Now read carefully this article written below on Tel Aviv's demands apparently, about the preparation of the next nuclear 9/11 which appeared clear to all of us after the Litvinenko affair back in 2006. This israeli nuclear false flag is to serve to start a world war and this operation is being prepared since more than 8 years now by the French, German, Brits, American and Israelis! The exact same who ran 9/11, Madrid and London bombings during the last decade. There are now concerns that the Liam Fox affair is directly linked to the preparation of this nuclear false flag to be blamed on Iran, as a few 'fake security contractors companies' were identified in London, which can serve as fronts like 'international building contractors companies' for the israelis and their allies inside the MOD.
A handful of suitcase nuke, prepared with russian nuclear material stolen by the european and russian jewish mafia based in Germany, South of France, and Eastern Europe. French-Israelis and Brits used Litvinenko for this exact purpose. These attacks will be blamed on the iranian government, as Russia is providing the rods for the iranian plant in Bushehr. But the original local plan drafted by the Britons was to blame Pakistani government and use the local Asian Muslim population in London as the scape goat like in 2005, as we explained last year with Captain Eric May here.
Aleksandr Litvinenko: An Islamist Threat?
One of the most surprising elements in the
recent poisoning of the former FSB officer Aleksandr Litvinenko is his
apparent deathbed conversion to Islam. At first, there seemed little
reason to believe this unlikely development, but the gradual
confirmation of the story has raised a number of questions regarding
Litvinenko’s cooperation with the Chechen resistance and, in a more
sensational vein, with Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaeda terrorist
organization.
A Quiet Conversion
The first notice of Litvinenko’s conversion
to Islam came in a press release from the Chechen Presidential
Administration after the death of the former spy: “We have learnt that
shortly before the attempt on his life, Aleksandr Litvinenko voluntarily
and sincerely converted to Islam. Thus, he not only became our
comrade-in-arms but also brother-in-faith” (Chechenpress, November 26).
Though the source was not given for this unexpected development, it was
eventually revealed that this news came from the Chechen representative
in London, Akhmed Zakayev, a personal friend and neighbor of Litvinenko.
News of the conversion apparently took several of Litvinenko’s friends
by surprise.
There seemed little reason to believe this
strange tale until it was confirmed by the spy’s father, Walter
Litvinenko, who described his son’s growing estrangement from Russia’s
Orthodox Church. Two days before his death, Litvinenko told his father
that he had decided to convert to Islam and desired to be buried as a
Muslim (Kommersant, December 4). Zakayev said that Litvinenko first
broached the subject of conversion shortly after he became ill,
returning to the topic repeatedly despite a lack of encouragement from
Zakayev. Eventually, Litvinenko recited the shahadah, a formula whose
recitation indicates the speaker’s willingness to convert to Islam. At
Litvinenko’s urging, Zakayev arranged for an imam to recite the
appropriate Koranic verses in the hospital room the day before the spy’s
death (RFE/RL, December 5).
Experiments with Poison
There was initial confusion as to what
constituted a lethal dose of polonium-210. If the Litvinenko poisoning
was indeed the work of Russia’s secret services, it is unlikely that
such an unusual method of assassination would have been employed without
previous testing.
In a recent interview, Zakayev alleged that
polonium poisoning had already been carried out on several high-profile
Chechen prisoners, including Lecha Ismailov (Frankfurter Allgemeine
Sonntagszeitung, December 3). The reference is undoubtedly to veteran
field commander Lechi (‘The Beard’) Islamov, who had worked closely with
the warlord Ruslan (Hamzat) Gelayev. Both hailed from the same town of
Komsomolskoye in southwestern Chechnya. As the leader of the “Shaykh
Mansur Special Task-Force Regiment,” Islamov was captured in 2000
following the siege of Grozny and was sentenced to nine years in prison
for seizing hostages and “organizing an armed group.” The Russian Deputy
Minister of Justice maintained that Islamov died in 2004 from heart and
kidney diseases, as well as from the complications brought on by a
“severe skin allergy” (Grani.ru, April 26, 2004). Islamov, however, was
convinced that he had been poisoned, describing a meeting that he had
attended in prison with several unknown men. The men seemed intent on
discussing matters of “life and death” with Islamov while urging him to
partake in tea and a pile of sandwiches. Within minutes after the
meeting, Islamov became seriously ill, though he did not receive medical
attention for days, and instead, was transferred to another prison.
