شبكة الإستخبارات الإسلامية

"They plot and plan but ALLAH also plans and ALLAH is the best of Planners." Qur’an VIII – 30

‘’ويمكرون ويمكر الله والله خير الماكرين ‘’: قال الله عزَّ وجل

سورة الأنفال

رضيت بالله ربا و بالإسلام دينا و بمحمد صلى الله عليه و سلم نبيا رسولا لا إلـه إلا اللـه ... محمد رسـول اللـه

This is default featured slide 1 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

This is default featured slide 2 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

This is default featured slide 3 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

This is default featured slide 4 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

This is default featured slide 5 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

Showing posts with label ISRAELI FALSE FLAG TERRORISM. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ISRAELI FALSE FLAG TERRORISM. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 08, 2011

WARNING; MESSAGE TO THE ISLAMIC RESISTANCE UNITS IN EGYPT, JORDAN, NORTH OF SAUDI ARABIA, LEBANON AND PALESTI NE : SULEIMAN IS LYING TO THE BROTHERS IN GHAZA LIKE HE DID THE 25TH DECEMBER 2008 WHEN HE SAID THAT ISRAEL WILL NOT ATTACK GHAZA... PREPARE FOR A TOTAL WAR . WE CONFIRM INFORMATION PREPARE FOR A TOTAL WAR ! FOR THOSE WHO WANT PLAY WITH THE LIFES OF THE INNOCENTS MAY ALLAH SWT BE WITNESS THAT WE HAVE PROVIDED THE RIGHT INFORMATION !

WARNING: SULEIMAN IS LYING AGAIN AND TOLD THE PALESTINIANS THAT ISRAEL WON'T TAKE THE SINAI, LIKE HE LIED THE 25TH DECEMBER 2008 WHEN HE SAID TO THE PALESTINIANS THAT GHAZZA WON'T BE ATTACKED. ISRAEL IS USING SULEIMAN, AND ISRAEL WILL KILL SULEIMAN, BLAME CHAOS AND INVADE THE SINAI AND CLOSE THE SUEZ CANAL ! THAT'S THE PLAN ! GHAZZA MUST PREPARE FOR WAR !

 ISRAEL PLANS TO KILL  SULEIMAN, THE MAN THEY CREATED IN FACT, DAYS AFTER MUBARAK LEAVE TO GERMANY! WHY? TO USE HIM AS A STRAW MAN BEHIND STABILITY NETANYAHU IS HIDING LONG TIME PLANNED PLAN TO SEIZE ARAB OIL FIELDS AND CREATE CHAOS! NOW WHO IS GOING TO BE BLAMED ? IKHWANE BECAUSE SULEIMAN SPENT ALL HIS LIFE EXTERMINATING IKHWANE  ON BEHALF OF ISRAEL! DEJA VU WITH SADDATE, ISN'T IT ?   


'BLITZKRIEG PLAN' TO TAKE CONTROL OF SAUDI ARABIA OIL FIELDS, JUST IN FRONT OF IRAN IN THE DHAHRAN RICH AREA, WHERE A MASSIVE SHIA COMMUNITY IS LIVING. WHAT DO YOU THINK IRAN WILL DO ?  

UPDATE 9TH FEBRUARY 2011: 01H24 UNIVERSAL TIME : ISRAEL LAUNCHED SEVERAL ATTACKS IN GHAZZA TARGETING MEDICAL SUPPLY BUILDINGS, AT LEAST 7 'DAHIA  DOCTRINE TYPE' ATTACKS WERE LAUNCHED BY THE WAR CRIMINALS DURING THE NIGHT!  

VIDEOS : http://www.youtube.com/user/1worldcitizen  
http://www.qassam.ps/news-4149-Zionist_Army_hits_medicine_warehouse_overnight.html
WA ALLAH SWT 'ALAM

ABU SULEYMAN

AFTER EGYPTIAN COUP - ISRAEL INVADES? 

How long before Israel grabs the Sinai from Egypt?

According to The Economist, there could be a big Middle East war during 2011.

"Unless remedial action is taken, 2011 might see the most destructive (Middle East) war for many years."

(The United States, Israel and the Arabs.)

Step 1 - topple Mubarak
Step 2 - create turmoil in the Sinai
Step 3 - invade

Remember what happened after the CIA toppled the Shah?

Share:

Sarkozy sachant que les anglais et israeliens etaient derriere les attentats en Egypte , tout comme lui supervise et finance le terrorisme au Maghreb Niger, Mali, a menti pour declencher une guerre des civilisations entre Chretiens et Musulmans, pour sauver Israel de sa propre auto-destruction programmée

Un membre du clan Moubarak est soupçonné d’avoir commandité l’attentat anti-chrétien d’Alexandrie

 
 

Explosif. La justice égyptienne soupçonne un ancien ministre de l’Intérieur d’avoir secrètement organisé un attentat terroriste imputé à Al Qaida.

Depuis treize ans, et jusqu’au 31 janvier dernier, il était un membre éminent du gouvernement. Hier, l’ex-ministre de l’Intérieur égyptien, Habib El Adly, a été mis en examen pour son implication supposée dans l’attentat anti-copte du Nouvel An qui a causé la mort de 24 personnes à Alexandrie. Le procureur général Abd-el-Majid Mahmud a considéré qu’il existait suffisamment d’éléments « sérieux » pour ouvrir une enquête sur l’ancien homme fort du régime Moubarak.

Share:

Sunday, February 06, 2011

Israel used wikileaks to start a big war in the Middle East, North Africa and take full control of all oil, gas and lands of the Arabs. Zionists Arab puppets in Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kuweit, Algeria, Libya, Morocco, Yemen, Jordan must step down now and escape now while alive or they will be killed, they are putting in danger the survival of all the Muslim peoples

Aljazeera, Israel Deception and the pre-emptive strike to take over all  the Middle East. 



Blitzkrieg Plan was activated last week and ready to be implemented ...

By sheykh Imran Hosein,
http://www.imranhosein.org/






If the Zionist Arab puppets don't step down now, in what the zionists are calling the 'transition process' then, every single plant of oil, gas will be disabled in all the Muslim World and all the routes sealed off, causing worldwide chaos because of Israel. 

Share:

Thursday, January 27, 2011

Israël contre-attaque

Jeff Gates
25 janvier 2011







      Dans la guerre « par la tromperie, » selon la devise qui a longtemps guidé les planificateurs de guerre israéliens, le timing est tout. Dès que les objectifs géopolitiques d'Israël sont menacés, le chaos est assuré. Dans la terminologie de la sécurité nationale, l'attentat du 24 janvier dans l'aéroport le plus fréquenté de Moscou était un « redéploiement de la dramaturgie. »

      Parmi les priorités de Tel-Aviv, la première est de maintenir l'attention sur la dernière chimère géopolitique d’une « guerre mondiale contre le terrorisme, » contre l'« islamo-fascisme. » Le fait que les deux dernières guerres livrées par l'Amérique servent les objectifs israéliens, reste largement non mentionné dans les médias occidentaux.
Share:

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Israeli company ICTS involved in 9/11 and London 7/7 is in charge of the security at Domededovo airport

Israeli 'Security' Firm ICTS Helped Provide 'Security' at Russia's Domodedovo Airport 

 

The details about this 2009 article are here, but it's PDF and I don't know how to copy and paste the story.

The story goes into a little detail about how Security Partners Ltd., the ICTS Europe subsidiary in Russia was going to assist with 'security' at Domodedovo airport.

The SAME ICTS that on 9/11 helped those MOSSAD agents, made up to look like Arabs, onto several flights.

The SAME ICTS that let the 'Shoe Bomber,' Richard Reid board.


The SAME ICTS that sent a 'sharp-dressed man' to help out the Christmas day 'underwear bomber' board a flight, with no money and NO PASSPORT.
Share:

Saturday, January 01, 2011

Israel ready to start 'self bombs made' campaign in the West : Israel is publishing a fake 'bomb manual' and started the campaign in London

Phony 'Al Qaeda' bomb manual published on the internet and manufactured  by  MOSSAD-MEMRI. Israel starting from London the new 2011 fake campaign of 'self  home grown terrorists' making 'self bombs' with 'fake manual published'.

The source for this "Al Qaeda" bomb book is none other than MEMRI.


This is a replay of a hoax from the late 1960s called the "Black Panther Coloring Book." Actually created by the FBI (and exposed during the COINTELPRO leaks), this was a book filled with highly racist drawings that was mailed into American homes (even we got one in West Covina) in order to give the US Media an easy means to demonize the growing civil rights movement that was pointing out that the Vietnam draft seemed to place most of the black kids on the front lines and most of the white kids in the rear support areas. 

Share:

Tuesday, August 03, 2010

ISRAEL TO USE IRANIAN AND PAKISTANI DUPES IN DIRTY NUKE PLOY

By Gordon Duff,
www.veteranstoday.com

This week, the last piece fell into place.  The National Research Council, part of the National Academy of Science, heavy on politics and light on science, announced that America was no longer able to track nukes threatening our shores.  Their report titled Nuclear Forensics: A Capability at Risk, released last week, outlines the details of a secret study requested by the Departments of Homeland Security, Defense and Energy, specifically the National Nuclear Security Administration.   The gist of the story is easy, if a nuke goes off in America, dirty nuke in Times Square, one in a container at a port, anywhere, America won’t be able to tell who made it.  Not a word of the report is true.  It is wild speculation and disinformation written in broad language with no hard science, written for a reason.

