Featured Post

GUERRE MESSIANIQUE SIONISTE AVANT LA VENUE DE LEUR MACHIAH/ANTECHRIST/DAJJAL: EXTENSION DES FRONTIERES DE L'ENTITE SIONISTE, VOL ET PILLAGE DU GAZ ET DU PETROLE DES PAYS MUSULMANS DE NOUAKCHOTT A BAGHDAD

« Le comble du savoir-faire ne consiste pas à remporter toutes les batailles, mais à soumettre l’armée ennemie sans livrer bataille » (Sun...

Sunday, May 30, 2010

Actualisation des évenements de la flotille de la Liberté (anglais et francais)

Sheykh Raed Salah, believed to have been killed during the israel massacres this morning. Brothers in Palestine just confirmed that the Sheykh is martyr (Shahid). Ina lillahi wa ina ileyhi raji3oun. AlJazeera, without any evidence, is still claiming that Sheykh Raed Salah is alive while the relatives of the sheykh had no contact with him or any other people kidnapped in high sea.

Israeli Flotilla Hit Part Of Broader Military Agenda

Turkey To Send New Flotilla - Defended By The Turkish Navy

Does Israel Rule the World?


Israel: The Pariah of the International Community

Israel Forces Fired On Sleeping Civillians Under Cover Of Darkness

Turkish Sources - Israeli Advance Target Assassination List Found on Flotilla

Israeli Death List lost by Israeli Soldier during raid

Former CIA Officer's McGovern & Giraldi: Israel Controls U.S. Government & Media

GORDON DUFF: ISRAEL SCAMS U.S., “GAZA CONVOY CARRYING STOLEN NUKES”

Israel's Attack on Us All


Attack against Freedom Flotilla is a terrorist act and a crime against humanity


Netanyahu and his cabinet brace for their survival now, cancels his visit in occupied USA, a country zionist jews control.

31 May 2010 :FLOTILLA TO GAZA LIVE
: International outrage after Israel kill 22 peace activists and humanitarian workers


Watch live streaming video from insaniyardim at livestream.com


http://www.livestream.com/insaniyar

For Arabic speakers, live stream :


http://www.aqsatv.ps/ar/?action=live


http://www.qudstv.com/LiveFeed.aspx


http://www.alhiwar.tv/


http://www.livestation.com/channels/43-al_jazeera_arabic



For English speakers :


http://www.livestation.com/channels/3-al_jazeera_english_english


http://www.livestation.com/channels/52-press_tv_english




This israeli attack is a prelude of a global war in the Middle East : Arab puppet states Saudis, Egypt and Jordan put their army on high alert, same for Lebanon, Syria, Turkey. Our sources confirmed that France, Germany, Italy, Spain did the same as members of NATO, this was requested by the white house 48 hours ago. This agression is a direct provocation to war against the new axis Turkey-Syria-Iran... These countries are the target of the Obama-Netanyahu plan, as North Korea !

Sources confirmed that Turkey army has ordered represails in Northern Iraq and a possible ground invasion. Turkish army received order to no reply to any american, NATO or israeli provocation at the moment, until they coordinate with their allies in the region. American, British put their bases in Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Kuweit and the Gulf in ' active combat phase', which means that the countries hosting these bases are now in full control of the pentagon. Which mean any attack on Iran from Saudi Arabia bases or any Gulf country will trigger a world war, as planned by Tel Aviv.

Israel Forces Fired On Sleeping Civillians Under Cover Of Darkness



Steve Watson
Prisonplanet.com
Monday, May 31st, 2010

Israel  Forces Fired On Sleeping Civillians Under Cover Of Darkness  310510attackWhile the Israeli government is praising it’s soldiers as heroes and saying they were acting in self defence by firing on unarmed civilians flying a white flag in international waters, one group involved with the Freedom Flotilla has a quite different story.

A spokeswoman for Israel Defence Forces (IDF), Avital Leibovich, claims that Israeli officers gave several warnings before boarding the the Turkish boat, the Mavi Marmara.

Somehow, according to Leibovich, when the soldiers did board the boat, they were then attacked by unarmed activists and relieved of their guns – a claim that is not backed up by video footage of the ambush.

Leibovich told reporters “We found ourselves in the middle of a lynching,”

“We didn’t look for confrontation but it was a massive attack,” she said. “What happened was a last resort.”

This story is on its face ridiculous.

The following press release came from Freegaza.com , one of the aid groups involved in the flotilla, in the wake of the attack:

Under darkness of night, Israeli commandoes dropped from a helicopter onto the Turkish passenger ship, Mavi Marmara, and began to shoot the moment their feet hit the deck.

They fired directly into the crowd of civilians asleep. According to the live video from the ship, two have been killed, and 31 injured. Al Jazeera has just confirmed the numbers.

Streaming video shows the Israeli soldiers shooting at civilians, and our last SPOT beacon said, “HELP, we are being contacted by the Israelis.”

As things currently stand 20 people are thought to have been killed in the attack.

While the IDF and the Israeli government claim that their soldiers were attacked by violent political agitators wielding knives, several videos of those on board the boats and scenes from their voyage reveal that they are peaceful civilians that could not possibly constitute any threat to one of the most powerful armies on the planet.

In the following clip American born pro-Palestinian activist Huwaida Arraf, the Free Gaza Movement chairperson and delegation co-coordinator for the flotilla, explains the mission of the flotilla noting that “Israel is threatening to attack us, to use force if necessary when it is obvious that we are average civilians, we don’t constitute any threat except for the fact that we want to stand up for the right of the Palestinian people to lead a life with dignity.”

Arraf is also the co-founder of the International Solidarity Movement (ISM), the stated mission of which is to “resist the Israeli occupation of the West Bank using nonviolent tactics”.

Just before being kidnapped by Israel, Arraf stated that: “No one could possibly believe that our small boat constitutes any sort of threat to Israel. We carry medical and reconstruction supplies, and children’s toys. Our passengers include a Nobel peace prize laureate and a former U.S. congressperson. Our boat was searched and received a security clearance by Cypriot Port Authorities before we departed, and at no time did we ever approach Israeli waters.”

As this Reuters clip from almost two weeks ago highlights, the activists and humanitarian workers were outraged at the fact that the Israeli government openly announced that it would use force against unarmed civilians if they attempted to break the blockade against Gaza:

Here is another video of one of the activists involved with the Freedom Flotilla, Irishman Shane Dillon, Mate on Challenger 1. The scenes aboard the boat clearly show that this was a humanitarian mission, not some kind of dangerous guerilla fleet:

The boat in this clip, in addition to another boat, Challenger II, are are flagged and registered in the United States which means they are U.S. territory.

The Free Gaza movement has stated “Therefore we expect the U.S. government to intervene if U.S. property is wrongly confiscated by Israeli authorities as they have threatened.”

The ships, manned by 700-800 activists and politicians from more than 40 countries, are carrying 10,000 tonnes of cargo including building materials, medical supplies and paper for schools. One boat is carrying a complete dental surgery including drills, another has crayons and chocolate intended for Gazan children. All the cargo has been paid for by public donations.

Other videos and images of the flotilla featured on the Witnessgaza.com website show that the boats were clearly marked as humanitarian vessels:

For elements of the mainstream media to publish, without any challenge, comments by Israeli officials claiming that this mission was violent or dangerous in any way shape or form is utterly reprehensible.

Not content with violating every international humanitarian agreement there is, the Israeli government with its latest actions is now engaged in violation of the UN convention on the Law of The Sea, which provides for “freedom of navigation” and states that “The high seas shall be reserved for peaceful purposes.”

The Palestinian people have been preparing for over a month to receive the aid boats, working on deepening the harbour in Gaza:

Now thanks to the Israeli “heroes” that ambushed and slaughtered sleeping humanitarians in the night, all that hard work will go unrewarded.


Boucherie israélienne en pleine mer

Publié le mardi 1er juin 2010 sur le site info-palestine.net
par Gilad Atzmon/Dissident Voice

C’est maintenant aux nations de bouger, et de faire monter une pression décisive sur Israël et ses citoyens... Dès maintenant, tout Israélien doit être considéré comme un criminel de guerre, sauf preuve contraire.


Certains de ceux qui ont ordonné cette boucherie

Au moment où j’écris ce texte, l’ampleur de la tuerie meurtrière israélienne en mer n’est pas encore bien connue. Cependant, nous savons déjà que vers 4 h du matin, heure de Gaza, des centaines de commandos des forces de défense israéliennes ont pris d’assaut la flottille du mouvement international humanitaire, Free Gaza. Nous apprenons de la presse arabe qu’au moins 16 (19) militants pour la paix ont été assassinés et plus de 50, blessés. Une fois encore, il est terriblement évident qu’Israël n’essaie pas de cacher sa véritable nature : une entreprise collective meurtrière inhumaine, alimentée par une psychose et conduite par la paranoïa.

Pendant des jours, le gouvernement israélien a préparé la société israélienne à ce massacre en mer. Il a prétendu que la Flottille transportait des armes, qu’il y avait des « terroristes » à bord. C’est seulement hier soir qu’il m’est apparu que cette campagne médiatique malveillante d’Israël était lancée pour préparer l’opinion israélienne à une opération militaire meurtrière et de grande ampleur, dans les eaux internationales. Ne vous méprenez pas. Si je n’ai vu qu’hier soir où Israël allait exactement et quelles seraient les conséquences possibles, le cabinet israélien et l’élite militaire en ont été pleinement conscients tout au long du processus. Ce qui s’est passé n’est pas juste une attaque de pirates terroriste. C’est en réalité un assassinat en plein jour, même s’il s’est produit dans l’obscurité.

