlent politiquement et économiquement. Dans un monde ‘démocratiquement’ capitaliste ou une petite minorité possède et contrôle la grande majorité des ressources et richesses, tout État est aussi sujette aux dictats d’un Super État capitaliste et suprématiste dont les symboles sont la Banque Mondiale et les Nations Unis contrôlés par les Sionistes, la CIA et bien d’autres.

M Rafic Soormally

Londres / 27 mars 2010

Thursday, March 25, 2010

War on Islaam in the UK : Are British Zionists behind the Tahir-ul- Qadri fatwa ?

Neo-Conservative ‘Fatwa’ of Tahir-ul-Qadri

Leading Islamophobes and Zionists have naturally welcomed Dr. Qadri’s one-dimensional fatwa, condemning suicide bombing and terrorism. There was hardly any reference to the context; the ongoing Anglo-US-Israeli terrorism over the last three decades that has resulted in occupation, theft of land and natural resources, and numerous massacres of innocent Muslims (Sabra and Shatila, Qana, Jenin, Lebanon, Gaza, Fallujah, Highway of Death going towards Basra, etc). Far from a fatwa, it looks like the typical spin of a nasty neo-conservative.



If the subject of the fatwa is terrorism, then he should at least define this elusive term; according to Dr. Qadri, terrorism is targeting non-combatants, whereas ‘legitimate’ war mean targeting combatants. It is strange for man claiming to have scholarly credential, to come up with such a simplistic view of war and terrorism, which bears no relation to the real world. The methods of warfare have ‘evolved’ from the days of spears and swords, and with the use of explosives over populated cities, substantial ‘collateral’ damage is guaranteed; war means the mass killing of civilians.



Even a mediocre academic recognises the pseudo distinction between, terrorism of non-state actors and wars waged by state. To be succinct –wars waged by states is mass terrorism with a big budget, whereas terrorism is war on a smaller budget. Both acts involve the killing of civilians, driven by a political motive. Therefore, one can wage war for democracy or for the implementation of Sharia laws. To label one category of violence, as terrorism has no intellectual merit, it is just for political convenience.



There is no inherent logic to suggest that terrorism can only be committed by non-state actors. The bombing of the pharmaceutical factory in Sudan, the illegal invasion of Iraq and the carnage in Gaza are all clear examples of state terrorism and crimes against humanity. However, such acts of terrorism fail to register on Dr. Qadri’s ‘fatwa’ radar. Indeed, it would have been logical and fair for Dr. Qadri to condemn ‘terrorism’ in terms of magnitude – thus start with condemning state terrorism, then the terrorism of non-state actors (groups and individuals); many of which can also be classed as resistance against state terrorism, such as the reaction to the criminal invasion and the subsequent gang rape of Iraq. In terms of rape, I am not just referring to the horror chamber of Abu-Ghraib, but the destruction and looting of the entire country.



Far from addressing state terrorism, Dr. Qadri calls such crimes as foreign policy mistakes1; this is the language of a typical heartless neo-conservative. If Dr. Qadri is really bothered by acts of terrorism, then he should have issued his fatwa a lot earlier, focusing on the primary source of terrorism, which is the ongoing state terrorism inflicted on the innocent Muslims and non-Muslims around the world by the Anglo-US-Israeli terrorists. Instead, he decides to jump into his fatwa suit, when the Muslims respond to invasion, occupation and slaughter of innocent civilians. He cites classical scholars and for sure, none of the classical scholars would have issued such a meaningless, irrational and a treacherous ‘fatwa’.



Furthermore, state terrorism is not confined to direct combat, collective punishment is also used by states to kill civilians. The sanction against Iraq killed 500,000 innocent children; Israelis also continue to use similar methods against the Palestinians, as it builds various concentration camps for the Palestinians. Such methods are far more effective than suicide bombing and they are not worthy of a fatwa.



The UN has failed to reach consensus on the notion of terrorism, simply because it is a term of abuse to denigrate ones opponent. Only the naive would carry the definition of the opponent. Thus, Dr. Qadri should retract his one-sided condemnation of the lesser ‘terrorism’; reissue the fatwa condemning the primary source of terrorism.



Allegedly, Dr. Qadri also supports the right to resist occupation, in places like Palestine. After giving extensive details of what the suicide bombers cannot attack in the face of the ongoing Israeli oppression and collective punishment, he implies that resistance can only target active Israeli troops in combat. However, he condemns the use of suicide bombing. Thus, how can the unarmed Palestinians resist a conventional force? How do you target an F16 flying at high altitude dropping bombs on the civilian population, and committing the ultimate act of mass terrorism? It seems Dr. Qadri is lecturing the side with the mass civilian casualties not to engage in killing enemy civilians, as a matter of response and deterrence. This is more like a Christian priest advising the followers to turn the other cheek, rather than an Islamic scholar calling for Jihad to liberate the occupied lands from oppressors.