Share:

Saturday, July 10, 2010

« Al-Qaïda Magazine » : la manipulation dévoilée

Envie d’un petit gâteau au Mojito ? Grâce à Al-Qaïda, c’est possible. Le document présenté par les officiels américains et la presse internationale comme étant la brochure du 'groupe terroriste' est en réalité un PDF corrompu dressant une liste de boulangeries américaines spécialisées. Après « Qui veut s’abonner à Al-Qaida Magazine ? », Oumma continue de dévoiler, en exclusivité, la recette d’une incroyable mystification.

Lee Gillentine n’est pas un de ces experts patentés du terrorisme ou de l’islamisme. Mieux que cela : il est web designer et s’occupe plus généralement de développement sur Internet. Un jeune geek assumé, vivant à New-York et branché sur l’actualité internationale.

Ainsi, lorsqu’il découvre le commentaire d’un internaute féru d’informatique -à la suite d’un article consacré au magazine imputé à Al-Qaïda- et selon lequel le document est suspicieux, Lee décide de vérifier et de faire partager, via Twitter, ses découvertes sur son blog.

Surprise, surprise : hormis les 3 premières pages lisibles, les 64 autres pages saturées du PDF comportent, après décryptage, le nom du dossier originel tel qu’il fut enregistré dans l’ordinateur de l‘auteur - « C :\Users\m050\Desktop\ellenbca.pdf 29 June 2010 16:45 ».

Une rapide recherche sur Internet permet de remonter la trace du document originel, un texte intitulé « Les meilleurs petits gâteaux en Amérique » et mis en ligne sur le site web de Main Street Cupcakes, entreprise basée dans la ville de Hudson, en Ohio.

Le papier recommandant les meilleures productions de sucreries avait été initialement publié en 2007 sur le site d’AOL. Seule particularité de la fabrique de l‘Ohio : ses gâteaux ont été promus dans une célèbre émission de télévision aux Etats-Unis, The Ellen DeGeneres Show. La liste de ces boutiques culinaires spécialisées, parmi lesquelles figure Main Street Cupcakes, est celle établie, avant altération, dans le PDF utilisé pour les pages défectueuses du magazine d‘Al-Qaïda.

Initié au langage informatique, notamment aux codages hex et ASCII, Lee Gillentine parvient rapidement à valider sa première intuition, en comparant la trame du texte du PDF avec celle du texte altéré figurant à la suite des 3 pages lisibles de la brochure pseudo-islamiste.

Sa conclusion, sans appel, est aisément vérifiable par tous les experts informatiques : non seulement le magazine imputé à la mouvance terroriste basée au Yémen était délibérément incomplet à l’origine mais, surtout, il s’appuie sur la récupération d’un document américain prodiguant des conseils alimentaires.

Si le webmagazine avait réellement été corrompu par des hackers anti-islamistes, comme certains l’ont supposé, rien n’empêchait Al-Qaïda de remettre en ligne une nouvelle version. A l’inverse, s’il s’agissait d’une opération psychologique frauduleuse élaborée par des services secrets, un camouflage plus efficace aurait été réalisé.

Quoiqu’il en soit, l’auteur de l’intox ne manque pas d’humour : choisir d’utiliser un texte rédigé par un certain Dulcy Israel pour en faire le support occulte d’un tract terroriste ne manque pas de sel.

Comment mener Le Monde en bateau

A l’annonce de l’apparition du magazine sur Internet, la presse internationale, dans sa vaste majorité, a repris sans sourciller la position officielle du gouvernement américain selon laquelle le document est authentique. Forcément authentique. Et inquiétant, cela va de soi.

En France, après avoir dupé Le Figaro et son auteur alarmiste, Georges Malbrunot, c’est au tour du Monde, mercredi, d’avoir été abusé.

Comble du ridicule, un expert est convoqué à la barre : Mathieu Guidère, professeur français basé à Genève, anciennement à Saint-Cyr, et ex-collaborateur au ministère de la Défense. Une caution intellectuelle parfaitement appropriée pour cette mystification à la mode depuis le 11 septembre 2001, consistant à amplifier la sempiternelle menace de radicalisation qui planerait au-dessus des musulmans occidentaux.

Curieusement, le chercheur est présenté, sans doute par confusion, comme étant l’un des rares à avoir eu accès à l’ensemble des 67 pages lisibles, alors qu’aucun autre analyste sur la planète n’a déclaré, nommément, avoir pu consulter de telles données. Seuls des officiels américains, sous couvert d’anonymat, et le groupe controversé SITE auront prétendu avoir analysé l’ensemble du PDF avant sa pseudo-corruption par un virus informatique. Le journaliste du Monde, Soren Seelow, précisa même que le spécialiste français interrogé aurait eu accès au document « en version intégrale sur des forums islamistes sécurisés » alors que la plupart de ces forums ont pourtant recommandé, par méfiance, de ne pas télécharger le PDF ou de ne lui accorder aucune publicité.

A défaut de pouvoir, visiblement, nous décrypter ce magazine dans ses moindres détails, l’universitaire Mathieu Guidère, qui sort à la rentrée un énième livre sur la menace terroriste, se contente donc d’alimenter le fantasme ambiant, alignant généralités et autres clichés culturels. Ainsi, pour tenter de démontrer l’authenticité de l’article, indiqué uniquement dans la table des matières et intitulé « Faire une bombe dans la cuisine de sa maman », l’analyste élabore une explication particulièrement fumeuse : « La cuisine est indissociable de la figure de la mère dans la culture islamique. C’est un message positif : le candidat aura ainsi l’impression d’avoir tous les outils sous la main pour fabriquer sa bombe avec la bénédiction maternelle ».

Qui veut encore, après cela, s’abonner au Monde ?

http://www.oumma.com/Al-Qaida-Magazine-la-manipulation

Share:

Sunday, July 04, 2010

American Zionist Jews Terrorists behind the swtich-kill internet in the West, they lost control of it

Guess Who Wants to Kill the Internet?



By Maidhc Ó Cathail

It would be hard to think of anyone who has done more to undermine American freedoms than Joseph Lieberman.


Since 9/11, the Independent senator from Connecticut has introduced a raft of legislation in the name of the “global war on terror” which has steadily eroded constitutional rights. If the United States looks increasingly like a police state, Senator Lieberman has to take much of the credit for it.

On October 11, 2001, exactly one month after 9/11, Lieberman introduced S. 1534, a bill to establish a Department of Homeland Security. Since then, he has been the main mover behind such draconian legislation as the Protect America Act of 2007, the Enemy Belligerent, Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution Act of 2010, and the proposed Terrorist Expatriation Act, which would revoke the citizenship of Americans suspected of terrorism. And now the senator from Connecticut wants to kill the Internet.

According to the bill he recently proposed in the Senate, the entire global internet is to be claimed as a “national asset” of the United States. If Congress passes the bill, the US President would be given the power to “kill” the internet in the event of a “national cyber-emergency.” Supporters of the legislation say this is necessary to prevent a “cyber 9/11” – yet another myth from the fear mongers who brought us tales of “Iraqi WMD” and “Iranian nukes.”

Lieberman’s concerns about the internet are not new. The United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, which Lieberman chairs, released a report in 2008 titled “Violent Islamist Extremism, The Internet, and the Homegrown Terrorist Threat.” The report claimed that groups like al-Qaeda use the internet to indoctrinate and recruit members, and to communicate with each other.

Immediately after the report was published, Lieberman asked Google, the parent company of You Tube, to “immediately remove content produced by Islamist terrorist organizations.” That might sound like a reasonable request. However, as far as Lieberman is concerned, Hamas, Hezbollah and even the Iranian Revolutionary Guard are terrorist organizations.

It’s hardly surprising that Lieberman’s views on what constitute terrorism parallel those of Tel Aviv. As Mark Vogel, chairman of the largest pro-Israel Political Action Committee (PAC) in the United States, once said: “Joe Lieberman, without exception, no conditions … is the No. 1 pro-Israel advocate and leader in Congress. There is nobody who does more on behalf of Israel than Joe Lieberman.”

Lieberman has been well-rewarded for his patriotism – to another country. In the past six years, he has been the Senate’s top recipient of political contributions from pro-Israel PACs with a staggering $1,226,956.

But what is it that bothers Lieberman so much about the internet? Could it be that it allows ordinary Americans access to facts which reveal exactly what kind of “friend” Israel has been to its overgenerous benefactor? Facts which they have been denied by the pro-Israel mainstream media.

How much faith would American voters have in the likes of Lieberman, who claims that the Jewish state is their greatest ally, if they knew that Israeli agents planted firebombs in American installations in Egypt in 1954 in an attempt to undermine relations between Nasser and the United States; that Israel murdered 34 American servicemen in a deliberate attack on the USS Liberty on June 8, 1967; that Israeli espionage, most notably Jonathan Pollard’s spying, has done tremendous damage to American interests; that five Mossad agents were filming and celebrating as the Twin Towers collapsed on September 11, 2001; that Tel Aviv and its accomplices in Washington were the source of the false pre-war intelligence on Iraq; and about countless other examples of treachery?

In his latest attempt to censor the internet, does Lieberman really want to protect the American people from imaginary cyber-terrorists? Or is he just trying to protect his treasonous cronies from the American people?