Hier à 22 h, j’ai contacté Free Gaza et j’ai partagé avec eux tout ce que je savais. J’ai évidement compris que ces centaines de militants pour la paix, la plupart des gens assez âgés, avaient peu de chances contre la machine à tuer israélienne. J’ai prié toute la nuit pour nos frères et sœurs. A 5 h (GMT) ce matin, la nouvelle a éclaté dans le monde. Dans les eaux internationales, Israël venait d’attaquer le convoi international innocent, des navires qui transportent du ciment, du papier et de l’aide médicale pour les Gazaouis assiégés. Les Israéliens ont utilisé des balles réelles, tuant et blessant tout autour d’eux.

Aujourd’hui, nous allons assister à des manifestations à travers le monde, à de nombreuses manifestations de deuil. Nous verrons même quelques amis d’Israël « prendre position » contre le massacre. De toute évidence, ça ne suffira pas.

Le massacre qui a eu lieu était une opération israélienne préméditée. Israël voulait du sang, parce qu’il croit que sa « puissance de dissuasion » grandit avec le nombre de morts qu’il laisse derrière lui. La décision israélienne d’utiliser des centaines de commandos contre des civils a été prise par le cabinet israélien et le haut commandement militaire israélien. Ce que nous avons vu, ce n’est pas juste un échec sur le terrain. Il s’agit en réalité d’un échec institutionnel d’une société morbide qui, depuis longtemps, a perdu tout contact avec l’humanité.

Ce n’est pas un secret que les Palestiniens vivent sous un siège depuis des années. Mais c’est maintenant aux nations de bouger, et de faire monter une pression décisive sur Israël et ses citoyens. Etant donné que ce massacre a été perpétré par une armée populaire qui a suivi les instructions données par un gouvernement « démocratiquement élu », dès maintenant, tout Israélien doit être considéré comme un criminel de guerre, sauf preuve contraire.

Considérant le fait qu’Israël a pris d’assaut des navires battant pavillon irlandais, turc et grec, les membres de Nations unies et les pays de l’Union européenne doivent immédiatement cesser toute relation avec Israël et fermer leur espace aérien aux avions israéliens.

Considérant les dernières infos d’hier selon lesquelles des sous-marins nucléaires israéliens se trouvent dans le Golfe, le monde doit réagir rapidement et sévèrement.

Israël est dorénavant officiellement dément et assassin. L’Etat juif n’est pas simplement insouciant de la vie humaine, comme nous l’avons cru durant sa campagne de presse qui a mené à cette boucherie, Israël en réalité, prend plaisir à infliger la souffrance et la dévastation aux autres.

Gilad Atzmon est écrivain et musicien de jazz, il vit à Londres. Son dernier CD : In Loving Memory of America.
Son site :
http://www.gilad.co.uk/

31 mai 2010, 11:58 AM - Gilad Atzmon - Vidéo sur Dissident Voice - traduction : JPP

Lien de l'article: http://www.info-palestine.net/article.php3?id_article=8817



Sheikh Raed Salah, blessé d’une balle dans la tête, est dans un état critique

Publié le lundi 31 mai 2010 sur le site info-palestine.net (lundi 31 mai: 16h34)
par Ma’an News


Sheikh Raed Salah a été grièvement blessé par les forces israéliennes qui ont attaqué « la Flottille de la Liberté » lundi matin, et il est actuellement traité à l’hôpital Tel Hashomer Israël pour une blessure par balle à la tête.


Sheikh Raed Salah, président du mouvement islamique en Israël


Salah est le dirigeant de la branche nord du Mouvement islamique en Israël. Des protestations massives sont attendues dans le nord, les citoyens palestiniens d’Israël qualifiant dès à présent l’incident de tentative d’assassinat.

Salah avait annoncé sa participation à la flottille lors d’une conférence en Allemagne il y a trois semaines, au cours de laquelle il a appelé les Palestiniens de la Diaspora à continuer à lutter pour leur droit au retour.

Salah s’était vu récemment interdire l’entrée dans la mosquée Al-Aqsa suite à des accusations selon lesquelles il avait, en 2007, agressé un officier israélien lors des manifestations sur le site sacré où il a mené des mobilisations contre les fouilles israéliennes autour d’Al-Aqsa.

Il avait appelé les responsables musulmans et chrétiens à tenir une réunion à Jérusalem-Est pour faire valoir leur opposition à ces fouilles. Mais la réunion avait été interdite par les autorités israéliennes [d’occupation] qui affirmaient que l’organisation à l’origine de la réunion, la Fondation Al-Aqsa, était affiliée au Hamas [mouvement de la résistance palestinienne].

Les organisateurs ont alors insisté sur la tenue de la réunion et l’ont transférée dans un autre hôtel, mais les forces israéliennes sont intervenues et ont cassé le rassemblement. Salah avait ensuite déclaré au journal britannique The Guardian : « le comportement des forces de sécurité israéliennes est infantile... »

Salah avait été acquitté de toutes les charges le mois dernier.

En mai 2003, Salah avait été arrêté et détenu par les forces israéliennes sur l’accusation de financer le Hamas, et il avait purgé deux ans dans une prison israélienne. À sa libération une interdiction de voyager a été émise contre lui, l’empêchant de quitter les frontières contrôlées par Israël et lui imposant de se présenter auprès de la police tous les mois.

Cheikh Salah a fait plusieurs observations sur la relation des juifs avec le Mur des Lamentations, certifiant que ce mur faisait partie du complexe d’al-Aqsa. Salah a été cité par le site électronique du journal israélien Yedioth Aharonoth comme disant que « Le Mur des Lamentations - sur toutes les diverses parties, les structures et les portes, [...] est une partie inséparable du complexe d’al Aqsa. Celui qui dit que les juifs ou l’establishment israélien a des droits sur al-Aqsa, même sur une seule pierre, commet une attaque abominable, un mensonge totalement infondé. »

31 mai 2010 - Ma’an News - Vous pouvez consulter cet article à :
http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDet...
Traduction : Info-Palestine.net

Lien de l'article: http://www.info-palestine.net/article.php3?id_article=8815


Global Outrage as Israel Kills 20 on Aid Flotilla

By Christopher Bollyn,

www.bollyn.com

May 31, 2010


At least 15 civilians were killed by Israeli forces on 31 May 2010 when the Israelis launched a pre-dawn commando raid on the international civilian aid flotilla headed for the blockaded population of Gaza. The Israeli raid occurred in international waters which makes it a "gross breach of international law", as a statement from the Turkish Foreign Ministry noted.



Israeli attacks on Gaza aid fleet "a gross breach of international law"

Israeli forces have attacked a flotilla of aid-carrying ships aiming to break the country's siege on Gaza. At least 15 people were killed and dozens injured when troops intercepted the convoy of ships dubbed the Freedom Flotilla early on Monday, the Israeli military said.

The flotilla was attacked in international waters, 65km off the Gaza coast.


Footage from the flotilla's lead vessel, the Mavi Marmara, showed armed Israeli soldiers boarding the ship and helicopters flying overhead. Al Jazeera's Jamal Elshayyal, on board the Mavi Marmara, said Israeli troops had used live ammunition during the operation.

The Free Gaza Movement, the organisers of the flotilla, said Israeli troops opened fire as soon as they stormed the convoy. Our correspondent said that a white surrender flag was raised from the ship and there was no live fire coming from the passengers.

Before losing communication with our correspondent, a voice in Hebrew was clearly heard saying: "Everyone shut up".




International Outrage:

"People certainly have the right to resist if they're being attacked. We taught our Free Gaza Movement people to be non-violent, and the Turks did the same, but if anyone resisted, it was in response to soldiers opening fire on them when they hit the deck."
- Greta Berlin, one of the flotilla organisers, rejecting Israel's claim that the activists were the first ones to start shooting. Berlin said there were no weapons on board the boats, and that any violence from the activists would have been in self-defense.

“The attack clearly shows Israel's aggressive nature and its disrespect to international and humanitarian rules and laws. We call on the international community to take immediate steps against Israel, a rogue state that practices all forms of terrorism and piracy, and instigates tension and instability in the region and in the middle of the Mediterranean Sea.”
- Amr Moussa, Secretary General, Arab League
“The Palestinian leadership is closely following the developments and the President calls on the United Nations to confront Israel, which is disregarding all international laws and norms. The attack on the Flotilla is an attack against humanity. This incident will have grave consequences in the region and the world.”
- Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas

“The Israeli attack on the aid convoy is a dangerous and crazy step that will exacerbate tensions in the region. Lebanon firmly denounces this attack and calls on the international community, notably major powers... to take action in order to end this continued violation of human rights and threat to international peace.”
- Saad Hariri, Prime Minister of Lebanon

“The interception on the convoy is unacceptable ... Israel will have to bear the consequences of its actions. We strongly condemn it and await an immediate explanation. By targeting innocent civilians, Israel has once again clearly displayed that does not value human lives and peaceful initiatives. We forcefully condemn these inhumane activities by Israel. The incident that occurred in open sea -- which is a gross breach of international law -- could cause irrevocable consequences for our relations. We wish to express our condolences to the bereaved families of the deceased, and swift recovery to the wounded.”
- Statement from Turkish Foreign Ministry
Sources:
"Israel attacks Gaza aid fleet", Al Jazeera, May 31, 2010
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2010/05/201053133047995359.html

"Outrage over Israel attack", Al Jazeera, May 31, 2010



Al-Khatib : la situation du Cheikh Raed Salah est très critique (12h07)


Al-Nassera – CPI

www.palestine-info.info

Le vice-président du mouvement islamique dans les territoires palestiniens occupés en 1948, Kamal al-Khatib, a affirmé que la blessure du Cheikh Raed Salah est très critique.


"Le cheikh Raed Salah va subir plusieurs opérations chirurgicale, à la tête, après qu'il a été attaqué violemment par les forces sionistes; sa situation est très critique", a dit al-Khatib en déclarant qu'il se trouve à l'hôpital de Tel Hachoumir, à Tel-Aviv.