War is a bilateral issue, at the very least. You fight the enemy as they fight you – because not only it is stated in a verse of Quran, but also that is the essence of combat. Thus, a fatwa should have started with examining the conduct of both sides, taking into account the disparity of the two sides and most importantly, highlight who is the culprit in the conflict. Any legal system demands that you make a distinction between culprit and the victim; otherwise, a murder is the same as the one killing in self-defence. The Palestinians in Jerusalem is not the guilty party, it is the thieves coming from abroad and occupying their home are the ones that need to be expelled. This is all justified in the name of religion by the fanatical Zionists.



In addition, it is in the interest of the Muslims to halt the killing of civilians, as they are the biggest victim. However, that requires a collective effort – and only a simpleton would call on the victims for unilateral disengagement.



Of course, the fatwa has been magnified by the media, and some quarters amongst the Muslims have shown support, as well as the anti-Islamic faction, but many more have not, their voice remains silent. Ultimately, the ‘success’ of the fatwa will depend on how many adheres to it. The essence fatwa seems to have adopted the method of Ghandi, advising the resistance to lay down their arms and recourse to non-violent actions and hope for mercy from their oppressors.



Dr. Qadri maybe recognised as a scholar of Islam in some quarters, and like many of the Muslim scholars and Imams, they are out of touch with the real world, and thus easily misguided on the simplest of issues. He should retract his superficial notion of terrorism and war, which no doubt will nullify his fatwa that is in the process of being fully translated.



It is reasonable to expect that any Islamic Scholar should take into account the interests of the Muslims, whilst issuing a fatwa. So, why Dr Qadri could not stand up and issue a fatwa when the civilian population were slaughtered in Gaza or the numerous occasions prior to that? He has written on human rights, and thus he could easily pass a fatwa on the numerous Muslims incarcerated in the prisons of the democratic western world. What about a fatwa on torture carried out by US intelligence? Is it too much to expect from Dr. Qadri to come out in defence of the Muslims? Anyway, so what prompted him to pronounce a ‘fatwa’ now? He says, the events in Pakistan have provoked him, yet the hundreds of thousands slaughtered prior to that were not enough to trigger him into action.



Far from being scholarly, Dr. Qadri seems like one of those simple people, suffering from the moderate-Muslim syndrome, who only see violence in the deaths of 3000 or 52, and fails to see the killing of one million plus innocent Muslim civilians. His fatwa radar is surely defective! After the killing of 1500 civilians, the Palestinians are still the terrorists and the Israelis were merely defending themselves; Dr. Qadri’s irrational and misguided ‘fatwa’ reinforces that type of skewed viewpoint that is propagated by the real terrorists and extremists of this world. Such a fatwa serves the neo-conservative agenda; most certainly, it will prove to be irrelevant for the oppressed Muslims.





Yamin Zakaria (yamin@radicalviews.org)

London, UK



Published on 21/03/2010



www.radicalviews.org

http://yaminzakaria.blogspot.com





1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09WxkO54egU&feature=related – Dr. Qadri gives a CNN interview.

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

OPERATION NOVEMBER 1950 : Netanyahu has a 'bullet for Obama' and 'dirty bombs' terror attacks for the europeans


Zionist jews of Londonistan in final preparation of massive terror attacks in Europe on behalf of Israel. As warned in this blog since the 8 November 2008. Great Britain, Netherlands-NATO, France and Germany are helping Tel Aviv. Note that these bastards wrote 'al Qa'ida' in French not the usual 'al Qaeda' in English, as North African were supposed to play the patsie roles... Some zionist jewish people in London are in big trouble !

We've warned you !

Abu Suleyman

Britain at risk from al-Qa'ida 'dirty' nuclear bomb




Britain is facing an increased threat of nuclear attacks by al-Qa'ida terrorists, according to three counter-terrorism reviews published yesterday.

Downing Street issued an update to the National Security Strategy, which stated that "the UK does face nuclear threats now", adding that there was "the possibility that nuclear weapons or nuclear material [could] fall into the hands of rogue states or terrorist groups."


According to the Daily Telegraph, Lord West, the Security Minister, has already made likely the possibility of London undergoing a similar attack to that of Mumbai in 2008, when terrorists used small vessels to enter ports and take the city under siege. It comes amid fears that terrorists could transport an improvised nuclear device on the Thames and detonate it in the heart of London. Other areas thought to be vulnerable included Bristol, Liverpool, Newcastle, Glasgow and Belfast.

Another report, on the Government's "Contest" counter-terrorism strategy, said there was a danger that the enhanced expertise of insurgent groups in Afghanistan had increased the threat from a radiological "dirty bomb".

The report also suggested that bomb makers that have been active in Afghanistan could already have the ability to produce a "dirty bomb" using information available over the internet.

A third counter-terrorism report said security around stockpiles of decommissioned material was "variable and sometimes inadequate leaving materials vulnerable and to theft".


http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/britain-at-risk-from-alqaida-dirty-nuclear-bomb-1925496.html