Maidhc Ó Cathail is a widely published writer based in Japan. To read more of his writing, go to Maidhc Ó Cathail: Writing and Analysis.

http://www.opinion-maker.org/2010/07/guess-who-wants-to-kill-the-internet/
Share:

Tuesday, June 22, 2010

Israel confirms that 9/11 was the start of the WWIII and Islam is the target, dirty bombs will be used to provoke total war

World War III has already begun, says Israeli spy chief



Former head of Israel's intelligence service tells Portuguese newspaper it would take at least 25 years before battle against fundamentalist terrorism is won; says nuclear strike by Muslim terrorists 'very likely'. (Halevy, are you talking about these nuclear dirty bombs you plan to detonate in european ports with the help of Merkel and Sarkozy ?)


A third World War is already underway between Islamic militancy and the West but most people do not realize it, the former head of Israel’s intelligence service Mossad said in an interview published Saturday in Portugal.

‘We are in the midst of a third World War,’ former Mossad chief Efraim Halevy told weekly newspaper Expresso.

‘The world does not understand. A person walks through the streets of Tel Aviv, Barcelona or Buenos Aires and doesn’t get the sense that there is a war going on,’ said Halevy who headed Mossad between 1998 and 2003.

‘During World War I and II the entire world felt there was a war. Today no one is conscious of it. From time to time there is a terrorist attack in Madrid, London and New York and then everything stays the same.’

Violence by Islamic militants has already disrupted international travel and trade just as in the previous two world conflicts, he said.




Halevy, who was raised in war-time London, predicted it would take at least 25 years before the battle against Islamic fundamentalist terrorism is won and during this time a nuclear strike by Islamic militants was likely.

‘It doesn’t have to be something very sophisticated, It doesn’t have to be the latest nuclear technology, it can be something simple like a dirty bomb which instead of killing millions only kills tens of thousands,’ he said.

Halevy served as an envoy for former Israeli Prime Ministers Yitzhak Shamir, Yitzhak Rabin and Shimon Peres and is a former Israeli ambassador to the European Union.


http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3357552,00.html

Share:

Monday, June 21, 2010

Quels sont les liens du Mossad avec les juifs de la diaspora ?

Nul doute que la question provoquera, comme à chaque fois que nous traitons un sujet en rapport avec la communauté juive, son lot de réprobations, d’insultes et de menaces.

Pourtant, à la lecture du livre de Jacob Cohen, Le Printemps des Sayanim, on est en droit de s’interroger à propos des liens étroits qui existent entre les services de renseignements israéliens et la diaspora juive. L’auteur a bien voulu nous faire parvenir le texte de présentation que nous vous proposons sur cette page, ainsi qu’un extrait de son livre.

Spencer Delane, pour Mecanopolis

[Suite à une demande expresse de notre avocat-conseil, nous avons modifié le titre initial de cet article]

mossad

Le Printemps des Sayanim

Par Jacob Cohen

Les sayanim – informateurs en hébreu – sont des Juifs de la diaspora qui, par « patriotisme », acceptent de collaborer ponctuellement avec le Mossad, ou autres institutions sionistes, leur apportant l’aide nécessaire dans le domaine de leur compétence.

L’Etat d’Israël possède ainsi un réservoir extraordinaire et inépuisable d’agents bien introduits dans tous les domaines et pratiquement tous les pays. Il suffit d’évoquer le Bnaï Brit (franc-maçonnerie juive internationale) et ses 500 000 membres, tous prêts à défendre Israël à n’importe quel prix. Il y aurait 3000 sayanim en France. Imaginons la contribution de plusieurs milliers de sayanim aux Etats-Unis, ne serait-ce que dans les domaines financier et cinématographique.

Le premier intérêt du récit, c’est de mettre en lumière cette nébuleuse aussi mystérieuse qu’efficace. Car à moins de se référer à quelques livres écrits par des spécialistes – en particulier anglo-saxons – du fameux Mossad, on ne trouve nulle trace de ces sayanim. Même leur nom n’apparaît pratiquement jamais. Pourtant leur rôle est primordial dans les entreprises d’espionnage et/ou de manipulation médiatique du Service qui les emploie. Cette occultation peut déjà être considérée en soi comme une victoire de ces réseaux. Ils peuvent ainsi agir dans l’ombre, évitant de fait toute contre-attaque, ou même une tentative de créer des réseaux hostiles pour les contrer. On peut aussi se poser des questions sur les médias français qui ont réussi l’exploit de parler d’Israël et du Mossad sans jamais mentionner cette espèce de 5e colonne.

Il va sans dire que l’auteur n’a eu aucun accès ni à des documents confidentiels ni à des témoignages directs. Mais le fait de connaître l’existence des sayanim, et leur dévouement exemplaire à Israël, lui a permis une lecture particulière de certains événements.

Un exemple significatif : L’auteur a été approché par des francs-maçons juifs du Grand Orient, sur la base de son identité évidente. En 2002, alors qu’Israël réprimait violemment la seconde intifada, ces frères français voulaient créer une loge juive et sioniste (en violation des règles du GODF) pour aider leur patrie de cœur. Il était évident qu’ils agissaient pour le compte de structures sionistes. D’ailleurs, les conditions d’installation et de fonctionnement de cette loge montrent à quel point celle-ci a bénéficié de la complaisance des instances supérieures de l’obédience de la rue Cadet.

Le Printemps des Sayanim met également en scène des personnages connus médiatiquement, dont l’influence est considérable, tant par leurs moyens financiers que par leurs réseaux, et qui, sans relâche, défendent la politique israélienne. On l’a vu récemment avec l’attaque brutale de la « flotille humanitaire ». Il s’est trouvé un grand philosophe pour évoquer « la pureté des armes sionistes », et un autre humaniste pour déplorer les « attaques antisémites ».

Il est impossible de tout citer. Mais on ne peut passer à côté de ce fait longuement détaillé dans le récit : Comment SOS Racisme est devenu un auxiliaire des institutions sionistes françaises, notamment l’UEJF, avec qui il travaille main dans la main.

Jacob Cohen

Le Printemps des Sayanim est édité chez l’Harmattan

Né en 1944 à Meknès, Jacob Cohen obtient une licence en Droit (Casablanca) et le diplôme de Sciences-Po (Paris). Il vit à Berlin et Montréal avant de revenir à Casablanca, où il est maître-assistant à la faculté de Droit, de 1978 à 1987. Il vit depuis à Paris. Il a déjà publié Les noces du commissaire, Moi, Latifa S., Du danger de monter sur la terrasse, L’espionne et le journaliste.

Extrait du livre :

Uri Sulitzer le reçut promptement, et commanda du café. Le cardiologue jeta à peine un coup d’œil au décor.

Mauvais signe, pensa le diplomate. D’habitude, les Juifs séfarades se pâmaient d’admiration devant les photos et les drapeaux. La moitié du travail était déjà accomplie. Mais on l’avait prévenu.

- Je suis très heureux de faire votre connaissance.

Zerbib inclina la tête, en signe de réciprocité. Sulitzer comprit qu’il devait d’abord lever une ambiguïté.

- C’est MST qui m’a donné votre numéro privé.

Le visiteur eut un mouvement d’étonnement, vite maîtrisé.

- Sans trahir un secret médical, MST ne jure que par vous. Il paraît que vous êtes un magicien. Un jour ou l’autre, il faudra que je me fasse examiner. On vit dans un tel stress.

Le cardiologue posa sa carte de visite sur le bureau.

- Je ne vous aurai pas dérangé pour cela. Merci quand même. MST m’a dit que je pouvais compter sur vous. Je sais qu’il est dans la loge Hatikvah, et que la direction du Bnaï Brit estime beaucoup votre contribution. Le poste de président en est la preuve.

- MST m’honore effectivement de son amitié.

- Savez-vous ce qu’est un sayan ? demanda abruptement Sulitzer.

- Non !

- Dans un sens, cela me fait plaisir. Cela montre qu’on peut l’être dans la plus totale discrétion. Certains membres de la loge Ben Gourion le sont. Pour vous exprimer ma confiance, je peux vous révéler que MST l’est aussi. Je le fais avec son autorisation, bien entendu.

Richard Zerbib attendit patiemment la suite.

- Le sayan est un informateur qui peut, dans le cadre de ses diverses activités, nous aider, dans la mesure de ses possibilités.

- Qui, « nous » ?

- Je ne peux pas entrer dans les détails pour le moment. Mettons les services de l’ambassade.

- Je me vois mal dans cet exercice.

- Vous serez le premier étonné. Tenez par exemple, en tant que président de la loge Ben Gourion, vous pourriez parrainer une rencontre sportive entre jeunes israéliens et palestiniens, et contribuer à sa réussite.

- Volontiers.

- Ce genre d’événement peut faire avancer la paix.

- Certes. Mais comment ?

- Je vous indiquerai. L’essentiel est d’abord d’avoir votre accord.

- Et c’est tout pour être considéré comme… euh…

- Sayan. C’est un pas important. Mais on pourrait vous demander autre chose.

Sulitzer ne sentait pas son interlocuteur envahi par un enthousiasme délirant.

- Vous aimez Israël, n’est-ce pas ?

- Bien entendu.

- Y êtes-vous déjà allé ?

- Une fois.

- Quelles ont été vos impressions ?

- C’est un pays dynamique, moderne, puissant.

Le diplomate soupira. Il triturait son paquet de cigarillos.

- Vous permettez ?