Il a ajouté qu'Allah seulement peut sauver la vie du Cheikh Raed Salah.


Israel kill 22 peace activists and humanitarian workers


The Israeli navy has stormed one of six ships carrying humanitarian aid to the Gaza strip, with at least two people reported killed.

Israel's Channel 10 private TV puts the death toll at about 14. Israel has so far declined to comment.

The exact location of the interception is unclear. Israel had warned the ships not to enter its territorial waters.

The ships are carrying 10,000 tonnes of aid to the Gaza Strip in an effort to break an Israeli blockade.

Turkish TV pictures taken on board the Turkish ship leading the flotilla show Israeli soldiers fighting to control passengers.

The footage showed a number of people, apparently injured, lying on the ground. The sound of gunshots could be heard. It is not clear whether the fighting is ongoing.

Al-Jazeera TV reported from the same ship that Israeli navy forces had fired and boarded the vessel, wounding the captain.

The Al-Jazeera broadcast ended with a voice shouting in Hebrew, "Everybody shut up!"

Organisers of the flotilla say at least 30 people were wounded in the incident.
"Provocation'

The six-ship flotilla left international waters off the coast of Cyprus on Sunday and was expected to arrive in Gaza later on Monday.

Israel has said it would stop the boats, calling the campaign a "provocation intended to delegitimise Israel".

An economic blockade was imposed by Israel after the Islamist movement Hamas took power in Gaza.

Israel says it allows about 15,000 tones of humanitarian aid into Gaza every week.

But the United Nations says this is less than a quarter of what is needed.

Hamas, a militant palestinian group that controls the Gaza strip, has fired thousands of rockets into Israel over the past decade.


Saturday, May 29, 2010

Afghanistan : Les Empires viennent mourir aux pieds des montagnes afghanes !!

Zouhair Lahna
Samedi 29 Mai 2010

Les Empires viennent mourir aux pieds des montagnes afghanes !!


Je me souviens des derniers jours que j’ai passé en Afghanistan juste après les attentats du 11 septembre 2001. J’ai du évacuer le pays avec mes collègues humanitaires d’Aide Médicale Internationale laissant derrière nous les afghans face à leur sort, qui se décidait à des milliers de kilomètres, dans un bureau ovale. La plupart des Afghans ordinaires sont des ruraux, ils ne connaissait ni New York, ni Oussama Ben Laden. Le ciel leur est tombé dessus, ensuite ils ont vu débarquer chez eux des soldats arrogants, leurs donnant des ordres et leurs infligeant des forfaits. C’est du déjà vu !!

Après le choc des attentats du World Trade Center. L’émotion fût immense, ne donnant plus place à la raison. Les coupables nommés sans preuves ni jugement. La loi du Far-West s’abat sans que cela fasse sourciller qui que se soit. Les pays arabes et musulmans dont sont issus les méchants désignés n’étaient pas en reste. Cédant aux amalgames savamment concoctés, ils ont béni à leurs tour cette expédition. La terreur aveugle ne faisant pas partie des enseignements de l’Islam, la condamnation fût unanime. Les rares voix qui demandaient des preuves ou qui disaient que le Pentagone n’a pas été attaqué par un avion, étaient tout simplement ignorées sinon stigmatisées.

Les jours qui ont suivi les attentats du 11 septembre et la requête des Talibans vis à vis des américains de leur fournir des preuves que le forfait a été commis par leur hôte d’alors Oussama Ben Laden. Des principes de base, que bien des musulmans ont oublié : On ne livre jamais un musulman à un Non musulman sans preuves de sa culpabilité. L’opinion publique internationale croyait les affirmations des responsables américains et de leurs services secrets comme des vérités absolues sans aucune preuve matérielle. Alors les américains ont exécuté leur 1er plan, celui d’envahir ce pays « facile » l’Afghanistan, prélude à un autre réputé plus important et plus coriace, l’Iraq. Là encore, un autre alibi celui des ‘’ Armes de Destruction Massives’’ a été avancé et martelé et il s’est avéré un mensonge caractérisé.

Force est de constater que les Think tanks américains d’alors, va-t-en guerre, grisés par la superpuissance militaire, ignorent les enseignements de l’histoire des peuples. Bientôt une dizaine d’année de ‘’guerre contre le terrorisme’’ sur le sol Afghan et les résultats sont loin d’être satisfaisants même pour les meneurs de cette expédition. Bien au contraire, le camp des Talibans s’est revigoré, soutenu par une population farouche et un terrain favorable. Sans parler de la légitimité religieuse dont les combattants tirent leurs forces.

M. Barack OBAMA, le curieux prix Nobel de la paix a choisi sa « bonne guerre » en augmentant le contingent américain de 40 000 soldats supplémentaires, dépassant les cent mille soldats. Quand le Soft Power ne marche pas comme partout ailleurs dans les autres pays musulmans sans gloire, les américains passent au Hard Power et toute leur puissance de feu. Et désormais, on utilise dans les guerres des mercenaires, qui échappent à la justice en cas de bavures. Leurs morts ne sont plus comptabilisés évitant ainsi d’annoncer un nombre réel de combattants décédés, afin de ne pas égratigner la sensibilité de l’opinion publique américaine. Quand aux pertes humaines afghanes et des familles détruites, ils n’ont pas d’importance aux yeux de leurs agresseurs. Une fois l’adversaire déshumanisé, le soldat ou le mercenaire pourra lui infliger tous les supplices imaginables. Dans l’esprit de pas mal de personnes, les afghans en général et les combattants talibans en particuliers sont des gens archaïques qui n’ont pas les mêmes ‘’valeurs universels’’ que l’occident évolué, par conséquent leur mort n’a pas la même importance et leur asservissement pourrait être légitime.

Imprégné par ces idées reçus et reniant ses propres valeurs humaines dans ce conflit, l’opinion publique internationale reste atone. Tétanisée , l’intelligentsia occidentale ne réagit que mollement à toutes les exactions commises par les armées dans ce pays depuis 2001. Rappelons que les objectifs premiers étaient la capture des dirigeants de la fameuse organisation Al Qaida et de bannir les Talibans. Aucun des objectifs n’a été atteint. Les dirigeants d’Al Qaida se sont évaporés ; Quand aux fameux Talibans caricaturaux, force est de constater qu’ils sont de plus en plus importunant et résistants. Détournés des objectifs premiers, on nous annonce actuellement la volonté à aider le pays vers « la bonne gouvernance » et bien entendu « la libéralisation de la femme ». La femme afghane a bon dos. Le joker qu’on sort toujours pour convaincre l’opinion publique occidentale de la légitimité de tuer un peu plus et de bombarder un peu plus. C’est pour faire le bien des peuples, alors c’est légitime. Drôle de concept et drôles de public qui se laisse convaincre par de pareilles aberrances.

Quand j’ai été à Peshawar, au Pakistan, j’avais vu une fresque qui a attiré mon intention dans le hall d’un hôtel. L’image d’un cavalier plié de fatigue sur sa monture errant entre les steppes, les montagnes en arrière plan. Le jeune administrateur afghan qui travaillait pour Aide Médicale Internationale m’a appris, sans dissimuler sa fierté, qu’il s’agit d’une relique d’un des rares soldats qui ont échappé à la mort lors d’une des expéditions anglaises. Trois expéditions anglaises, trois échecs plus ou moins grinçants pour les Anglais et une certitude : Que l’Afghanistan est indomptable. La suite de ce qui est advenu de l’empire Britannique est connue.

Les Soviétiques n’ont pas eu plus de bonne fortune. Le Président communiste NAJIBULLAH, installé par les communistes, en voyant les troupes Soviétiques partir en Mai 1988 ne s’en doutait, ni de son destin funeste, ni du démantèlement de l’Union Soviétique et par ricochet de tout le bloc de l’Est. Cette débandade à l’Est nous dit-on était du fait de l’Oncle Sam. Pas si sûr !!! Le président mal élu Hamid KARZAI, un poil ‘transculturé’, devrait s’intéresser à l’histoire, parce qu’elle a tendance à bégayer dans un pays si attaché à la tradition.

Les Afghans, installés dans leur culture, immuable depuis des siècles, l’utilisent comme antidote à la puissance technologique Américaine. La foi musulmane donne aux combattants Talibans, une proximité avec la mort, sans en avoir peur, le martyr faisant partie de leur culture. D’autant plus qu’ils défendent leur terre contre des envahisseurs ‘’ impies’’. Ils ne font pas de différence entre les nationalités de la coalisation de l’ISAF ou de l’OTAN. Considèrent Hamid KARZAI, ses ministres et ses soldats comme des traîtres qu’il faut combattre au même titre que les envahisseurs. Et pour finir, ils n’acceptent aucune négociation et restent bien évidement réfractaires à toutes les tentatives de corruption. C’est que les afghans appartiennent à un royaume insolent qui ne tolère pas le colonialisme.

La machine médiatique est en marche, elle aveugle les opinions internationales. S’efforçant de leur donner une vision tronquée des réalités du terrain. Tous les experts militaires et humanitaires savent qu’il ne s’agit plus qu’une guerre d’usure, et que cette guerre de Goliath contre David ne peut être gagnée. Des voix s’élèvent pour conseiller aux américains un calendrier de retrait des soldats, afin d’aménager une porte de sortie honorable. Mais ils sont confrontés à la fois à l’arrogance des Yankees qui entraînent tout l’OTAN dans son sillage ; et aux manœuvres des Sionistes qui ne peuvent laisser des résistants afghans catalogués Jihadistes Salafistes sortir vainqueurs de cette confrontation. La défaite inéluctable selon les experts et les observateurs, risquera par contre, de mettre sur la table des questions cruciales en Occident sur l’intérêt des armées hyperpuissantes et coûteuses payées par l’argent des contribuables. Et surtout faire des émules dans pas mal d’endroits du monde musulman à feu et à sang depuis des décennies.