According to Islamov’s attorney, the
commander began to suffer from organ failure. Some of the symptoms of
Islamov’s last days resemble those endured by Litvinenko. His attorney
provided a description: “He cannot speak or move, has became absolutely
bald, lost his hair, beard and eyebrow hairs, skin is peeling off in
pieces from his head and hands” (Kommersant, April 4, 2004). Doctors
were unable to diagnose the disease that was quickly killing Islamov or
devise any treatment. Zakayev alleges that it was only because of
Litvinenko’s extraordinary good health that allowed him to survive long
enough for the radioactive poison to be discovered; the poor health of
the past victims resulted in their death within ten days. Traces of
polonium-210 have also been found in Zakayev’s car.
Zakayev, who serves as the representative
of the Chechen republic in London, has been the subject of several
extradition attempts by Moscow on charges of murder, abduction and
torture. Russian allegations have tended to be so spurious that they
have been tossed aside by British judges. For instance, an Orthodox
priest that Zakayev is alleged to have killed actually turned up to
challenge allegations of his own murder. There are reports that Russia
will now require the extradition of Zakayev and exiled Russian oligarch
Boris Berezovsky in return for Russian cooperation in the investigation
of Litvinenko’s death (The Times, December 6).
Dirty Bombs and Suitcase Nukes
After the news of his conversion broke, a
number of media sources retroactively elevated Litvinenko to the ranks
of the “Islamist extremists” who threaten the West as well as Russia.
Britain’s Sunday Express tabloid reported that Scotland Yard and
counterterrorism experts feared that Litvinenko was assisting al-Qaeda
in building a radioactive “dirty bomb” (Sunday Express, December 3). A
televised panel of Russian “nuclear experts” claimed that Litvinenko
worked in an underground laboratory in London where he was preparing a
“dirty bomb” on behalf of the Chechen extremists (NTV, December 3). A
news agency also suggested that Litvinenko actually poisoned himself by
handling polonium-210, the last ingredient needed to detonate a “dirty
nuclear bomb” (RIA Novosti, December 5). Another Russian agency repeated
the “dirty bomb” allegations while adding the accusation that
“Anglo-American” security forces were planting traces of polonium around
London to implicate Russia in Litvinenko’s death (Isvestiya, December
5). The Washington Times asked whether Litvinenko’s assassination might
have been “just another revenge killing in the name of Allah?”
(Washington Times, December 5). Less credible internet sources have even
revived the long discredited allegations that Osama bin Laden had
purchased a number of “suitcase nukes” from Chechen militants for use
against the United States. These stories speculate that Litvinenko was
working on polonium-based triggering devices for these weapons and had
failed to clean traces of polonium from his fingers before going out for
a sushi lunch.
As usual, many media sources seem unable to
differentiate between nuclear bombs and “dirty bombs.” The latter is a
primitive weapon involving no nuclear reaction, just the dispersal of
radioactive debris. Polonium-210 was used as part of the triggering
devices on early nuclear weapons, but is no longer used for this
purpose. A “dirty bomb” does not require a sophisticated trigger as it
is simply radioactive waste wrapped around a conventional explosive;
polonium-210 is not a very useful material for constructing “dirty
bombs.” A 1957 fire at a Cumbrian nuclear facility in England released
enough polonium-210 to kill thousands of people if ingested, but the
isotopes dispersed quickly and harmlessly in the air. The point of a
“dirty bomb” is not so much to kill individuals (conventional explosives
are much better for this purpose) but to create lasting contamination,
public panic and economic damage. Polonium is not regarded as
particularly dangerous unless inhaled or ingested in a significant
quantity. A sheet of paper is enough to block the radioactive alpha rays
and even human skin can be enough to prevent penetration into the body.
Conclusion
Despite Litvinenko’s talents in the world
of espionage, it is highly unlikely that he would have been capable of
maintaining and repairing complicated nuclear weapons, such as portable
“suitcase bombs,” in a basement laboratory in London. Assumptions of
this sort belong to the world of paperback thrillers. Many of the
imaginative stories regarding the “Islamist threat’ posed by Litvinenko
are designed to sell newspapers, but other accounts seem designed to
discredit the former KGB member and divert attention away from his
assassins or even to justify their deed as being in the interest of
public security.
3 Comments