- Vous êtes chez vous.

- Je vous remercie. Ce que j’ai à vous dire est très important.

Il alluma un cigarillo, et souffla plusieurs fois.

- Vous savez, Israël donne cette impression de force indestructible. Tant mieux, nous sommes forts. Mais la menace est permanente. Nos ennemis sont de plus en plus déterminés. Toutes les occasions sont bonnes pour nous nuire, nous porter le coup fatal. La guerre ne se gagne pas que sur le front militaire. Notre seule chance de survie réside dans notre unité, l’unité du peuple juif tout entier. Sans elle, c’est le début de la fin.

Sulitzer l’observait à travers les volutes de fumée. À son grand soulagement, le visiteur finit par demander :

- Qu’attendez-vous réellement de moi ?

Il se redressa et reposa le cigarillo.

- Monsieur Zerbib, j’aimerais que vous compreniez. Nous sommes en guerre. C’est eux ou nous. Nous devons frapper à toutes les portes. Tout soutien nous est indispensable. L’évolution du milieu médical nous inquiète. Surtout au niveau international. Les congrès se transforment en tribunes politiques pour condamner une soi-disant occupation inhumaine. Le sort des populations civiles palestiniennes tourmente les bonnes âmes. Et c’est Israël qu’on montre du doigt, n’est-ce pas ?

- Evidemment.

- Il semble que êtes assez lié avec le docteur Pearson.

- C’est exact. Mais je ne vois pas le rapport.

- Le docteur Pearson est un des dirigeants de l’association internationale de cardiologie. Son autorité morale est très grande. Nous n’aurions eu que des louanges à lui adresser s’il ne s’était mis en tête de visiter les territoires palestiniens et de prendre des positions politiques contraires à l’éthique médicale. Il a visité la Cisjordanie il y a six mois. Il vient de faire un séjour à Gaza. Le saviez-vous ?

- Il m’en avait informé.

- D’après nos renseignements, il aurait fait des déclarations d’une violence déplacée. Est-ce qu’il faisait de la politique ?

- À ma connaissance, non.

- Vous voyez où mène la propagande de nos ennemis ? Transformer un savant en militant. C’est indigne. Il ne faut pas mélanger les genres. Probablement un cardiologue arabe ou un Anglo-Saxon illuminé qui lui aurait fait tourner la tête.

Le diplomate prit un nouveau cigarillo. Zerbib ne se demandait plus d’où il tenait ces informations.

- Il y a bien un congrès à Marbella dans quelques jours ?

- Exact.

- Vous y serez ?

- Bien sûr.

- Il est vrai que vous faites partie du bureau de l’association. J’aimerais que vous notiez les interventions du docteur Pearson, et d’autres éventuellement, surtout celles qui vous paraissent les plus virulentes, ou qui contiennent des propositions anti-israéliennes. Les noms des orateurs et leurs titres.

- Que leur ferez-vous ?

La question jaillit spontanément, avec un soupçon de crainte. Sulitzer sourit, un sourire particulier qui aurait fait le bonheur de son ami Gilles Talibani.

- Voyons ! Nous ne recourons plus à ce genre d’expédients. Nous essaierons de les faire changer d’avis.

- Comment ?

- Par la persuasion, Monsieur Zerbib. Par la persuasion. Ah, encore une chose. C’est le plus important. Si une résolution anti-israélienne venait à être soumise, faites tout votre possible pour qu’elle ne soit pas adoptée. Et soyez sans crainte. Votre nom ne sera jamais mentionné.

Richard Zerbib se sentait pris au piège. Il aurait voulu dire : « Vous faites erreur sur la personne. Adieu ! », sortir de l’ambassade, et tourner la page. Mais il était trop impliqué maintenant. Comme son épouse. Toute une partie de leur vie sociale tournait autour de ces organisations. Il ne pouvait même pas repousser cette offre en particulier. Les informateurs de sa loge, et d’autres, auront vite fait de répandre des rumeurs sur sa « trahison ». Il ne craignait rien pour lui-même, mais sa femme risquait d’en pâtir.

Il tenta une diversion, qui lui fit presque honte.

- Vous savez, je ne suis pas bon à ce genre de choses. Je risque de vous induire en erreur.

Magnanime, le diplomate réfuta l’objection.

- On ne vous demande pas de jouer les James Bond. Soyez naturel. Vous verrez, c’est assez facile, et même excitant. On finit par y prendre goût.

- C’est contraire à l’éthique médicale, mais vues les circonstances…

- Je vous remercie, Monsieur Zerbib. Votre patriotisme vous honore.

Publié sur Mecanopolis le 19 juin 2010

Share:

Wednesday, June 16, 2010

Fox in the henhouse: can we trust Israeli security companies?


ICTS the israeli company responsible for the security of the american airports during 9/11 and London underground, indirectly Madrid train bombings, is funded by former mossadniks and had been awarded, by the french authorities, the security contract of the Port of Calais, North of France, which makes France and the city of Calais, or Dover in the UK a primary target for israeli nuclear 'dirty bombs' false flag attack in Europe. The Channel is a strategic place for the North of Europe. (drug smuggling, NBC weapons, international and eastern europe jewish mafia prostitution networks, organ trafics, etc...). Several other european ports are directly under Tel Aviv control in Netherlands, Germany, Italy, Spain.


Did Israel give us the disease to sell us the cure?

By Gordon Duff

16 June 2010

Gordon Duff argues that recent evidence proving that Israel fabricated video scenes from the Freedom Flotilla attack should serve as a wake-up call to alert the world to the activities of Israeli agents worldwide – many of whom work in companies contracted to “guard” international airports – and the real possibility that they could use their positions to stage the next “terrorist” attack.

This week we learned that Israel had staged scenes from the Freedom Flotilla attack using actors and common Hollywood special effects, called “double negative”. The actors were shown standing among peaceful humanitarian workers, waving weapons around. This became a problem when the stage Israel used wasn’t quite the same. We ended up with a film showing our Israeli “terrorists” walking through solid steel time and time again. Israel’s film industry has been suffering of late. Even the phony Bin Laden videos have given over to audio. The new Bin Laden they use was doing Marlboro commercials in Egypt before they took him on.

“With the ‘news cycle’ such as it is, a new massacre or terrorist bombing could happen at any time. As Israel needs one quickly, it is quite possible we may get one."

It is a given that Israel has destroyed any credibility it once had. It is one thing when a cheap set-up job is leaked but this one was sent out special delivery with “Government of the State of Israel” stamped all over it. This was pure suicide. Only idiots that want to be fooled – politicians in the pocket of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and Fox News – were really taken in. Frankly, with no integrity to sacrifice in the first place, humiliation is impossible anyway. With the “news cycle” such as it is, a new massacre or terrorist bombing could happen at any time. As Israel needs one quickly, it is quite possible we may get one.

I guess I never thought that any country would go as far as to place people, spawned just like in a video game, in something to use as vital evidence in support of the notion of Israelis “defending themselves”. Not much hope of making that dog hunt anymore. Maybe that dog never should have been tossed in a well at birth. Israel’s continual ranting about terrorism might all have been movie magic from day one. We now have to go back decades and look for photos and videos that are now likely to have all been altered like the films Israel sent of the dancing Palestinians on 9/11. Nothing was altered on these; they were simply many years old, just like the still photos of weapons Israel claimed they found on the Freedom Flotilla, photos with digital signatures from as early as 2006.

What Israel has presented to us as “self-defence” is now an act of terrorism. I don’t know if putting armed terrorists in a film, Israeli actors dressed up, waving steel rods around, is a crime but it should be. Were there any question, the films make it clear. What we need to know is why has falsifying evidence of terrorist acts become an industry in Israel, a nation that handles the security, including the video security, of most world airports, including nearly all airports in the United States? Would you go to a doctor who worked in a germ warfare lab? Would you hire a cheque forger to work in a bank? Would you hire a child molester to watch your kids? Well, we have hired Israel to watch our ports, our nuclear facilities, our airports and much more – a country we know for certain will give us a phony video, an altered container scan or a falsified radiation reading if it serves its purpose.

“What we need to know is why has falsifying evidence of terrorist acts become an industry in Israel, a nation that handles the security, including the video security, of most world airports, including nearly all airports in the United States?”

Think of the Americans continually piping on about Israel as our ally, the great democracy, the bastion of liberty in the Middle East. Even the ill-named Simon Wiesenthal Centre or the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), issuing a mass fatwa declaring the entire population of the planet either “anti-Semites” or “self-hating Jews”, or a combination of both, won’t get them past this one. Israel already killed off their “Auschwitz card” when they were caught dubbing “Go Back to Auschwitz” over the screams for help from flotilla wounded, like ventriloquists. We have even heard that Israel is now telling the Palestinians to go back to “Gazauschwitz”. Odd sense of humour.

There is no doubt America was burned in the flood of intelligence received from Israel after 9/11. “Their” agenda, a long history of grudges, was settled at the cost of thousands of American lives, lives still being lost.

A question comes to mind: why develop an industry for falsifying evidence of terrorism? What comes to mind at first is, of course, that Israel has a multi-billion-dollar industry in selling security equipment and services, managed by Mossad personnel who are allowed now to work in the private sector and still actively serve their government. But does it go deeper? If you can and will, as Israel has shown us, add people into videos, then you can also remove them. When we see videos of “Arab terrorists” planting bombs or firing weapons as in Mumbai, what else are we not seeing? Have the players been switched? Have some people been removed? Why?