Zouhair Lahna
Ancien vice président d’Aide Médicale Internationale

http://www.alterinfo.net/Les-Empires-viennent-mourir-aux-pieds-des-montagnes-afghanes-_a46674.html

Israel is pushing Jewish Al Saud against Iran in 2010

ANOTHER MAJOR SIGN OF THE END OF ISRAEL, FAMILY RULERS IN THE KHALEEJ KILLING EACH OTHER TO STAY IN POWER. IS 2010 A TURNING POINT AGAINST ISRAEL IN THE MIDDLE EAST ? THE FALL OF MUBARAK AND THE SEFARAD SAUDIS WILL BREAK ISRAEL INTO SHRED PIECES....

Zionist Rulers of Arabia


Brief synopsis about the leading Saudi figures


King Abdel Aziz:


also known as Ibn Saud. King Abdul Aziz is the father of King Fahd and 44 other sons. Abdul Aziz united Saudi Arabia with the sword. A savage bedouin whose self gratification, war after war, was to taste the blood of those he killed. During the early twentieth century, he offered his services to the Ottoman empire and was rejected by the Turks as unreliable and uncivilized. The British, during the same period, were looking to increase their sphere of influence in Arabia, and saw in Ibn Saud the unruly, savage warrior they were looking for to control Arabia for them. They financed him and protected him to deliver Arabia to them. Among the many of the ruling families during that period : The Hashemites (King Hussein of Jordan), the Rasheeds (trading respected family from Saudi Arabia) and the Idrisses were all unwilling to deal with the British empire after World War I on the British terms. The British found in Abdul Aziz a willing bandit they could rely on to conquer and preserve their interests. Since Abdul Aziz was a Wahhabi, he encouraged Fundamentalism to create fear in the various tribes he was trying to unite. Little did he and King Fahd after him know that fundamentalism has grown to become more than a politically oriented idealogy but a way of life.


King Fahd bin Abdel Aziz:


The corrupt members of Al-Saud Family are many. It is not easy to assemble facts on all of them with total accuracy, however, the most corrupt of them all and master of all masters is none other than the King himself. King Fahd bin Abdul Aziz. Absolute power over Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of the Saudi government. He is the judge, jury, prosecutor, defense attorney, and executioner. Having total power, he has, with other members of his family, emptied the coffers of the government. Today, Saudi Arabia is bankrupt and has a very grim economic future because of his policies and lack of vision.
More about this king and his dark history of corruption and waste in future articles to come...


Prince Sultan bin Abdel Aziz:


Third in command of the country but no less corrupt than King Fahd is Sultan bin Abdul Aziz who has four titles all with the intent to retain power and to rob the country. He is the Deputy Crown Prince, Minister of Defense, Chairman of Saudia Airlines, and the Inspector General of the country of Saudi Arabia. Imagine being the fox watching over the chicken hen !! Minister of Defense and Inspector General. This is like having the head of the largest chemical company head also the Environmental Protection Agency. What a joke. Sultan is known for his sexual deviation including penophily. He maintains several bordellos for his own pleasures in Saudi Arabia and abroad.


Prince Muhammed bin Fahd:


Eldest son of King Fahd, Mohammad bin Fahd was exposed to corruption early on. With the blessings of his father, Mohammad has stolen government funds through large telecommunications projects. Telephone deals, cellular deals, equipment, etc... His wealth is valued at close to $5 billion mostly amassed during the heydays of the late seventies and early eighties. His father assigned a government post after he pilfered through business deals. Today, he is the governor of the Eastern Province in Saudi Arabia where 25% of the oil world reserves lie. His father wants him to become the Crown Prince and Bandar bin Sultan the new Defense Minister.



Prince Faisal bin Fahd:


If a classroom had to write a thesis on al-Saud Family, Faisal bin Fahd would win the award for the imbecile of the family. Stupidly stubborn and unmistakably foolish, Faisal has spent his life in pursuit of two things : drugs and women. He gets his drugs from Lebanon through his business associates and his women from Europe following the same trail of contacts. This is a man who has never done anything right, good, or useful in his life. His father, King Fahd, appointed him as the head of all youth sports programs. One must be sick to appoint a well known drug addict to be head of all youth programs. This is like hiring a child molester as your Kindergarten teacher.


Prince Abdel Aziz bin Fahd:


The youngest son of King Fahd, Abdul Aziz is a 24 year old child who is the most protected child on earth. Born to an astute mother, King Fahd was duped into believing that if he took his son everywhere, he will never be assassinated (like King Faisal). So Abdul Aziz was born with a golden spoon in his mouth. This is a kid who is so spoiled and so protected that he has never known pain, physical, moral or emotional. People that are close to him say that he is unremarkable and vain. When his father had a heart attack in November of 1995, he bequested him $10 billion of his personal fortune. The money was transferred to Abdul Aziz accounts at Credit Suisse and Union de Banques Suisses in Geneva and Zurich with the help of Khaled al-Ibrahim, his uncle.


Prince Bandar bin Sultan:


The most ignorant and dangerous of the newcomers to the scene of politics. Bandar is the unofficial son of Sultan (See the full story below). For those who do not know him, Bandar is a murderer (he financed and approved the planting of a bomb in Beirut that killed 80 innocent women and children), a liar (Washington and his fellow Ambassadors know him well), a thief (ask Mrrs. Saeed Karma and Wafic Saeed in London), and a back stabber all in one. He also happens to be the Ambassador of Saudi Arabia to the United States since 1984, a side job considering that he spends his time plotting and stealing. His friends are few and his enemies are many. His dream is to return to power in Saudi Arabia jumping over Princes Naef and Salman. His uncle King Fahd is helping him achieve that goal. Once King Fahd dies, Bandar will lose all his powers. Bandar despises anyone who has more money than he does or is more respected than he is, mainly Prince Saud bin Faisal, Minister of Foreign Affairs who is highly respected, Prince Mohammad bin Fahd who is richer than he is, and lately Prince Walid bin Talal, the businessman wiz who has, unlike any of the al-Saud House members, made money rather than steal it.


Prince Khalid bin Sultan:


If one had to describe this big ugly huggable bear, the best description will have to be the quote provided anonymousely by General Schwarzkopf staff during the Gulf war : "When it comes to military knowhow, he gets a C minus.When it comes to bravery, he gets a D. When it comes to intelligence, he gets a D minus. Other than that, he is OK". This is the man who provided water and food to the Desert Storm troops through a contractual agreement with the government of Saudi Arabia. This contract alone made him $2 billion in commissions. After the war, he claimed that he was behind the victory of Desert Storm. Needless to say that he has been exiled to London where he has written a self-promoting book that exuded his intelligence and understanding of military operations. Even Prince Sultan wishes he never had that son. Today, he spends his time trying to impress Europeans and Americans alike through social activities. He is totally ignored except for those who benefit directly and indirectly from the crums of his money.


Prince Naef bin Abdel Aziz:


Minister of Interior and head of internal security, he is known for his cowardice. During the Mecca uprising by Jumaiha al-Otaibi, Naef fleed the Ministry to hide underground. It took a long time for him to recover. Naef oversees a large budget of which 40% a year goes to pay for bribes, kickbacks, and fixed contracts for himself and his sons. His weakness helped extremist elements in Saudi Arabia plant a bomb in Riyadh that killed five Americans. He spends most of his time overlooking a bloated bureaucracy that blocks his vision when it comes to the security of the country. His incompetency is never questioned as he is another Sudeiri. His younger brother Salman has made it clear that he will jump Naef to the throne when the right time comes.


Prince Saud bin Naef:


is the son of the Interior Minister. Here we have the typical son of a Sudeiri who steels from the government and then looses it all through rsiky businesses and pure stupidty. In fact, he is so financially overstretched that he is unable to maintain payments and obligations which means very little for him since he does not admit any obligations or knowledge of debts. A typical true business deal for Saud bin Naef is when he invested millions to build car inspection stations all over Saudi Arabia. After he built them, he went to his father seeking a royal decree that all 5 million plus cars in Saudi Arabia must be inspected annually by a certified inspection station. And the company that got immediate certification is none other than the one he put together prior to the decree. Saud bin Naef is a small government within a government charging people hundreds of Riyals a year to have their car inspected and then loosing it all somewhere else. How did the government of Saudi Arabia go bankrupt ?


Prince Salman bin Abdel Aziz:


As Governor of Riyadh, the capital of Saudi Arabia, Salman bin Abdul Aziz wears many hats. He is the strongman of Saudi Arabia and heading fast to the throne. In the last year, Salman has met with major Jewish organizations in the US to dispel the rumors that he is anti-semitic and supports Israel in its push for peace. His message was met with skeptisism according to people who have arranged the meetings to take place. Salman is as corrupt as any of his brothers and has amassed his fortunes by appropriating vast lands from the government and then selling it back to the government for whatever he needed to cover the expensive lifestyle he maintains. Salman has been instrumental in advising Fahd on procedural issues regarding the future of the seven brothers in light of Prince Abdullah taking over the throne upon the imminent death of King Fahd. But lately, King Fahd has been ignoring him totally by advancing his son Mohammad and Bandar bin Sultan to the throne.


Mohammad bin Fahd Bin Abdel Aziz

Fifty-year-old Prince Mohammad is the second son of King Fahd. He is the governor of the oil-rich eastern province, the most visible of his brothers and a secret pretender to the Saudi throne. Simultaneously, he has been involved in more shady business pay-offs at home, moral and business scandals abroad and political negligence than the younger princes of his generation.

Mohammad's qualifications are vague; a high school degree from California. His ascendancy over his older brother Faisal owes more to the latter's lack of character than to Mohammad's talents. Faisal has been disqualified from fatherly attention for indulging in drink and drugs and the writer Peler Theroux (Sandstorm) has accused him to murdering his male lover. Mohammad stepped into the number one spot by default. Pay-offs at home take place through Mohammad's Al Bilad and United Arab Helicopter companies, but Mohammad's business interests were never limited to them. In fact, as we will see, companies were created to deal with huge individual contracts and dissolved after the illegal deal was concluded.