Thus far we have seen proof that Israel creates phony passports from any country and moves agents where they choose. We have also seen videos altered to cover the murder of innocent civilians. From this we can guess that when we see a video of a rock-throwing teen being shot it may well have been a child carrying school books instead. This is exactly the kind of thing done with the videos from the Freedom Flotilla and no reasonable person could imagine that Israel sat on this 35-year-old technology without ever using it.

Were phony videos and agents using falsified passports used to cover the 7/7 bombings in London? A curious set of circumstances involving the Netanyahu visit, alterations of his plans to avoid areas under attack, bring the videos showing “Arab-looking” suspects under suspicion. Now we know it could have been anyone or no one; the bombs could have been planted at any time and remotely activated.

Once you take that step into deception or the moment you are caught doing something you may have done for decades, you can’t close that door again.

“Most intelligence professionals recognize that a significant percentage of Israelis who do business around the world are employed by their intelligence agencies.”

Most intelligence professionals recognize that a significant percentage of Israelis who do business around the world are employed by their intelligence agencies. Many of these individuals carry Australian, German or British passports; many more seem to be Arabs, speaking local dialects with perfection. Many American contracting companies have had Israeli agents placed among their employees as have UN and non-governmental organizations, many well-known charities and, of course, the press. However, the majority are employed in selling, installing, maintaining equipment in high security installations or, in fact managing the installations themselves, providing broad services. This is, as it were, the rub. Schiphol Airport in Amsterdam, the airport the Detroit “Crotch Bomber” hurried through with no passport, was an Israeli-run facility.

Where were the videos showing who our terrorist met with while in Schiphol, an airport with the broadest high-definition video of any facility outside Israel? Oh, the video is missing, it disappeared, the Israeli company running the airport misplaced it. Wasn’t there time to cut in a pack of dancing Palestinians who could have been shown strapping a bomb to his “johnson”? They could have all been carrying steel bars and walked right through the airport walls to get there. When they left, they might have just dissolved through the floor like vampires.

Times Square was supposed to get us to forget the Mossad fiasco in Detroit, another airport managed by Israelis. When the Indian passenger picked out by the bomb dogs was taken into custody, where did that video go? What was his name? Did he simply disappear? Was he sent back to Israel like the dancing Israeli video crew on 9/11? When the government of Yemen reported that the “Al-Qaeda” operatives, you remember, the ones Dick Cheney released from Guantanamo, had been in contact with Israeli handlers, where did that story go? Yemen has their laptops, filled to the brim with helpful hints on running operations, Mossad style.

The issue then is one of trust. Can an airport be guarded by the same people who shuffle assassins and terrorists through airports? Can we accept a group of special effect clowns to handle video security footage that we may end up going to war over? No matter how cheaply priced or how nicely packaged the stolen American technology being offered is, shouldn’t it matter who we do business with?


Gordon Duff is senior editor of Veterans Today.
Share:

Monday, June 14, 2010

Israel sacrifices Jewish Al Saud against Iran in 2010. Saudis, Egypt on the brink of collapse this summer

In June of 1981 when the Israeli Air Force struck the Osirak nuclear facility in Iraq, the Saudi air defense radar at Tabuk in Northwest Saudi Arabia just happened to be most conveniently off the air for an 8 hour maintenance routine. On the return route aerial refueling was conducted in Saudi airspace. This was reported by Saudi Border Police. There were Air Defense personnel in the Tabuk radar approach control facility during the maintenance period and they reported a few radar hits over the Saudi-Jordanian border station at al-Mudawara. The senior Saudi Air Force officers at Tabuk thought Iraq had attacked Israel. The Pakistan Air Force officers (all Punjabis but one, by the way) on secondment to the Royal Saudi Air Force were remarkably silent.

GORDON DUFF: ISRAEL-SAUDI WAR PACT ON IRAN “HOGWASH”

June 12, 2010 posted by Gordon Duff


Saudi Israel Pact on Iran

LONDON TIMES STORY OUTLINING NUKE ATTACK ON IRAN CITED AS ISRAELI DECEPTION TO MANIPULATE U.S. STOCK MARKET

By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor

The London Times reported today that Saudi Arabia has given permission for Israel to fly over their territory to attack unspecified “nuclear facilities” in Iran. Mention of specific Saudi actions including deactivating their air defense systems to allow Israel use of their airspace was directly referenced by the Times in their story by Hugh Tomlinson. However, not only is such a possibility not a possibility, the story itself is designed to destabilize world markets.

Iran is capable of closing the Straits of Hormuz and stopping all oil shipments from, not only the Persian Gulf states, including Kuwait and Iran but Saudi Arabia itself. At the first sight of an Israeli plane, every tanker and oil facility in the Gulf would be destroyed and the Saudi capital in ruins from Iranian missiles.

The closing of the Straits alone would crash the world’s stock markets instantly throwing the world into an immediate depression. Oil would go over $250 a barrel overnight and gas prices in the US would hit $10 per gallon. This is not speculation.

IRANIAN SILKWORM MISSILE NEAR HORMUZ

Iran’s military capability has been focused entirely on closing the Straits and cutting off much of the world’s oil supply. Thousands of Chinese Silkworm missiles are at the ready, set into the islands of the Straits seized by Iran years ago or hidden along the coastline or on mobile launchers. In fact, the US Navy is would have to immediately withdraw from the region.

Every defense specialist in the world knows all of this. The United Arab Emirates sits across the Straits from Iran and stares into this mass of missiles, torpedo boats and submarines. They are funding a massive missile defense system and have even considered spending billions to construct a canal bypassing the narrow straits. Iranian troops have been dug into islands adjacent to the Straits for decades. When talking about the Straits of Hormuz, the term “tight as a tick” comes to mind. “Duck in a barrel” is another analogy with us being the ducks.

The game isn’t to start a war, knowing full well that America would be required to defend Saudi Arabia though there are no agreements to defend Israel, especially if they are the aggressor. With over $2 trillion dollars pumped from the US economy by Israeli-American companies like Goldman Sachs during the Bush sponsored “pump and dump,” the “banksters” weren’t satisfied. They now want to pick America’s bones.

Any attack on Iran that involved Saudi Arabia in any way would bring an automatic response from Pakistan. Without their military efforts, the US would be forced to withdraw from Afghanistan in weeks. Even with their help, and increased force levels, America’s presence is unsustainable as the Karzai government has already collapsed. Nobody is admitting it yet but Karzai and his US backers rule nothing and control nothing, even worse than when Bush left office.

The real players in the Middle East are Turkey, Iran and Pakistan. Two of these nations are major US allies. The population of the three nations exceeds that of the US and their combined armies number, with reserves at two million, over double that of the United States. Were the three to join together, Afghanistan and Iraq would be forced, out of survival to join in, creating a contiguous state, a nuclear state, capable of taking Saudi Arabia in days and doing so without any US resistance. After all, these are American allies and Saudi Arabia would be, technically, an aggressor nation. Though mutual defense pacts do not include Iran, a history of resentment against Saudi-Israeli collusion and the current chill between Israel and Turkey would build this polyglot coalition state almost overnight.

In the long run, such a country would be the real strategic partner the US has always desired, with a single nuclear arsenal under Pakistani control and Iranian issues eliminated as they would be the junior power in a coalition with decades of ties to the US. If any of this seems difficult to grasp, position papers outlining this exact situation have been around for years.

Given the chance, Israel would join this group of states. Those familiar with private “back channel” diplomatic initiatives know that this has is considered. Turkey, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan all maintain a covert level of cordial relations with Israel, relations poisoned by the Gaza crisis.

Israel’s aggressive stance toward apartheid expansionism, fueled by the hubris supplied by American hegemony in the region is only one of the considerations needed in evaluating the dynamic in the region. The humiliation Turkey suffered, despite the fact Turkey’s powerful military has always worked closely with Israel, threatens to destabilize their civilian government and add to Islamic militancy there.

Iraq is going through a rough period after recent elections. They are expect to ask the US to keep troops in place in significant numbers well past the agreed upon date of withdrawal.

Iran, a country whose civil government is extremely unpopular with its own people, maintains stability through police state tactics rivaling those of the Shah’s Savak and punishes its own population by maintaining status as a rogue state, a virtual pariah nation, as a way of clamping down on dissent.

Afghanistan is in total collapse. Along with the Taliban, a number of additional divides with the nation have occurred and the new national army and police force are total failures. An informal defacto government is now ruling increasing areas of the country and may be able to build stability if certified by the royal families. President Karzai is trying to work closely with Pakistan, a major policy change for him, out of a combination of necessity and panic. However, Karzai has burned too many bridges to be able to bring cordial relations between Pakistan and Afghanistan, nations with a history of rivalry and some acrimony.

Pakistan may be the key to the puzzle. Pakistan’s unsteady democracy has been ineffective but current military leadership in Pakistan is highly competent, very pro-US and moderate. The primary problems are Pakistan’s economy, nearing total collapse and the instability of terrorism that has pushed Pakistan to the edge. Pakistan’s desire is to underwrite economic growth but has no oil resources for such as task. Without the ability to overcome internal corruption and address the root causes of extremism in the tribal areas along the border with Afghanistan, Pakistan faces destabilization. Membership in a coalition state would address some of these problems. Occupation of Saudi Arabia under an “Islamic Protectorate” necessitated by Israeli incursions into Saudi airspace would solve all of Pakistan’s problems.