The biggest scandal conducted under the cover of a company of convenience was exposed by the Guardian and Wall Street Journal newspapers in November 1980. A Japanese company called Petrmonde was buying 140.000 barrels of oil a day from ARAMCO at $32 a berrel. However, close examination revealed the following: the company was paying $34.63 a barrel and the differential amounted to $368.000 a day ($135 million a year), the company was not Japanese but London-based and headquartered at the Al Bilad offices and the difference in price was pocketed by Mohammad. Occurring as it did during the Iran-Iraq War, a period of tight oil supplies, the deal infuriated the American oil companies which put pressure on ARAMCO and brought the arrangement to an end. But Mohammad walked away wealthier and though Petromonde disappeared.

A second deal involving Mohammad and Saudi Telecom was an open contract but no less horrific in its scale of corruption. In 1979 international firms were invited to undertake the tripling of the number of Saudi telephone lines from 200.000 to 600.000. The project was so huge, some of the companies transported their offers in pick up trucks, and the value was estimated at somewhere between 6 and 10 billion dollars. The contract was won by a consortium of Philips of Holland, Bell of Canada and Sweden's Erikson and the agent was the Mohammad-owned and operated Al Bilad company. Other contenders for the contract, ITT, Western Electric, Thompson of France and Hitachi, smelt a rat and demanded an investigation. They claimed that their offers were lower and better than those of the winning consortium and tried to reach Mohammad to lodge a protest, but he was not available.

Nor were King Khalid and crown Prince Fahd available to receive American Ambassador William Porter who too tried to protest on behalf of his county's multinationals. Eventually the noise died down, estimates of the Mohammad-Al Bilad commission run as high as 20 per cent or $1.3 billion of the $6.7 billion winning tender. To this day, the maintenance contract for this project, because other contractors have disqualified themselves knowing that they can't win, is with Mohammad and its carries a hefty commission much greater than is acceptable in normal circumstances.

Mohammad's colossal home contracts didn't stop him from misbehaving abroad. Among others, he had established connections with British MP and one time Under Secretary of Defence Jonathan Aitken. The British politician appears to have used Mohammed's Al Bilad London offices free of charge and there have been allegations, so far unrefuted, that Mohammad and Aitken have conspired to sell arms to Singapore which eventually found their way to Iran at a time when such sales were prohibited.

Moreover, in 1981, the News of The World newspaper reported an incident involving Mohammad and a London girl for hire. His Highness appears to have roughed up the girl and escaped to America after she threatened disclosure. This aspect of Mohammad's character is reported to have more to it and a recent television programme has accused Aitken of procuring for Royals and implied that Mohammad was involved.

Most recently, during the Gulf War, Mohammad was accused of realizing hundreds of millions of dollars in profit from housing and feeding American troops sent to Saudi Arabia to protect it against Saddam Hussein. Housing these troops meant building temporary accommodations on public land confiscated by Mohammad specifically for that purpose. Feeding them, ordinarily a simple operation, found some of Mohammad's open or de facto companies charging exorbitant rates to provide them with everyday provision. It is estimated that Mohammad's profits out of this were $28 per soldier, per day, If the number of soldiers was 500.000 then it adds up per diem $14.000.000. If Mohammad's business deals make corrupt financial sense then his political qualifications are totally absent. His first appointment to an official position was as assistant to the Minister of Interior, and there is very little to report about that. Later, in 1985, he was appointed Deputy Governor of the Eastern Province and once again it is impossible to judge a performance by its non-existence. Yet later, in 1989, he was appointed to the important post of governor of the same province.

Perhaps the best way to judge his governance is to review his action in 1995. He spent five months away from his post, in Arizona in the United States with his ailing mother. During that period nothing was done, no one dared make any decisions because everything is in Mohammad's hands. Upon his return, he was confronted with the problem of what to do to implement promises made to the Shias of this province in return for making peace with the house of Saud.

The Situations in the Eastern Province continues to deteriorate, Mohammad shows no interest in the affairs of the state, his business activities continue unabated despite the overall reduction in the oil income of the country and his personal behavior is as abominable as ever. Yet, this is the star among Fahd's sons, the one his father is thinking of making King, supposedly the symbol of a new generation to replace the old discredited one.


Nayef bin Abd-al-Aziz

63 years old, Minister of the Interior. Since taking over the Ministry of Interior in 1975, Prince Nayef has been subjected to national and international attention owing to occurrences of repression and scandals. More recently he has been in the limelight for his heavy-handed clampdown against the alleged authors of the two anti-American bombings which took place in November 1995 in Riyadh and June 1996 in al-Khubar. Unfortunately, his harsh repressive stance has been closely linked to corruption and murky dealings, like most of the members of the House of Saud. Yet, initially the man was not, to use an understatement, as irresponsible as he is today. Who is Nayef bin Abd-al-Aziz? Born in 1933, Nayef is the third son of Hussa bint Ahmad al-Sudeiri, one of the seven Sudeiri brothers. He obtained his first degree in the Kingdom, but is not particularly bright intellectually, nor is he considered to be well educated. However, an honorary doctorate was conferred upon him by South Korea in 1979.


Good man turned evil:


Nayef is one of those strange human beings that mankind has known throughout the centuries. He was a calm man, who always avoided making hasty decisions in matters which committed the reputation of his ministry and himself. He used to comport himself with good manners and deference, earning himself respect and consideration amongst important personalities in society, amongst politicians and even diplomats. He maintained particularly good relations with the ulama and the religious institutions. But one day, in 1991, there was a certain Gulf War and the man turned evil almost overnight. He is known to have spoken in a way which does not befit an ordinary man, let alone his office as Minister of the Interior.


The appointment and promotion:


In 1951 he was given his first ever appointment as Deputy Governor of Riyadh from which he became Governor in 1953 only to cede it to Prince Fawaz a year later. From then on he did not assume any responsibility in public service until 1971 when his elder brother (Interior Minister Fahd) appointed him as his Deputy. Four years later, after the assassination of King Faisal in 1975, he eventually became Interior Minister himself. Twenty one years later, he is still head of this ministry and his record is indeed impressive.


Sudeiris tighten grip on power:


The Sudeiris reached the highest positions of the State when Faisal took over as King in 1962. Fahd was given the Interior, Sultan the Defence and Salman the Governorate of Riyadh. The appointment of Nayef as Deputy Interior Minister in 1971 was seen as a move which reinforced the grip of the Sudeiris on the State machinery. When he took full charge of the Ministry in 1975, Nayef, in turn, appointed his younger brother Ahmad as his deputy with whom he has since planned and executed the ministry's policies.


Importance of the Interior Ministry:


As Interior Minister, Nayef was granted important prerogatives following the demise of King Faisal. These were to gradually increase year by year, thereby emphasising the importance of the Interior Ministry in the strategy of the House of Saud of holding onto power.

The Interior Ministry has usually been seen as the bridge to the supreme office, as the cases of King Faisal and King Fahd demonstrate. Since its inception, the post has respectively been held by Prince Faisal before he became King, Musa id bin Abd-al-Rahman Al-Saud, Abd-al-Muhsin bin Abd-al-Aziz, Faisal bin Turki bin Abd-al-Aziz, Fahd and finally Nayef. Moreover, a great many lesser princes have been employed by the ministry throughout the Arabian provinces and emirates, which indicate yet again the extent of the House of Saud's grip on the country. The Interior Ministry's importance comes from the fact that it controls the policing of the population through the security services; the borders and coasts through the Borders and Coast Guards and the tribes through the so-called Mujahidin Forces. Under Nayef, and among its prominent services are the Special Police Forces, who have became notorious of late and the Anti-terrorist Squad.

One of the features of Nayef's authority, is that all civilian services within the country's provinces report directly to his ministry even if they are attached to other ministries. This is another strategic method by which the House of Saud foils possible unrest and uncovers any activity deemed suspicious. This prerogative has enabled Nayef to infringe upon the authority of the Minister of Justice as Nayef is able to control the proceedings of scores of courts, especially those dealing with political activity.

Another aspect of Nayef s prerogatives is his overall control of the media. The Supreme Information Council, set up in 1977, paradoxically comes under his authority instead of that of the Ministry of Information, which once more underlines the repressive character of the regime. Even the Foreign Ministry's Information Department was integrated into this council which has become the initiator of both internal and external information policy. In the wake of the 1979 revolt inside the Sacred Mosque in Makka, Prince Nayef was given unlimited power over the audio-visual and written press. Under the notorious March 1980 Decree no. 78, Nayef appointed a representative of his Ministry to monitor the activities of newsmen whom he forced to practice self-censorship.

In the field of human rights Nayef has always ignored the requests of human rights organizations regarding the rights of political prisoners for fair trials, and has even undertaken media campaigns against them in an attempt to belittle their importance. In the recent trials of defendants charged in connection with the Riyadh and al-Khobar anti-American bombings, Nayef himself oversaw the proceedings and is reported to have personally interrogated the accused, while circulating rumours that they were ShiÕa dissidents rather than an armed opposition to the Saud oligarchy. As a prince belonging to the family of King Abd-al-Aziz, Nayef is annually entitled to a remuneration of $100 million.

He also has a quota of oil which accounts for hundreds of millions of dollars, in addition to a quota of royal lands which he resells. He is also known to have confiscated land for his own benefit claiming that it was for security reasons. Meanwhile he is rumoured to be involved in the sale of drugs and alcohol for which he receives a commission.