The media can be a powerful thing. When a story, such as the one in the London Times, could jolt markets or push nations to irational acts, a poor understanding of regional conditions and history could have quite another effect, one entirely unexpected.


http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/06/12/gordon-duff-israel-saudi-war-pact-on-iran-hogwash/





Share:

Tuesday, June 01, 2010

Apres la signature du traité entre le Bresil, la Turquie et l'Iran et l'echec des sanctions contre l'Iran, Netanyahu declenche une nouvelle guerre

Pourquoi Israël a t-il attaqué des civils en Méditerranée ?

par Thierry Meyssan*

Israël a pesé à l’avance les conséquences de l’attaque qu’il a lancé contre un convoi humanitaire maritime. Quels sont ses objectifs en déclenchant une crise diplomatique mondiale, pourquoi a t-il défié son allié turc et son protecteur états-unien ?

L’attaque conduite par trois patrouilleurs lance-missiles israéliens de classe Saar, le 31 mai 2010, contre la flottille de la liberté, dans les eaux internationales de Méditerranée illustre la fuite en avant de Tel-Aviv.

La flottille de la liberté est une initiative de militants des droits de l’homme [1] [2], soutenue par le gouvernement turc. Son objectif est à la fois de véhiculer de l’aide humanitaire jusqu’à Gaza et, ce faisant, de briser le blocus mis en place illégalement par l’armée israélienne à l’encontre d’1,5 million de Gazaouites.

La décision d’aborder des navires civils dans les eaux internationales constitue un « acte de guerre » au regard du droit international. Juridiquement parlant, il y a eu vol des navires et de leurs cargaison, enlèvement et séquestration de leurs passagers, meurtres ; voire assassinats, si l’on admet les informations de la télévision turque selon laquelle les commandos avaient une liste des personnalités à liquider au cours de l’assaut.

Cet acte de guerre, à l’encontre des pavillons grecs et turcs de ces navires, a été perpétré afin de consolider le blocus, lequel constitue en lui-même une violation du droit international.

En choisissant l’argument de la « légitime défense », les autorités israéliennes ont explicitement revendiqué leur souveraineté sur les eaux internationales à 69 miles nautiques au large de la Palestine ; cette annexion —temporaire ou durable— étant nécessaire à la poursuite du blocus, lequel serait nécessaire à la sécurité de l’Etat d’Israël.

En abordant un navire turc et en en tuant des passagers, Tel-Aviv a d’abord choisi de répondre militairement à la crise diplomatique qui l’oppose depuis janvier 2009 à Ankara. Cette initiative est censée provoquer une crise au sein de l’état-major turc et entre celui-ci et le gouvernement turc. Cependant, elle pourrait aboutir à une rupture complète des relations militaires entre les deux pays, alors même que la Turquie aura été pendant un demi-siècle le meilleur allié d’Israël dans la région. D’ores et déjà, les manœuvres conjointes turco-israéliennes ont été annulées sine die. En outre, cette crise pourrait aussi avoir des conséquences sur les relations commerciales entre les deux pays, alors même que la Turquie est un partenaire vital pour l’économie israélienne.

Cependant, Tel-Aviv se devait de casser la crédibilité de la Turquie au moment où elle se rapproche de la Syrie et de l’Iran, et ambitionne d’exercer avec ses nouveaux partenaires une autorité régionale [3]. Dans l’immédiat, Israël devait sanctionner le rôle d’Ankara dans la négociation du Protocole de Téhéran sur l’industrie nucléaire iranienne.

Côté turc, où l’on s’attendait à une intervention israélienne musclée mais pas létale, le moment est venu de se poser en protecteur des populations palestiniennes, selon la doctrine néo-ottomane théorisée par le ministre des Affaires étrangères, le professeur Ahmet Davutoğlu. Sans attendre le retour du Premier ministre Recep Erdoğan, en voyage en Amérique latine, l’ambassadeur Turc à Tel-Aviv a été rappelé à Ankara et une cellule de crise a été mise en place autour du vice-Premier ministre, Bülent Arınç. Elle est immédiatement entrée en contact avec les 32 gouvernements des Etats dont les passagers du convoi sont ressortissants. Tout le personnel diplomatique turc a été mobilisé pour saisir du problème le maximum d’Etats et d’organisations internationales. Dans une conférence de presse, M. Arınç a exigé la restitution immédiate des trois bateaux turcs volés et de leur cargaison, ainsi et surtout que la libération des centaines de citoyens turcs enlevés et séquestrés. Il a choisi de qualifier l’attaque d’acte de « piraterie » (et non de guerre), de manière à offrir au gouvernement Netanyahu la possibilité de présenter l’affaire comme une « bavure » et non comme une politique. Dans cette logique, le président Abdullah Gül, quant à lui, a exigé que les tribunaux israéliens jugent les responsables de cette tuerie.

Depuis le Chili, M. Erdoğan a déclaré : « Cette action est totalement contraire aux principes du droit international, c’est le terrorisme d’un Etat inhumain. Je m’adresse à ceux qui ont appuyé cette opération, vous appuyez le sang, nous soutenons le droit humanitaire et la paix ».

Dans l’après-midi, Ankara a saisi la Conseil atlantique. La Turquie est membre de l’OTAN. Si elle ne trouve pas la réponse qu’elle attend du gouvernement israélien, elle pourrait qualifier l’attaque d’acte de guerre et requérir l’aide militaire des Etats membres de l’Alliance en vertu de l’article 5 du Traité de l’Atlantique Nord.

Le gouvernement Netanyahu a invité ses ressortissants à quitter la Turquie, tandis que des manifestations spontanées se multiplient devant les consulats israéliens où la foule réclame vengeance.

JPEG - 52.2 ko
Le 26 mai 2010, le Premier ministre Benjamin Netanyahu, reçoit à Tel-Aviv le secrétaire général de la Maison-Blanche, Rahm Emanuel. Celui-ci lui remet une invitation de Barack Obama, que la partie israélienne annulera cinq jours plus tard.

Côté états-unien, cette affaire rappelle celle de l’USS Liberty (8 juin 1967). Durant la guerre des Six jours, les Israéliens attaquèrent un bâtiment de surveillance électronique de l’US Navy, faisant 34 morts et 171 blessés. Tel-Aviv présenta ses excuses pour cette méprise sur le champ de bataille tandis que, tout en les acceptant officiellement, Washington y vu un outrage délibéré. Les Israéliens auraient voulu à l’époque sanctionner les critiques états-uniennes.

Cette fois, l’attaque de la flottille de la liberté pourrait être une sanction après le vote par Washington d’une résolution des Etats signataires du Traité de non-prolifération enjoignant Israël à déclarer ses armes nucléaires et à accepter les contrôles de l’Agence internationale de l’énergie atomique.

La décision israélienne d’attaquer des navires civils dans les eaux internationales intervient après l’assassinat aux Emirats d’un dirigeant palestinien par une unité du Mossad ; la découverte d’un vaste système de copie falsifiées de passeports au détriment d’Etats occidentaux ; et le refus d’assister à la conférence internationale de suivi du Traité de non-prolifération. Cet ensemble de faits peut être interprété comme une succession de coups perpétrés par un Etat sûr de son impunité —et dans ce cas, il pourrait s’agir cette fois d’un coup de plus ou de trop—, ou comme une escalade après une courte friction publique avec l’administration US —il s’agirait alors de revendiquer le leadership du mouvement sioniste en montrant que Tel-Aviv décide et Washington entérine—.

Le Premier ministre Benjamin Netanyahu, en voyage en Amérique du Nord, a décidé de terminer sa visite canadienne et d’annuler son rendez-vous à la Maison-Blanche. Il a été joint par téléphone par le président Obama qui lui a demandé des explications.

La Haut commissaire des Nations Unies pour les droits de l’homme, Navi Pillay, a déclaré que l’opération israélienne ne pouvait avoir aucune justification juridique. Le Rapporteur spécial sur les Droits de l’homme dans les territoires occupés palestiniens, Richard Falk, a tenu à souligner qu’au delà de l’atteinte à la liberté de circulation sur les mers, le problème central reste le blocus. « À moins que des actions promptes et décisives soient prises pour mettre au défi l’approche israélienne sur Gaza, nous serons tous complices d’une politique criminelle qui menace la survie d’une communauté assiégée », a t-il affirmé. Le Conseil de sécurité a été convoqué en urgence, ce jour, à 18h TU. Le ministre turc des Affaires étrangères est parti à New York.


http://www.voltairenet.org/article165580.html

Share:

Monday, May 24, 2010

Time Square Operation Linked To The American Kosher Nostra

Michael Milken, one of the heads of the Kosher Nostra and the israeli criminal networks in the US


When waging modern warfare, often the loudest sound is the one you don’t hear.

Why is no one reporting that “Faisal the Fizzler” is tied to Israeli-American Leon Black and Israel-dominated organized crime syndicates dating back to the 1920s? Why is no one reporting the ties to junk bond king and Israeli-American Michael Milken? How can Americans make informed choices without access to the real facts?


Faisal Sharzad—AKA The Times Square Fizzler—reportedly was trained by the “Pakistan Taliban” for a deadly deed that went horribly wrong.

Not only did he lock his keys in the car, including his apartment key, his Rube Goldberg contraption of alarm clocks, Walmart propane tanks and firecrackers failed to explode.