In the meantime, one of his wives, Maha Sudeiri, is known to dominate him and actually makes decisions in his place at the Interior Ministry, which has led to persistent abuses of power. The victims are the ordinary people. Also, her misbehaviour abroad was such that an American television stations in Florida broadcast a film about her. Her attitude caused great embarrassment to the House of Saud who kept urging Nayef to divorce her, but in vain.

As the fourth key personality of the regime (after the King, the Heir Apparent and the Defence Minister), Nayef has an eye on the highest office, but so has his elder brother, Sultan and younger brother, Salman. This situation has created a rift between the Sudeiris, although this has so far been kept under control. But for how long? And would this diminish Crown Prince Abdallah's chances of succeeding the ailing King Fahd?


Sultan bin Abdel Aziz

SULTAN, the Defence Minister and son of King Abdul Aziz, was born in 1924. He is one the Sudeiri Seven, the full brothers of King Fahd. He is second in line to the Saudi throne.


Ambitions of a would-be Dictator:


Sultan rose to fame when he was appointed Governor of Riyadh, the capital city. But he became more powerful when he was appointed Defence Minister in 1964, a post which he still holds. Worse than this, within the Sudeiri family's relentless endeavour to secure monopoly of power, Sultan gradually acquired many other important posts in addition to the defence ministry. He is now the Deputy chairman of the Council of Ministers, the Government's General Inspector, Head of the Higher Education Council, Head of the Higher Council for Islamic Affairs and, last but not least, Head of the Higher Labour Council. These were only his most important responsibilities.

Sultan has nurtured his ambition to succeed King Fahd and this ambition has become even more apparent since Fahd's health has degenerated irremediably over the last year. But his half-brother, heir apparent Prince Abdullah, is next to succeed King Fahd under Saudi succession law which reserves the right to succession to the most senior prince. The fact that the dejure successor is Crown Prince Abdullah, is for Sultan and his six Sudeiri brothers, a great obstacle.


Low IQ blamed for violent behaviour:


Sultan is known for his manichean classification of people as masters and slaves. The best example is his long-standing, irrational determination to disown his own son Bandar, son of a slave woman, for fear that he might become a slave. He refrained from doing so only after King Faisal's intervention. But fate decreed that Bandar became an educated person, and is the Kingdom's Ambassador to Washington, while Sultan's other sons have inherited their father's undesirable traits. His class mentality expresses itself in his attitude towards the respected men of the nation and its scholars on whom he bestows derogatory nicknames.

Among the members of the House of Saud, Sultan shines with ignorance. He had little formal education and acquired his present fame only on account of his family name. Those who know him testify that his knowledge and experience does not exceed the fields of repression, wealth plundering and moral perversion. Despite his oratory style he is known to make regular blunders in speeches. For example, when addressing the inhabitants of Jizan (a part of the Kingdom) he began by conveying to them the regards of the people of Arabia, a statement that made him the laughing-stock of the whole country.

Such behaviour stems from his inferiority complex which partly explains why he is the most zealous opponent of education. But at another level, Sultan believes that educating people paves the way for awareness and thus the questioning of the House of Saud's dictatorship. In the past he took a strong stand against educational development projects. When the Islamic reformist movement inaugurated its period of political questioning in the nineties, through the scholars memoranda for reform, Sultan felt a malicious pleasure to tell his ruling brothers you did this yourselves when you allowed them to get educated.

The man is not renowned for his capability to deal with problems using hindsight, calmness, wisdom, argument and dialogue worthy of any respectful political leader. Lacking all of these qualities has given him an inferiority complex which impels him to resort to force and violence in order to deal with any political opposition.


A threat to the Kingdom:


The 1994 clampdown against reformist scholars took place too late as far as he was concerned. If it had been up to him, and if King Fahd had not feared social unrest, he would have led the crackdown years earlier. In any case, reliable sources within the regime told MIRA that Sultan was the one urging the Sudeiris which led the last two years campaigns against the reformist opposition; he is reported to have personally signed the arrest warrant against Sheikh Safar al-Hawali and Salman al-Awdah. He is also said to have taken steps with the judicial authorities to obtain a series of immediate executions against the Muslim reformists and only backed down after being advised of the untold social unrest that such executions would entail.

His violent attitude and disrespect is unwisely directed even at people whose loyalty is important to him. He is known to be deeply unpopular in the armed forces that he heads. On the advice of foreign powers, he retires officers early and rotates them frequently for security reasons. Meanwhile, he is known to be very abusive to the high-ranking officers he commands and to whom he is supposed to be a role model. In this respect he does not refrain from insulting, hitting and spitting at officers in front of their colleagues. He reportedly humiliated them this way even in the presence of foreign delegations just as a master would do with his slaves.

Psychologists would surely find Sultan very interesting. He has married many times and into different tribes. He allegedly does not even know how many children he has. Dangerous claims have been said about his personal life. Indeed, it has come to the knowledge of the opposition (and unfortunately interested parties outside the Kingdom) that Sultan may have something to hide. Furthermore, according to reports, his psychological condition has been blamed for dubious decisions relating to army promotions, relationships and so on. Also, MIRA has learned that a number of foreign countries and other parties have blackmailed Sultan and the Kingdom through the procurement of material evidence depicting his immoral behaviour. This may explain some of the policies that the Kingdom has adopted in order to suit the political and strategic interests of such countries.

Obviously, from the Islamic point of view this is scandalous as Sultan is the Defence Minister of the country in which there exist the holy shrines of Islam. Furthermore what is striking is not so much his absence of devotion to Islam but his intolerance of practising Muslims. He is reported to have severely beaten one of his new employees. The unfortunate man had ventured to call for prayer at one of his residences (the call being a regular practice, officially enjoyed all over the Kingdom).

As far as corruption is concerned, the Defence Minister is one of the richest multi-billionaires in the world. He has used the defence ministry to amass an untold amount of wealth in the 32 year period he has been at its head. Hundreds of thousands of dollars have been spent on the armed forces over this period. Yet it arose that of the total amount spent only 5% was effectively used for the purchase of military hardware and training. It will not be difficult to imagine where the remaining 95% went. Meanwhile the Arabian armed forces humiliated by Sultan himself, ill-equipped and lacking obvious military training were caught unprepared in 1991 by the invading Iraqi army. That the whole episode was a foreign conspiracy is self-evident as far as we are concerned, it remains though that Sultan and his brothers turned the US military assistance into a glorious episode through the manipulation of their subservient media.


Bandar bin Sultan

For those who know him, Bandar has grown up unhappy and deprived of any real fatherly love. His mother was a slave girl of Sudanese origin, which caused his father to steer clear of him. Because of the status of his mother, his father, Defence Minister Sultan has for a long time denied that Bandar was his son. So intense was Sultan's irrational behaviour that he thought that Bandar would grow up with a slave mentality. Sultan only refrained from disowning Bandar as a result of King Faisal's intervention.

Bandar was born in 1950 and, owing to his father's rejection spent most of his childhood with his uncles. He would only meet other members of his family on special occasions such as at gatherings at his aunt Hissa al-Sudeiriyah. He also made good childhood relationships with the Sudeiri children, such as his half brothers Fahd bin Sultan (born in 1953) and Khalid bin Sultan (1949) and also with his cousins Mohammed bin Fahd (1948), Sultan bin Fahd (1951) and Su'ud bin Nayef (1955).

At the insistence of, his now mature child and Bandar's uncles, Sultan eventually agreed to meet Bandar and patched up his relationship with him. To Sultan's surprise, the unwanted child showed a high level of intelligence, which he had developed in the company of the Sudanese in whose company he grew up after being rejected by his other brothers.

Bandar was then sent to attend American schools along with the other Sudeiri children. In 1967, he joined the British Air Force Academy in Cornwall. After his graduation he was sent for further training in American air bases in Texas and in Carolina. At the end of his air force training, Bandar joined John Hopkins University in the United States where he graduated four years later in International Relations and Politics.

Bandar's relations with the United States started under the Presidency of Jimmy Carter where he built up strong ties with Carter's collaborators, Hamilton Jordan and Robert Strauss. He thus, gradually eased himself into the position of intermediary between his country and the American Administration by conveying messages and views between the two sides.

In 1979, during a trip to the United States, Bandar paid a visit to President Jimmy Carter who stressed his country's strong relationship with Saudi Arabia and promised assistance to Riyadh if the Iran-Iraq war threatened the Saudi Kingdom.

Following Iran's initial victories over Iraq and the occupation of part of the Basra area by Iranian troops, the United States sent on 28th September 1981 a delegation to Arabia headed by General David Jones, joint Chief of Staff, to convey to them that the turn of the war was worrying Washington who feared the fall of the House of Saud. The American delegation was welcomed at Dahran Airport by Prince Fahd bin Abdallah and Prince Bandar who was then promoted to the position of commander of a squadron of jet fighters.

The House of Saud, which was already alarmed by Iranian victories over Iraq, enabled Bandar to play a key role in acquiring AWACS radar planes. Requested by Bandar, General David Jones conveyed to the Carter Administration the Saudi need for the AWACS, but the pro-Zionist lobby in Congress opposed the sale of AWACS to an Arab country on the grounds that it this would constitute a threat to Israel.

But months later, the Saudi's felt an even greater need for the AWACS. They needed someone who could convince Washington of such an urgent need and give assurances that the radar planes would not be a threat to the Zionist State. The House of Saud agreed that the man tailor-made for this mission was Bandar, who indeed succeeded and thus, Arabia obtained the American-manned AWACS.

His success earned him the promotion of Ambassador to Washington. Bandar soon became very friendly with the Head of Operations at the CIA who was in charge of contacting foreign diplomatic missions in Washington. He reportedly involved himself in CIA activities and surprised diplomats with lavish parties parties organised by his wife Fiha, daughter of Faisal bin Abdelaziz in defiance to the Kingdom's traditions and moral code.