Apparently he was also expertly trained to purchase fertilizer that could not possibly explode.

Happily, Pakistani Evil Doers did not train him to drive. He could have ended up in New Jersey.

Somehow he found his way to one of the busiest streets in midtown Manhattan just as the United Nations—in midtown Manhattan—was preparing to debate a treaty to create a Middle East free of nuclear weapons.

Was that part of the story missing from the coverage you saw of this incident? Perhaps you were watching Fox News though for non-coverage any mainstream source would suffice.

That U.N. treaty, first proposed in 1995, would force Israel to forfeit its nuclear weapons, a goal first sought by President John F. Kennedy in June 1963.

What’s become of this Muslim Evil Doer after he miraculously found his way to Times Square—after miraculously eluding airport security during his 16 trips abroad to train with the Pakistan Taliban?

Though this well-timed incident added plausibility to a narrative supporting the “Global War on Terrorism,” the facts suggest that the Fizzler’s storyline has since become problematic.

Branded as “news you can trust,” CNN briefly showed a photo of Apollo Management, his employer. That photo appeared on CNN for about a second. End of story and no mention since.

Here’s the online Newsweek account of where the Fizzler worked from 2006-2009:

May 4 (Bloomberg) — Faisal Shahzad, charged with attempting to bomb New York’s Times Square, worked for three years at a company controlled by Leon Black’s private-equity firm, Apollo Management LP.

Who is Leon Black? And why isn’t his three-year employment of the Fizzler newsworthy?

Remember Major Nidal Hasan, the Fort Hood Shooter? His job history provided critical clues to understanding his bizarre behavior. Is that why he too has disappeared from the news?

Are the Clues Hidden in Plain Sight?

Imagine if the intelligence that induced the U.S. to war in Iraq was proven “fixed” around a preset goal. What if the common source of that treachery is poised to become transparent?

If you were complicit in a deception of that magnitude—a clear act of treason—how would you obscure the facts?

How would you sustain a “Muslim terrorist” narrative? And a storyline built on a widely share belief in the threat of Islamo-fascism?

What happens to the storyline if the pre-war intelligence is proven a fiction traceable to a common source? What then for the storytellers?

For those marketing The Clash of Civilizations, Major Hasan’s psychotic break at Fort Hood in Texas was a well-timed blessing. See if you detect a common component in these accounts:

  • At Family Security Matters, President Carol Taber described this incident as “the Ft. Hood terrorist attack” by an “Islamist gunman.”
  • Editor Pam Meister promoted “the shocking TRUTH (sic) behind these attacks so that we might ward off those yet to come.”
  • Executive Vice-President Linda Cohen, who also serves as a trustee of the Anti-Defamation League, offered this advice: “No one is safe now. Not you, not the military, not your children, not office workers nor subway riders, nor anyone who happens to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.”

Why was The Times Square Fizzler at just the right place at just the right time?

Advancing the Narrative

Is there a precedent for combining aberrant personal behavior and “terrorism” to advance a preset agenda? Do you recall the sniper attacks around Washington, D.C. in October 2002?

That murder spree began one day before debate commenced on Senate Resolution 46 proposed by Senator Joe Lieberman to authorize the use of U.S. forces in Iraq.

In the immediate aftermath of 911, Lieberman and Arizona Senator John McCain urged that the U.S. focus its forces not on Al Qaeda in Afghanistan but on regime change in Iraq.

Meanwhile the nation’s capital became a city under siege when those attacks created widespread insecurity and heightened anxiety as serial murders left ten dead and three wounded over a 10-day period.

Those random shootings quickly transformed the emotionally wrenching terror of 911 into a personal reality for Washington residents, including U.S. lawmakers considering whether to invade Iraq.

Meanwhile Lieberman and McCain—citing phony intelligence—promoted the invasion of a nation that had no hand in that mass murder.

Assets and Transnational Treason

Was Faisal Sharzad a Pakistani patsy? In the psy-ops parlance, was he an “asset”? An asset is a profiled personality who can be catalyzed to act out known dysfunctions in ways that advance an agenda based on the time, place and circumstances of their behavior.

The facts suggest that Nidal Hasan was such an asset. But don’t expect to find this analysis in mainstream media. You will not find this on the Rupert Murdoch-controlled Fox News or in his many newspapers.

Assets are typically profiled and developed over lengthy periods of time. Their potential to act out a known personality disorder is held in reserve in much the same way that a military commander holds troops in reserve for deployment at an opportune time.

How is an asset developed in plain sight and “tasked” at the opportune time? Only a careful investigation can identify those influences particular to Dr. Hasan. That includes the decisions that led to his transfer to Ft. Hood and the circumstances there that triggered his behavior.

That’s also true for The Times Square Fizzler. While hardly the brightest light in the shed, he was sufficiently competent to drive a car though he may have picked up the wrong fertilizer at Walmart. God only knows where he bought the fireworks. Perhaps in New Jersey.

A similar history surrounds the Christmas Day Bomber whose failed exploit mirrors that of Sharzad. Rebranded The Crotch Bomber, this young Nigerian was helped by an Israeli airport security firm to evade detection in Amsterdam and board an international flight to Detroit.

What’s the common component in each of these well-timed “incidents?”

Who had the means, motive, opportunity and insider intelligence to perpetrate this “terrorist” act in midtown Manhattan?

Is The New York Times correct in its May 22nd editorial: “As the aborted Times Square and Christmas Day bombings proved, militant groups are determined to strike here again.” Is that what these incidents proved?

Is it sufficient to decide that this latest incident is traceable to the Pakistan Taliban? Does that evidence alone explain how such operations are pre-staged and orchestrated?

What role was played by Sharzad’s employer?

As a combat-stress psychiatrist, Dr. Hasan dealt daily with injured and mentally troubled veterans at Walter Reed Hospital where the most grievously wounded from Iraq and Afghanistan are sent to recover. Many of them are amputees, disfigured or otherwise handicapped for life.

While coping with that vicarious trauma, he was taunted for his Muslim beliefs and harassed for his Middle Eastern heritage even though he was born, raised and educated in the U.S.

What happened to Faisal Sharzad during his three years at Apollo? Did he encounter an experience similar to Hasan? Is that why the Leon Black story disappeared so quickly?

That question brings us to the curious history of Mr. Black, his investment banking firm and the question of what is proven by this latest in a series of high profile ‘terrorist incidents.’

The Mental Environment

The National Crime Syndicate convened its first nationwide conference in Atlantic City in 1929. That’s where the mobsters began to divide the U.S. into 24 exclusive markets in order to stop murderous disputes over territory that created unseemly political problems.

Those territories were finalized in 1931 at a Jews-only conclave at the Franconia Hotel in Manhattan. Five of the 24 markets were established in and around New York City.

The Outfit has long been a source of pop culture narratives, including The Godfather movies starring Marlon Brando and Al Pacino and The Sopranos, a popular television series. Both storylines branded organized crime as Italian or Sicilian with Jews playing only a minor role.

This is Hollywood after all.

To say Sicilian organized crime is OK. To say Jewish organized crime assures a charge of anti-Semitism—unless you’re Jewish. Then the charge is “self-hating.” Those remain the only two alternatives when speaking candidly about organized crime.

Estonian Kalle Lasn saw firsthand how facts could be displaced in plain sight by those skilled at targeting the mental environment. In March 2004, he published an article in Adbusters noting that while less than two percent of Americans are Jewish, 26 of the top 50 neoconservatives advocating war in Iraq are Jewish (52%). Those are the facts.

He titled the article: “Why Won’t Anyone Say They’re Jewish?” He soon found out. He was attacked as an “anti-Semite” for asking the question. Don’t ask. Don’t tell.

Yet the facts remain. The bulk of those who “fixed” U.S. intelligence around the predetermined goal of invading Iraq were either Jewish or assets whose careers were developed by pro-Israelis. Lasn’s subtitle for Adbusters, a magazine he founded: The Journal of the Mental Environment.

Could the mental environment be the target for this series of well-timed “terrorist” attacks that could plausibly be blamed on Muslim Evil Doers?

But first back to Mr. Black and a glimpse into the “fields within fields…within fields” of relationships through which transnational organized crime operates across time and distance.

Discrediting and Disabling the U.S.

Leon Black first appeared on the national scene in 1975 when his father fell to his death from the 44th floor of Manhattan’s Pan Am Building. Two years later, the son emerged as head of mergers and acquisitions and co-head of corporate finance at Drexel Burnham Lambert where he worked closely with Michael Milken, the firm’s “junk bond” specialist in Beverly Hills.

In the 1970s, Cincinnati’s Carl Lindner and his American Financial Group began investing in United Fruit. The name was changed to United Brands and then Chiquita Brands International in order to escape its notorious past. After the death of CEO Eli Black, Lindner assumed control.

United Fruit became a key conduit for moving Israeli arms into covert wars throughout Latin America, culminating in the Iran-Contra scandal of 1987. That scandal discredited the presidency of Ronald Reagan when he was forced to concede that his administration sold arms to Iran, an avowed enemy, and used the funds to arm Nicaraguan rebels despite a Congressional ban.

The term “Banana Republic” traces to the corrupting influence of United Fruit over decades. The U.S. was discredited throughout Latin America and the Caribbean by the firm’s bribery of foreign officials and its use of armed force to control and impoverish indigenous peoples.