One of the missions entrusted to Bandar was to find a solution to the Palestinian issue and the recognition of Israel by the Arab States. Being involved with the CIA, Bandar also played a role in the Western Sahara in favour of Morocco in its dispute with Spain. Similarly, he played a role in the Lebanese conflict and was in charge of supplying the Phalangist movement with Saudi arms and armoured vehicles through Port Said and via Malta, but his plan was frustrated when the Maltese authorities intercepted the ship.

In the Lebanon hostage crisis he stated to Al-Sharq al-Awsat (25/02/85) that he was making every effort to obtain the release of the hostages. In Sudan, he intervened on the side of the separatists of the South and provided them with financial and medical assistance. His relationship with the CIA led him to becoming entrusted with a mission to assassinate Sheikh Fadlallah of the Lebanese Hisbullah but the bomb intended to kill the man missed its target. Bandar also involved himself in many other murky affairs such as with the Nicaraguan Contras.


Arms Deal

Is the Defence Minister Prince Sultan fond of arms deals because of the cash rewards they bring ? or, has the House of Saud been pressurised into buying American arms for other reasons? At the end of January, there was extensive Press coverage in the United States concerning an accord which stipulated that the Saudi rulers, had in principle, agreed to buy up to one hundred F16 jet fighters for an estimated value of $25 billion - $30 billion. According to an anonymous official who spoke to the press the deal will be signed during a future, but unspecified, visit to Washington by the Saudi Defence Minister.

According to expert sources in the arms trade, the total cost of the fighter planes is just $2.5 billion, whilst the outstanding balance is alleged to cover spare parts and maintenance for the jets and the training of the flight crews !

This deal comes as a surprise for several reasons. To begin with, the Saudi army does not need a new air defence system nor does it even need reinforcement. The Yamama deal with Britain (in the mid-1980's) and the earlier American-bought AWACS and F15 planes more than cover the needs of Arabia's air defence. In addition, none of these planes have ever been used.

What is even more surprising is that the deal comes at a time of dire economic crisis in the Kingdom: The Government's total debt has spiralled to more than $100 billion and if one includes unemployment (already at a staggering 25% of the active population), rising inflation, the rapidly decreasing income level per capita and poor social services, one cannot find any justification for new, very costly and otherwise unwarranted military spending.

It is equally interesting, and curious to say the least, that the deal has come at a time when the Saudi rulers are basically at the mercy of America, with the latter literally occupying Arabia and looting its resources against a background of anti-American guerrilla operations. So, is the deal a mere deal, or does Washington have a few cards up its sleeves which enables it to put a knife to the House of Saud's throats? Moreover, why would Riyadh enter into such a new deal when it has already passed deals with the United States totalling $25 billion and whose payment facility spreads to the year 2,000.

This deal also comes at a critical time in the bitter dispute between the different members of the House of Saud over the succession to King Fahd. However, if, as it appears, such a deal does not worry the Americans it is possible that they are already certain of who the eventual victor in the succession conflict will be.

Another reason to be vigilant remains that the leaks concerning the arms deal follow shortly after the FBI's Director Louis Freeh's angry outburst about the Saudi rulers' secretive approach to the inquiry over the anti-American bomb attack at al-Khobar on 25th June last year. At a meeting with Washington Post staff, he expressed his frustration about the lack of Saudi cooperation. The Attorney General, Janet Renois, also made a similar statement on the same day. Was this a coincidence, or did these two officials have the green light to do so for other reasons ? What is clear is that not only will this arms deal cause even further financial hardship for the Arabian people, but that it may also have serious consequences for America too.

So what are the possible motives behind this deal. Could it possibly be that the Saudi rulers are trying to placate the Americans after having lied to, and embarrassed the Americans about the authors of the Khobar attack ? Or, on the contrary, is the US Administration raising the stakes by using the FBI's Director's angry remarks to strategically secure more leverage over the House of Saud by forcing the deal through?

In our view, the deal is not being used to boost the Kingdom's air defence, nor is it an attempt by Riyadh to placate the Americans in the Khobar bombing affair. Simple though the explanation may be, it appears as if the Defence Minister Prince Sultan believes that he will again make a huge commission on the deal as he did on the Yamama deal with Britain which was revealed by the British press at the time. Clearly his highness has not learnt his lesson.

As mentioned, experts in the Arm's trade have calculated that out of the total amount of $25 - $30 billion spent on the deal, only $2.5 billion is for the actual purchase of the F16 fighter jets. It is, therefore, totally inconceivable that the remaining $22.5 - $27.5 billion is for spare parts, training and maintenance. The reality, (which is now common knowledge) is to be paid in commission to the Sultan himself, his son Bandar and other close advisors and intermediaries such as arms dealers.

This deal will further strain the Kingdom's economy, and thereby generate not only more hardship for the Saudi population but further anti-government and anti-American feeling. Undoubtedly, it could lead to increased anti-American violence.

US press comments, however, gave numerous reasons as to why the deal should not go through. It was argued that if such enormous funds were available to the Saudis, then they would do better to alleviate the population's suffering by spending the amount on much needed social services. The US Press underlined the point that the Saudi economy could not support such expenditure, and noted that America would, by agreeing to this deal, undermine, and thus jeopardise the very stability of the pro-American Kingdom.

Such comments do point to a new awareness in America concerning the dangerous policy Washington is following towards Arabia. But this awareness does not stem from a novel, altruistic notion following on from the Vietnamese, Lebanese and Somali experiences, as unfortunately, it has needed two bomb attacks targeting US military installations in Arabia to drive home to the Americans that perhaps their country is easing itself into yet another quagmire. But still, some decision-makers in the Clinton Administration stubbornly seek to mortgage Arabia's oil for generations to come; so that if any political shift occurs in Arabia which questions the US domination of the Kingdom's oil resources, then the United States could invoke international law in order to justify a military intervention. In other words, it looks as if Washington is paving the way for the law of the jungle in Arabia, thus inaugurating what Chomsky called the new world disorder.


Khalid bin Sultan Bin Abdel Aziz


Lineage:


Prince Khalid bin Sultan bin Abdulaziz. Must be known to many people. During the second Gulf war, he came on the news repeatedly due to his involvement in the war and because of the many gaffes he made. The Americans fought the anti-Iraqi war, but Khalid alleged that he won it He is the son of Defence Minister Prince Sultan bin Abdulaziz and of Laila bint Ahmad Abdallah bin Uthman, sister of the late King Fasals wife Iffat al Thaniyan. He was born on 23rd September 1949 in Makkah and studied at the King Saud School for princes in Riyadh. Unlike his half brother Bandar, whose mother was a slave girl, Khalid was the subject of much attention from his father who saw in him his successor at the head of the Defence Ministry.


Education:


At a very young age, he was sent to train at Sandhursts military academy in Britain from where he graduated in 1967. He was then sent to Fort Pills in Texas for advanced training in air defence. He is said to have completed an MA in military Sciences at Fort Lefnort military Academy (Kansas City) in 1979. Meanwhile, he is alleged to have joined the Maxwell Air Warfare Academy in Alabama in 1980 and, strange though it may seem, he is officially reported to have carried, at the same time, yet another MA in Administrative and Political Sciences at Montgomery University, Alabama, only one year after the previous MA. Some people do have an extraordinary IQ and time.

In any case, back in Arabia, he was promoted very swiftly. He successively occupied the positions of Air Squadron Chief, Training Officer/ Assistant Staff Officer for Operations, Army Inspectorate Chief. Director of the Administration of Air Defence Projects, Deputy Chief of the Air Force, Chief of Air Defence and, to crown it all, Chief of the Strategic Missiles Force.


Quest of Notoriety:


Prince Khalid was in the shadow during his studies and while in the various offices he occupied. His urge to become known nationally and to be heard of internationally led him to do what the other Gulf princes normally do, that is to give an astonishing donation to save a westerner in danger of death. Khalid did just that when he offered a huge amount of money to an American child who needed a heart and kidneys transplant. He announced this sensational news in front of an American television crew during a holiday in the Bermudas.

But Khalid came to notoriety through his dealings with the London-based arms merchant Mohammad Wafiq al-Said. Arms deals involving Defence Minister Sultan and his sons made Wafiq al-Said a billionaire and Khalid the same. The first deal in which Khalid was involved alongside al-Said appears to have been the purchase of administrative equipment for an air defence system, bought from France in January 1984a deal which was, at that time, the biggest arms deal the French had ever made.

The commissions made on the it were to the tune of $750 million, with $300 million taken by Prince Khalid alone. Khalid also shared with his father, his brother Bandar, al-Said and others, a two billion dollar deal for the purchase of 10 Boeing transport planes and their spare parts for Saudia Airlines in 1984 (Sunday Times 5/8/84). During the scandal over the £20 billion Yamama deal with Britain in 1984, Khalid was mentioned in the international press as being involved in the commissions which reportedly reached half the total of the cost of only the Tornado jets side of the Yamama deal. Witnessing before an American civil court, a former head of the British Arms Company, Gerald James said that each Tornado was sold to the Saudis for £40 million whereas the standard price is only £20-22 million.

Another nine billion dollar deal with American for the supply of F15 fighter jets was reported in the international press as having a real value of four billion dollars. Khalid was again quoted as having pocketed a share of the remaining five billion dollar commission alongside his father, brothers, King Fahd and the usual sharks around them.

The air surveillance AWACS radar planes deal of 1980, organized by Bandar bin Sultan, also involved a hefty commission for Khalid whose name was mentioned in this connection in the Dooley Papers. The usual partners in the deal got their share of commission through Global Enterprise Group, a company set up for this particular purpose.


Khalid Enters the Media World:


After the 1979 Sacred Mosque incident, the Iran-Iraq war and some other scandals involving their royal highnesses, the House of Saud, and the Sudeiris in particular, realized the importance of a media network under their control. So, from 1984 on, they embarked on building a veritable media network which has come to include many Arabic dailies and weeklies as well as radio and television stationsmost of international coverage. Once the network was in place, Prince Khalid was pushed to the fore mainly to project the Sudeiri familys views to the world.

Khalids first appearance in the media world was his attempt to buy the British daily The Observer. He offered a very attractive price but, however moderate an Arab he was in the eyes of the West, he remained after all an Arab and, in the view of some shadowy political lobbies, the Arab must not be given the opportunity to own media of international coverage. Hence, his offer to buy the British daily was turned down.

Continuing in his attempts, he bought off the Lebanese newspaper El-Hayat in 1988 and started its daily publication from London under the editorship of a former Lebanese Maronite, Jihad al-Khazen. Meanwhile, he bought actions in the Bahraini daily Al-Ayyam and later founded the weekly Al-Wasat in London. About a year ago, he set up the Arab-American Television station in the United States.

Even though all the Saudi-controlled media are in the hands of the Sudeiris, conflict between them erupted over many petty issues, which led them to a lot of bickering in public. This is how Al-Sharq al-Awsatfounded by Khalids uncle Salman! published the photo of Prince Khalids mistress Brigitte Nelson, while Khalids El-Hayat published King Fahds mistress Leila Alawi.


Desert Storm Blows Khalid Away:


Khalids career declined sharply with the second Gulf war. King Fahd entrusted him with the catering service of the anti-Iraqi coalition of forces under the leadership of American General Schwartzkopff. Misleadingly named by the Saudi monarch Chief of the joint forces. He was, in fact, simply a collaborator of the Americans against his own people because of assisting the friendly forces over sensitive issues likely to cause anti-American unrest among the Arabian people. His being constantly present alongside General Schartzkopff in the Operations Room got him some media coverage both nationally and internationally. So, he soon became too big for his boots. Apart from diverting an important part of the catering budget, which aggravated Washington, he dared criticize General Schwartzkopff, who had returned to America. Later Khaled wrote in his book Desert Warrior that the success of the Gulf war was due to his own planning.

Even more compromizing was his statement shortly after the war over the necessity of rearming the Arabian army (under the command of his father Sultan) and the National Guard (under the command of Crown Prince Abdallah, Sultans rival), and the need to make compulsory conscription, all of which are sensitive issue within the House of Sauds carefully maintained balance of forces. Other revelations made in his book, and which had been concealed by the Americans, regarding the role of the joint Arab troops during the Gulf war caused some friction between Washington and Riyadh which was the last straw and caused his downfall. Ironically King Fahad sacked him in humiliating circumstances for the same reason. Khaled went too far in his own imagination of being the Commander of the Forces. King Fahad was extremely furious when Khaled took several decisions without consulting him.

Khalid has ever since been ignored by the regime and the Saudi media. He has gradually slumped into oblivion. Neither his father, nor his estimated wealth of $10 billion have been of any assistance to remember him to the world. Perhaps another $50 billion donation to help control AIDS in America might do the trick


Prince Faisal bin Fahd Bin Abdel Aziz

Prince Faisal, son of King Fahd bin Abdulaziz, was born in 1945. He did most of his studies in the Kingdom and obtained a BA in Political Sciences from abroad.

His first job was in 1971 as Head of the Youth Department with ministerial rank. The Labour Ministry was also attached to his Department. Since then, he has had many positions, all within the youth and sport areas. He was successively President of the Arab Football Union, Arabian Football Union, Arabian Olympic Committee, Arab Sports Union and Head of the National Committee on Drugs Control. At the international and regional level, Faisal bin Fahd was nominated Honorary President of the International Swimming Federation. In 1974 he became Chairman of the Arab Ministers’ Council on Youth and of member of the Supreme Council of Youth which was set up that very year. Finally, he acquired the position of President of the Basket Ball Federation. During his term in these positions, he naturally attended a great many sports events including the conferences of the International Football Federation in Munich between 1972 and 1974.

Faisal has been kept in the same position since he was appointed to it in 1971 at the time of King Faisal, when his own father was Interior Minister. In the meantime, his brothers and cousins in the Sudeiri family had been raised to higher offices. In fact, were it not for the present system of succession to the throne, which was established by his grand father King Abdulaziz, Faisal would have had the chance to become king himself, especially as he is well educated. So, why is it that he has been kept in the same position when he is not less eager than his relatives to wield power? Faisal bin Fahd was connected with the Youth Department at an early age, when the situation of sport in the kingdom was dismal with almost inexistent sport facilities. His appointment at the head of this Department coincided with the oil boom.

The plan was to make sport popular among the youth. But the ultimate objective of the Sudeiris was a long term strategic one. The point was to keep young people busy in order to protect the grip on power by the House of Saud. Many countries, like the former Soviet bloc, used sport as a means to keep their youth away from any political or intellectual activity. Various studies exist which show that the use of sport for such ends put state budgets for games second only to military expenditure in such countries.

As a by-product of this objective, another not less devious goal was sought: the creation of a feeling of national, ‘Saudi’ belonging which would supersede and even marginalize the Arabian youth’s sense of belonging to the wider Arab and Islamic Ummah. For this purpose Saudi Arabia had to fix the ways and means to train a sport-oriented youth which would enable the Kingdom to have access to International events and Olympic games to eventually instil this sense in an ever greater number of youths.

The House of Saud gave Faisal all the prerogatives to attain this goal. With an annual budget of $20 billion for the Youth Department, Faisal embarked on a programme of impressive sport facilities and training and visits to various world-famous clubs were regularly undertaken and Western coaches recruited at great costs. With the assistance of his brother Sultan bin Fahd, Faisal undertook the construction of sport villages, centres and stadia, clubs and fully staffed training facilities of all kinds at a cost considered enough to be meet the nations needs until the year 2000. One particular sports complex occupies an area of 80,000 m2 and cost xxxxxxx1,280 Saudi Riyals.

It accommodates swimming pools, Olympic-standard activity areas, restaurants for 1,000 people and a purpose-made building for the House of Saud and their guests. Faisal had similar complexes built in the other major cities like Riyadh, Jeddah and Dammam. Alongside these facilities, separate Olympic-grade swimming pools, youth hostels as well as unions and clubs for all sorts of games were set up. At the same time, Faisal undertook to have the Saudi national team and clubs join international federations. It was in this context that, in 1976, he hired the British football coach Jimmy Hill. Hill was given a special budget with prerogatives to train young people of all ages, everywhere in the kingdom. In a move to boost the country’s chance of winning matches and get promoted to higher divisions, Faisal hired several western players at prohibitive costs.

Therefore, the cost of hanging on to power is double: on the one hand, billions of pounds have been spent out of the country’s wealth; on the other hand, through sport the youth is being alienated from its Islamic values and traditions, and is being made redundant intellectually. Not that sport as such is the "opium of the people," but the very policy which underlies it is intentionally devious and harmful. Whereas the Sudeiri brothers— morally and financially corrupt—are banking on time to instil in the youth the a sense of narrow nationalism and regionalism, the late Al-Saud kings can be credited with keeping away from these concepts for religious reasons and because of the kingdom’s religious weight in the Muslim world. Apart from heading the Sudeiri family’s policy of alienating Saudi youth, Prince Faisal is no exception in the world of financial corruption. His commissions are reported to be 30% of the budget of his Youth Department. This classic way of obtaining commissions is no different from that of his father, uncles, brothers and cousins: a percentage is taken on each project, service and equipment supplies. Another percentage is taken annually on the earnings of each of the facilities. Yet a further source of illegal income comes from the budget devoted to sports events both at home and abroad.

Faisal’s embezzlement was not limited to the sports world and his Department. According to two authors, Nacer Said (History of the House of Saud, Arabic p. 773) and AbderRahman Al-Shamrani (The Scandal Kingdom, Arabic, vol. 2, p. 287), Faisal obtained a commission of $40 million from the European company Philips which was entrusted with the modernization of the country’s telephone system in the seventies. Meanwhile Faisal was involved in the confiscation of poor people’s lands. He is known to have taken 4 million m2 of land along the Jeddah sea shore, while he confiscated the Dammam Project no. 92 which included 92,000 allotments distributed to impoverished people. Property licences were suddenly withdrawn from the beneficiaries overnight without any valid explanation and the lands were given to Prince Faisal. The latter’s embezzlement from real estates is reported to be much higher than the commissions he acquired through his office at the head of the Youth Department.

King Fahd who used to prepare his sons for high offices became desperate about Faisal’s disastrous behaviour. This explains why the King, his father, has decided not to promote him. Indeed Faisal is known to be both a homosexual and a chronic drug addict. For all this, King Fahd reportedly continued to test him. In the hope of getting him to improve, he gave him several sensitive missions to Gorbatchev’s Soviet Union and to communist China under cover of sporting events. But this was to no avail as Faisal continued his drug addition and went even as far as having a drug wing under his control, which led to complaints from various foreign diplomatic and intelligence services to the Saudi authorities, according to a journalist close to the royal family. As a remedy, Faisal was sent to the West for drug addiction treatment. It was at that time that he was appointed president of the Drug Control Committee, a move meant to encourage him to give up taking drugs but, again, to no avail.

In view of his son’s hopelessness, King Fahd decided to groom his other two sons, Muhammed and Abdulaziz bin Fahd, for high positions. Muhammed was then dropped and the King concentrated his attention on Abdulaziz. The latter received $300 million from the state’s budget while his father transferred to him another all his fortune both in real estates and in money—a total estimated to be to the tune of $40 billion. Needless to say that all this aggravated Faisal who saw his chances of promotion gone, perhaps for ever.

Yet, Faisal is not poor: the wealth he stole or was given from the people’s stolen wealth is estimated to be between seven and ten billion dollars. He is still relatively young, so he still may have a lot of time to plunder and become richer.

http://just-another-inside-job.blogspot.com/2008/12/zionist-rulers-of-arabia.html

Translated from Arabic

From Page 1

Click to enlarge

From the last page