Along with insurance firms owned by Meshulam Riklis and Saul Steinberg, Lindner’s American Financial Group was an early investor in Drexel’s high-yield (“junk”) securities packaged by Milken in deals coordinated with Leon Black in midtown Manhattan.

Riklis’ Rapid-American Corp. became an acquisition vehicle for Lerner Shops, Playtex and other companies such as RKO film studios, previously owned in part by bootlegger Joseph Kennedy, father of President John F. Kennedy. JFK was murdered five months after he sought to end Israel’s nuclear weapons program in order to avoid a nuclear arms race in the Middle East.

In 1967, in one of the first junk bond-financed leveraged buyouts (“LBOs”)—while Michael Milken was still an undergraduate at the University of California Berkeley—Riklis acquired Lewis Rosenstiel’s shares in Cincinnati-based Schenley Industries.

The Istanbul-born Riklis paid for Schenley with junk bonds issued by Rapid-American Corp., a firm that Riklis owned with Lindner. Under Lindner’s leadership, United Fruit’s purchase of 40% of Rapid-American reportedly provided majority owner Riklis and his colleagues with resources to purchase for General Ariel Sharon his ranch in Israel’s Negev Desert.

Rosenstiel’s wife, Leonore, left him to marry Walter Annenberg, Ronald Reagan’s “best friend for 50 years” according to Nancy Reagan. Annenberg also served as Richard Nixon’s ambassador to Great Britain. Son of Chicago mobster Moses “Moe” Annenberg, Walter laundered profits from the family’s racing-wire service through Triangle Publications, publisher of T.V. Guide and Seventeen.

Leonore Annenberg was raised by her uncle, Harry Cohn, head of Columbia Pictures. First married to Belden Kattleman, a Las Vegas businessman, she then married Rosenstiel. During Prohibition, Rosenstiel bootlegged liquor from England, Europe, and Canada via Saint Pierre and then by truck into Cincinnati, building what became Schenley Distillers.

Enabling the Networks

As the National Crime Syndicate was being formed in 1929, the racing wire service provided the sinew that bound together organized crime’s gambling operations dispersed across the U.S. and Canada and into Mexico and Cuba. As Walter Annenberg steadily distanced himself from organized crime, he steadily gained legitimacy and influence in Republican politics through his ownership of The Philadelphia Inquirer.

In 1989, Annenberg liquidated $3 billion of his wealth, including The Racing Form, in a sale to Rupert Murdoch. With those proceeds, he donated $150 million to Annenberg communication schools at the University of Pennsylvania and the University of Southern California.

While president, Ronald and Nancy Reagan routinely spent their New Year’s vacation at Sunnylands, Annenberg’s extensive estate in Rancho Mirage, California near Palm Springs. Walter’s father also gravitated to sunnier climes. After double-crossing a partner in Chicago, Moe fled to south Florida to seek the protection of National Crime Syndicate “Chairman” Meyer Lansky until he and his son relocated to Pennsylvania.

Fields Within Fields…within Fields

Why take you down this circuitous route in an account of the Times Square Fizzler? Read on to close the circle.

In the mid-1950s, former Phoenix mobster Gus Greenbaum managed and then sold the Riviera Hotel and Casino in Las Vegas, one of the premier properties controlled by the Chicago Outfit. The buyer was Cincinnatian Riklis, a former member of the Haganah, a paramilitary outfit active in Palestine from 1920 to 1948 when it became the Israel Defense Forces.

Riklis tutored Milken, then a young bond broker, and reportedly was Milken’s first customer. Fellow Cincinnatian Carl Lindner emerged as a father figure to Milken who oversaw a massive “control fraud” at Lincoln Savings and Loan in Phoenix, Arizona.

The face on this fraud was Charles Keating who previously served as general counsel to the Linder-controlled, Cincinnati-based American Financial Group.

Arizona Senator John McCain led a group of five Senators known as “the Keating Five” whose delay of needed reforms raised the taxpayer cost of that nationwide fraud by an additional $50 billion, to exceed $150 billion.

Lindner boasts on the firm’s website that he is the “largest non-Jewish contributor to Jewish causes in the U.S.” Alan Greenspan, then a consultant to J.P. Morgan, was retained by Keating to help recruit the Keating Five.

Greenspan expended with that lobbying effort much of the political capital he amassed as chairman of a 1983 Social Security Commission (“the Greenspan Commission”). Its recommendation: work longer and levy higher payroll taxes.

A confidante of radical free market theorist Ayn Rand (Russian Alisa Rosenbaum), Greenspan reemerged as the Reagan-appointed Chairman of the Federal Reserve where he enabled the subprime mortgage fraud with sustained low interest rates and enthusiastic support for what this Rand confidante described as “financial innovation.”

John McCain wrote to Keating in 1983 after his first Congressional victory: “Of the many things to be grateful for in this world, the friendship of the Keating family is certainly among the most meaningful.” McCain’s top supporters included Keating and father-in-law James Hensley.

Here begins the closing of the circle connecting the savings and loan fraud of the 1980s and the subprime mortgage fraud two decades later. And, the facts suggest, the role of misdirection aided by this latest in an ongoing series of well-timed incidents by Muslim Evil Doers.

Murder Inc.

Notorious mobster Bugsy Siegel is widely credited with founding Las Vegas when he built The Flamingo, an early casino named after Virginia Hill, a mob courier girlfriend from Alabama who used Flamingo as her showgirl name.

The National Crime Syndicate maintained discipline through Murder, Inc., a cadre of hit men. When Siegel was found stealing from the mob, his murder in 1947 required that the syndicate relocate Gus Greenbaum to Vegas from Phoenix, leaving Kemper Marley in charge. Marley hired Jim and Gene Hensley.

After two close scrapes with federal liquor violations for which the Hensley brothers reportedly took the heat, Jim Hensley emerged with a beer distributorship that has grown to the fifth largest in the nation—owned by Cindy Hensley McCain. Hensley’s Arizona lawyer, William Rehnquist, was appointed by Reagan as Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court.

McCain met Hensley, then 24, when he was the married 42-year old U.S. Navy liaison to the U.S. Senate. Soon divorced, relocated and remarried in Arizona, he worked on public relations for his father-in-law while being positioned for election to the Congress four years before Senator Barry Goldwater’s pending retirement.

After 911, Republican Senator McCain emerged alongside Democrat Joe Lieberman as the most insistent voices for the invasion of Iraq based on intelligence we now know was false.

Are these webs of relationships coincidental? Or is this typical of the overlapping links common to syndicate operations? Is this how organized crime is sustained through fields-within-fields of relationships that stretch across time, distance and, as here, both major political parties?

What does this have to do with the Fort Hood Shooter, the Crotch Bomb Sizzler and the Times Square Fizzler? Are these “incidents” typical of how war is waged in the mental environment by creating—and constantly refreshing—a narrative?

Does a renewed fear of terrorism help divert attention away from the latest massive financial fraud? And from the need for reforms that are not yet forthcoming—from either party?

Are these insecurity-inducing “incidents” a form of marketing to ensure that defense spending is sustained, an area? Is it coincidental that Israel is the world’s third largest arms exporter?

Is this how we persuade ourselves as a nation to assume more debt to wage more wars with no end in sight? Is this just business-as-usual for transnational organized crime?

Was the same criminal syndicate involved in the S&L fraud also active in the Enron fraud? The Dotcom crash? The subprime fraud? The failed “reform” legislation?

Did these massive financial “incidents” just happen? Or were they stage-managed from the shadows in an alliance between policy-making assets and transnational organized crime?

Did the war in Iraq emerge as a natural reaction to the provocation of 911? Or was the invasion anticipated and pre-staged, with 911 the plausible catalyst for a long-planned agenda?

Whose Agenda?

In 1948, the Joint Chiefs of Staff cautioned Harry Truman against granting sovereign recognition to an extremist enclave that was already using ethnic cleansing to terrorize the indigenous population and occupy their lands.

Their rationale: Palestinian land was rightly theirs as The Chosen because it was given to them—by a God of their own choosing.

Truman was warned by U.S. military leaders about the “fanatical concepts of the Jewish leaders” and their plans for “Jewish military and economic hegemony over the entire Middle East.” Truman chose not to follow their advice nor that of his Secretary of State, former General George C. Marshall who viewed recognition as a geopolitical blunder.

Did military leaders fail to grasp the depth of the threat posed by these extremists to U.S. national security? Did these “fanatical concepts” include a plan to deceive the U.S. so that we would deploy our military to pursue their agenda for dominance in the region?

Working as a transnational criminal syndicate, did these extremists collaborate to endanger the U.S. economy with debt?

Could the criminal roots of this operation explain why we hear nothing about Leon Black’s employment of the Times Square Fizzler?

Is the sound of silence speaking to us with an eloquence we do not yet understand?

Jeff Gates is a widely acclaimed author, attorney, investment banker, educator and consultant to government, corporate and union leaders worldwide. He served for seven years as counsel to the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance. He is widely published in the trade, popular and academic press. His Website: http://www.criminalstate.com His latest book is Guilt by Association: How Deception and Self-Deceit Took America to War. His previous books include Democracy at Risk: Rescuing Main Street From Wall Street and The Ownership Solution: Toward a Shared Capitalism for the 21st Century.

Read More at his website: http://www.criminalstate.com

Share:

Blog Archive

Support


Definition List

Just Foreign Policy Iraqi Death Estimator

Unordered List